1. It's not the findings but what you want to make them say. Just look at the global warming issue. Two distinct sides on the same thing based on research both claim to be true.
This isn't Global Warming we're talking about. So far you have not refuted any of these studies.
2. How many have sued claiming they were fired because they were gay. It's the automatica assumption.
Can't you answer a question or provide examples? We aren't talking about people being fired because they were gay (people have sued about being fired because they were black, Christian, female, disabled - so what?). You said sued becaues people said something about them.
3. It shows you use something that happens once in how many thousands of cases as if it is a regular occurrence.
4. Tebow actually accomplished something before he Tebowed on the field. The media made Michael Sam a hero without ever having stepped foot on an NFL field.
Michael Sam had a good Highschool career, good enough to get multiple scholarships. So he accomplished something. But beyond that - he and Tebow are the same because the media made them heros NOT because of accomplishment. Do you get it?
5. Difference is free exercise of religion is written in the Constitution where the word marriage doesn't. Different even if you are too ******* stupid to realize it.
Equal Protection IS.
By the way, those same ones you say argue equality are the first ones to deny equality to certain types of marriages they oppose. Just suggest polygamy and theyll find all sorts of personal reasons for situations that don't affect them to say it shouldn't happen. To them I respond, if you don't want to marry more than one person don't.
You sure about that?
I don't care one way or the other about polygamy. If consenting adults choose that - so be it. It's their right.