The individuals in the American left wing media need to be charged with high treason and treated accordingly. Start with Tapper

[Marener]

Because the sender knows the recipient will release it and fight it?

In open court?

Meanwhile government and the elites hide behind social media and do far worse, because it's hidden behind layers.

So Florida wasn’t doing anything in open, it was the TV stations that brought it into the open.

Social media companies had nothing to fight since they were participating voluntarily without threat of force.

So your argument is that threatening people to suppress free speech is better than asking platforms to voluntarily take down posts because it’s so repulsive that everyone will find out.

Is that it? Congrats. You guys are so shitty that there’s no way to keep it a secret.

 

[martybegan]

So Florida wasn’t doing anything in open, it was the TV stations that brought it into the open.

Social media companies had nothing to fight since they were participating voluntarily without threat of force.

So your argument is that threatening people to suppress free speech is better than asking platforms to voluntarily take down posts because it’s so repulsive that everyone will find out.

Is that it? Congrats. You guys are so shitty that there’s no way to keep it a secret.

The letter wasn't confidential, not harm from the TV station releasing it.

So since the SA wasn't really part of the government, the Nazi government wasn't really behind their actions?

My argument is Florida did it the right way, the easily counter-able legal way. The left went after COVID stuff via the scumbag way.

 

[Marener]

The letter wasn't confidential, not harm from the TV station releasing it.

So since the SA wasn't really part of the government, the Nazi government wasn't really behind their actions?

My argument is Florida did it the right way, the easily counter-able legal way. The left went after COVID stuff via the scumbag way.

And nothing that the government did with Meta was deemed confidential either.

Florida didn’t do shit the right way. The right way was to never threaten anyone with criminal prosecution for engaging in protected political speech. They did it so wrong that they immediately got bitch slapped in court like we all knew they would.

The whole question around government getting involved in speech is whether they’re using unconstitutional coercion to affect speech.

With social media, it’s an open question because opinions vary as to whether there was any coercion at all. Social media platforms didn’t have to counter anything legally. They just didn’t have to do anything because there were no repercussions.

There’s no question as to whether threatening criminal prosecution is coercion.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Candycvnt probably has his hands down his pants, jerking off over his supposed 'gotcha" moment.

Not much of a “gotcha”.

 

[Blisterfinger]

Yup. These Trumpers would CHEER if Trump sent journalists to “the camps”

Which ones?

 

[Rawley]

"The federal government is stepping up its war on Facebook: President Joe Biden has accused Mark Zuckerberg's social media platform of failing to purge anti-vaccine content, thus contributing to vaccine hesitancy and "killing people," said the president.
Now the White House is considering methods of tinkering with Section 230, the federal statute that immunizes internet platforms from legal liability, in order to punish Facebook for failing to do everything the government wants.
"We're reviewing that, and certainly they should be held accountable," said Kate Bedingfield, White House communications director, in response to a question about Section 230 posed by Morning Joe's Mika Brzezinski".

Biden Wants To Punish Facebook for the Government's Own Vaccine Failures

The federal government is stepping up its war on Facebook: President Joe Biden has accused Mark Zuckerberg's social media platform of failing to purge

reason.com

Marener crickets

 

[martybegan]

And nothing that the government did with Meta was deemed confidential either.

Florida didn’t do shit the right way. The right way was to never threaten anyone with criminal prosecution for engaging in protected political speech. They did it so wrong that they immediately got bitch slapped in court like we all knew they would.

The whole question around government getting involved in speech is whether they’re using unconstitutional coercion to affect speech.

With social media, it’s an open question because opinions vary as to whether there was any coercion at all. Social media platforms didn’t have to counter anything legally. They just didn’t have to do anything because there were no repercussions.

There’s no question as to whether threatening criminal prosecution is coercion.

And that's why it took hearings for it to come out.....

No, the Dem way is to threaten violence against speech they don't like. Much better.

With social media they use an end around, and you are OK with it because it goes with your pathetic agenda.

 

[Rawley]

the guys submitted an affidavit in court saying so. I provided all the links and even screenshot the court document for you.

Not that you care. There’s basically nothing these corrupt assholes can do that you won’t defend.

Projection at its finest

 

[Marener]

And that's why it took hearings for it to come out.....

No, the Dem way is to threaten violence against speech they don't like. Much better.

With social media they use an end around, and you are OK with it because it goes with your pathetic agenda.

The fuck it did. We knew about it in real time. Biden was totally public about calling out social media companies for perpetuating COVID disinformation.

‘They’re Killing People’: Biden Denounces Social Media for Virus Disinformation (Published 2021)

The president’s blunt statement capped weeks of frustration in the White House over the spread of vaccine disinformation on Facebook and other platforms.

www.nytimes.com

Inside the White House-Facebook Rift Over Vaccine Misinformation (Published 2021)

Frustrations grew behind the scenes among top leaders on both sides, potentially hurting the government’s efforts to overcome the pandemic.

www.nytimes.com

Loading…

www.cnn.com

In 2020, Zuckerberg himself said they don’t want to perpetuate misinformation that could get people hurt.

All you have is a phony narrative that crumbles anytime you actually scrutinize it.

 

[martybegan]

The fuck it did. We knew about it in real time. Biden was totally public about calling out social media companies for perpetuating COVID disinformation.

‘They’re Killing People’: Biden Denounces Social Media for Virus Disinformation (Published 2021)

The president’s blunt statement capped weeks of frustration in the White House over the spread of vaccine disinformation on Facebook and other platforms.

www.nytimes.com

Inside the White House-Facebook Rift Over Vaccine Misinformation (Published 2021)

Frustrations grew behind the scenes among top leaders on both sides, potentially hurting the government’s efforts to overcome the pandemic.

www.nytimes.com

Loading…

www.cnn.com

In 2020, Zuckerberg himself said they don’t want to perpetuate misinformation that could get people hurt.

All you have is a phony narrative that crumbles anytime you actually scrutinize it.

Even worse.

Then you add the backdoor machinations, and you get government getting companies to do their dirty work to end run the 1st amendment.

And how much of that "disinformation" ended up being shown to be not disinformation at all?

 

[Marener]

Even worse.

Then you add the backdoor machinations, and you get government getting companies to do their dirty work to end run the 1st amendment.

And how much of that "disinformation" ended up being shown to be not disinformation at all?

You’re so delusional.

You think it’s worse to work with social media companies to moderate their platforms voluntarily as opposed to using threats or criminal prosecution to scare people into censoring speech.

That’s so screwed up. No sane, logical, coherent person thinks government threats of force is the good way to go.

Social media moderation policies are not against the first amendment. Obviously.

 

[martybegan]

You’re so delusional.

You think it’s worse to work with social media companies to moderate their platforms voluntarily as opposed to using threats or criminal prosecution to scare people into censoring speech.

That’s so screwed up. No sane, logical, coherent person thinks government threats of force is the good way to go.

Social media moderation policies are not against the first amendment. Obviously.

The thing with Florida was resolved in a week. The social media bullshit is still being investigated, and we are still feeling the impacts of the government's attempts to silence dissent.

It's not moderation, its government induced censorship.

 

[Marener]

The thing with Florida was resolved in a week. The social media bullshit is still being investigated, and we are still feeling the impacts of the government's attempts to silence dissent.

It's not moderation, it’s government induced censorship.

The Florida thing isn’t resolved. They had to go get a fucking injunction from a federal judge and the case is ongoing.

To solve the social media “thing”, all they had to do was say “no thanks”. It would have taken 5 seconds. They don’t do that because they didn’t WANT to do that. It was voluntary.

 

[martybegan]

The Florida thing isn’t resolved. They had to go get a fucking injunction from a federal judge and the case is ongoing.

To solve the social media “thing”, all they had to do was say “no thanks”. It would have taken 5 seconds. They don’t do that because they didn’t WANT to do that. It was voluntary.

It's pretty much resolved. Nothing happened to the lying advertiser nor the TV stations.

So you are OK with censoring shitheads as long as they make the fake firewall by pretending the government "asked them"

what a pathetic fucking rube you are.

 

[Lesh]

Banning books

Jailing left wing journalists

Yeah

You’re fascists

 

[martybegan]

Banning books

Jailing left wing journalists

Yeah

You’re fascists

Removing porn-y books from middle schools is not banning them.

Which ones, the anti-fa activists hiding behind pretending to be journalists?

 

[Marener]

It's pretty much resolved. Nothing happened to the lying advertiser nor the TV stations.

So you are OK with censoring shitheads as long as they make the fake firewall by pretending the government "asked them"

what a pathetic fucking rube you are.

It’s not censorship when social media platforms tell you what you can and can’t post, dipshit.

It’s censorship when the government tells TV stations what they can and can’t air. Obviously.

It’s all over except for the hundreds of billable hours to fight the fascist little losers in DeSantis’s office because you know they’ll never admit they’re wrong.

 

[martybegan]

It’s not censorship when social media platforms tell you what you can and can’t post, dipshit.

It’s censorship when the government tells TV stations what they can and can’t air. Obviously.

It’s all over except for the hundreds of billable hours to fight the fascist little losers in DeSantis’s office because you know they’ll never admit they’re wrong.

It's passthrough censorship when the government asks them to do it.

And in the end, it's what lefties like you jerk off to, people with power fucking over those with less.

 

[Marener]

It's passthrough censorship when the government asks them to do it.

And in the end, it's what lefties like you jerk off to, people with power fucking over those with less.

If the social media platforms do it voluntarily it’s not government censorship. FFS Zuckerberg said at the beginning of the pandemic he didn’t want people posting disinformation and asked health agencies for help with making policy.

That’s a lot different than threatening criminal prosecution, dipshit.

 

[martybegan]

If the social media platforms do it voluntarily it’s not government censorship. FFS Zuckerberg said at the beginning of the pandemic he didn’t want people posting disinformation and asked health agencies for help with making policy.

That’s a lot different than threatening criminal prosecution, dipshit.

"voluntarily"

Still doing the government's bidding, and of course you don't see the danger in all this.

once again, the "disinformation" bullshit.

In the Florida case they are being accused of flat out lying.