The Israeli Criminals Behind the NSA Spy Scandal

[daws101]

Robert McCoy -- High-rise Architect - 9/11 Expert Testimony.mp4 - YouTube

posting assholes and eunuchs propaganda clips does not make your delusion fact..
do us a favor and google FALSE PREMISE. ..

 

[eots]

Robert McCoy -- High-rise Architect - 9/11 Expert Testimony.mp4 - YouTube

post assholes and eunuchs propaganda clips does not make your delusion facts..
do us a favor aND google FALSE PREMISE. ..

assholes and eunuchs propaganda ?....this is your flailing attempt to debwunk
Robert McCoy -- High-rise Architect call him silly names...once again...you lose

 

[eots]

Robert McCoy -- High-rise Architect - 9/11 Expert Testimony.mp4 - YouTube

posting assholes and eunuchs propaganda clips does not make your delusion fact..
do us a favor and google FALSE PREMISE. ..

In the presentation last year by Shyam Sunder it was said that they concluded that WTC 7 was not brought down by controlled demolition. They did not tests for explosives in the rubble or dust, instead they go on lenghts to prove there was no explosion sound measured and therefore it could not be a controlled demolition.

The engineer and explosive expert Ron Craig showed similar views in a Gage-radio debate.

Now this premise is clearly false, as the sound or blast waves were matter of new patents to reduce their effects.

So, if you ever be confronted with the “sound” premise, just show them theses patents:

US patent 6183669
"primary disadvantage of explosive shaped charges is that they generate excessive noise and debris upon detonation. This noise and debris can pose potentially serious health and safety hazards to someone using a cutting device which employs conventional shaped charge explosives.
Thermite-based cutting devices which employ a cutting flame produce virtually no extended shock wave and generate relatively little over pressure. Thermite-based cutting devices do not present the same health and safety hazards which are attendant upon explosive shape charge cutting devices."

http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=
1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=6183569.PN.&OS=
PN/6183569&RS=PN/6183569

German patent 19718270

 

[daws101]

Robert McCoy -- High-rise Architect - 9/11 Expert Testimony.mp4 - YouTube

posting assholes and eunuchs propaganda clips does not make your delusion fact..
do us a favor and google FALSE PREMISE. ..

In the presentation last year by Shyam Sunder it was said that they concluded that WTC 7 was not brought down by controlled demolition. They did not tests for explosives in the rubble or dust, instead they go on lenghts to prove there was no explosion sound measured and therefore it could not be a controlled demolition.

The engineer and explosive expert Ron Craig showed similar views in a Gage-radio debate.

Now this premise is clearly false, as the sound or blast waves were matter of new patents to reduce their effects.

So, if you ever be confronted with the “sound” premise, just show them theses patents:

US patent 6183669
"primary disadvantage of explosive shaped charges is that they generate excessive noise and debris upon detonation. This noise and debris can pose potentially serious health and safety hazards to someone using a cutting device which employs conventional shaped charge explosives.
Thermite-based cutting devices which employ a cutting flame produce virtually no extended shock wave and generate relatively little over pressure. Thermite-based cutting devices do not present the same health and safety hazards which are attendant upon explosive shape charge cutting devices."

http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=
1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=6183569.PN.&OS=
PN/6183569&RS=PN/6183569

German patent 19718270

no thermite residue was found ...so this, like your last post is based on a false premise... and has no evidential value.

 

[eots]

posting assholes and eunuchs propaganda clips does not make your delusion fact..
do us a favor and google FALSE PREMISE. ..

In the presentation last year by Shyam Sunder it was said that they concluded that WTC 7 was not brought down by controlled demolition. They did not tests for explosives in the rubble or dust, instead they go on lenghts to prove there was no explosion sound measured and therefore it could not be a controlled demolition.

The engineer and explosive expert Ron Craig showed similar views in a Gage-radio debate.

Now this premise is clearly false, as the sound or blast waves were matter of new patents to reduce their effects.

So, if you ever be confronted with the “sound” premise, just show them theses patents:

US patent 6183669
"primary disadvantage of explosive shaped charges is that they generate excessive noise and debris upon detonation. This noise and debris can pose potentially serious health and safety hazards to someone using a cutting device which employs conventional shaped charge explosives.
Thermite-based cutting devices which employ a cutting flame produce virtually no extended shock wave and generate relatively little over pressure. Thermite-based cutting devices do not present the same health and safety hazards which are attendant upon explosive shape charge cutting devices."

http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=
1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=6183569.PN.&OS=
PN/6183569&RS=PN/6183569

German patent 19718270

no thermite residue was found ...so this, like your last post is based on a false premise... and has no evidential value.

22. Did the NIST investigation look for evidence of the WTC towers being brought down by controlled demolition? Was the steel tested for explosives or thermite residues?

NIST did not test for the residue of these compounds in the steel.

FAQs - NIST WTC Towers Investigation

 

[eots]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3a0B4CAZVM]Nano-Thermite Found in World Trade Center Dust- Prof. Niels Harrit - YouTube[/ame]

 

[daws101]

In the presentation last year by Shyam Sunder it was said that they concluded that WTC 7 was not brought down by controlled demolition. They did not tests for explosives in the rubble or dust, instead they go on lenghts to prove there was no explosion sound measured and therefore it could not be a controlled demolition.

The engineer and explosive expert Ron Craig showed similar views in a Gage-radio debate.

Now this premise is clearly false, as the sound or blast waves were matter of new patents to reduce their effects.

So, if you ever be confronted with the “sound” premise, just show them theses patents:

US patent 6183669
"primary disadvantage of explosive shaped charges is that they generate excessive noise and debris upon detonation. This noise and debris can pose potentially serious health and safety hazards to someone using a cutting device which employs conventional shaped charge explosives.
Thermite-based cutting devices which employ a cutting flame produce virtually no extended shock wave and generate relatively little over pressure. Thermite-based cutting devices do not present the same health and safety hazards which are attendant upon explosive shape charge cutting devices."

http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=
1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=6183569.PN.&OS=
PN/6183569&RS=PN/6183569

German patent 19718270

no thermite residue was found ...so this, like your last post is based on a false premise... and has no evidential value.

22. Did the NIST investigation look for evidence of the WTC towers being brought down by controlled demolition? Was the steel tested for explosives or thermite residues?

NIST did not test for the residue of these compounds in the steel.

FAQs - NIST WTC Towers Investigation

because there was nothing to test for...there was no evidence of of thermite use...

 

[eots]

no thermite residue was found ...so this, like your last post is based on a false premise... and has no evidential value.

22. Did the NIST investigation look for evidence of the WTC towers being brought down by controlled demolition? Was the steel tested for explosives or thermite residues?

NIST did not test for the residue of these compounds in the steel.

FAQs - NIST WTC Towers Investigation

because there was nothing to test for...there was no evidence of of thermite use...

but you just claimed they found none...implying testing was done...why do you try to be deceptive ?..even you must deep down realize how disingenuous,your statement is

 

[holston]

but you just claimed they found none...implying testing was done...why do you try to be deceptive ?..even you must deep down realize how disingenuous,your statement is

They know.

 

[daws101]

22. Did the NIST investigation look for evidence of the WTC towers being brought down by controlled demolition? Was the steel tested for explosives or thermite residues?

NIST did not test for the residue of these compounds in the steel.

FAQs - NIST WTC Towers Investigation

because there was nothing to test for...there was no evidence of of thermite use...

but you just claimed they found none...implying testing was done...why do you try to be deceptive ?..even you must deep down realize how disingenuous,your statement is

lol! I implied nothing if chemical testing had been necessary I would have said so.
there was no obvious signs that thermite or explosives were used.
why the fuck don't you understand this?
so no further testing was needed.
for the billionth time it would have been obvious if thermite or explosives were used.
chemical testing would have only shown the chemical signature of either one.
not if they had been used at all.

 

[Jos]

They shipped all the Steel beams out of the country in double quick time

 

[SFC Ollie]

There is still no visible or audio evidence that says there should have been time and money wasted on testing for explosives that were not there.......

 

[daws101]

They shipped all the Steel beams out of the country in double quick time

that's another twoofer steaming pile of shit...

 

[daws101]

There is still no visible or audio evidence that says there should have been time and money wasted on testing for explosives that were not there.......

eots seem to have a tough time with the obvious...

 

[SFC Ollie]

There is still no visible or audio evidence that says there should have been time and money wasted on testing for explosives that were not there.......

eots seem to have a tough time with the obvious...

Well, you know, the government has this new silent explosive that leaves no trace behind....

 

[eots]

They shipped all the Steel beams out of the country in double quick time

that's another twoofer steaming pile of shit...

thisi pathetic clown just says..no it isn't without offering any counter evidence
then if you supply him with the evidence he will just move his goal post and say..it does not matter they rapidly shipped the metal off ...he has no real interest in what is true

 

[daws101]

They shipped all the Steel beams out of the country in double quick time

that's another twoofer steaming pile of shit...

thisi pathetic clown just says..no it isn't without offering any counter evidence
then if you supply him with the evidence he will just move his goal post and say..it does not matter they rapidly shipped the metal off ...he has no real interest in what is true

another classic false assumption .
there is no credible evidence to support that the wtc steel was whisk away for any other purpose but recycling..
your crapspirasy myth doesn't cut it.
be side there are many tons of wtc steel on display : World Trade Center steel on display in Denver | Video | 9news.com

speaking about me in the third person is chicken shit. but typical ..

 

[SFC Ollie]

Not to mention the steel that was used in the Hull of the USS New York........

 

[eots]

There is still no visible or audio evidence that says there should have been time and money wasted on testing for explosives that were not there.......

Silent Blast Chemical
Brand Name :Silent Blast
Model Number :0079
Place of Origin :India
Silent Blast Chemical from Ryan India Export , India

rack.Dexpan is a soundless and safe demolition agent which is quite different from ordinary demolition agents such as explosives and dangerous materials. It does not cause any fly rock, noise, ground vibration, gas, dust or any other environmental pollution when used properly.

As requirements for demolishing rock and reinforced concrete in construction increase in tight quarters, the use of explosives and explosive agents is becoming more restricted as far as safety and environmental pollution problems are concerned.Crack.Dexpan is the solution.

In mining and quarrying industry, Crack Dexpan helps to achieve perfect slabs and blocks from limestone, onyx, marble, granite or any other type of stone you are working with. Compares to blasting, Crack Dexpan avoids waste of valuable stone, high insurance, costly storage and labor.

Crack Dexpan can also be applied along with traditional methods like primer cord, hydraulic breaker, diamond blade saw and jackhammer to help cut cost, work time and increase safety, Plus its silent operation, Crack Dexpan is perfect for residential, school, hospital and airport area.Crack Dexpan helps your work to become more efficient and cost effective

 

[eots]

Spoliation of a fire scene is a basis for destroying a legal case in an investigation. Most of the steel was discarded, although the key elements of the core steel were demographically labeled. A careful reading of the NIST report shows that they have no evidence that the temperatures they predict as necessary for failure are corroborated by findings of the little steel debris they have. Why hasn't NIST declared that this spoliation of the steel was a gross error?


OpEdNews - Page 2 of Article: Former Chief of NIST's Fire Science Division Calls for Independent Review of World Trade Center Investigation