The individuals in the American left wing media need to be charged with high treason and treated accordingly. Start with Tapper

[Marener]

"voluntarily"

Still doing the government's bidding, and of course you don't see the danger in all this.

once again, the "disinformation" bullshit.

In the Florida case they are being accused of flat out lying.

Guess what? Sometimes people do things that the government wants at the request of the government.

I know an antisocial loser like yourself doesn’t understand how people work to create a functional society, but it’s not that weird.

 

[martybegan]

Guess what? Sometimes people do things that the government wants at the request of the government.

I know an antisocial loser like yourself doesn’t understand how people work to create a functional society, but it’s not that weird.

And collusion is just as bad as submission when it comes to silencing citizens.

"functioning society"

If you haven't noticed our society isn't functioning.

 

[Marener]

And collusion is just as bad as submission when it comes to silencing citizens.

"functioning society"

If you haven't noticed our society isn't functioning.

Collusion? They were working with the owners of the platform, dipshit. The owners get to set the rules for the platform or have you decided that citizens have a right to the property of others?

Society would be functioning a lot better if we had fewer self centered antisocial weirdos like yourself.

 

[martybegan]

Collusion? They were working with the owners of the platform, dipshit. The owners get to set the rules for the platform or have you decided that citizens have a right to the property of others?

Society would be functioning a lot better if we had fewer self centered antisocial weirdos like yourself.

Collusion. Working in tandem to silence opinions they didn't like, many of which were later to be found to have truth in them, despite the government's protest.

Yes, Blue cities going through hell shows it's those of us with an independent streak that are causing the problems.

 

[Rawley]

Marener crickets

Marener the crickets are deafening.

Biden Wants To Punish Facebook for the Government's Own Vaccine Failures

The federal government is stepping up its war on Facebook: President Joe Biden has accused Mark Zuckerberg's social media platform of failing to purge

reason.com

 

[Marener]

Collusion. Working in tandem to silence opinions they didn't like, many of which were later to be found to have truth in them, despite the government's protest.

Yes, Blue cities going through hell shows it's those of us with an independent streak that are causing the problems.

If a social media platform doesn’t want your opinion on their website, that’s their right. If a social media platform wants to work with the government to best identify what is and isn’t good information about a pandemic, that’s their right. This is all perfectly consistent with the first amendment.

It’s not consistent if the government threatens criminal prosecution to silence citizens for expressing opinions they don’t like.

You’re defending obvious unconstitutional behavior and pretending something FAR less sinister is out of bounds. It’s crazy.

 

[MisterBeale]

Not really. And from the right it's mostly reactionary. Beat a dog enough and it will try to bite back.

nope.

No excuse for lobbying for the destruction of the constitution.

 

[struth]

Way to avoid the entirety of my point.

To be defamed you have to show harm. How do you show harm if people are ultimately immune from any responsibility for the actions of others informed by your information (or misinformation rather)?

The point being is that misinformation is harmful. You claim that ultimately everyone is responsible for their own actions, I guess. But you ignore that people are influenced by information, which makes the people who convey that information also responsible. Without that responsibility, there could be no defamation.

Misinformation is very harmful, it gave us the xiden harris admin and record Covid deaths, skyrocketing interest rates and inflation, an open southern border run by the cartels, terrorist on the rise globally, due to the taliban surrender, wars in Europe, the Middle East, China able to do whatever they want…including openly spying on us…and a record number of Americans worse off since before they were elected

 

[martybegan]

If a social media platform doesn’t want your opinion on their website, that’s their right. If a social media platform wants to work with the government to best identify what is and isn’t good information about a pandemic, that’s their right. This is all perfectly consistent with the first amendment.

It’s not consistent if the government threatens criminal prosecution to silence citizens for expressing opinions they don’t like.

You’re defending obvious unconstitutional behavior and pretending something FAR less sinister is out of bounds. It’s crazy.

And the censors applaud, and you along with it.

No, what you support is far more sinister, and it's pathetic you can't or won't see it.

 

[martybegan]

nope.

No excuse for lobbying for the destruction of the constitution.

The right supports the Constitution far far more than the left does. Any attempt at equivalence is just the usual desire of some to see both sides.

Moderation is not always the right path.

 

[Marener]

And the censors applaud, and you along with it.

No, what you support is far more sinister, and it's pathetic you can't or won't see it.

Moron. It’s not censorship if social media platforms take down your shitpost.

What’s sinister is turning this country so fascist you defend government threatening people with criminal prosecution for their speech.

 

[martybegan]

Moron. It’s not censorship if social media platforms take down your shitpost.

What’s sinister is turning this country so fascist you defend government threatening people with criminal prosecution for their speech.

it's censorship, just not direct government censorship, and this case it's government adjacent censorship.

Learn how words mean things, curried goathearder.

They were informed the advertisement lied, and the lie could have impact on people's health. Life or death impact, immediate life or death impact.

 

[Marener]

it's censorship, just not direct government censorship, and this case it's government adjacent censorship.

Learn how words mean things, curried goathearder.

They were informed the advertisement lied, and the lie could have impact on people's health. Life or death impact, immediate life or death impact.

If it's not directed by the government, it's not censorship. Government "adjacent" censorship is something you just made up. It's meaningless.

They were "informed" that the government was going to throw them in jail if they allowed the ad on the air. That's actual censorship. Don't you at least agree that Florida was actually trying to censor the anti-abortion group?

 

[martybegan]

If it's not directed by the government, it's not censorship. Government "adjacent" censorship is something you just made up. It's meaningless.

They were "informed" that the government was going to throw them in jail if they allowed the ad on the air. That's actual censorship. Don't you at least agree that Florida was actually trying to censor the anti-abortion group?

It has plenty of meaning, you just approve of it and dismiss it.

They were informed the advertisements could be breaking the law.

 

[Marener]

It has plenty of meaning, you just approve of it and dismiss it.

They were informed the advertisements could be breaking the law.

No, it’s literally something you just made up to sound scary.

So you approve of censorship when it’s on your side. Gotcha.

 

[martybegan]

No, it’s literally something you just made up to sound scary.

So you approve of censorship when it’s on your side. Gotcha.

I approve of people giving warning about potentially breaking the law.

Maybe the capitol police should have done that before they let the people into the building on J6.

 

[Marener]

I approve of people giving warning about potentially breaking the law.

Maybe the capitol police should have done that before they let the people into the building on J6.

How many people did DeSantis prosecute for spreading false information about COVID?

 

[martybegan]

How many people did DeSantis prosecute for spreading false information about COVID?

How many were advertisements that lied about the laws covering COVID?

 

[Marener]

How many were advertisements that lied about the laws covering COVID?

Does the law only apply to advertisements?

 

[martybegan]

Does the law only apply to advertisements?

The law in question.

 Sanitary nuisance.—A sanitary nuisance is the commission of any act, by an individual, municipality, organization, or corporation, or the keeping, maintaining, propagation, existence, or permission of anything, by an individual, municipality, organization, or corporation, by which the health or life of an individual, or the health or lives of individuals, may be threatened or impaired, or by which or through which, directly or indirectly, disease may be caused.