The Hunter Biden Tax Indictment Is a Disaster for the White House

Doc7505

Diamond Member
Feb 16, 2016
15,718
27,674
2,430
The Hunter Biden Tax Indictment Is a Disaster for the White House
8 Dec 2023 ~~ By Andrew McCarthy

If you’ve been following the Biden saga, the indictment has some neon-flashing problems for the president. All Our Opinion in Your Inbox

NR Daily is delivered right to you every afternoon. No charge. There are several astonishing things about the 56-page grand-jury indictment filed with nine counts against the president’s son, Hunter Biden, by federal prosecutor David Weiss.
The first is that it’s dizzying.
The indictment is scathing in describing the younger Biden’s unsavory lifestyle, his deep dishonesty, and his willful decision to evade tax liabilities on millions of dollars in income and instead spend the money on escorts, drugs, luxury goods, and the like. Hunter is portrayed as exactly the kind of tax cheat who should be prosecuted. In fact, he appears to be just the sort of elitist scoundrel abominated in the rhetoric of his father and Democrats — privileged, addicted to consumption, producing little of real value, and greedily unwilling to pay his “fair share.”
But here’s the problem: Just four months ago, the same David Weiss tried to bury the same tax case against the same Hunter Biden — offering him a no-jail plea to two puny misdemeanors, a sweetheart deal so out of the ordinary that Weiss’s minions could not answer a judge’s simple questions about it, and that the ever-entitled Hunter’s defense lawyers foolishly blew up over fear of a hypothetical prosecution on tougher charges that Weiss patently had no intention to bring.
~Snip~
If the case were ever to go to trial, it would be very embarrassing for the Biden administration. The indictment’s background allegations get into schemes with various agents of corrupt and anti-American regimes from whom the Biden family business reeled in millions of dollars.
~Snip~
The Biden Justice Department tried to bury this case. Weiss was shamed into indicting it because that gambit imploded — because the whistleblower agents went public, and the investigating House committees (building on the scut work previously done by Senators Chuck Grassley and Ron Johnson) proved the jaw-dropping transfers of millions of dollars from shady foreign agents to the Bidens. And now it’s obvious why the administration needed the case buried: Hunter is not the only Biden for whom it is a disaster.


Commentary:
While Mr. Weisss describes Hunter Biden as "a Georgetown, Yale educated, lawyer, lobbyist, consultant, businessman, I see him as a sybaritic, dishonorably discharged, drug-addled, tax evading, fake artist with a bad case of "Spare". Beau Biden was the star of the Biden family, and poor Hunter, in an effort to compete, went totally scorched Earth, even having an affair with Beau's widow. The overall effect here is to degrade the rest of the Georgetown, Yale educated lawyers.
Hunter Biden’s tax evasion reminds me of Al Capone’ tax evasion that brought him down with 11 years in federal prison, fined $50,000 plus $7,692 for court costs, and was held liable for $215,000 plus interest due on his back taxes. Likewise for Hunter, you can run but you can’t hide from the I.R.S. like his daddy said, “it’s time large corporations and the wealthiest Americans pay their fair share.” He will be beaten like a tin drum.
AI search: there is no credible or verified information suggesting that Joe Biden or his son Robert Hunter Biden were registered as a foreign agents between 2017 and 2021
 
Last edited:
Let’s Be Clear About the Indictment:
This Is About Joe Biden, Not Hunter Biden
11 Dec 2023 ~~ By David Harsanyi

When James Comer wondered on CNN whether Special Counsel David Weiss had indicted Hunter Biden on nine tax-related charges to protect him from having to be deposed in the House Oversight Committee, Jake Tapper snarkily responded: “Yes, the classic rubric. He indicted him to protect him. I got it.”
Well, yes. Indicting a person on lesser charges can often protect him from more serious ones. It happens all the time. In this case, though, “him” isn’t Hunter, it’s Joe.
Weiss failed to indict Hunter for failing to register as a foreign agent or failing to pay taxes on the millions that flowed from those arrangements. Why? Probably because any investigation into Hunter’s $17 million foreign influence-peddling business — which Weiss has scrupulously avoided — leads to the president of the United States answering lots of awkward queries about his connection to disreputable people and authoritarian regimes. There is no Hunter Biden case without Joe. There is no Biden Inc. without Joe.
Hunter’s laptop — the one that the New York Post got its hands on, and that Tapper and others attempted to cover up — was crammed with texts and emails in which the son references his dad’s role in securing payments and taking cuts from the business. None of that is to mention the numerous witnesses that have come forward to contend that the “Big Guy” played a part in that outfit. Or the checks that ended up being written to Joe. Any genuine investigation into the 20-plus shell companies set up by James Biden, Joe’s brother, and Hunter would compel lots of people to answer questions on the record or under oath.
Weiss conveniently allowed some of these infractions to pass the statute of limitations, but some have not. Hunter pulled in a million a year from Burisma from the years 2014-2017, while Joe was forging American policy in that nation. It’s only a weird happenstance, not a massive conflict of interest, that the sitting vice president’s decisions may have aided the oil concern while his son was being paid. Hunter’s salary fell to roughly $500,000 annually from 2017 to 2019, after Joe was out of the White House. Another weird coincidence.
But the president’s son also had a 10 percent stake in a Chi-com investment fund named BHR Partners from 2013 to 2021. Joe flew him to China to set it up, met one of the partners, and then wrote a letter of recommendation for the man’s kid. All completely innocent, no doubt.
Let’s not forget, either, that without the IRS whistleblowers coming forward, Hunter would probably have escaped any charges. And let’s also not forget that without U.S. District Court Judge Maryellen Noreika putting the kibosh on it, Weiss would have allowed Hunter’s lawyers to write an extraordinary plea agreement that not only would have ensured the president’s name wouldn’t be dragged into the investigation, but it would have let Hunter plead out to two of the least consequential charges — with virtually no punishment — in exchange for blanket immunity for a slew of serious potential offenses, including tax, gun, and drug crimes.
At every turn, Weiss is protecting Joe.
~Snip~
Weiss knows, despite the media’s insistence, that Joe doesn’t need to directly benefit from his family’s foreign ventures to corrupt himself — though there is plenty of circumstantial evidence that he did. If one of the most powerful men in the United States government participates in a scheme — or allows people to believe he is offering access — that makes millions for his entire family, it may or may not be illegal, but it is corrupt.
And any investigation that leads to those questions is a disaster for the president.

Commentary:
Fortunately Two IRS whistleblowers came forward to despite the Weiss cover-up case forcing Weiss to indict Hunter.
When Judge Cannon blew the plea deal Weiss and Garland had to doe for the indictment. Now there is the question involving FARA violations that Congress is attempting to enforce.
 
Nope, It's about Hunter.

~~~~~~
Not according to the Federalist article

"None of that is to mention the numerous witnesses that have come forward to contend that the “Big Guy” played a part in that outfit. Or the checks that ended up being written to Joe. Any genuine investigation into the 20-plus shell companies set up by James Biden, Joe’s brother, and Hunter would compel lots of people to answer questions on the record or under oath."

Notably, I don't believe David Weiss will be calling Archer Devon, or Tony Bobulinsky to testify for the prosecution.
 
The Hunter Biden Tax Indictment Is a Disaster for the White House
8 Dec 2023 ~~ By Andrew McCarthy

If you’ve been following the Biden saga, the indictment has some neon-flashing problems for the president. All Our Opinion in Your Inbox

NR Daily is delivered right to you every afternoon. No charge. There are several astonishing things about the 56-page grand-jury indictment filed with nine counts against the president’s son, Hunter Biden, by federal prosecutor David Weiss.
The first is that it’s dizzying.
The indictment is scathing in describing the younger Biden’s unsavory lifestyle, his deep dishonesty, and his willful decision to evade tax liabilities on millions of dollars in income and instead spend the money on escorts, drugs, luxury goods, and the like. Hunter is portrayed as exactly the kind of tax cheat who should be prosecuted. In fact, he appears to be just the sort of elitist scoundrel abominated in the rhetoric of his father and Democrats — privileged, addicted to consumption, producing little of real value, and greedily unwilling to pay his “fair share.”
But here’s the problem: Just four months ago, the same David Weiss tried to bury the same tax case against the same Hunter Biden — offering him a no-jail plea to two puny misdemeanors, a sweetheart deal so out of the ordinary that Weiss’s minions could not answer a judge’s simple questions about it, and that the ever-entitled Hunter’s defense lawyers foolishly blew up over fear of a hypothetical prosecution on tougher charges that Weiss patently had no intention to bring.
~Snip~
If the case were ever to go to trial, it would be very embarrassing for the Biden administration. The indictment’s background allegations get into schemes with various agents of corrupt and anti-American regimes from whom the Biden family business reeled in millions of dollars.
~Snip~
The Biden Justice Department tried to bury this case. Weiss was shamed into indicting it because that gambit imploded — because the whistleblower agents went public, and the investigating House committees (building on the scut work previously done by Senators Chuck Grassley and Ron Johnson) proved the jaw-dropping transfers of millions of dollars from shady foreign agents to the Bidens. And now it’s obvious why the administration needed the case buried: Hunter is not the only Biden for whom it is a disaster.


Commentary:
While Mr. Weisss describes Hunter Biden as "a Georgetown, Yale educated, lawyer, lobbyist, consultant, businessman, I see him as a sybaritic, dishonorably discharged, drug-addled, tax evading, fake artist with a bad case of "Spare". Beau Biden was the star of the Biden family, and poor Hunter, in an effort to compete, went totally scorched Earth, even having an affair with Beau's widow. The overall effect here is to degrade the rest of the Georgetown, Yale educated lawyers.
Hunter Biden’s tax evasion reminds me of Al Capone’ tax evasion that brought him down with 11 years in federal prison, fined $50,000 plus $7,692 for court costs, and was held liable for $215,000 plus interest due on his back taxes. Likewise for Hunter, you can run but you can’t hide from the I.R.S. like his daddy said, “it’s time large corporations and the wealthiest Americans pay their fair share.” He will be beaten like a tin drum.
AI search: there is no credible or verified information suggesting that Joe Biden or his son Robert Hunter Biden were registered as a foreign agents between 2017 and 2021
So Hunter didn't pay his taxes for a few years. What actual proof do you have that proves Biden did anyhing wrong? Inuendo or your gut feeling just won't get it.
 
So Hunter didn't pay his taxes for a few years. What actual proof do you have that proves Biden did anyhing wrong? Inuendo or your gut feeling just won't get it.
But unlike their dear leader.
Biden did pay all back taxes and penalties.
Trump?
The great "businessman" that the country so desperately needs?

The IRS did not audit Trump during his presidency's first 2 ...​

1702374208552.png
NPR
https://www.npr.org › 2022/12/20 › a-house-panel-voted...

Dec 20, 2022 — In 2016 and 2017, he paid just $750 in net tax on his income. In 2020, he paid $0 in net tax on his income. He reported millions in losses ...
 
Let’s Be Clear About the Indictment:
This Is About Joe Biden, Not Hunter Biden
11 Dec 2023 ~~ By David Harsanyi

When James Comer wondered on CNN whether Special Counsel David Weiss had indicted Hunter Biden on nine tax-related charges to protect him from having to be deposed in the House Oversight Committee, Jake Tapper snarkily responded: “Yes, the classic rubric. He indicted him to protect him. I got it.”
Well, yes. Indicting a person on lesser charges can often protect him from more serious ones. It happens all the time. In this case, though, “him” isn’t Hunter, it’s Joe.
Weiss failed to indict Hunter for failing to register as a foreign agent or failing to pay taxes on the millions that flowed from those arrangements. Why? Probably because any investigation into Hunter’s $17 million foreign influence-peddling business — which Weiss has scrupulously avoided — leads to the president of the United States answering lots of awkward queries about his connection to disreputable people and authoritarian regimes. There is no Hunter Biden case without Joe. There is no Biden Inc. without Joe.
Hunter’s laptop — the one that the New York Post got its hands on, and that Tapper and others attempted to cover up — was crammed with texts and emails in which the son references his dad’s role in securing payments and taking cuts from the business. None of that is to mention the numerous witnesses that have come forward to contend that the “Big Guy” played a part in that outfit. Or the checks that ended up being written to Joe. Any genuine investigation into the 20-plus shell companies set up by James Biden, Joe’s brother, and Hunter would compel lots of people to answer questions on the record or under oath.
Weiss conveniently allowed some of these infractions to pass the statute of limitations, but some have not. Hunter pulled in a million a year from Burisma from the years 2014-2017, while Joe was forging American policy in that nation. It’s only a weird happenstance, not a massive conflict of interest, that the sitting vice president’s decisions may have aided the oil concern while his son was being paid. Hunter’s salary fell to roughly $500,000 annually from 2017 to 2019, after Joe was out of the White House. Another weird coincidence.
But the president’s son also had a 10 percent stake in a Chi-com investment fund named BHR Partners from 2013 to 2021. Joe flew him to China to set it up, met one of the partners, and then wrote a letter of recommendation for the man’s kid. All completely innocent, no doubt.
Let’s not forget, either, that without the IRS whistleblowers coming forward, Hunter would probably have escaped any charges. And let’s also not forget that without U.S. District Court Judge Maryellen Noreika putting the kibosh on it, Weiss would have allowed Hunter’s lawyers to write an extraordinary plea agreement that not only would have ensured the president’s name wouldn’t be dragged into the investigation, but it would have let Hunter plead out to two of the least consequential charges — with virtually no punishment — in exchange for blanket immunity for a slew of serious potential offenses, including tax, gun, and drug crimes.
At every turn, Weiss is protecting Joe.
~Snip~
Weiss knows, despite the media’s insistence, that Joe doesn’t need to directly benefit from his family’s foreign ventures to corrupt himself — though there is plenty of circumstantial evidence that he did. If one of the most powerful men in the United States government participates in a scheme — or allows people to believe he is offering access — that makes millions for his entire family, it may or may not be illegal, but it is corrupt.
And any investigation that leads to those questions is a disaster for the president.

Commentary:
Fortunately Two IRS whistleblowers came forward to despite the Weiss cover-up case forcing Weiss to indict Hunter.
When Judge Cannon blew the plea deal Weiss and Garland had to doe for the indictment. Now there is the question involving FARA violations that Congress is attempting to enforce.
Joe Biden ha not been indicted.

However this case is nothing more than an attempt to smear him even though he's not involved.

The linked attack piece from a RWNJ propaganda outfit is an attempt to further the attack by proxy on Joe Biden.
 
~~~~~~
Not according to the Federalist article

"None of that is to mention the numerous witnesses that have come forward to contend that the “Big Guy” played a part in that outfit. Or the checks that ended up being written to Joe. Any genuine investigation into the 20-plus shell companies set up by James Biden, Joe’s brother, and Hunter would compel lots of people to answer questions on the record or under oath."

Notably, I don't believe David Weiss will be calling Archer Devon, or Tony Bobulinsky to testify for the prosecution.
I doubt he would call Rudy either.
 
So Hunter didn't pay his taxes for a few years. What actual proof do you have that proves Biden did anyhing wrong? Inuendo or your gut feeling just won't get it.
Not paying your taxes is a crime, dumbass.
 
But unlike their dear leader.
Biden did pay all back taxes and penalties.
Trump?
The great "businessman" that the country so desperately needs?

The IRS did not audit Trump during his presidency's first 2 ...



View attachment 871755
NPR
https://www.npr.org › 2022/12/20 › a-house-panel-voted...
Dec 20, 2022 — In 2016 and 2017, he paid just $750 in net tax on his income. In 2020, he paid $0 in net tax on his income. He reported millions in losses ...
Trump isn't charged with not paying taxes, you fucking dumbass.
 

Forum List

Back
Top