Gold Supporting Member
- Dec 5, 2008
- Reaction score
- Ft Worth,TX
So its been presented in no actual courts then. And she won't turn over to any law enforcement agency. Or any court. Or even Tucker Carlson.She hasn't said but it will be announced soon.Which court. Surely not this one:Evidence will be presented in court, not on USMB, not on fake news.What evidence?Have patience. Sydney will present her evidence this week.So I've heard the story you're mechanically apeing.Yes. Food for the hungry ballot counting machines.What 'truck loads of ballots'? You mean the truck bringing *food*?Dominion went bonk, because the algorithm couldnt keep up with the vote switching and so the progs had to shut the machines down, and bring in trucks full of ballots to cover the rest.
But what's its basis?
Your ilk have said a lot of silly shit.
Also....why wasn't it presented in court? Trump's lawsuits were dismissed for lack of evidence.
So which court are you referring to?Judge Matthew Brann said:One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens.
That has not happened. Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence.
And she won't tell you where the 'evidence' is, when it will be presented, or to whom.