Gifs have made the case against this goon, Greer who was Kennedy's real assassin. Over and over and over an over we can see this killer slowing for only himself and then speeding off to Parkland.
Gifs have made the case against this goon, Greer who was Kennedy's real assassin. Over and over and over an over we can see this killer slowing for only himself and then speeding off to Parkland.
How come the survivors (Connolly, Mrs. Kennedy, etc.) didn't implicate the driver then?
Gifs have made the case against this goon, Greer who was Kennedy's real assassin. Over and over and over an over we can see this killer slowing for only himself and then speeding off to Parkland.
How come the survivors (Connolly, Mrs. Kennedy, etc.) didn't implicate the driver then?
Thanks for a question, instead of the normal nonsense. I have thought of it this way. He was the governor of the second largest state in the country and that still stands today. Him coming forward and saying that he witnessed the driver's shot (which he clearly did) would have been diametrically opposed to what the government and media gave to the American people as the truth.
Jackie was looking at jfk, so she didn't see Greer shoot although she may have realized it but who knows. Connally saw Greer shoot jfk and took it to his grave. They didn't say anything because it was a massive cover-up.
Connally said he saw the fatal shot and quickly corrected himself but his reaction when looking at Greer proves he slipped up. Watch him hit the floor in horror once he realized Greer shot Kennedy.
Obviously, at least the major wound that I took in the shoulder through the chest couldn't have been anything but the second shot. Obviously, it couldn't have been the third, because when the third shot was fired I was in a reclining position, and heard it, saw it and the effects of it, rather--I didn't see it, I saw the effects of it--so it obviously could not have been the third, and couldn't have been the first, in my judgment.
How come the survivors (Connolly, Mrs. Kennedy, etc.) didn't implicate the driver then?
Thanks for a question, instead of the normal nonsense. I have thought of it this way. He was the governor of the second largest state in the country and that still stands today. Him coming forward and saying that he witnessed the driver's shot (which he clearly did) would have been diametrically opposed to what the government and media gave to the American people as the truth.
Jackie was looking at jfk, so she didn't see Greer shoot although she may have realized it but who knows. Connally saw Greer shoot jfk and took it to his grave. They didn't say anything because it was a massive cover-up.
Connally said he saw the fatal shot and quickly corrected himself but his reaction when looking at Greer proves he slipped up. Watch him hit the floor in horror once he realized Greer shot Kennedy.
Obviously, at least the major wound that I took in the shoulder through the chest couldn't have been anything but the second shot. Obviously, it couldn't have been the third, because when the third shot was fired I was in a reclining position, and heard it, saw it and the effects of it, rather--I didn't see it, I saw the effects of it--so it obviously could not have been the third, and couldn't have been the first, in my judgment.
yes thanks for asking a questiona dn being reasonable.yeah thats a good point by seven.Like he said,connolly changed his story when he found out what the official lies were the media were telling the american people and you got to remember,these people,if jackie had seen it,they would not only have killed her,they would have killed her children as well.they wont stop at any lengths.
matter of fact Jackie when she was asked if she wanted a different dress to wear at the swearing in of Johnson said no she did not saying_ i want everyone to see what THEY did to my husband.she knew it was a conspiracy.connolly knoew as well and was involved.when he got shot he thought HE was going to get killed as well crying out Oh my god,THEY are going to kill us all!!! he thought when he got killed they were going to kill them ALL and he spilled the beans there.lol.
Thanks for a question, instead of the normal nonsense. I have thought of it this way. He was the governor of the second largest state in the country and that still stands today. Him coming forward and saying that he witnessed the driver's shot (which he clearly did) would have been diametrically opposed to what the government and media gave to the American people as the truth.
Jackie was looking at jfk, so she didn't see Greer shoot although she may have realized it but who knows. Connally saw Greer shoot jfk and took it to his grave. They didn't say anything because it was a massive cover-up.
Connally said he saw the fatal shot and quickly corrected himself but his reaction when looking at Greer proves he slipped up. Watch him hit the floor in horror once he realized Greer shot Kennedy.
Obviously, at least the major wound that I took in the shoulder through the chest couldn't have been anything but the second shot. Obviously, it couldn't have been the third, because when the third shot was fired I was in a reclining position, and heard it, saw it and the effects of it, rather--I didn't see it, I saw the effects of it--so it obviously could not have been the third, and couldn't have been the first, in my judgment.
yes thanks for asking a questiona dn being reasonable.yeah thats a good point by seven.Like he said,connolly changed his story when he found out what the official lies were the media were telling the american people and you got to remember,these people,if jackie had seen it,they would not only have killed her,they would have killed her children as well.they wont stop at any lengths.
matter of fact Jackie when she was asked if she wanted a different dress to wear at the swearing in of Johnson said no she did not saying_ i want everyone to see what THEY did to my husband.she knew it was a conspiracy.connolly knoew as well and was involved.when he got shot he thought HE was going to get killed as well crying out Oh my god,THEY are going to kill us all!!! he thought when he got killed they were going to kill them ALL and he spilled the beans there.lol.
something I meant to say earlier for the benefit of pheonixops when I made this post was i meant to say if Jackie had come out and said Greer shot Kennedy,they would not only have killed her the way they easily killed kennedy,they would have killed her children as well.
Death threats might not have worked on her if she had told the truth what she knew that Greer shot him if she saw him do it-i dont think she saw it cause she was looking at Kennedy the whole time,but if they had said-okay we wont kill you,but we'll kill your children.any parent who cares about their chilldren,they are going to keep quiet obviously.
matter of fact many witnesses that were there that day kept quiet ufor many years until the late 80's and 90's and did not talk about seeing a gunman behind the picket fence firing a rifle-obviously a diversion to get everybodys attention away from greer,they kpet qiet because of all the mysterious deaths that occured of so many people sying who gave versions that did not fir the explanation of the governments.the CIA not only murdered kennedy,but many innocent bystanders that were there that day as well.
as always,you show how predictable you are agent rat in the ass and how you have an obsession with me.
Not only that, you also show off what an agent troll you are coming on here trying to derail any kind of reasonable discussion someone brings on here who isnt a troll like Pheonixops.He comes on and makes a reasonable post unlike so many here,and you come on and troll the boards trying to derail any kind of reasonable discussion he started.Nice.
it's Tuesday, that means it's handjob's happy time on the computer.as always,you show how predictable you are agent rat in the ass and how you have an obsession with me.
Not only that, you also show off what an agent troll you are coming on here trying to derail any kind of reasonable discussion someone brings on here who isnt a troll like Pheonixops.He comes on and makes a reasonable post unlike so many here,and you come on and troll the boards trying to derail any kind of reasonable discussion he started.Nice.
translation of rat in the asses last two posts-yeahh you are right 9/11.I have a childish obsession with you and your fart jokes and like you said,I am here because my boss has sent me to try and derail any reasonable truth discussions on government corruption.
kennedy - back of the head witnesses - parkland
I will be responsible for telling the real truth, but my discovery of the rear gaping and exploding in Zapruder is something that Bob Harris and most jfk researchers will likely never acknowledge because they know where it leads. It leaves no doubt about the exit location and leads to a conclusion that they don't want. It's coming whether they like it or not. There may have been some missing temporal bone below and left of the right ear but not the right side of the head. Audrey Bell confirms this important fact.
"-Although only in Trauma Room One for 3-5 minutes, she did see the head wound. After asking Dr.
Perry “where is the wound,” she said he turned the President’s head slightly to the President’s anatomical
left, so that she could see a right rear posterior head wound, which she described as occipital in both her
oral remarks, and in her drawings; -She said she could see brain and spinal fluid coming out of the wound, but could not tell what type of
brain tissue it was;
-She said it was her recollection that the right side of the PresidentÂ’s head, and the top of his head,
were intact, which is why she had to ask Dr. Perry where the wound was in the first place."(04/l 4/97 Summary of ARRB interview)
kennedy - back of the head witnesses - parkland
I will be responsible for telling the real truth, but my discovery of the rear gaping and exploding in Zapruder is something that Bob Harris and most jfk researchers will likely never acknowledge because they know where it leads. It leaves no doubt about the exit location and leads to a conclusion that they don't want. It's coming whether they like it or not. There may have been some missing temporal bone below and left of the right ear but not the right side of the head. Audrey Bell confirms this important fact.
"-Although only in Trauma Room One for 3-5 minutes, she did see the head wound. After asking Dr.
Perry “where is the wound,” she said he turned the President’s head slightly to the President’s anatomical
left, so that she could see a right rear posterior head wound, which she described as occipital in both her
oral remarks, and in her drawings; -She said she could see brain and spinal fluid coming out of the wound, but could not tell what type of
brain tissue it was;
-She said it was her recollection that the right side of the PresidentÂ’s head, and the top of his head,
were intact, which is why she had to ask Dr. Perry where the wound was in the first place."(04/l 4/97 Summary of ARRB interview)
rat in the ass and dawgshits handlers are getting very worried your getting all this truth out seven.
someone farted in here.
someone farted in here.
