The individuals in the American left wing media need to be charged with high treason and treated accordingly. Start with Tapper

[Marener]

The law in question.

Great. So we would have expected DeSantis to have been threatening tons of people with criminal prosecution during COVID for spreading false information. Misinformation they most likely did harm and kill hundreds of thousands of people.

Of course he didn’t. He never would. But when it comes to an opinion about the inadequate protections for the life of a woman in the abortion law, he’s all hot and bothered.

Not only that, but the mere suggestion that such misinformation be voluntarily removed by companies running social media platforms is appalling to you.

 

[Mac1958]

Three major newspapers are afraid to endorse Harris.

The oligarchs are getting in line, just in case.

They want to imprison the press.

It's all playing out. Again.

 

[martybegan]

Great. So we would have expected DeSantis to have been threatening tons of people with criminal prosecution during COVID for spreading false information. Misinformation they most likely did harm and kill hundreds of thousands of people.

Of course he didn’t. He never would. But when it comes to an opinion about the inadequate protections for the life of a woman in the abortion law, he’s all hot and bothered.

Not only that, but the mere suggestion that such misinformation be voluntarily removed by companies running social media platforms is appalling to you.

Not false information, a direct lie. This was a direct lie about an emergency situation, not a shot over a bad flu.

It's only "inadequate" to those who want the law removed entirely. It's political posturing on the part of abortion zealots like you.

 

[Marener]

Not false information, a direct lie. This was a direct lie about an emergency situation, not a shot over a bad flu.

It's only "inadequate" to those who want the law removed entirely. It's political posturing on the part of abortion zealots like you.

I’m sorry, what is the “emergent situation” that you’re referring to exactly?

Would that be people afraid to go seek medical attention while suffering from severe COVID because they were told that hospitals try to harm them because they’re paid by the government to do so?

 

[martybegan]

I’m sorry, what is the “emergent situation” that you’re referring to exactly?

Would that be people afraid to go seek medical attention while suffering from severe COVID because they were told that hospitals try to harm them because they’re paid by the government to do so?

emergency situation, i.e. needing to remove a dead or distressed fetus that threatens the life of the mother, something allowed for under this law. And clarified by the Florida DOH that in an emergency the prior approvals aren't needed.

Stop going back to COVID, it's not the same.

 

[Marener]

emergency situation, i.e. needing to remove a dead or distressed fetus that threatens the life of the mother, something allowed for under this law. And clarified by the Florida DOH that in an emergency the prior approvals aren't needed.

Stop going back to COVID, it's not the same.

What does that have to do with the content or the ad? Did you even listen to it?

Why isn’t COVID the same? Surely you’re aware that there were a lot of lies being perpetuated about COVID and led to death among those who believed it.

 

[martybegan]

What does that have to do with the content or the ad? Did you even listen to it?

Why isn’t COVID the same? Surely you’re aware that there were a lot of lies being perpetuated about COVID and led to death among those who believed it.

Yes, and the Florida DOH has a valid concern, which they expressed.

People in respiratory arrest weren't being told they won't get treatment because of a law by some people. That is the situation here.

 

[Marener]

Yes, and the Florida DOH has a valid concern, which they expressed.

Do you actually think the ad was talking about an emergency situation? It wasn’t about removing a dead or distressed fetus that was a threat to the mother. I don’t think you actually know what the ad is about.

People in respiratory arrest weren't being told they won't get treatment because of a law by some people. That is the situation here.

The law does not make any such distinction, so it’s irrelevant.

 

[martybegan]

Do you actually think the ad was talking about an emergency situation? It wasn’t about removing a dead or distressed fetus that was a threat to the mother. I don’t think you actually know what the ad is about.

The law does not make any such distinction, so it’s irrelevant.

Actually that was what the letter was about.

That's for the judge to decide in the case at hand.

Also, for the COVID thing to work, the information would have to have been given out over regulated airwaves.

 

[Marener]

Actually that was what the letter was about.

That's for the judge to decide in the case at hand.

Also, for the COVID thing to work, the information would have to have been given out over regulated airwaves.

The ad was not about an emergency situation. You support censorship even without knowing what was being censored. What a good little German you are.

The law you posted has nothing to do with regulated airwaves, which Florida doesn’t regulate anyway. You really are just desperately trying to find distinctions to defend your hypocrisy.

 

[Rawley]

If it's not directed by the government, it's not censorship. Government "adjacent" censorship is something you just made up. It's meaningless.

They were "informed" that the government was going to throw them in jail if they allowed the ad on the air. That's actual censorship. Don't you at least agree that Florida was actually trying to censor the anti-abortion group?

So threatening to take away their section 230 immunity is not govt censorship? LOL

 

[martybegan]

The ad was not about an emergency situation. You support censorship even without knowing what was being censored. What a good little German you are.

The law you posted has nothing to do with regulated airwaves, which Florida doesn’t regulate anyway. You really are just desperately trying to find distinctions to defend your hypocrisy.

The ad said they could be denied life-saving care because of the law. That's a lie.

Again, that's for a judge to figure out.

The sad thing is you are fighting Florida for saying that access is ALLOWED for life saving abortions.

 

[Marener]

The ad said they could be denied life-saving care because of the law. That's a lie.

Again, that's for a judge to figure out.

The sad thing is you are fighting Florida for saying that access is ALLOWED for life saving abortions.

The ad said a woman needed an abortion to get chemotherapy. How is that an emergency situation?

The corrupt governor of Florida is trying to suppress speech to hide the fact that his law is very ambiguous and has unintended consequences.

But again, when did meatball Ron prosecute false information that would hurt people with COVID? You know, something that ACTUALLY happened.

 

[martybegan]

The ad said a woman needed an abortion to get chemotherapy. How is that an emergency situation?

The corrupt governor of Florida is trying to suppress speech to hide the fact that his law is very ambiguous and has unintended consequences.

But again, when did meatball Ron prosecute false information that would hurt people with COVID? You know, something that ACTUALLY happened.

That was part of the ad. They also said the law was preventing other medical procedures.

The corrupt abortionists are lying to get a law they don't like overturned.

 

[Marener]

That was part of the ad. They also said the law was preventing other medical procedures.

That was the entirety of the ad. It was entirely about her specific circumstance, which wasn’t an emergency.

You don’t even know what you want to censor. You just accept what your masters told you.

The corrupt abortionists are lying to get a law they don't like overturned.

Corrupt Republicans are using government threats to censor speech they don’t like.

 

[martybegan]

That was the entirety of the ad. It was entirely about her specific circumstance, which wasn’t an emergency.

You don’t even know what you want to censor. You just accept what your masters told you.

Corrupt Republicans are using government threats to censor speech they don’t like.

Corrupt Dems are using corporations to end run the 1st amendment.

Nothing was censored in DeSantis' case.

 

[Marener]

Corrupt Dems are using corporations to end run the 1st amendment.

Nothing was censored in DeSantis' case.

Again, where was the emergency situation?

A TV station took the ad down as a result of the threat of criminal prosecution so they were definitely censored.

Corporations taking down posts from their websites isn’t censorship, no matter how badly you want to believe it.

I guess the Dems should have been threatening to prosecute social media companies for the COVID lies? That’s what you seem to want.

 

[martybegan]

Again, where was the emergency situation?

A TV station took the ad down as a result of the threat of criminal prosecution so they were definitely censored.

Corporations taking down posts from their websites isn’t censorship, no matter how badly you want to believe it.

I guess the Dems should have been threatening to prosecute social media companies for the COVID lies? That’s what you seem to want.

You have proof they "took it down" before the injunction came out?

Yes it is censorship. It's not usually government censorship, but it's censorship, and in the cases we are discussing, government influenced.

And these are not just websites, these are social media sites where the owners claim the content isn't theirs.

Actually that's what they probably threatened when they "Asked" them to remove some posts. Didn't think that one through, did ya?

 

[berg80]

Nope, the government applied pressure to them, implying that their monoply statuses would be revoked if they did not do what the totalitarians in government wanted them to.


Even Zuck, who tends to be on the left, had said he was uncomfortable with the corrupt pressure applied.

just stahp already

So.........you object to the government trying to prevent potentially deadly misinformation about a pandemic from being allowed on social media but have no problem with trump saying he will seek to revoke the broadcast license of cable stations reporting information critical of him. Got it.

 

[martybegan]

So.........you object to the government trying to prevent potentially deadly misinformation about a pandemic from being allowed on social media but have no problem with trump saying he will seek to revoke the broadcast license of cable stations reporting information critical of him. Got it.

Come back to me when or if he actually follows through.