The John Kennedy assassination ..who's who on the Grassy Knoll

[7forever]

why would i need to do that? the doc is correct...yours on the other hand

You can't prove it because it's fake. The eyewitnesses debunk that trash all by itself. Not one mention of eyewitnesses in that piece of shit.

because the eyewitness testimony does not match the forensic facts eyewitness testimony is only valid when it matches the physical evidence....
you lose ..... next.

The eyewitnesses are corroborated by the autopsy report, which included missing skull in the Occipital bone. The three films are the best physical evidence in this case. It shows the driver shooting jfk, very clearly.

What is Physical Evidence?


Lawrence Chow

Physical evidence is any object that can establish that a crime has been committed or can provide a link between a crime and its victim or between a crime and its perpetrator. The examination of physical evidence by a forensic investigator is usually undertaken for identification and comparison. The purpose of identification is to determine the physical or chemical identity of a substance with as near absolute certainty as existing analytical techniques will permit. The objective of a comparison is to determine whether or not the suspect specimen and a control specimen have a common origin, by subjecting them to the same examinations and tests. In a comparison analysis, the forensic investigator must not forget the role that probability plays a determining factor in the discovering the origins of two or more specimens. Evidence is said to possess individual characteristics when it can be associated with a common source with an extremely high degree of probability. However, evidence that can be associated only with a group and never with a single source is said to possess class characteristics.

 

[7forever]

why would i need to do that? the doc is correct...yours on the other hand

You can't prove it because it's fake. The eyewitnesses debunk that trash all by itself. Not one mention of eyewitnesses in that piece of shit.

because the eyewitness testimony does not match the forensic facts eyewitness testimony is only valid when it matches the physical evidence....
you lose ..... next.

This autopsy photo was credited to Robert Groden, as it's told. The right rear is removed as so many said it was, lying flat. That matches frame 313 on the rear, BUT NOT THE RIGHT FRONT. His face was clear.

 

[Rat in the Hat]

This autopsy photo was credited to Robert Groden, as it's told. The right rear is removed as so many said it was, lying flat. That matches frame 313 on the rear, BUT NOT THE RIGHT FRONT. His face was clear.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_u7VGiMO0U]Monty Python - Albatross - YouTube[/ame]

 

[7forever]

i haven't made any major mistakes regarding greer's shot or the rear exit wound.

mistake 1:

there is no evidence that greer shot jfk. Zero. Zilch. Nada. You know that greer's "gun" is the top of the passenger's head, so you use 10th-generation blur-o-rama gifs and claim that the reflection was added. To an 8mm film. In 1963.

mistake 2:

rear exit wound

the only rear exit wound is the one you got the last time your sycophant, whackjob, used his foaming pipe snake on your plumbing. You claim that the blood splatter as the bullet exits jfk's head is also faked, while simultaneously believing that other frames of the zapruder film are real, because you say so. It doesn't work that way in the real world, far from the land of the cracked coconuts where you and your sycophant reside, sugarlump.

spectacular bump !

Your fake entrance wound is NOT where the huge exit wound was, is, and always will be, THE RIGHT REAR. It's your case to prove. You have NO REAR entry in Zapruder and cannot ignore this area because that's exactly where your fake entrance has to be. Your fake entrance has to fit in the large hole on the rear. YOUR FAKE BELIEF IS DEBUNKED by that simple fact.

 

[Rat in the Hat]

 

[LA RAM FAN]

The fake reflection is not an issue. Greer's hands were off the wheel. He was passing gun during that period before he turned the first time[/B].

From page 2 of this very thread:

I have studied first-generation clear prints of the Zapruder film and it is apparent that while it may be questionable as to why Greer turned and looked back at Kennedy and then could not recall that fact for the Warren Commission, at no time did his two hands leave the steering wheel of the limousine. There are plenty of real conspiracies out there without dragging this old wheezer up again.

So, which is it, Upchuck? Did Big Bad Bill's hands come off the steering wheel or not? C'mon, make up that shriveled old raisin you call a brain. We'll wait.

Go get that idiot Marrs and I WILL MOCK HIM RELENTLESSLY. His hands came off the wheel, ya.

love how the agent trolls use the logic that because the fake altered zapruder film has his hand on the wheel,that that automatically makes it true that his hand is on the wheeel.comedy gold from the agents.

 

[namvet]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DguBcLpWBS0]Did the driver shoot JFK? (revised) - YouTube[/ame]

​

 

[LA RAM FAN]

the agent trolls are getting desperate,their handlers are sending them in droves to try and derail this thread. nam wanna be vet kid id s the exception of someone not a paid troll.He is just a kid that fantasies about what it was like to be a vietnam vet.

 

[namvet]

the agent trolls are getting desperate,their handlers are sending them in droves to try and derail this thread. nam wanna be vet kid id s the exception of someone not a paid troll.He is just a kid that fantasies about what it was like to be a vietnam vet.

prove it

 

[namvet]

Did the driver shoot JFK? (revised) - YouTube

​

Bob is a complete moron. He left out Greer's hands being off the wheel. Start there. He focused on about 8 frames. Ask him why he omitted frames 240-278 from his fake video.

prove it

 

[Rat in the Hat]

 

[namvet]

Bob is a complete moron. He left out Greer's hands being off the wheel. Start there. He focused on about 8 frames. Ask him why he omitted frames 240-278 from his fake video.

prove it

How do I prove something that happens in a video besides pointing it out? Harris excluded those frames and I know that because I used his video many times over the years.

The better question is how would Jim Marrs prove Greer's hands never left the steering wheel when they were clearly off the wheel? He simply lied and was proven a liar when I started posting his bullshit article a few years ago.

prove it

 

[namvet]

How do I prove something that happens in a video besides pointing it out? Harris excluded those frames and I know that because I used his video many times over the years.

The better question is how would Jim Marrs prove Greer's hands never left the steering wheel when they were clearly off the wheel? He simply lied and was proven a liar when I started posting his bullshit article a few years ago.

prove it

Bob Harris and Jim Marrs proved it by lying about it, and/or, omitting those material facts.

prove it

 

[Rat in the Hat]

 

[namvet]

never has been since post 1

its just humor so I came in for a few laffs

 

[namvet]

Bob Harris and Jim Marrs proved it by lying about it, and/or, omitting those material facts.

prove it

Let's say for example that no one ever acknowledged Greer's hands being off or on the wheel, then the 'I can't see shit' excuse could be made. These issues were made by idiots like Harris, Marrs, and many other gatekeepers.

Bob Harris and Jim Marrs proved it by lying about it, and/or, omitting those material facts.

prove it

 

[Rat in the Hat]

Real pic of JFK'S ASSASSIN:

 

[SAYIT]

I started posting this over three years ago. His left arm was edited out of Zapruder during the shooting sequence and replaced with video fakery. In other words, they (THE GOVERNMENT EDITORS) were required to make it look like he shot jfk, but provided some excuses for people not to believe it. Greer's arm extention refutes those excuses completely.

jfk assassination films-orville nix - Video Dailymotion

Advance to 1:09 for the close-up. Robert Groden narrarates but ignores Greer's left arm movement and focuses on the headshot.

I started looking at the Zapruder film in 7-09 and it went from there. I got the closeup of Greer's arm going over in 9-2010. That's what's made it factual. I paid a guy a whopping thirty dollars to enhance it. Once that was clear this case was closed for everyone willing to look past all the nonsense that came before it. If Greer's left arm really moved back toward JFK just the way it appears to in Zapruder, then he was definitely the shooter. They apparently had to create a cartoon of Greer shooting jfk, which is quite comical to say the least.

A tragic waste of $30.

 

[Rat in the Hat]

Real pic of JFK'S ASSASSIN:

 

[daws101]

You can't prove it because it's fake. The eyewitnesses debunk that trash all by itself. Not one mention of eyewitnesses in that piece of shit.

because the eyewitness testimony does not match the forensic facts eyewitness testimony is only valid when it matches the physical evidence....
you lose ..... next.

The eyewitnesses are corroborated by the autopsy report, which included missing skull in the Occipital bone. The three films are the best physical evidence in this case. It shows the driver shooting jfk, very clearly.

What is Physical Evidence?


Lawrence Chow

Physical evidence is any object that can establish that a crime has been committed or can provide a link between a crime and its victim or between a crime and its perpetrator. The examination of physical evidence by a forensic investigator is usually undertaken for identification and comparison. The purpose of identification is to determine the physical or chemical identity of a substance with as near absolute certainty as existing analytical techniques will permit. The objective of a comparison is to determine whether or not the suspect specimen and a control specimen have a common origin, by subjecting them to the same examinations and tests. In a comparison analysis, the forensic investigator must not forget the role that probability plays a determining factor in the discovering the origins of two or more specimens. Evidence is said to possess individual characteristics when it can be associated with a common source with an extremely high degree of probability. However, evidence that can be associated only with a group and never with a single source is said to possess class characteristics.

Lawrence Chou
Lawrence Chou
www.hkcinemagic.…
Lawrence Chou is a Canadian singer and actor. Born in Hong Kong and raised in Vancouver, Chou developed a strong passion for music since he was a little kid. With his exceptional vocal talent, Chou won numerous singing contests in Vancouver and eventually earned a record deal with BMG in 1998. With two EPs and three LPs to his name, Chou quickly established himself as one of the brightest young singers in Taiwan, and was awarded the Best Male Newcomer award in 1998 by Channel V - the equivalent of MTV in Asia. Chou further revealed his musical talent as a producer and co-producer on many different albums for other artists or band since 1999, including highly acclaimed Mavis Fan's Jazz album, ASOS’s Rock album, and finished release his own independent music group the album in 2003, and won the Best Electronic Music Album awards in China 2004.


wtf!