The GOP’s absurd anti-Pope crusade

[tinydancer]

I left the Church of Rome for many reasons. But I love her still to this day. But this Pope disturbs me.

Why? Because he believes in man made influence on the climate and fighting income inequality?

Because I know his inner circle.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Funny how the left suddenly has a more favorable view of the Pope when he is taking more liberal than conservative views on things. For the record I neither love nor hate the Pope he's entitled to his views and to express them the fact he is the Pope does not make his views or opinions more relevant to me than anyone else's.

Funny how the right suddenly has a more unfavorable view of the Pope when he is taking more liberal than conservative views on things. For the record I neither love nor hate the Pope he's entitled to his views and to express them the fact he is the Pope does not make his views or opinions more relevant to me than anyone else's.

 

[tinydancer]

Shall we discuss the Pope's inner circle?

 

[nat4900]

First of all, Jesus Christ probably did not exist in the way you think he did.

Secondly, If he did exist I can say with no qualm that I am opposed to his leftist tripe. People should be judged on what they do instead of being assigned intrinsic value. Intrinsic value is, in essence, a form of social subside in that it entitles someone, King or skag rapist, to certain natural rights that they did nothing to earn.

Third, I am an atheist. Therefore, your intended "profound" comeback failed miserably.

Given ALL the above, wouldn't you conclude that your "contributions" to this thread are worthless?

 

[tinydancer]

I left the Church of Rome for many reasons. But I love her still to this day. But this Pope disturbs me.

Why? Because he believes in man made influence on the climate and fighting income inequality?

No he is a Pope of Man and not of Christ.Pretty big deal when you're talking Rome.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Shall we discuss the Pope's inner circle?

Might as well. Can't talk about the Pope and the Vatican without eventually finding yourself in the middle of wild conspiracy rants after all.

 

[Buzz Jenkins]

Hey..................I liked Pope John Paul II (saw him in the Vatican once), and I thought he was a decent man.

I have absolutely no use for Benedict Ratzinger (I call him Bent Dick the Rat Singer), he was more for the rich and his own status than anything else.

Pope Francis? I like him very much, he seems a lot more open to getting people forgiven than he is for condemning them.

I

I too admired John Paul II. However, I also admired Benedict because he stood for DISCIPLINE. I am not a religious person. However, if you are going to have this church then you are going to have to maintain its dogma and history. Benedict was a very intelligent and learned man who adhered to the historical dogma. The very idea that he "was for the rich" is an indictment of your intelligence and decency.

The Jesuit, however, is a scum bag. Why am I not surprised that someone with such contempt for doctrinal discipline and scholarship embraces the Jesuit creep?

 

[blackhawk]

Funny how the left suddenly has a more favorable view of the Pope when he is taking more liberal than conservative views on things.

WOW, what a revelation....sort of like conservatives liking the presidency more under Reagan than under Obama?

We are again underwhelmed by your brilliance.

 

[Buzz Jenkins]

I left the Church of Rome for many reasons. But I love her still to this day. But this Pope disturbs me.

Why? Because he believes in man made influence on the climate and fighting income inequality?

Because I know his inner circle.

You know them personally?

 

[Buzz Jenkins]

First of all, Jesus Christ probably did not exist in the way you think he did.

Secondly, If he did exist I can say with no qualm that I am opposed to his leftist tripe. People should be judged on what they do instead of being assigned intrinsic value. Intrinsic value is, in essence, a form of social subside in that it entitles someone, King or skag rapist, to certain natural rights that they did nothing to earn.

Third, I am an atheist. Therefore, your intended "profound" comeback failed miserably.

Given ALL the above, wouldn't you conclude that your "contributions" to this thread are worthless?

Go eat fuck, you pig.

 

[blackhawk]

Funny how the left suddenly has a more favorable view of the Pope when he is taking more liberal than conservative views on things. For the record I neither love nor hate the Pope he's entitled to his views and to express them the fact he is the Pope does not make his views or opinions more relevant to me than anyone else's.

Funny how the right suddenly has a more unfavorable view of the Pope when he is taking more liberal than conservative views on things. For the record I neither love nor hate the Pope he's entitled to his views and to express them the fact he is the Pope does not make his views or opinions more relevant to me than anyone else's.

My view of the Pope has never changed no matter what views he was taking I wonder how many of you on the left can honestly say the same I'm guessing not many.

 

[Vandalshandle]

First of all, Jesus Christ probably did not exist in the way you think he did.

Secondly, If he did exist I can say with no qualm that I am opposed to his leftist tripe. People should be judged on what they do instead of being assigned intrinsic value. Intrinsic value is, in essence, a form of social subside in that it entitles someone, King or skag rapist, to certain natural rights that they did nothing to earn.

Third, I am an atheist. Therefore, your intended "profound" comeback failed miserably.

Given ALL the above, wouldn't you conclude that your "contributions" to this thread are worthless?

Go eat fuck, you pig.

Eloquent!

 

[TheOldSchool]

Funny how the left suddenly has a more favorable view of the Pope when he is taking more liberal than conservative views on things. For the record I neither love nor hate the Pope he's entitled to his views and to express them the fact he is the Pope does not make his views or opinions more relevant to me than anyone else's.

Funny how the right suddenly has a more unfavorable view of the Pope when he is taking more liberal than conservative views on things. For the record I neither love nor hate the Pope he's entitled to his views and to express them the fact he is the Pope does not make his views or opinions more relevant to me than anyone else's.

My view of the Pope has never changed no matter what views he was taking I wonder how many of you on the left can honestly say the same I'm guessing not many.

But you won't ask the right that question. Go figure.

 

[tinydancer]

This is just a man. My heart breaks here. This is a man who hasn't even read the Word.

It hurts. This Pope is a joke.

 

[westwall]

The GOP hates pope francis because he addresses actual issues they want to ignore.
The GOP’s absurd anti-Pope crusade: The bizarre spectacle of Republicans turning on a religious leader

Faced with the distinct possibility that the man who is currently the world’s most beloved and respected moral authority will publicly shred their governing ideology and rebuke their position on issues from immigration to climate change, conservatives are responding by having a complete meltdown over Pope Francis’ impending visit.



In the equivalent of putting your fingers in your ears and singing “La! La! La!”

Republican Catholic Congressman Paul Gosar announced that he will boycott Pope Francis’ Thursday speech to Congress because the pope may talk about climate change. As he writes in Time, he was super psyched to hear Francis talk about the persecution of Christian minorities in the Middle East, the “enslavement, belittlement, rape and desecration of Christian women and children,” and the “condoned, subsidized, intentionally planned genocide of unborn children by Planned Parenthood.”

But, to his eternal disappointment, Francis reportedly “instead intends to focus the brunt of his speech on climate change—a climate that has been changing since first created in Genesis.” Even worse, according to Gosar, is the fact that “this climate change talk has adopted all of the socialist talking points, wrapped false science and ideology into ‘climate justice’ and is being presented to guilt people into leftist policies.”

What most disappoints Gosar is that Francis isn’t sticking to “standard Christian theology”—you know, that part of the bible where it says “thou shall not fund Planned Parenthood,” not the part that says “for the land is mine; with me you are but aliens and tenants. Throughout the land that you hold, you shall provide for the redemption of the land” (Leviticus 25:23-24). Or the part that says, “For the fate of humans and the fate of animals is the same; as one dies, so dies the other. They all have the same breath, and humans have no advantage over the animals; for all is vanity” (Ecclesiastes 3:18-22).

The new Pope is a Peronista. I suggest you look that up.

 

[TheOldSchool]

This is just a man. My heart breaks here. This is a man who hasn't even read the Word.

It hurts. This Pope is a joke.

Hundreds of millions of people across the planet disagree with you.

 

[David_42]

The GOP hates pope francis because he addresses actual issues they want to ignore.
The GOP’s absurd anti-Pope crusade: The bizarre spectacle of Republicans turning on a religious leader

Faced with the distinct possibility that the man who is currently the world’s most beloved and respected moral authority will publicly shred their governing ideology and rebuke their position on issues from immigration to climate change, conservatives are responding by having a complete meltdown over Pope Francis’ impending visit.



In the equivalent of putting your fingers in your ears and singing “La! La! La!”

Republican Catholic Congressman Paul Gosar announced that he will boycott Pope Francis’ Thursday speech to Congress because the pope may talk about climate change. As he writes in Time, he was super psyched to hear Francis talk about the persecution of Christian minorities in the Middle East, the “enslavement, belittlement, rape and desecration of Christian women and children,” and the “condoned, subsidized, intentionally planned genocide of unborn children by Planned Parenthood.”

But, to his eternal disappointment, Francis reportedly “instead intends to focus the brunt of his speech on climate change—a climate that has been changing since first created in Genesis.” Even worse, according to Gosar, is the fact that “this climate change talk has adopted all of the socialist talking points, wrapped false science and ideology into ‘climate justice’ and is being presented to guilt people into leftist policies.”

What most disappoints Gosar is that Francis isn’t sticking to “standard Christian theology”—you know, that part of the bible where it says “thou shall not fund Planned Parenthood,” not the part that says “for the land is mine; with me you are but aliens and tenants. Throughout the land that you hold, you shall provide for the redemption of the land” (Leviticus 25:23-24). Or the part that says, “For the fate of humans and the fate of animals is the same; as one dies, so dies the other. They all have the same breath, and humans have no advantage over the animals; for all is vanity” (Ecclesiastes 3:18-22).

The new Pope is a Peronista. I suggest you look that up.

I know what peronism is.

 

[blackhawk]

Funny how the left suddenly has a more favorable view of the Pope when he is taking more liberal than conservative views on things. For the record I neither love nor hate the Pope he's entitled to his views and to express them the fact he is the Pope does not make his views or opinions more relevant to me than anyone else's.

Funny how the right suddenly has a more unfavorable view of the Pope when he is taking more liberal than conservative views on things. For the record I neither love nor hate the Pope he's entitled to his views and to express them the fact he is the Pope does not make his views or opinions more relevant to me than anyone else's.

My view of the Pope has never changed no matter what views he was taking I wonder how many of you on the left can honestly say the same I'm guessing not many.

But you won't ask the right that question. Go figure.

You can ask them if you want too feel free to start a thread I suspect you will get the same amount of honesty you would from the left.

 

[tinydancer]

Funny how the left suddenly has a more favorable view of the Pope when he is taking more liberal than conservative views on things. For the record I neither love nor hate the Pope he's entitled to his views and to express them the fact he is the Pope does not make his views or opinions more relevant to me than anyone else's.

Funny how the right suddenly has a more unfavorable view of the Pope when he is taking more liberal than conservative views on things. For the record I neither love nor hate the Pope he's entitled to his views and to express them the fact he is the Pope does not make his views or opinions more relevant to me than anyone else's.

When he walks out there as the infallible one we are to take note.

What part of the POPE IS INFALLIBLE DON'T YOU GET ASSHOLE?

 

[Fishlore]

I have thought it was a mistake from the beginning to appoint a fucking Jesuit as Pope. He's clearly a leftist creep. He's not a Marxist, but I can see how people may get that impression. He is, however, a left-leaning **** who apparently thinks that the poor and wretched have some kind of intrinsic value and that the wealthy have some kind of duty to transfer some of their wealth to them.

Fuck the Jesuit creep!

Mr Jenkins may find interesting the following statement by Pope John Paul II:

“The needs from which socialism had historically arisen were real and serious. The situation of exploitation to which inhumane capitalism had subjected the proletariat since the beginning of industrialized society was indeed an evil. This was Marxism’s basic kernel of truth, which enabled it to present itself as an attractive reality to Western society.”