The GOP bombs Iran. What are the unintended consequences?

[JakeStarkey]

The unintended consequences of bombing Iran?

There won't be any.

To say that it would make ISIS the #1 power in the ME is retarded.

Bombing Iran might very well take a lot of support away from ISIS as Iran is obviously one of its backers.

Even if not it certainly won't make ISIS stronger since Iran is in no way holding ISIS back.

How anyone can be stupid enough to believe the OP's nonsense is beyond me.

Iran is holding up Iraq, Hamas, and the PLO. Make Iran go away, and ISIS will run wild. Turkey and Saudi Arabia would split the ME between them as they fight ISIS in that case.

 

[PredFan]

The unintended consequences of bombing Iran?

There won't be any.

To say that it would make ISIS the #1 power in the ME is retarded.

Bombing Iran might very well take a lot of support away from ISIS as Iran is obviously one of its backers.

Even if not it certainly won't make ISIS stronger since Iran is in no way holding ISIS back.

How anyone can be stupid enough to believe the OP's nonsense is beyond me.

Iran is holding up Iraq, Hamas, and the PLO. Make Iran go away, and ISIS will run wild. Turkey and Saudi Arabia would split the ME between them as they fight ISIS in that case.

That won't make ISIS stronger. It will move to the #1 spot simply because the current number one was knocked down. Their #1 status would be meaningless. If they spread themselves that thin, it would make them vulnerable to losing ground they've already won.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The unintended consequences of bombing Iran?

There won't be any.

To say that it would make ISIS the #1 power in the ME is retarded.

Bombing Iran might very well take a lot of support away from ISIS as Iran is obviously one of its backers.

Even if not it certainly won't make ISIS stronger since Iran is in no way holding ISIS back.

How anyone can be stupid enough to believe the OP's nonsense is beyond me.

Iran is holding up Iraq, Hamas, and the PLO. Make Iran go away, and ISIS will run wild. Turkey and Saudi Arabia would split the ME between them as they fight ISIS in that case.

That won't make ISIS stronger. It will move to the #1 spot simply because the current number one was knocked down. Their #1 status would be meaningless. If they spread themselves that thin, it would make them vulnerable to losing ground they've already won.

You really do not understand geo-politics.

 

[PredFan]

The unintended consequences of bombing Iran?

There won't be any.

To say that it would make ISIS the #1 power in the ME is retarded.

Bombing Iran might very well take a lot of support away from ISIS as Iran is obviously one of its backers.

Even if not it certainly won't make ISIS stronger since Iran is in no way holding ISIS back.

How anyone can be stupid enough to believe the OP's nonsense is beyond me.

Iran is holding up Iraq, Hamas, and the PLO. Make Iran go away, and ISIS will run wild. Turkey and Saudi Arabia would split the ME between them as they fight ISIS in that case.

That won't make ISIS stronger. It will move to the #1 spot simply because the current number one was knocked down. Their #1 status would be meaningless. If they spread themselves that thin, it would make them vulnerable to losing ground they've already won.

You really do not understand geo-politics.

Geopolitics is irrelevant, the fact remains that making ISIS #1 by knocking Iran down is meaningless. It would be like making the Seattle Seahawks last year's Super Bowl winners by taking New England's title away for cheating. It won't make the Seahawks a better team.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The unintended consequences of bombing Iran?

There won't be any.

To say that it would make ISIS the #1 power in the ME is retarded.

Bombing Iran might very well take a lot of support away from ISIS as Iran is obviously one of its backers.

Even if not it certainly won't make ISIS stronger since Iran is in no way holding ISIS back.

How anyone can be stupid enough to believe the OP's nonsense is beyond me.

Iran is holding up Iraq, Hamas, and the PLO. Make Iran go away, and ISIS will run wild. Turkey and Saudi Arabia would split the ME between them as they fight ISIS in that case.

That won't make ISIS stronger. It will move to the #1 spot simply because the current number one was knocked down. Their #1 status would be meaningless. If they spread themselves that thin, it would make them vulnerable to losing ground they've already won.

You really do not understand geo-politics.

Geopolitics is irrelevant.

The unintended consequences of bombing Iran?

There won't be any.

To say that it would make ISIS the #1 power in the ME is retarded.

Bombing Iran might very well take a lot of support away from ISIS as Iran is obviously one of its backers.

Even if not it certainly won't make ISIS stronger since Iran is in no way holding ISIS back.

How anyone can be stupid enough to believe the OP's nonsense is beyond me.

Iran is holding up Iraq, Hamas, and the PLO. Make Iran go away, and ISIS will run wild. Turkey and Saudi Arabia would split the ME between them as they fight ISIS in that case.

That won't make ISIS stronger. It will move to the #1 spot simply because the current number one was knocked down. Their #1 status would be meaningless. If they spread themselves that thin, it would make them vulnerable to losing ground they've already won.

You really do not understand geo-politics.

Geopolitics is irrelevant.

Goalllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll! PredFan is 0 - 18 this season.

 

[PredFan]

The unintended consequences of bombing Iran?

There won't be any.

To say that it would make ISIS the #1 power in the ME is retarded.

Bombing Iran might very well take a lot of support away from ISIS as Iran is obviously one of its backers.

Even if not it certainly won't make ISIS stronger since Iran is in no way holding ISIS back.

How anyone can be stupid enough to believe the OP's nonsense is beyond me.

Iran is holding up Iraq, Hamas, and the PLO. Make Iran go away, and ISIS will run wild. Turkey and Saudi Arabia would split the ME between them as they fight ISIS in that case.

That won't make ISIS stronger. It will move to the #1 spot simply because the current number one was knocked down. Their #1 status would be meaningless. If they spread themselves that thin, it would make them vulnerable to losing ground they've already won.

You really do not understand geo-politics.

Geopolitics is irrelevant.

The unintended consequences of bombing Iran?

There won't be any.

To say that it would make ISIS the #1 power in the ME is retarded.

Bombing Iran might very well take a lot of support away from ISIS as Iran is obviously one of its backers.

Even if not it certainly won't make ISIS stronger since Iran is in no way holding ISIS back.

How anyone can be stupid enough to believe the OP's nonsense is beyond me.

Iran is holding up Iraq, Hamas, and the PLO. Make Iran go away, and ISIS will run wild. Turkey and Saudi Arabia would split the ME between them as they fight ISIS in that case.

That won't make ISIS stronger. It will move to the #1 spot simply because the current number one was knocked down. Their #1 status would be meaningless. If they spread themselves that thin, it would make them vulnerable to losing ground they've already won.

You really do not understand geo-politics.

Geopolitics is irrelevant.

Goalllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll! PredFan is 0 - 18 this season.

Meh, you are a moron, your opinion is also irrelevant.

 

[Contumacious]

Care to share with us what element of the ISIS recruitment drive you found most attractive?

First, tell us which side you favor, ISIS or Iran?

I prefer the US side. But since the GOP got rid of the Sunni's in Iraq and made Iran so powerful, I'm sensing they were on the side of the Shiites. Or are they just ignorantly running around bombing anything that moves?

they just ignorantly running around bombing anything that moves.......the smell of spilt blood sexually excites them.


.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Care to share with us what element of the ISIS recruitment drive you found most attractive?

First, tell us which side you favor, ISIS or Iran?

I prefer the US side. But since the GOP got rid of the Sunni's in Iraq and made Iran so powerful, I'm sensing they were on the side of the Shiites. Or are they just ignorantly running around bombing anything that moves?

It's a fair question. After all, during the Reagan administration they sold weapons to Iran AND backed Saddam against Iran. You never know what those wascally Wepublicans are going to do!!!

Because they are wascals.

What is this childish nonsense?

And you dumbfucks can't figure out why so many of your threads end up in the rubber room.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Iran is holding up Iraq, Hamas, and the PLO. Make Iran go away, and ISIS will run wild. Turkey and Saudi Arabia would split the ME between them as they fight ISIS in that case.

That won't make ISIS stronger. It will move to the #1 spot simply because the current number one was knocked down. Their #1 status would be meaningless. If they spread themselves that thin, it would make them vulnerable to losing ground they've already won.

You really do not understand geo-politics.

Geopolitics is irrelevant.

Iran is holding up Iraq, Hamas, and the PLO. Make Iran go away, and ISIS will run wild. Turkey and Saudi Arabia would split the ME between them as they fight ISIS in that case.

That won't make ISIS stronger. It will move to the #1 spot simply because the current number one was knocked down. Their #1 status would be meaningless. If they spread themselves that thin, it would make them vulnerable to losing ground they've already won.

You really do not understand geo-politics.

Geopolitics is irrelevant.

Goalllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll! PredFan is 0 - 18 this season.

Meh, you are a moron, your opinion is also irrelevant.

PredFan, kidding aside, the ISIS are real players, and if Iran goes away, we will have a wide spread regional war of intense and increasingly violence.

 

[PredFan]

That won't make ISIS stronger. It will move to the #1 spot simply because the current number one was knocked down. Their #1 status would be meaningless. If they spread themselves that thin, it would make them vulnerable to losing ground they've already won.

You really do not understand geo-politics.

Geopolitics is irrelevant.

That won't make ISIS stronger. It will move to the #1 spot simply because the current number one was knocked down. Their #1 status would be meaningless. If they spread themselves that thin, it would make them vulnerable to losing ground they've already won.

You really do not understand geo-politics.

Geopolitics is irrelevant.

Goalllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll! PredFan is 0 - 18 this season.

Meh, you are a moron, your opinion is also irrelevant.

PredFan, kidding aside, the ISIS are real players, and if Iran goes away, we will have a wide spread regional war of intense and increasingly violence.

Again you are assuming that Iran is somehow holding ISIS back, there simply is no evidence at all of that.

 

[theHawk]

Remember when historians and Middle Eastern experts told Bush that if he attacks Iraq, that will leave Iran as the strongest country in the Middle East?

And there you have it. Add Iraq's meager strength to Iran and you have a very powerful Middle Eastern country.

And once Republicans scuttle the Iran deal, our so called allies will end the sanctions, and the US and Israel will become isolated with Iran throwing their oil into the world market and watch the money pour in. And Republicans will look like fools to everyone but their ignorant base who they will convince this is Obama's fault for not having a good deal to begin with.

So they manage to gain the presidency and they bomb Iran.

Then what?

When Republicans bombed Iraq, they drove the Sunni from power and made Shiites THE power in Iraq which of course led to Isis and a strong Iran.

If they bomb Iran back to the stone age, they will leave Isis as the strongest military force in the Middle East.

Talk about unintended consequence. How could they possibly leave Isis as THE major power in the Middle East?

Why is it for us to decide who is in power in the Middle East? Let the pedophile worshippers decide for themselves. They can all kill each other for all we care. So long as they don't get nukes. The consequences, intended or otherwise, are that Islamic maniacs don't get nukes.

 

[whitehall]

Remember when Bill Clinton avoided congress and went to his liberal socialist pal in NATO for permission to bomb a defenseless country in Europe when he was literally caught with his pants down? The liberal media has set the rules so that unintended consequences only matter in republican administrations

 

[Davros]

Remember when Bill Clinton avoided congress and went to his liberal socialist pal in NATO for permission to bomb a defenseless country in Europe when he was literally caught with his pants down? The liberal media has set the rules so that unintended consequences only matter in republican administrations

What were the unintended consequences of anti Serbian bombing campaigns?

 

[Davros]

The major unintended consequence of bombing Iran would be to empower the extremists in Iranian politics. Also, if Iran were to be weakened regionally, ISIS would be strengthened.

 

[rdean]

The unintended consequences of bombing Iran?

There won't be any.

To say that it would make ISIS the #1 power in the ME is retarded.

Bombing Iran might very well take a lot of support away from ISIS as Iran is obviously one of its backers.

Even if not it certainly won't make ISIS stronger since Iran is in no way holding ISIS back.

How anyone can be stupid enough to believe the OP's nonsense is beyond me.

Oh Gawd. You just went full on stupid brainfucked tard.

Isis are Sunnis, Iran is Shiite. This is why the normals can't talk to your kind.

 

[rdean]

Remember when Bill Clinton avoided congress and went to his liberal socialist pal in NATO for permission to bomb a defenseless country in Europe when he was literally caught with his pants down? The liberal media has set the rules so that unintended consequences only matter in republican administrations

No, I don't remember that. What are you talking about?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Remember when historians and Middle Eastern experts told Bush that if he attacks Iraq, that will leave Iran as the strongest country in the Middle East?

And there you have it. Add Iraq's meager strength to Iran and you have a very powerful Middle Eastern country.

And once Republicans scuttle the Iran deal, our so called allies will end the sanctions, and the US and Israel will become isolated with Iran throwing their oil into the world market and watch the money pour in. And Republicans will look like fools to everyone but their ignorant base who they will convince this is Obama's fault for not having a good deal to begin with.

So they manage to gain the presidency and they bomb Iran.

Then what?

When Republicans bombed Iraq, they drove the Sunni from power and made Shiites THE power in Iraq which of course led to Isis and a strong Iran.

If they bomb Iran back to the stone age, they will leave Isis as the strongest military force in the Middle East.

Talk about unintended consequence. How could they possibly leave Isis as THE major power in the Middle East?

You underestimate the war-mongering right – they won't stop with Iran, they'll invade Iraq again, then Syria to 'destroy' the self-proclaimed 'Islamic state'; they'll have Americans fighting and dying in the ME for decades.

This is one of many, many good reasons why a republican should be kept out of the WH for the foreseeable future, this is why a republican president can't be trusted.

 

[PredFan]

The unintended consequences of bombing Iran?

There won't be any.

To say that it would make ISIS the #1 power in the ME is retarded.

Bombing Iran might very well take a lot of support away from ISIS as Iran is obviously one of its backers.

Even if not it certainly won't make ISIS stronger since Iran is in no way holding ISIS back.

How anyone can be stupid enough to believe the OP's nonsense is beyond me.

Oh Gawd. You just went full on stupid brainfucked tard.

Isis are Sunnis, Iran is Shiite. This is why the normals can't talk to your kind.

That's irrelevant, idiot. It's as stupid as your OP is. How you can be this stupid and still use a computer is a mystery.

 

[rdean]

The unintended consequences of bombing Iran?

There won't be any.

To say that it would make ISIS the #1 power in the ME is retarded.

Bombing Iran might very well take a lot of support away from ISIS as Iran is obviously one of its backers.

Even if not it certainly won't make ISIS stronger since Iran is in no way holding ISIS back.

How anyone can be stupid enough to believe the OP's nonsense is beyond me.

Oh Gawd. You just went full on stupid brainfucked tard.

Isis are Sunnis, Iran is Shiite. This is why the normals can't talk to your kind.

That's irrelevant, idiot. It's as stupid as your OP is. How you can be this stupid and still use a computer is a mystery.

Irrelevant? That's the very heart of the matter turd. Obviously, the truly stupid thinks it's every one else who is stupid.

 

[CowboyTed]

The unintended consequences of bombing Iran?

There won't be any.

To say that it would make ISIS the #1 power in the ME is retarded.

Bombing Iran might very well take a lot of support away from ISIS as Iran is obviously one of its backers.

Even if not it certainly won't make ISIS stronger since Iran is in no way holding ISIS back.

How anyone can be stupid enough to believe the OP's nonsense is beyond me.

Well if that is what you know about the ME you should remove yourself from further discussions.

Twit, Iran are fighting ISIS... IRAN is Shia and ISIS is Sunni...
Way to go there.... I know why bedowin could be grossly misinformed....