The Original Tree
Diamond Member
6 Years of Illegal Harassment. You aren't very bright are you?Then Trump and his attorney would have stated it was a illegal search, so try again!
Biden ShitzenPantz Troopers on the march.

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
6 Years of Illegal Harassment. You aren't very bright are you?Then Trump and his attorney would have stated it was a illegal search, so try again!
The issue is the affidavit, not the warrant. The warrant itself won’t give us any information of how they obtained itTrump has a copy, there's no law preventing him from releasing it.
Why doesn't he?
Hmmm, still what is his lawyer doing?I'm sure they are speaking more of UNETHICAL and UNDERHANDED, than they are illegal.
The DoJ had to convince a federal judge there was reason to believe evidence of Trump having committed a crime was present at Mar-a-Lago. So, yes, they had probable cause to do the search.Of course, if it's likely revealed that the FBI had probable and just cause to do this search will it even matter to the Trump supporters?
Illegally taking classified material is not a clerical error.They turned a clerical matter into a national disgrace.
Signed by a Dimmer judge, all we need to know.I imagine they will in the coming days. Is there some reason that Trump's lawyer can't make it public now? I'm obviously not an attorney, so I don't know what laws are governing that, but it would clear up a lot. Of course, if it's likely revealed that the FBI had probable and just cause to do this search will it even matter to the Trump supporters?
And….and….and… the stuff we got when we barged in is so so so very bad and super duper secret that we won’t tell you what it is but it’s BAD.Illegally taking classified material is not a clerical error.
Some of the presidential records recovered from former president Donald Trump’s residence at Mar-a-Lago are so sensitive they may not be able to be described in forthcoming inventory reports in an unclassified way, two people familiar with the matter said Friday.
The revelation comes as Rep. Carolyn B. Maloney (D-N.Y.) sent the National Archives and Records Administration a request for further information on 15 boxes of records recovered from Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort last month. The Archives set Friday as its deadline for an inventory of the contents.
The Archives has publicly confirmed earlier reporting by The Washington Post that classified materials were found within the boxes and that torn-up records had been transferred to the Archives but not reconstructed by the Trump White House.
The inventory is expected to provide more information on the volume and scope of classified documents, including details on the level of classification, according to the two people familiar with the matter, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive topic. There are records at the very highest levels of classification, including some that can be viewed by only a small number of government officials, the two people said.
He took classified documents from the WH. That is not in dispute.Continued persecution of a man who did not do things the Bushwood Country Club political way
Sounding delusional isn't helping your cause.And….and….and… the stuff we got when we barged in is so so so very bad and super duper secret that we won’t tell you what it is but it’s BAD.
Lib 201
How do you know that he has a copy?Trump has a copy, there's no law preventing him from releasing it.
Why doesn't he?
He knows very very little about all actions his staff is takingIt is amazing tbe President of the United States has not stepped forward to explain why the historic, unprecedented raid of a President's home - his former / current / future political opponent was conducted by his DOJ & FBI...
....WITHOUT HIS PRIOR KNOWLEDGE OR APPROVAL.
Illegally taking classified material is not a clerical error.
Some of the presidential records recovered from former president Donald Trump’s residence at Mar-a-Lago are so sensitive they may not be able to be described in forthcoming inventory reports in an unclassified way, two people familiar with the matter said Friday.
The revelation comes as Rep. Carolyn B. Maloney (D-N.Y.) sent the National Archives and Records Administration a request for further information on 15 boxes of records recovered from Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort last month. The Archives set Friday as its deadline for an inventory of the contents.
The Archives has publicly confirmed earlier reporting by The Washington Post that classified materials were found within the boxes and that torn-up records had been transferred to the Archives but not reconstructed by the Trump White House.
The inventory is expected to provide more information on the volume and scope of classified documents, including details on the level of classification, according to the two people familiar with the matter, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive topic. There are records at the very highest levels of classification, including some that can be viewed by only a small number of government officials, the two people said.
If we raided a former President's house in the middle of the night because there were some classified documents there, we have turned a corner.He took classified documents from the WH. That is not in dispute.
Hey you guys took a dozen shots with Stormy and Russians and Ukrainians and Mueller and failed impeachment’s and….and…and so decided to launch your own Nazi raid that gave you so much damning material that you won’t tell anyone.Sounding delusional isn't helping your cause.
You clearly understand the method of speaking.Sounding delusional isn't helping your cause.
Biden didn't know about this like he didn't know about Operation Russian Collusion Cross Fire Hurricane.The DoJ had to convince a federal judge there was reason to believe evidence of Trump having committed a crime was present at Mar-a-Lago. So, yes, they had probable cause to do the search.
No Reasonable Prosecutor would care, right James Comey?Cant Trump just say he doesnt remember getting briefed on classified document handling procedures? I feel like that's a defense that's been used in front of Congress in the not so distant past....
Why would Trump or his counsel wish to broadcast/amplify false allegations motivated by a SIX YEAR witch hunt?