The friends of Jordan Peterson

[Tommy Tainant]

Cathy Newman says her 14-year-old daughter received vitriolic online abuse after Jordan Peterson gender pay gap interview

They seem like a pretty sick crew of incels. Is this guy a total twat ? He did a panel show over here in 2018 and came across as sort of normal but with nothing much to say.

Channel 4 presenter Cathy Newman has said her 14-year-old daughter witnessed a torrent of vitriolic online abuse directed at the veteran journalist.

The news presenter recounted the harassment she was subjected to after interviewing controversial Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson – revealing her child even saw a fake pornographic image of her.

Channel 4 was forced to call in security specialists to analyse threats targeted at Ms Newman after her interview about the gender pay gap with Prof Peterson – a controversial figure who has attracted a far-right following.


The 44-year-old, who has worked for Channel 4 for over a decade, has looked back at the vile online abuse and harassment she experienced in a piece for The Pool.

She wrote: “One of the 200 or so on-screen interviews I did this year [2018] was with the controversial Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson. I challenged him about the gender pay gap, which he believes is a fiction, and what he calls the ‘murderous equity doctrine’ embraced by many modern women.

 

[Meathead]

Cathy Newman says her 14-year-old daughter received vitriolic online abuse after Jordan Peterson gender pay gap interview

They seem like a pretty sick crew of incels. Is this guy a total twat ? He did a panel show over here in 2018 and came across as sort of normal but with nothing much to say.

Channel 4 presenter Cathy Newman has said her 14-year-old daughter witnessed a torrent of vitriolic online abuse directed at the veteran journalist.

The news presenter recounted the harassment she was subjected to after interviewing controversial Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson – revealing her child even saw a fake pornographic image of her.

Channel 4 was forced to call in security specialists to analyse threats targeted at Ms Newman after her interview about the gender pay gap with Prof Peterson – a controversial figure who has attracted a far-right following.


The 44-year-old, who has worked for Channel 4 for over a decade, has looked back at the vile online abuse and harassment she experienced in a piece for The Pool.

She wrote: “One of the 200 or so on-screen interviews I did this year [2018] was with the controversial Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson. I challenged him about the gender pay gap, which he believes is a fiction, and what he calls the ‘murderous equity doctrine’ embraced by many modern women.

Poor child didn't get to choose her mother, but that's life.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Cathy Newman says her 14-year-old daughter received vitriolic online abuse after Jordan Peterson gender pay gap interview

They seem like a pretty sick crew of incels. Is this guy a total twat ? He did a panel show over here in 2018 and came across as sort of normal but with nothing much to say.

Channel 4 presenter Cathy Newman has said her 14-year-old daughter witnessed a torrent of vitriolic online abuse directed at the veteran journalist.

The news presenter recounted the harassment she was subjected to after interviewing controversial Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson – revealing her child even saw a fake pornographic image of her.

Channel 4 was forced to call in security specialists to analyse threats targeted at Ms Newman after her interview about the gender pay gap with Prof Peterson – a controversial figure who has attracted a far-right following.


The 44-year-old, who has worked for Channel 4 for over a decade, has looked back at the vile online abuse and harassment she experienced in a piece for The Pool.

She wrote: “One of the 200 or so on-screen interviews I did this year [2018] was with the controversial Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson. I challenged him about the gender pay gap, which he believes is a fiction, and what he calls the ‘murderous equity doctrine’ embraced by many modern women.

They seem like a pretty sick crew of incels.

They remind you of.....you?

 

[there4eyeM]

The hysteria about Dr. Jordan Peterson is entirely incomprehensible. The man is a reasoned thinker who brings nothing but intelligent observation to the table. That he is vilified is testimony to the inability to listen and hear, see and understand.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

The hysteria about Dr. Jordan Peterson is entirely incomprehensible. The man is a reasoned thinker who brings nothing but intelligent observation to the table. That he is vilified is testimony to the inability to listen and hear, see and understand.

He isnt being vilified..Its his supporters who are the agressors.

 

[Street Juice]

Cathy Newman says her 14-year-old daughter received vitriolic online abuse after Jordan Peterson gender pay gap interview

They seem like a pretty sick crew of incels. Is this guy a total twat ? He did a panel show over here in 2018 and came across as sort of normal but with nothing much to say.

Channel 4 presenter Cathy Newman has said her 14-year-old daughter witnessed a torrent of vitriolic online abuse directed at the veteran journalist.

The news presenter recounted the harassment she was subjected to after interviewing controversial Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson – revealing her child even saw a fake pornographic image of her.

Channel 4 was forced to call in security specialists to analyse threats targeted at Ms Newman after her interview about the gender pay gap with Prof Peterson – a controversial figure who has attracted a far-right following.


The 44-year-old, who has worked for Channel 4 for over a decade, has looked back at the vile online abuse and harassment she experienced in a piece for The Pool.

She wrote: “One of the 200 or so on-screen interviews I did this year [2018] was with the controversial Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson. I challenged him about the gender pay gap, which he believes is a fiction, and what he calls the ‘murderous equity doctrine’ embraced by many modern women.

Boohoo

 

[Tehon]

Cathy Newman says her 14-year-old daughter received vitriolic online abuse after Jordan Peterson gender pay gap interview

They seem like a pretty sick crew of incels. Is this guy a total twat ? He did a panel show over here in 2018 and came across as sort of normal but with nothing much to say.

Channel 4 presenter Cathy Newman has said her 14-year-old daughter witnessed a torrent of vitriolic online abuse directed at the veteran journalist.

The news presenter recounted the harassment she was subjected to after interviewing controversial Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson – revealing her child even saw a fake pornographic image of her.

Channel 4 was forced to call in security specialists to analyse threats targeted at Ms Newman after her interview about the gender pay gap with Prof Peterson – a controversial figure who has attracted a far-right following.


The 44-year-old, who has worked for Channel 4 for over a decade, has looked back at the vile online abuse and harassment she experienced in a piece for The Pool.

She wrote: “One of the 200 or so on-screen interviews I did this year [2018] was with the controversial Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson. I challenged him about the gender pay gap, which he believes is a fiction, and what he calls the ‘murderous equity doctrine’ embraced by many modern women.

Peterson is a twat, but not in totality.

He certainly can't be held responsible for the way in which people act out on the internet.

 

[Olde Europe]

The hysteria about Dr. Jordan Peterson is entirely incomprehensible. The man is a reasoned thinker who brings nothing but intelligent observation to the table. That he is vilified is testimony to the inability to listen and hear, see and understand.

He isnt [SIC] being vilified..Its [SIC] his supporters who are the agressors. [SIC]

"That he is vilified is testimony to the inability to listen and hear, see and understand."

Amazing, isn't it?

BTW, Tommy, and with all due respect, did someone steal your ' button?

 

[Olde Europe]

Peterson is a twat, but not in totality.

He certainly can't be held responsible for the way in which people act out on the internet.

Really, a "tw**"? The best you can come up with in this context is a misogynistic slur?

Moreover, if you're the kind of guy who systematically attracts a devoted misogynistic, alt-right, incel crowd, and incite them to a point where dozens or hundreds of them feel encouraged to release their vitriol, you "certainly can't be held responsible"? It so happens I disagree. Maybe, depending on the law, you are not liable, but in a moral sense you sure are responsible for the reactions you can predict will ensue from your advocacy. Mr. Peterson does know what he's doing:

“I tweeted out, ‘Look, lay the hell off. Enough is enough’,” he told the Radio Times. “Or something a little bit more civilised than that. You don’t need to beat a dead horse. I’m glad I wasn’t the one who was being torn to shreds online.”​

Except, his followers aren't beating a dead horse. They are vilifying a woman, a woman Mr. Peterson then moves further to dehumanize.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

Cathy Newman says her 14-year-old daughter received vitriolic online abuse after Jordan Peterson gender pay gap interview

They seem like a pretty sick crew of incels. Is this guy a total twat ? He did a panel show over here in 2018 and came across as sort of normal but with nothing much to say.

Channel 4 presenter Cathy Newman has said her 14-year-old daughter witnessed a torrent of vitriolic online abuse directed at the veteran journalist.

The news presenter recounted the harassment she was subjected to after interviewing controversial Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson – revealing her child even saw a fake pornographic image of her.

Channel 4 was forced to call in security specialists to analyse threats targeted at Ms Newman after her interview about the gender pay gap with Prof Peterson – a controversial figure who has attracted a far-right following.


The 44-year-old, who has worked for Channel 4 for over a decade, has looked back at the vile online abuse and harassment she experienced in a piece for The Pool.

She wrote: “One of the 200 or so on-screen interviews I did this year [2018] was with the controversial Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson. I challenged him about the gender pay gap, which he believes is a fiction, and what he calls the ‘murderous equity doctrine’ embraced by many modern women.

Butt hurt ramblings 101

 

[Correll]

Peterson is a twat, but not in totality.

He certainly can't be held responsible for the way in which people act out on the internet.

Really, a "tw**"? The best you can come up with in this context is a misogynistic slur?

Moreover, if you're the kind of guy who systematically attracts a devoted misogynistic, alt-right, incel crowd, and incite them to a point where dozens or hundreds of them feel encouraged to release their vitriol, you "certainly can't be held responsible"? It so happens I disagree. Maybe, depending on the law, you are not liable, but in a moral sense you sure are responsible for the reactions you can predict will ensue from your advocacy. Mr. Peterson does know what he's doing:

“I tweeted out, ‘Look, lay the hell off. Enough is enough’,” he told the Radio Times. “Or something a little bit more civilised than that. You don’t need to beat a dead horse. I’m glad I wasn’t the one who was being torn to shreds online.”​

Except, his followers aren't beating a dead horse. They are vilifying a woman, a woman Mr. Peterson then moves further to dehumanize.

1. He does not "attract" a following as you describe. He attracts a huge number of listeners, and a small, very small percentage are as you describe.

2. And what do you mean by "alt-right"? Are you using in the broadest sense, ie some one sort of on the right, not traditional, or in the more slanderous one, ie White Supremacist?

3. He did not incite them in this case. Cathy Newman's behavior was absurd in the interview, and afterwards.

4. I doubt he said anything to "dehumanize" her. YOu want to back that up?

 

[iamwhatiseem]

Peterson is a twat, but not in totality.

He certainly can't be held responsible for the way in which people act out on the internet.

Really, a "tw**"? The best you can come up with in this context is a misogynistic slur?

Moreover, if you're the kind of guy who systematically attracts a devoted misogynistic, alt-right, incel crowd, and incite them to a point where dozens or hundreds of them feel encouraged to release their vitriol, you "certainly can't be held responsible"? It so happens I disagree. Maybe, depending on the law, you are not liable, but in a moral sense you sure are responsible for the reactions you can predict will ensue from your advocacy. Mr. Peterson does know what he's doing:

“I tweeted out, ‘Look, lay the hell off. Enough is enough’,” he told the Radio Times. “Or something a little bit more civilised than that. You don’t need to beat a dead horse. I’m glad I wasn’t the one who was being torn to shreds online.”​

Except, his followers aren't beating a dead horse. They are vilifying a woman, a woman Mr. Peterson then moves further to dehumanize.

1. He does not "attract" a following as you describe. He attracts a huge number of listeners, and a small, very small percentage are as you describe.

2. And what do you mean by "alt-right"? Are you using in the broadest sense, ie some one sort of on the right, not traditional, or in the more slanderous one, ie White Supremacist?

3. He did not incite them in this case. Cathy Newman's behavior was absurd in the interview, and afterwards.

4. I doubt he said anything to "dehumanize" her. YOu want to back that up?

He simply suffers from Butt hurt.
Peterson has been handily kicking leftist ass in Canada for years.
They cannot beat him on substance, so this is just a pathetic attempt to attack him in a different way.
And shows you how weak his "opponents" really are right in this thread.

 

[Correll]

Peterson is a twat, but not in totality.

He certainly can't be held responsible for the way in which people act out on the internet.

Really, a "tw**"? The best you can come up with in this context is a misogynistic slur?

Moreover, if you're the kind of guy who systematically attracts a devoted misogynistic, alt-right, incel crowd, and incite them to a point where dozens or hundreds of them feel encouraged to release their vitriol, you "certainly can't be held responsible"? It so happens I disagree. Maybe, depending on the law, you are not liable, but in a moral sense you sure are responsible for the reactions you can predict will ensue from your advocacy. Mr. Peterson does know what he's doing:

“I tweeted out, ‘Look, lay the hell off. Enough is enough’,” he told the Radio Times. “Or something a little bit more civilised than that. You don’t need to beat a dead horse. I’m glad I wasn’t the one who was being torn to shreds online.”​

Except, his followers aren't beating a dead horse. They are vilifying a woman, a woman Mr. Peterson then moves further to dehumanize.

1. He does not "attract" a following as you describe. He attracts a huge number of listeners, and a small, very small percentage are as you describe.

2. And what do you mean by "alt-right"? Are you using in the broadest sense, ie some one sort of on the right, not traditional, or in the more slanderous one, ie White Supremacist?

3. He did not incite them in this case. Cathy Newman's behavior was absurd in the interview, and afterwards.

4. I doubt he said anything to "dehumanize" her. YOu want to back that up?

He simply suffers from Butt hurt.
Peterson has been handily kicking leftist ass in Canada for years.
They cannot beat him on substance, so this is just a pathetic attempt to attack him in a different way.
And shows you how weak his "opponents" really are right in this thread.

Agreed.

The best clips of Peterson are when lefties TRY to slam him on anything, and he gets a chance to answer them.


Because he always crushes them.

 

[Tehon]

Really, a "tw**"? The best you can come up with in this context is a misogynistic slur?

Twat - Wikipedia
The word twat is widely used as a derogatory epithet, especially in British English, referring to a person considered obnoxious or stupid.

Moreover, if you're the kind of guy who systematically attracts a devoted misogynistic, alt-right, incel crowd, and incite them to a point where dozens or hundreds of them feel encouraged to release their vitriol, you "certainly can't be held responsible"? It so happens I disagree. Maybe, depending on the law, you are not liable, but in a moral sense you sure are responsible for the reactions you can predict will ensue from your advocacy. Mr. Peterson does know what he's doing:

“I tweeted out, ‘Look, lay the hell off. Enough is enough’,” he told the Radio Times. “Or something a little bit more civilised than that. You don’t need to beat a dead horse. I’m glad I wasn’t the one who was being torn to shreds online.”
Except, his followers aren't beating a dead horse. They are vilifying a woman, a woman Mr. Peterson then moves further to dehumanize.

I watched the interview. Where was the incitement to cause the interviewer harm?

The problem for Cathy Newman wasn't Peterson's beliefs. The problem was the perception of how the interview was conducted. Peterson had no control over Cathy Newman's approach.

 

[Olde Europe]

Really, a "tw**"? The best you can come up with in this context is a misogynistic slur?

Twat - Wikipedia
The word twat is widely used as a derogatory epithet, especially in British English, referring to a person considered obnoxious or stupid.

Moreover, if you're the kind of guy who systematically attracts a devoted misogynistic, alt-right, incel crowd, and incite them to a point where dozens or hundreds of them feel encouraged to release their vitriol, you "certainly can't be held responsible"? It so happens I disagree. Maybe, depending on the law, you are not liable, but in a moral sense you sure are responsible for the reactions you can predict will ensue from your advocacy. Mr. Peterson does know what he's doing:

“I tweeted out, ‘Look, lay the hell off. Enough is enough’,” he told the Radio Times. “Or something a little bit more civilised than that. You don’t need to beat a dead horse. I’m glad I wasn’t the one who was being torn to shreds online.”
Except, his followers aren't beating a dead horse. They are vilifying a woman, a woman Mr. Peterson then moves further to dehumanize.

I watched the interview. Where was the incitement to cause the interviewer harm?

The problem for Cathy Newman wasn't Peterson's beliefs. The problem was the perception of how the interview was conducted. Peterson had no control over Cathy Newman's approach.

You may want to think about that pap, because defining away your slur doesn't cut it, and neither does trying to blame Newman for what happened to her.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

He seems to have problems with women for some reason . He was a guest on Question Time last year and didnt have much to say. Maybe he felt a bit out of his comfort zone.

 

[Tehon]

Really, a "tw**"? The best you can come up with in this context is a misogynistic slur?

Twat - Wikipedia
The word twat is widely used as a derogatory epithet, especially in British English, referring to a person considered obnoxious or stupid.

Moreover, if you're the kind of guy who systematically attracts a devoted misogynistic, alt-right, incel crowd, and incite them to a point where dozens or hundreds of them feel encouraged to release their vitriol, you "certainly can't be held responsible"? It so happens I disagree. Maybe, depending on the law, you are not liable, but in a moral sense you sure are responsible for the reactions you can predict will ensue from your advocacy. Mr. Peterson does know what he's doing:

“I tweeted out, ‘Look, lay the hell off. Enough is enough’,” he told the Radio Times. “Or something a little bit more civilised than that. You don’t need to beat a dead horse. I’m glad I wasn’t the one who was being torn to shreds online.”
Except, his followers aren't beating a dead horse. They are vilifying a woman, a woman Mr. Peterson then moves further to dehumanize.

I watched the interview. Where was the incitement to cause the interviewer harm?

The problem for Cathy Newman wasn't Peterson's beliefs. The problem was the perception of how the interview was conducted. Peterson had no control over Cathy Newman's approach.

You may want to think about that pap, because defining away your slur doesn't cut it, and neither does trying to blame Newman for what happened to her.

I didn't blame her. And you didn't answer the question.

 

[Tehon]

He seems to have problems with women for some reason .

In what way?

 

[Tommy Tainant]

He seems to have problems with women for some reason .

In what way?

He doesnt think women have ever been oppressed. Thats bonkers.

 

[westwall]

Cathy Newman says her 14-year-old daughter received vitriolic online abuse after Jordan Peterson gender pay gap interview

They seem like a pretty sick crew of incels. Is this guy a total twat ? He did a panel show over here in 2018 and came across as sort of normal but with nothing much to say.

Channel 4 presenter Cathy Newman has said her 14-year-old daughter witnessed a torrent of vitriolic online abuse directed at the veteran journalist.

The news presenter recounted the harassment she was subjected to after interviewing controversial Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson – revealing her child even saw a fake pornographic image of her.

Channel 4 was forced to call in security specialists to analyse threats targeted at Ms Newman after her interview about the gender pay gap with Prof Peterson – a controversial figure who has attracted a far-right following.


The 44-year-old, who has worked for Channel 4 for over a decade, has looked back at the vile online abuse and harassment she experienced in a piece for The Pool.

She wrote: “One of the 200 or so on-screen interviews I did this year [2018] was with the controversial Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson. I challenged him about the gender pay gap, which he believes is a fiction, and what he calls the ‘murderous equity doctrine’ embraced by many modern women.

Peterson is a twat, but not in totality.

He certainly can't be held responsible for the way in which people act out on the internet.

A "twat" Why do you say that? Because he is so clearly able to demolish the progressives arguments, succinctly, and with polite, reasoned thinking?