The Illiteracy of Right-Wing Statistical Analysis

IM2

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Mar 11, 2015
76,928
33,980
2,330

Nazis Can’t Do Math: Reflections on Racism, Crime and the Illiteracy of Right-Wing Statistical Analysis​


I'll let Tim Wise do the talking. Now just remember he's white before you start whining about me hating all white people. And no, he's not some guilt riddled liberal, which is the excuse you use to diss white who actually are not racists.

1627895853170.png


Remember, white supremacists are hoping to scare white people into believing that they are at serious risk of homicidal victimization at the hands of black people. But what are the facts?

Well, to begin, 704 whites killed by blacks, as a percentage of the white population in 2010 (196.8 million) was a whopping 3.6 ten-thousandths of one percent (0.00036) of all whites who were killed by a black person that year. This comes out to about 1 white person out of every 277,000 who were killed by a black person in 2010. Quite the risk, that. Clearly sufficient to justify a generalized fear of being interracially murdered by a black person…

Oh, except, here’s the problem: any given black person is far more likely to be interracially murdered by a white person than that. 413 blacks killed by whites, as a percentage of the black population in 2010 (42 million) was 1 one-thousandths of a percent (0.001) of all blacks who were killed by a white person that year. This equates to about 1 black person out of every 100,000 who were killed by a white person in 2010.

In other words, although interracial homicides are incredibly rare in either direction, any given black person in the United States is about 2.8 times more likely to be killed by a white person than any given white person is to be murdered by a black person.


Your per capita argument is just as full of holes now as it was in 2010. The number of blacks killed by whites as a percentage of our population are far higher than whites being killed by blacks.

You want to talk about math, stats, rate and probability. In each case, your racist argument is a loser.

1 white person out of every 277,000 whites killed by blacks. 1 out of every 100,000 blacks were killed by whites. Blacks are almost 3 times more likely to be killed by whites than otherwise based on our population. You want to play per capita, but you still lose because it shows what everything else shows:​


WHITES ARE MORE VIOLENT THAN ANYONE ELSE!
 

Nazis Can’t Do Math: Reflections on Racism, Crime and the Illiteracy of Right-Wing Statistical Analysis​


I'll let Tim Wise do the talking. Now just remember he's white before you start whining about me hating all white people. And no, he's not some guilt riddled liberal, which is the excuse you use to diss white who actually are not racists.

View attachment 520369

Remember, white supremacists are hoping to scare white people into believing that they are at serious risk of homicidal victimization at the hands of black people. But what are the facts?

Well, to begin, 704 whites killed by blacks, as a percentage of the white population in 2010 (196.8 million) was a whopping 3.6 ten-thousandths of one percent (0.00036) of all whites who were killed by a black person that year. This comes out to about 1 white person out of every 277,000 who were killed by a black person in 2010. Quite the risk, that. Clearly sufficient to justify a generalized fear of being interracially murdered by a black person…

Oh, except, here’s the problem: any given black person is far more likely to be interracially murdered by a white person than that. 413 blacks killed by whites, as a percentage of the black population in 2010 (42 million) was 1 one-thousandths of a percent (0.001) of all blacks who were killed by a white person that year. This equates to about 1 black person out of every 100,000 who were killed by a white person in 2010.

In other words, although interracial homicides are incredibly rare in either direction, any given black person in the United States is about 2.8 times more likely to be killed by a white person than any given white person is to be murdered by a black person.


Your per capita argument is just as full of holes now as it was in 2010. The number of blacks killed by whites as a percentage of our population are far higher than whites being killed by blacks.

You want to talk about math, stats, rate and probability. In each case, your racist argument is a loser.

1 white person out of every 277,000 whites killed by blacks. 1 out of every 100,000 blacks were killed by whites. Blacks are almost 3 times more likely to be killed by whites than otherwise based on our population. You want to play per capita, but you still lose because it shows what everything else shows:​


WHITES ARE MORE VIOLENT THAN ANYONE ELSE!
That's why they wanna off us first

You'll be easily killed off if they wipe us out first

I'll see em in hell

We're on auto pilot it only a matter of time

shsbbdhdhhdhd.jpg


Oh yeah ....the utopia they're promising you they've been promising to useful idiots since the French revolution

Good luck out there

 
I understand illiteracy AND illegitimacy are very high in the black community.
Rural whites have all the same problems black people do only it's spread out and better hidden. If you get a mile off the main road in the rural south you will find pockets of some of the poorest, stupidest most drug addicted white people in the world. They have been told they must hide their poverty and suffer in silence.
 

Nazis Can’t Do Math: Reflections on Racism, Crime and the Illiteracy of Right-Wing Statistical Analysis​


I'll let Tim Wise do the talking. Now just remember he's white before you start whining about me hating all white people. And no, he's not some guilt riddled liberal, which is the excuse you use to diss white who actually are not racists.

View attachment 520369

Remember, white supremacists are hoping to scare white people into believing that they are at serious risk of homicidal victimization at the hands of black people. But what are the facts?

Well, to begin, 704 whites killed by blacks, as a percentage of the white population in 2010 (196.8 million) was a whopping 3.6 ten-thousandths of one percent (0.00036) of all whites who were killed by a black person that year. This comes out to about 1 white person out of every 277,000 who were killed by a black person in 2010. Quite the risk, that. Clearly sufficient to justify a generalized fear of being interracially murdered by a black person…

Oh, except, here’s the problem: any given black person is far more likely to be interracially murdered by a white person than that. 413 blacks killed by whites, as a percentage of the black population in 2010 (42 million) was 1 one-thousandths of a percent (0.001) of all blacks who were killed by a white person that year. This equates to about 1 black person out of every 100,000 who were killed by a white person in 2010.

In other words, although interracial homicides are incredibly rare in either direction, any given black person in the United States is about 2.8 times more likely to be killed by a white person than any given white person is to be murdered by a black person.


Your per capita argument is just as full of holes now as it was in 2010. The number of blacks killed by whites as a percentage of our population are far higher than whites being killed by blacks.

You want to talk about math, stats, rate and probability. In each case, your racist argument is a loser.

1 white person out of every 277,000 whites killed by blacks. 1 out of every 100,000 blacks were killed by whites. Blacks are almost 3 times more likely to be killed by whites than otherwise based on our population. You want to play per capita, but you still lose because it shows what everything else shows:​


WHITES ARE MORE VIOLENT THAN ANYONE ELSE!


You stupid little Moon Bat. Where do you come up with this silly bullshit? Do you get it in Negro School?

Many murders are connected with criminal activities and the filthy ass Negros commit more crimes than Whites and therefore are murdered by Whites and anybody else that confronts them.

As a White person I am much more likely to have to shoot a Negro breaking into my house or trying to rape my wife than a White.

However, the thing the stupid article forgot to mention is that the most dangerous person to a Negro is another Negro.

Stop being a stupid Negro apologist. It just makes you look like an idiot.

If you want for things to better for Negroes then advocate that they stop committing so many crimes, get off welfare, start talking care of their families and stop voting for Democrats that fuck everything up. Trying to blame their problems on Whites is just shitty and has no credibility. They are not victims. They are shitheads.
 

Nazis Can’t Do Math: Reflections on Racism, Crime and the Illiteracy of Right-Wing Statistical Analysis​


I'll let Tim Wise do the talking. Now just remember he's white before you start whining about me hating all white people. And no, he's not some guilt riddled liberal, which is the excuse you use to diss white who actually are not racists.

View attachment 520369

Remember, white supremacists are hoping to scare white people into believing that they are at serious risk of homicidal victimization at the hands of black people. But what are the facts?

Well, to begin, 704 whites killed by blacks, as a percentage of the white population in 2010 (196.8 million) was a whopping 3.6 ten-thousandths of one percent (0.00036) of all whites who were killed by a black person that year. This comes out to about 1 white person out of every 277,000 who were killed by a black person in 2010. Quite the risk, that. Clearly sufficient to justify a generalized fear of being interracially murdered by a black person…

Oh, except, here’s the problem: any given black person is far more likely to be interracially murdered by a white person than that. 413 blacks killed by whites, as a percentage of the black population in 2010 (42 million) was 1 one-thousandths of a percent (0.001) of all blacks who were killed by a white person that year. This equates to about 1 black person out of every 100,000 who were killed by a white person in 2010.

In other words, although interracial homicides are incredibly rare in either direction, any given black person in the United States is about 2.8 times more likely to be killed by a white person than any given white person is to be murdered by a black person.


Your per capita argument is just as full of holes now as it was in 2010. The number of blacks killed by whites as a percentage of our population are far higher than whites being killed by blacks.

You want to talk about math, stats, rate and probability. In each case, your racist argument is a loser.

1 white person out of every 277,000 whites killed by blacks. 1 out of every 100,000 blacks were killed by whites. Blacks are almost 3 times more likely to be killed by whites than otherwise based on our population. You want to play per capita, but you still lose because it shows what everything else shows:​


WHITES ARE MORE VIOLENT THAN ANYONE ELSE!
Really, don't do math. You just confuse yourself. Besides, math is racist.
 
And the usual suspects can't handle the truth. This time I used their favorite measuring tool, per capita and that even shows whites are more violent.

And JGalt, your ass says nothing about the countless threads full of fake news by your racist buddies. So your white ass WILL face the truth.
 

Nazis Can’t Do Math: Reflections on Racism, Crime and the Illiteracy of Right-Wing Statistical Analysis​


I'll let Tim Wise do the talking. Now just remember he's white before you start whining about me hating all white people. And no, he's not some guilt riddled liberal, which is the excuse you use to diss white who actually are not racists.

View attachment 520369

Remember, white supremacists are hoping to scare white people into believing that they are at serious risk of homicidal victimization at the hands of black people. But what are the facts?

Well, to begin, 704 whites killed by blacks, as a percentage of the white population in 2010 (196.8 million) was a whopping 3.6 ten-thousandths of one percent (0.00036) of all whites who were killed by a black person that year. This comes out to about 1 white person out of every 277,000 who were killed by a black person in 2010. Quite the risk, that. Clearly sufficient to justify a generalized fear of being interracially murdered by a black person…

Oh, except, here’s the problem: any given black person is far more likely to be interracially murdered by a white person than that. 413 blacks killed by whites, as a percentage of the black population in 2010 (42 million) was 1 one-thousandths of a percent (0.001) of all blacks who were killed by a white person that year. This equates to about 1 black person out of every 100,000 who were killed by a white person in 2010.

In other words, although interracial homicides are incredibly rare in either direction, any given black person in the United States is about 2.8 times more likely to be killed by a white person than any given white person is to be murdered by a black person.


Your per capita argument is just as full of holes now as it was in 2010. The number of blacks killed by whites as a percentage of our population are far higher than whites being killed by blacks.

You want to talk about math, stats, rate and probability. In each case, your racist argument is a loser.

1 white person out of every 277,000 whites killed by blacks. 1 out of every 100,000 blacks were killed by whites. Blacks are almost 3 times more likely to be killed by whites than otherwise based on our population. You want to play per capita, but you still lose because it shows what everything else shows:​


WHITES ARE MORE VIOLENT THAN ANYONE ELSE!

196.8 million whites killed 413 blacks.

42 million blacks killed 704 whites.

It's clear, blacks are a lot more violent than whites.

You want to talk about math, stats, rate and probability. In each case, your racist argument is a loser.

Coming from a racist loser like you.......LOL!
 
196.8 million whites killed 413 blacks.

42 million blacks killed 704 whites.

It's clear, blacks are a lot more violent than whites.

You want to talk about math, stats, rate and probability. In each case, your racist argument is a loser.

Coming from a racist loser like you.......LOL!
They are more violent than we whites, and IM2 is a racist.
 

Forum List

Back
Top