Try following the bouncing ball ... I didn't say they were Conservatives -- I said they were conservative. Which they were no matter how much that pisses you off.Oh?? You saying the Bible Belt wasn't conservative in the 1860's?Actually, it took men from the north to beat the racist conservative south into submission to give up their slaves.And yet NONE of that ended slavery, it took white people to grow up and accept man was the same no matter the color. And EVERY European Country outlawed slavery not because of a black uprising and not because of blacks speaking but because enough whites finally understood and voted it away. And it took a war In the US where whites fought to end slavery.
Using modern labels to describe evens of over 150 years ago, is misleading and dishonest.
Which is why you did it.
Because you know that lying is the only way for modern liberals like yourself, to win an argument.
I'm saying that pretending an unity between a political faction TODAY, and a group of people over a 150 years ago, is something only an dishonest hack would do.
That was my point. I made it. Are you going to address it now, or would you prefer to pretend to not understand it again?
Conservatives in America TODAY, are interesting in "conserving" THe Enlightenment Era principles of the Founding Fathers.
ANy pretense that that is not the case, is someone lying. Or being an ignorant fool, I guess...
No, it is someone lying. Anyone that stupid, could not figure out how to work a keyboard, or find their way out of their room.
Yes, I know. And my point, my answer is, that doing so is misleading.
It does not piss me off. Please do not interpret my use of appropriate language as anger. When I am angry, you should be able to tell.
I am used to you libs being dishonest. YOu are dishonest, pretty much all the time. As I have discussed and for the reasons we both know to be true.