The John Kennedy assassination ..who's who on the Grassy Knoll

You watched it, right? Did mammoth tell the truth when he said the following? You won't answer this direct question because you're an asswiped loser.:lol:

Quote: Originally Posted by mamooth View Post
NOVA looks into the story, using modern forensics.

NOVA | Cold Case JFK

Summary: All the evidence is consistent with Oswald's weapon and location, and inconsistent with a second shooter on the grassy knoll.
I saw it when it first aired.
you did not answer his question and yes you are an ass wipe loser.
the conclusions present in that doc are correct....
the crap you present is just crap...

Provide one example you miserable loser.:cuckoo: I haven't made any major mistakes regarding Greer's shot or the rear exit wound.
really since all of it is your fantasy and not fact I'd say that'S a MAJOR **** UP.
 
i haven't made any major mistakes regarding greer's shot or the rear exit wound.

mistake 1:
greer's shot

there is no evidence that greer shot jfk. Zero. Zilch. Nada. You know that greer's "gun" is the top of the passenger's head, so you use 10th-generation blur-o-rama gifs and claim that the reflection was added. To an 8mm film. In 1963.

mistake 2:
rear exit wound

the only rear exit wound is the one you got the last time your sycophant, whackjob, used his foaming pipe snake on your plumbing. You claim that the blood splatter as the bullet exits jfk's head is also faked, while simultaneously believing that other frames of the zapruder film are real, because you say so. It doesn't work that way in the real world, far from the land of the cracked coconuts where you and your sycophant reside, sugarlump. :eusa_whistle:
spectacular bump !
 
Rockland just exposed himself for who he really is on what i have been saying about him from day one that he is that thing that you wear over your feet and under your shoes.
chris has been gone for over two years now where rockland has only been here like 6 months or so. he couldnt possibly no chris unless of course he was the thing i just dscribed

Oh noes, I didn't know that reading old threads was a board violation! Please ban me immediately!

Have you ever read a post where someone, perhaps a former poster, was mentioned, and been curious enough about that person to look up their posts, Whackjob? I'm sure you have. But nooooooooo, in your addled "brain," this just proves some bizarre point of yours. Kindly dry-hump a cactus. :cuckoo:
 
:rofl: @ Rimjob forgetting how he whined about my bumping Christophera's threads a couple months ago.


:lmao:
 
i haven't made any major mistakes regarding greer's shot or the rear exit wound.

mistake 1:

there is no evidence that greer shot jfk. Zero. Zilch. Nada. You know that greer's "gun" is the top of the passenger's head, so you use 10th-generation blur-o-rama gifs and claim that the reflection was added. To an 8mm film. In 1963.

mistake 2:
rear exit wound

the only rear exit wound is the one you got the last time your sycophant, whackjob, used his foaming pipe snake on your plumbing. You claim that the blood splatter as the bullet exits jfk's head is also faked, while simultaneously believing that other frames of the zapruder film are real, because you say so. It doesn't work that way in the real world, far from the land of the cracked coconuts where you and your sycophant reside, sugarlump. :eusa_whistle:
spectacular bump !

The fake reflection is not an issue. Greer's hands were off the wheel. He was passing gun during that period before he turned the first time.:lol:
 
I saw it when it first aired.
you did not answer his question and yes you are an ass wipe loser.
the conclusions present in that doc are correct....
the crap you present is just crap...

That's your job you little shit. You have to articulate what they are talking about. The conclusions in the doc are pure fiction.
why would i need to do that? the doc is correct...yours on the other hand :lol::lol::lol:

You can't prove it because it's fake. The eyewitnesses debunk that trash all by itself.:eusa_whistle: Not one mention of eyewitnesses in that piece of shit.:lol:
 
i haven't made any major mistakes regarding greer's shot or the rear exit wound.

mistake 1:

there is no evidence that greer shot jfk. Zero. Zilch. Nada. You know that greer's "gun" is the top of the passenger's head, so you use 10th-generation blur-o-rama gifs and claim that the reflection was added. To an 8mm film. In 1963.

mistake 2:
rear exit wound

the only rear exit wound is the one you got the last time your sycophant, whackjob, used his foaming pipe snake on your plumbing. You claim that the blood splatter as the bullet exits jfk's head is also faked, while simultaneously believing that other frames of the zapruder film are real, because you say so. It doesn't work that way in the real world, far from the land of the cracked coconuts where you and your sycophant reside, sugarlump. :eusa_whistle:
spectacular bump !

Not one mention of the autopsy report findings about the exit wound extending back to Occipital bone.:lol: The blue is the Occipital.

 
mistake 1:

there is no evidence that greer shot jfk. Zero. Zilch. Nada. You know that greer's "gun" is the top of the passenger's head, so you use 10th-generation blur-o-rama gifs and claim that the reflection was added. To an 8mm film. In 1963.

mistake 2:

the only rear exit wound is the one you got the last time your sycophant, whackjob, used his foaming pipe snake on your plumbing. You claim that the blood splatter as the bullet exits jfk's head is also faked, while simultaneously believing that other frames of the zapruder film are real, because you say so. It doesn't work that way in the real world, far from the land of the cracked coconuts where you and your sycophant reside, sugarlump. :eusa_whistle:
spectacular bump !

Not one mention of the autopsy report findings about the exit wound extending back to Occipital bone.:lol: The blue is the Occipital.


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cAYDiPizDIs&feature=player_embedded#]Monty Python - Theory on Brontosauruses by Anne Elk (Miss). - YouTube[/ame]!
 
spectacular bump !

The fake reflection is not an issue. Greer's hands were off the wheel. He was passing gun during that period before he turned the first time[/B].:lol:

From page 2 of this very thread:

I have studied first-generation clear prints of the Zapruder film and it is apparent that while it may be questionable as to why Greer turned and looked back at Kennedy and then could not recall that fact for the Warren Commission, at no time did his two hands leave the steering wheel of the limousine. There are plenty of real conspiracies out there without dragging this old wheezer up again.
greer239247.gif

gifsoup.gif

So, which is it, Upchuck? Did Big Bad Bill's hands come off the steering wheel or not? C'mon, make up that shriveled old raisin you call a brain. We'll wait. :eusa_whistle:

Go get that idiot Marrs and I WILL MOCK HIM RELENTLESSLY.:D His hands came off the wheel, ya.:eusa_whistle:
 
i haven't made any major mistakes regarding greer's shot or the rear exit wound.

mistake 1:

there is no evidence that greer shot jfk. Zero. Zilch. Nada. You know that greer's "gun" is the top of the passenger's head, so you use 10th-generation blur-o-rama gifs and claim that the reflection was added. To an 8mm film. In 1963.

mistake 2:
rear exit wound

the only rear exit wound is the one you got the last time your sycophant, whackjob, used his foaming pipe snake on your plumbing. You claim that the blood splatter as the bullet exits jfk's head is also faked, while simultaneously believing that other frames of the zapruder film are real, because you say so. It doesn't work that way in the real world, far from the land of the cracked coconuts where you and your sycophant reside, sugarlump. :eusa_whistle:
spectacular bump !

That is correct because the eyewitnesses confirm the rear exit. And frame 313 verifies those forty or so witnesses. They said so, which include the driver, Clint Hill, and Jackie.

600gape.jpg
 
The fake reflection is not an issue. Greer's hands were off the wheel. He was passing gun during that period before he turned the first time[/B].:lol:

From page 2 of this very thread:

I have studied first-generation clear prints of the Zapruder film and it is apparent that while it may be questionable as to why Greer turned and looked back at Kennedy and then could not recall that fact for the Warren Commission, at no time did his two hands leave the steering wheel of the limousine. There are plenty of real conspiracies out there without dragging this old wheezer up again.
greer239247.gif

gifsoup.gif

So, which is it, Upchuck? Did Big Bad Bill's hands come off the steering wheel or not? C'mon, make up that shriveled old raisin you call a brain. We'll wait. :eusa_whistle:

Go get that idiot Marrs and I WILL MOCK HIM RELENTLESSLY.:D His hands came off the wheel, ya.:eusa_whistle:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=83U5Oupj1RI]White Star Fleet vs. Advanced Destroyers - YouTube[/ame]
 
i haven't made any major mistakes regarding greer's shot or the rear exit wound.

mistake 1:

there is no evidence that greer shot jfk. Zero. Zilch. Nada. You know that greer's "gun" is the top of the passenger's head, so you use 10th-generation blur-o-rama gifs and claim that the reflection was added. To an 8mm film. In 1963.

mistake 2:
rear exit wound

the only rear exit wound is the one you got the last time your sycophant, whackjob, used his foaming pipe snake on your plumbing. You claim that the blood splatter as the bullet exits jfk's head is also faked, while simultaneously believing that other frames of the zapruder film are real, because you say so. It doesn't work that way in the real world, far from the land of the cracked coconuts where you and your sycophant reside, sugarlump. :eusa_whistle:
spectacular bump !

You have been shown the testimony of many doctors who viewed the exit wound. The bullet entered the front and exited the right rear.

V. Palamara: 'Medical Reference' book (excerpt)

JFK Lancer

The damage to the cerebellum confirms the exit wound was low at the lowest point, but definitely extended to the Parietal bone, and likely to the Temporal region. That is consistent with the autopsy report.

1) Dr. William Kemp Clark, Chief Neurosurgeon:
WR 516-518/ 17 H 1-3 / CE 392 [undated summary; see also 21 H 150-152
:Clark's 11/23/63 report to Admiral Burkley with the verbatim summary .
In addition, see "Assassination Science", pp. 416-418: this is an FBI
report dated 11/25/63 which includes the verbatim summary to Burkley
from 11/23/63]---"..in the occipital region of the skull "; "There was a
large wound in the right occipitoparietal region "; "Both cerebral and
cerebellar tissue were extruding from the wound
.";

2) Dr. Malcolm Oliver "Mac" Perry, Attending Surgeon:
a) WR 521-522/ 17 H 6-7/ CE392: report written 11/22/63---"A large wound
of the right posterior cranium ";
b) Parkland press conference, 11/22/63 [see "Assassination Science", pp.
419-427; silent film clip used in "Reasonable Doubt" (1988), "20/20"
(4/92), etc.]---"There was an entrance wound in the neck It appeared to
be coming at him The wound appeared to be an entrance wound in the front
of the throat; yes, that is correct. The exit wound, I don't know. It
could have been the head or there could have been a second wound of the
head." (apparently, based off this conference, the Associated Press
dispatch on 11/22/63 stated that Dr. Perry "said the entrance wound was
in the front of the head
," while all the AP wires for this day stated
that JFK had a large hole in the "back" of his head.);

3) Dr. Robert Nelson McClelland, Attending Surgeon:
a) WR 526-527 / 17 H 11-12 / CE 392: report written 11/22/63---" a
massive gunshot wound of the head with a fragment wound of the
trachea The cause of death was due to massive head and brain injury from
a gunshot wound of the left temple.";
b) "St. Louis Post-Dispatch", 12/1/63---"This [the neck wound] did
appear to be an entrance wound."
c)e) 6 H 33-34, 35, 37 / testimony---" I could very closely examine the
head wound, and I noted that the right posterior portion of the skull
had been extremely blasted probably a third or so
, at least, of the
brain tissue, posterior cerebral tissue and some of the cerebellar
tissue had been blasted out
"; " there was definitely a piece of
cerebellum that extruded from the wound "; " the loss of cerebral and
cerebellar tissues were so great massive head injuries with loss of
large amounts of cerebral and cerebellar tissues "; "The initial
impression that we had was that perhaps the wound in the neck, the
anterior part of the neck, was an entrance wound and that it had perhaps
taken a trajectory off the anterior vertebral body and again into the
skull itself, exiting out the back, to produce the massive injury in the
head.";

4) Dr. Marion Thomas "Pepper" Jenkins, Chief Anesthesiologist [deceased
11/22/94]:
WR 529-530 / 17 H 14-15 / CE 392: report addressed to Administrator
C.J. Price dated 11/22/63 (the verbatim, retyped report, this time
addressed to Dean A.J. Gill, can be found at 20 H 252-253)---" a great
laceration on the right side of the head (temporal and occipital),
causing a great defect in the skull plate so that there was herniation
and laceration of great areas of the brain, even to the extent that the
cerebellum had portruded from the wound
."[see also p. 35 of Jesse
Curry's 1969 book entitled "JFK Assassination File"];

5) Dr. Charles James "Jim" Carrico, Resident Surgeon:
a) WR 519-520 / 17 H 4-5 / CE 392: handwritten report dated
11/22/63---"[the skull] wound had avulsed the calvarium and shredded
brain tissue present with profuse oozing attempts to control slow oozing
from cerebral and cerebellar tissue via packs instituted
."; "small
penetrating wound of ent. neck";

6) Dr. Ronald Coy Jones, Chief Resident Surgeon:
a) 20 H 333: handwritten report dated 11/23/63---" severe skull and
brain injury was noted as well as a small hole in anterior midline of
neck thought to be a bullet entrance wound air was bubbling through the
neck wound.";
b)a) 6 H 53-54, 56 / testimony (3/24/64)---" he had a large wound in the
right posterior side of the head There was large defect in the back side
of the head
as the President lay on the cart with what appeared to be
some brain hanging out of this wound with multiple pieces of skull noted
with the brain "; "what appeared to be an exit wound in the posterior
portion of the skull
the only speculation that I could have as far as to
how this could occur with a single wound would be that it would enter
the anterior neck and possibly strike a vertebral body and then change
its course and exit in the region of the posterior portion of the
head."; "The hole [in the throat] was very small and relatively clean
cut, as you would see in a bullet that is entering rather than exiting
from a patient.";

7) Dr. Gene Coleman Akin, Resident Anesthesiologist [a.k.a. Solomon Ben
Israel]:
6 H 65 and 67 / testimony---"The back of the right occipitalparietal
portion of his head was shattered
, with brain substance extruding."; "I
assume the right occiptalparietal region was the exit,
so to speak, that
he had probably been hit on the other side of the head, or at least
tangentially in the back of the head "; "this [the neck wound] must have
been an entrance wound ";

8) Dr. Paul Conrad Peters, Urologist:
6 H 70-71 / testimony---"It was pointed out that an examination of the
brain had been done we saw the wound of entry in the throat and noted
the large occipital wound ";" I noticed that there was a large defect in
the occiput It seemed to me that in the right occipitalparietal area
that there was a large defect
.";

9) Dr. Charles A. Crenshaw, Resident Surgeon:
a) "Conspiracy of Silence" (1992), p. 86 (and throughout [inc. photos of
himself])---"I walked to the President's head to get a closer look. His
entire right cerebral hemisphere appeared to be gone. It looked like a
crater---an empty cavity From the damage I saw, there was no doubt in my
mind that the bullet had entered his head through the front
, and as it
surgically passed through his cranium, the missile obliterated part of
the temporal and all the parietal and occipital lobes before it
lacerated the cerebellum
."; [p. 79] "I also identified a small opening
about the diameter of a pencil at the midline of his throat to be an
entry bullet hole. There was no doubt in my mind about that wound.";
b) "High Treason 2", pp. 110-115 and 549 (interviews of 7/12/80 [90?]
and 9/21/91)---" it was in the parietal-occipital area"; thinks the
body was tampered with at Bethesda
;
c) WC references to his presence on 11/22/63: 6 H 40 (Baxter), 6 H 31-32
(McClelland), 6 H 80-81 (Salyer), 6 H 141 (Henchcliffe), 6 H 60
(Curtis)+15 H 761: index;
d) Completely overlooked WC reference to his presence on 11/24/63: 21 H
265(report by Parkland Administrator Charles Price)---"Dr. Charles
Crenshaw was in the corridor and said they had been alerted. He said,
'You're not going to put him [Oswald] in the same room the President was
in, are you?' told him I surely was glad he had thought of it and by
all means, not to.";



Your faked video shows blood splatter coming from the front where no exit wound existed. It is so evident that you are just being contrary. With that said I am thinking we are done here because you just won't be honest.

DOGSHIT IS A DISHONEST LIAR:cuckoo:
 
mistake 1:

there is no evidence that greer shot jfk. Zero. Zilch. Nada. You know that greer's "gun" is the top of the passenger's head, so you use 10th-generation blur-o-rama gifs and claim that the reflection was added. To an 8mm film. In 1963.

mistake 2:

the only rear exit wound is the one you got the last time your sycophant, whackjob, used his foaming pipe snake on your plumbing. You claim that the blood splatter as the bullet exits jfk's head is also faked, while simultaneously believing that other frames of the zapruder film are real, because you say so. It doesn't work that way in the real world, far from the land of the cracked coconuts where you and your sycophant reside, sugarlump. :eusa_whistle:
spectacular bump !

That is correct because the eyewitnesses confirm the rear exit. And frame 313 verifies those forty or so witnesses. They said so, which include the driver, Clint Hill, and Jackie.

600gape.jpg

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rJhZfpzxTMQ]Picard And Janeway Fight The Borg - YouTube[/ame]
 
Re-posting because my original post somehow got lost in the shuffle.

Also, hey, if 7-Upchuck can re-post all the time...

The fake reflection is not an issue. Greer's hands were off the wheel. He was passing gun during that period before he turned the first time[/B].:lol:

From page 2 of this very thread:

I have studied first-generation clear prints of the Zapruder film and it is apparent that while it may be questionable as to why Greer turned and looked back at Kennedy and then could not recall that fact for the Warren Commission, at no time did his two hands leave the steering wheel of the limousine. There are plenty of real conspiracies out there without dragging this old wheezer up again.
greer239247.gif

gifsoup.gif

So, which is it, Upchuck? Did Big Bad Bill's hands come off the steering wheel or not? C'mon, make up that shriveled old raisin you call a brain. We'll wait. :eusa_whistle:
 
15th post
Go get that idiot Marrs and I WILL MOCK HIM RELENTLESSLY.:D His hands came off the wheel, ya.:eusa_whistle:

Oh, so now his hands came off the wheel. What made you change your mind, Upchuck? His hands not coming off the wheel didn't support the rest of your bullshit theory? :eusa_whistle:
 
From page 2 of this very thread:



So, which is it, Upchuck? Did Big Bad Bill's hands come off the steering wheel or not? C'mon, make up that shriveled old raisin you call a brain. We'll wait. :eusa_whistle:

Go get that idiot Marrs and I WILL MOCK HIM RELENTLESSLY.:D His hands came off the wheel, ya.:eusa_whistle:

Oh, so now his hands came off the wheel. What made you change your mind, Upchuck? His hands not coming off the wheel didn't support the rest of your bullshit theory? :eusa_whistle:

Jim Marrs told that lie you punk.:lol:

Marrs Rebuts JFK Driver As Shooter Theory Now you agree with the evidence as it really is.:eusa_whistle:

"I have studied first-generation clear prints of the Zapruder film and it is apparent that while it may be questionable as to why Greer turned and looked back at Kennedy and then could not recall that fact for the Warren Commission, at no time did his two hands leave the steering wheel of the limousine. There are plenty of real conspiracies out there without dragging this old wheezer up again."

 
Go get that idiot Marrs and I WILL MOCK HIM RELENTLESSLY.:D His hands came off the wheel, ya.:eusa_whistle:

Oh, so now his hands came off the wheel. What made you change your mind, Upchuck? His hands not coming off the wheel didn't support the rest of your bullshit theory? :eusa_whistle:

If it wasn't important, then Marrs would not have lied about it. I am very sure Groden told the same lie to the HSCA. It'll just take some time to go through the testimony.
 
That's your job you little shit. You have to articulate what they are talking about. The conclusions in the doc are pure fiction.
why would i need to do that? the doc is correct...yours on the other hand :lol::lol::lol:

You can't prove it because it's fake. The eyewitnesses debunk that trash all by itself.:eusa_whistle: Not one mention of eyewitnesses in that piece of shit.:lol:
because the eyewitness testimony does not match the forensic facts eyewitness testimony is only valid when it matches the physical evidence....
you lose ..... next.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom