The FBI Says Biden Bribe Scheme Whistleblower Is 'Highly Credible' FBI Confidential Human Source Used By The FBI In The Past

easyt65

Diamond Member
Aug 4, 2015
90,307
61,071
2,645
'The individual behind the information that then-Vice President Joe Biden was involved in a criminal bribery scheme with a foreign national is a "highly credible" FBI confidential human source who has been used by the bureau in multiple investigative matters dating back to the Obama administration.

The confidential human source who provided the Biden information to the FBI was a "pre-existing" FBI source who has been used in multiple investigative matters separate from the Biden information
. The confidential human source has been "consistently reviewed by the FBI" and has been "found to be highly credible."



Wray had no choice but to admit the FBI form FD-1023 the whistleblower referred to was real and that the FBI had it be cause the whistleblower is a known, highly credible human source.
The whistleblower is a serious problem for Wray, the FBI, and Biden, as is this FD-1023 ... which is why Wray has conti ued to release it to the Oversight Committee.

It seems, as a result of this newly expoaed info, the FBI has finally agreed to bring physical documents, believed to include the FD-1023, to the Capitol for viewing by the Committee (or at least Comer and Grassly) in a SCIF on Monday.

To continue to protect tbe President, it will be interesting to see what Wray and the FBI have instore on Monday.


 
Amazing that we get no leaks about anything Biden. And have to force(!) the FBI to give Congressional oversight to Biden.

Meanwhile, the laughable attempt to use some document Trump had about an Iranian invasion plan (so SECRET that they leaked it to the MSM) to deflect from the Biden Crime Family.
 
Now the FBI is making a half-assed attempt to appear to comply with the subpoena. They are going to show two congressment the report, not give congress the report as the subpoena requires. No doubt it will be heavily redacted, but by making Raskin one of the people they show it to, they can be sure he will say that no important information was redacted and that they document is not at all damning to the Biden crime family.
 
Now the FBI is making a half-assed attempt to appear to comply with the subpoena. They are going to show two congressment the report, not give congress the report as the subpoena requires. No doubt it will be heavily redacted, but by making Raskin one of the people they show it to, they can be sure he will say that no important information was redacted and that they document is not at all damning to the Biden crime family.
my understanding is he wouldn't do that.
He had to be seen by all.
 
'The individual behind the information that then-Vice President Joe Biden was involved in a criminal bribery scheme with a foreign national is a "highly credible" FBI confidential human source who has been used by the bureau in multiple investigative matters dating back to the Obama administration.

The confidential human source who provided the Biden information to the FBI was a "pre-existing" FBI source who has been used in multiple investigative matters separate from the Biden information
. The confidential human source has been "consistently reviewed by the FBI" and has been "found to be highly credible."



Wray had no choice but to admit the FBI form FD-1023 the whistleblower referred to was real and that the FBI had it be cause the whistleblower is a known, highly credible human source.
The whistleblower is a serious problem for Wray, the FBI, and Biden, as is this FD-1023 ... which is why Wray has conti ued to release it to the Oversight Committee.

It seems, as a result of this newly expoaed info, the FBI has finally agreed to bring physical documents, believed to include the FD-1023, to the Capitol for viewing by the Committee (or at least Comer and Grassly) in a SCIF on Monday.

To continue to protect tbe President, it will be interesting to see what Wray and the FBI have instore on Monday.



It has been available for anyone to look at. Again evidence is required. Just because someone says it is so does not make it so.
 
my understanding is he wouldn't do that.
He had to be seen by all.
The story changes quickly. My understanding is that the FBI will now bring the documents to congress rather than insisting that the congressmen come to them. Maybe that's what the FBI said and the media is reporting it as a done deal, when it isn't.

I hope you're right. Comer should stand his ground, or congress will have no oversight ability at all.
 
Is Wray going to try to discredit his own 'Highly Reliable Confidential Human Resource'?
 
'The individual behind the information that then-Vice President Joe Biden was involved in a criminal bribery scheme with a foreign national is a "highly credible" FBI confidential human source who has been used by the bureau in multiple investigative matters dating back to the Obama administration.

The confidential human source who provided the Biden information to the FBI was a "pre-existing" FBI source who has been used in multiple investigative matters separate from the Biden information
. The confidential human source has been "consistently reviewed by the FBI" and has been "found to be highly credible."



Wray had no choice but to admit the FBI form FD-1023 the whistleblower referred to was real and that the FBI had it be cause the whistleblower is a known, highly credible human source.
The whistleblower is a serious problem for Wray, the FBI, and Biden, as is this FD-1023 ... which is why Wray has conti ued to release it to the Oversight Committee.

It seems, as a result of this newly expoaed info, the FBI has finally agreed to bring physical documents, believed to include the FD-1023, to the Capitol for viewing by the Committee (or at least Comer and Grassly) in a SCIF on Monday.

To continue to protect tbe President, it will be interesting to see what Wray and the FBI have instore on Monday.


News Flash: Nothing burgers are on sale!


“Well, my understanding is that there is information provided by an FBI source who has been credible, but has no firsthand information,” Goldman replied. “So, this FBI source is reporting information to the FBI that was provided by the source from somebody else. Now, that relates to the completely debunked and false allegations about sort of corruption related to then-Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden, who was on the board of Burisma.”



quotes:
Goldman then addressed the allegation against Joe Biden that Republicans have long lobbed against him, which is that as veep, he facilitated the firing of a Ukrainian prosecutor who was investigating the company. However, Goldman cited witnesses in the first Donald Trump impeachment investigation who said the opposite was true.

The congressman stated that those expert witnesses said was “that what Joe Biden was doing in Ukraine in urging Ukraine to remove their prosecutor general was done consistent with U.S. policy because this prosecutor general was not investigating corruption, including at [companies] like Burisma.”

He added, “This is complete garbage” and noted the Trump Department of Justice declined to prosecute the Bidens.

“And they determined it was not worth pursuing these allegations,” Goldman said. “This is a complete nothing burger.”
 
'The individual behind the information that then-Vice President Joe Biden was involved in a criminal bribery scheme with a foreign national is a "highly credible" FBI confidential human source who has been used by the bureau in multiple investigative matters dating back to the Obama administration.

The confidential human source who provided the Biden information to the FBI was a "pre-existing" FBI source who has been used in multiple investigative matters separate from the Biden information
. The confidential human source has been "consistently reviewed by the FBI" and has been "found to be highly credible."



Wray had no choice but to admit the FBI form FD-1023 the whistleblower referred to was real and that the FBI had it be cause the whistleblower is a known, highly credible human source.
The whistleblower is a serious problem for Wray, the FBI, and Biden, as is this FD-1023 ... which is why Wray has conti ued to release it to the Oversight Committee.

It seems, as a result of this newly expoaed info, the FBI has finally agreed to bring physical documents, believed to include the FD-1023, to the Capitol for viewing by the Committee (or at least Comer and Grassly) in a SCIF on Monday.

To continue to protect tbe President, it will be interesting to see what Wray and the FBI have instore on Monday.



“Well, my understanding is that there is information provided by an FBI source who has been credible, but has no firsthand information,” Goldman replied. “So, this FBI source is reporting information to the FBI that was provided by the source from somebody else. Now, that relates to the completely debunked and false allegations about sort of corruption related to then-Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden, who was on the board of Burisma.”




Well that was anti-climactic.
 
'The individual behind the information that then-Vice President Joe Biden was involved in a criminal bribery scheme with a foreign national is a "highly credible" FBI confidential human source who has been used by the bureau in multiple investigative matters dating back to the Obama administration.

The confidential human source who provided the Biden information to the FBI was a "pre-existing" FBI source who has been used in multiple investigative matters separate from the Biden information
. The confidential human source has been "consistently reviewed by the FBI" and has been "found to be highly credible."



Wray had no choice but to admit the FBI form FD-1023 the whistleblower referred to was real and that the FBI had it be cause the whistleblower is a known, highly credible human source.
The whistleblower is a serious problem for Wray, the FBI, and Biden, as is this FD-1023 ... which is why Wray has conti ued to release it to the Oversight Committee.

It seems, as a result of this newly expoaed info, the FBI has finally agreed to bring physical documents, believed to include the FD-1023, to the Capitol for viewing by the Committee (or at least Comer and Grassly) in a SCIF on Monday.

To continue to protect tbe President, it will be interesting to see what Wray and the FBI have instore on Monday.


He's going to be replaced
He's bringing the powers that be to much heat...

To many Americans have taken notice
 
He's going to be replaced
He's bringing the powers that be to much heat...

To many Americans have taken notice

Again, the wasn't relaying first hand claims. They were relaying second hand....about the Biden/Burisma conspiracy that had already been debunked.

This claims was received on Trump's watch....and the FBI didn't pursuit it for a reason.
 
How many times do you have to cry wolf before we are supposed to stop taking you seriously?

Get some results, then we will talk.
 
How many times do you have to cry wolf before we are supposed to stop taking you seriously?

Get some results, then we will talk.

Laughing.....this is Easy. The guy that insisted that Biden destroyed the Nord Stream pipeline, and Chuck Schumer had Carlson fired from Fox.

You can't fix stupid.
 
'The individual behind the information that then-Vice President Joe Biden was involved in a criminal bribery scheme with a foreign national is a "highly credible" FBI confidential human source who has been used by the bureau in multiple investigative matters dating back to the Obama administration.

The confidential human source who provided the Biden information to the FBI was a "pre-existing" FBI source who has been used in multiple investigative matters separate from the Biden information
. The confidential human source has been "consistently reviewed by the FBI" and has been "found to be highly credible."



Wray had no choice but to admit the FBI form FD-1023 the whistleblower referred to was real and that the FBI had it be cause the whistleblower is a known, highly credible human source.
The whistleblower is a serious problem for Wray, the FBI, and Biden, as is this FD-1023 ... which is why Wray has conti ued to release it to the Oversight Committee.

It seems, as a result of this newly expoaed info, the FBI has finally agreed to bring physical documents, believed to include the FD-1023, to the Capitol for viewing by the Committee (or at least Comer and Grassly) in a SCIF on Monday.

To continue to protect tbe President, it will be interesting to see what Wray and the FBI have instore on Monday.


Who told the highly credible whistleblower the information in question?
 
No one knows and it hasn’t been corroborated.

Sounds a lot like the Steele Dossier

Get Durham on it pronto
The Steele Dossier was bought and paid for opposition research whose lies the FBI dressed up as evidence in order to get warrants to spy on the Trump campaign in order to interfere with the 2016 election, with the full knowledge of Clinton and Obama.

This single Form 1023 sounds nothing like that.
 
The Steele Dossier was bought and paid for opposition research whose lies the FBI dressed up as evidence in order to get warrants to spy on the Trump campaign in order to interfere with the 2016 election, with the full knowledge of Clinton and Obama.

This single Form 1023 sounds nothing like that.
Wow. Someone bright up the Steele dossier and you pounced. Good job.

Do you know who told the credible whistleblower his story or did you just want to talk about the Steele Dossier?
 
Wow. Someone bright up the Steele dossier and you pounced. Good job.
Wow, you're very sensitive abou seeing Lesh' misinformation corrected. Why is that?
Do you know who told the credible whistleblower his story or did you just want to talk about the Steele Dossier?
Lesh brought the Steele Dossier. Do you understand the irony that Democrats are now using the Steele Dossier as an example of obviously faked evidence?

I don't know who told the whistle blower his story. I don't know if the whistle blower and the source for the FD 1023 are the same person. I don't know that the whistle blower and/or the source are actually credible. I know that the FBI has paid him $200K+ over the last two years, which many are taking as evidence that the FBI has confidence in him.

But, after the FBI saw the Steele Dossier, they paid Christopher Steele to continue to dig up dirt just a month before the 2016 election. So the fact that the FBI pays someone doesn't mean they have confidence in them to tell the truth. In Steele's case they paid him hoping for more lies.

I don't know a lot of what we need to know becuase the FBI is hiding it.

I do know that it took almost two months for FBI Director Wray to even admit that the 1023 existed, and that he is very, very, concerned that it not be viewed by the public, even though we now know in summary what is in it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top