DonGlock26
Diamond Member
- Sep 15, 2024
- 16,893
- 24,838
- 2,288
So, you are unable to form an opinion on the actual statement.Durham did that. He couldn't find any evidence of the emails in the report.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So, you are unable to form an opinion on the actual statement.Durham did that. He couldn't find any evidence of the emails in the report.
What do you take away from that?
Exactly... if there are emails that our own corrupt intel can get from "monitoring the Russians", then the least they can do is do their own job and verify or not of these emails instead of continuing this "cloud of mystery and smoke and mirrors" that they some how and their "best assessment" got it from some Russian source...Time to subpoena the emails, smart phones, and servers.
My opinion is that you're poorly informed.So, you are unable to form an opinion on the actual statement.
It's stunning how you guys can be presented with the truth and then turn it upside down to fit your duplicitous narrative.One would take away the message, not the messenger... the emails were true and that truth exposed a Soros group and the Clinton campaign were cooking up the Russia Hoax
Corrupt intel? Let me guess. They're corrupt because the IC concluded, based on overwhelming evidence, Russia worked to get trump elected in 2016. Do I have that right?Exactly... if there are emails that our own corrupt intel
They were constantly spying on Trump's campaign with planes.The release of the annex was no exception. John Ratcliffe, the C.I.A. director, said in a statement that the materials proved that suspicions of Russian collusion stemmed from “a coordinated plan to prevent and destroy Donald Trump’s presidency.”
And Kash Patel, the F.B.I. director, who has a long history of pushing false claims about the Russia investigation, declared on social media that the annex revealed “evidence that the Clinton campaign plotted to frame President Trump and fabricate the Russia collusion hoax.”
In reality, the annex shows the opposite, indicating that a key piece of supposed evidence for the claim that Mrs. Clinton approved a plan to tie Mr. Trump to Russia is not credible: Mr. Durham concluded that the email from July 27, 2016, and a related one dated two days earlier were probably manufactured.
Gaslighting has become routine among members of the regime.

You sure it wasn’t black helicopters?They were constantly spying on Trump's campaign with planes
Nope. Can't find the article right now. Might have been in a Military news publication.You sure it wasn’t black helicopters?
Right. You weirdos really are just so strange.Nope. Can't find the article right now. Might have been in a Military news publication.
Right. You weirdos really are just so strange.
That doesn’t make any difference, of course – conservatives will continue to lie.His report was palpably anticipated by the Right with expectations it would "blow the lid off" nefarious acts by the Obama admin. He found none.
Durham did that. He couldn't find any evidence of the emails in the report.

Not me. You’re accusing Durham, who tried as hard as he could to twist reality to make the Russian disinformation come true.Your gaslighter is empty again
Not me. You’re accusing Durham, who tried as hard as he could to twist reality to make the Russian disinformation come true.
Explain the plan in detail and I’ll tell you how you’re wrong.The Russians made up a false plan that the Hillary campaign then followed? Do you really believe your own BS?