Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Please excuse the people who have not built an all-consuming fetish around what is essentially a tool to make holes in things. Iike my guns but I do not feel the need to be dick about it.
Actually, it’s a thread premise that fails as a hasty generalization fallacy.An amusing man on the street piece with Steven Crowder.
Hilarious Live Video Shows "Common Sense Gun Control" People Know Nothing About Guns
Please excuse the people who have not built an all-consuming fetish around what is essentially a tool to make holes in things. Iike my guns but I do not feel the need to be dick about it.
Weapons are more than just a tool to put holes in things.
They are tools that can wipe out corruption, defend the people from tyranny, and protect a free society.
Guns don't do those things, people do those things.
Usually when people attempt to do those things with guns they eventually become the tyranny they are fighting.
Guns, they boom and they are deadly. Is there something else I am missing? I think we can do without guns. Or things that go boom and do harm and are misused frequently. It isn't that hard.
Not here to argue gun rights. I do not support gun control laws but I'll be damned if I'm on the same side of the debate with the gun fetishists. Sometimes armed revolts have turned out OK but most of the time it degenerates into fascism.Guns don't do those things, people do those things.
What kind of effective army does not have guns?
Usually when people attempt to do those things with guns they eventually become the tyranny they are fighting.
Not necessarily. Especially when their purpose is singular, clear, and concise.
That is also an argument for why everyone needs to be afforded equal firearm liberty. All the good weapons are currently in the hands of the police state.
Not here to argue gun rights. I do not support gun control laws but I'll be damned if I'm on the same side of the debate with the gun fetishists. Sometimes armed revolts have turned out OK but most of the time it degenerates into fascism.
Um, I have found in real life it's the bad guys abusing guns that are the problem. Keeping them from getting guns is what this issue is about. I can do just fine without guns or people trying to make it mandatory to have one just to survive. That's a self feeding cycle. I refuse to feed into that mind set.Guns, they boom and they are deadly. Is there something else I am missing? I think we can do without guns. Or things that go boom and do harm and are misused frequently. It isn't that hard.
Without them, the common man is defenseless against tyrants, thugs, and abuse.
The state takes them away to marginalize dissent, and create dependency.
That is what you are missing.
Um, I have found in real life it's the bad guys abusing guns that are the problem.
Keeping them from getting guns is what this issue is about.
I can do just fine without guns or people trying to make it mandatory to have one just to survive. That's a self feeding cycle. I refuse to feed into that mind set.
There is a fact of human nature that you must come to terms with, any group that uses violence to overthrow the establishment will use violence to retain power.Not here to argue gun rights. I do not support gun control laws but I'll be damned if I'm on the same side of the debate with the gun fetishists. Sometimes armed revolts have turned out OK but most of the time it degenerates into fascism.
The gun fetishshists are on the right side of the debate.
Even if they are a bunch of backwards small town mountain hicks.
And no one takes issue with that, hence the myth of an ‘anti-gunner.’Please excuse the people who have not built an all-consuming fetish around what is essentially a tool to make holes in things. Iike my guns but I do not feel the need to be dick about it.
Weapons are more than just a tool to put holes in things.
They are tools that can wipe out corruption, defend the people from tyranny, and protect a free society.
The Second Amendment is not ‘unlimited,’ it is subject to reasonable restrictions by government, where such restrictions do not manifest as a ‘violation’ of ‘gun rights’ – no one wants to ‘take’ anyone’s guns, there are no ‘gun grabbers,’ and no one seeks to ‘confiscate’ firearms, the notion is delusional nonsense.
The video shows it to be no hasty generalization. Crowder clearly exposes gun grabbers for the ignoramuses that they are.Actually, it’s a thread premise that fails as a hasty generalization fallacy.An amusing man on the street piece with Steven Crowder.
Hilarious Live Video Shows "Common Sense Gun Control" People Know Nothing About Guns
There is a fact of human nature that you must come to terms with, any group that uses violence to overthrow the establishment will use violence to retain power.
There is no right side of this debate because no one is actually debating it realistically.
Um, I have found in real life it's the bad guys abusing guns that are the problem. Keeping them from getting guns is what this issue is about. I can do just fine without guns or people trying to make it mandatory to have one just to survive. That's a self feeding cycle. I refuse to feed into that mind set.
The Constitution is a meaningless chunk of parchment.And no one takes issue with that, hence the myth of an ‘anti-gunner.’
The idiocy occurs when ‘gun rights’ extremists attempt to propagate the ridiculous lie that the Second Amendment is ‘absolute,’ exhibiting an unwarranted hostility toward necessary, proper, and perfectly Constitutional firearm regulatory measures.
The Second Amendment is not ‘unlimited,’ it is subject to reasonable restrictions by government, where such restrictions do not manifest as a ‘violation’ of ‘gun rights’ – no one wants to ‘take’ anyone’s guns, there are no ‘gun grabbers,’ and no one seeks to ‘confiscate’ firearms, the notion is delusional nonsense.
