The Epstein Files
- Thread starter TemplarKormac
- Start date
This is what is in the files:
www.justice.gov
....
That is pretty detailed description of what happened... These are pretty scary allegations...
She could be interviewed more and see has she more detail, like what was the room like and what was in it...
Pictures of women who told her to wear a bra at night. If they recognise her...
More could be done to collaborate her testimony.
Remember it is a crime to lie to the FBI. So this brave woman was effectively under oath.
Is Trump going to speak about this while being legally bound to speak the truth...
Age Verification | United States Department of Justice
....
That is pretty detailed description of what happened... These are pretty scary allegations...
She could be interviewed more and see has she more detail, like what was the room like and what was in it...
Pictures of women who told her to wear a bra at night. If they recognise her...
More could be done to collaborate her testimony.
Remember it is a crime to lie to the FBI. So this brave woman was effectively under oath.
Is Trump going to speak about this while being legally bound to speak the truth...
- Sep 16, 2012
- 76,903
- 73,900
- 3,605
It's about transparency......It's about victims.......tell me about the outrage over congress and the Epstein Files.
Something doesn’t add up about this.
The same members of Congress who are constantly screaming about Donald Trump and the Epstein list just voted 357–65 to block the public release of sexual misconduct reports involving members of Congress.
Think about that.
They say they care about victims. They say they want transparency. They say they want the truth exposed.
But when it comes to releasing files about allegations involving members of Congress themselves… they voted to keep those records secret.
The vote was bipartisan: 182 Democrats and 175 Republicans voted to send the measure to the Ethics Committee — a move widely seen as a way to kill the effort.
Only 65 members voted against blocking it.
So here’s a fair question:
If they truly care about victims and accountability, why vote to hide the files.
Everybody getting their Nad's up over Epstein.....?
WASHINGTON — The House on Wednesday voted to scuttle an effort by Republican Rep. Nancy Mace to shed more light on sexual misconduct allegations against members of Congress.
www.nbcnews.com
Something doesn’t add up about this.
The same members of Congress who are constantly screaming about Donald Trump and the Epstein list just voted 357–65 to block the public release of sexual misconduct reports involving members of Congress.
Think about that.
They say they care about victims. They say they want transparency. They say they want the truth exposed.
But when it comes to releasing files about allegations involving members of Congress themselves… they voted to keep those records secret.
The vote was bipartisan: 182 Democrats and 175 Republicans voted to send the measure to the Ethics Committee — a move widely seen as a way to kill the effort.
Only 65 members voted against blocking it.
So here’s a fair question:
If they truly care about victims and accountability, why vote to hide the files.
Everybody getting their Nad's up over Epstein.....?
WASHINGTON — The House on Wednesday voted to scuttle an effort by Republican Rep. Nancy Mace to shed more light on sexual misconduct allegations against members of Congress.
House kills effort to release all congressional sexual misconduct and harassment reports
Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., had forced the vote in light of allegations that her Republican colleague Tony Gonzales of Texas sent sexual text messages to a subordinate.
www.nbcnews.com
This is what is in the files:
Age Verification | United States Department of Justice
View attachment 1227470
View attachment 1227468
....
View attachment 1227471
That is pretty detailed description of what happened... These are pretty scary allegations...
She could be interviewed more and see has she more detail, like what was the room like and what was in it...
Pictures of women who told her to wear a bra at night. If they recognise her...
More could be done to collaborate her testimony.
Remember it is a crime to lie to the FBI. So this brave woman was effectively under oath.
Is Trump going to speak about this while being legally bound to speak the truth...
This is the fake story of someone using the fake name of "Katie Johnson". The story was being peddled around by the Jerry Springer's show's producer using an alias to hide his identity because he had a long history of peddling salacious and knowingly false stories. It was eventually dismissed or dropped all together.
Unsubstantiated Trump Child Rape Allegations Originated with 'Jerry Springer' Producer
While Trump has been found liable for — and bragged about — sexual misconduct, claims related to underage abuse stem from dubious sources.
www.snopes.com
Stop making yourself look like a useless, gullible tool.
He was trying to pass that off in another thread and I called him on it and he quit posting there.This is the fake story of someone using the fake name of "Katie Johnson". The story was being peddled around by the Jerry Springer's show's producer using an alias to hide his identity because he had a long history of peddling salacious and knowingly false stories. It was eventually dismissed or dropped all together.
Unsubstantiated Trump Child Rape Allegations Originated with 'Jerry Springer' Producer
While Trump has been found liable for — and bragged about — sexual misconduct, claims related to underage abuse stem from dubious sources.
Stop making yourself look like a useless, gullible tool.
See he's at it again.
What about Ukraine?
Reading this:It's about transparency......It's about victims.......tell me about the outrage over congress and the Epstein Files.
Something doesn’t add up about this.
The same members of Congress who are constantly screaming about Donald Trump and the Epstein list just voted 357–65 to block the public release of sexual misconduct reports involving members of Congress.
Think about that.
They say they care about victims. They say they want transparency. They say they want the truth exposed.
But when it comes to releasing files about allegations involving members of Congress themselves… they voted to keep those records secret.
The vote was bipartisan: 182 Democrats and 175 Republicans voted to send the measure to the Ethics Committee — a move widely seen as a way to kill the effort.
Only 65 members voted against blocking it.
So here’s a fair question:
If they truly care about victims and accountability, why vote to hide the files.
View attachment 1227486
Everybody getting their Nad's up over Epstein.....?
WASHINGTON — The House on Wednesday voted to scuttle an effort by Republican Rep. Nancy Mace to shed more light on sexual misconduct allegations against members of Congress.
House kills effort to release all congressional sexual misconduct and harassment reports
Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., had forced the vote in light of allegations that her Republican colleague Tony Gonzales of Texas sent sexual text messages to a subordinate.
Later Wednesday, Mace forced a vote during a House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing Wednesday to subpoena the Office of Congressional Workplace Rights for records about sexual harassment awards and settlements under the Congressional Accountability Act, which protects employees who work for the legislative branch.
That effort was successful, after striking a compromise with Rep. Robert Garcia, the top Democrat on the panel, to limit her subpoena to only members of Congress; her original effort had included staffers, as well. Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-N.C.) secured an additional caveat to ensure information related to payouts for congressional aides would also be released.
The subpoena will cover records before 2018, allows for redactions for alleged victims and witnesses. The House approved a measure in 2018 that forced lawmakers to pay for their own harassment settlements.
----
I think they wanted the scoping to be just Congress (i.e. elected officials) not every allegation against everyone will appear on the internet.
I presume they wanted staffers to be treated like any other Government or Corporate employee..
Read that testimony from that Victim earlier...
Do every GOP rep think she is lying, this is quite detailed and she is taking on risk telling this... She was definitely a Epstein victim.
Read it through... The Trump in that testimony doesn't sound like this was a one time thing... This could mean there are more...
What would happens when more come forward... This is a general pubic sample, these are women who have been abused by Epstein.. This is a finite group of victims, hard to say that making things up and lying to the FBI...
Then they would have to accept that the MAGA President raped and beat young girls....
"Let me teach you how little girls are supposed to be." TRUMP unzipped his pants
That creates an image that is hard to forget...
Mac-7
Diamond Member
- Oct 9, 2019
- 90,049
- 67,928
- 3,565
Your claim - as well as all the other lib do-gooders - is that you just want to know the truth
But in fact your outrage is strictly political partisanship against trump
Because the left, including you, has said virtually nothing about congress refusing to make public its own sexual harassment/misconduct files
Why?
Because they include nothing about trump
Where's the concern? Doesn't apply to congressional peckers I guess.
If this was so salacious, why didn't it show up in two of Trump's election campaigns?
schmidlap
Platinum Member
- Oct 30, 2020
- 14,688
- 9,386
- 1,138
Despite your hyper-partisan dogma, I denounce all sleazeballs without regard to party affiliation. Of course, Trump - who called the Epstein files a "hoax" - is the current POTUS and, consequently, receives greater attention - as current events do.
Mac-7
Diamond Member
- Oct 9, 2019
- 90,049
- 67,928
- 3,565
I had to drag a comment from you about the secret congress payoffs
Schmedley, from your breaking news article:
The vast majority of the mentions, however, appear to reveal nothing new or substantive connecting Epstein — the disgraced financier and convicted sex offender who died in jail in 2019 — to the man who is now U.S. president.
Rawley
Diamond Member
- Sep 8, 2014
- 53,704
- 39,673
- 3,645
So what crimes are you accusing these people of?
The latest dump with unsubstantiated allegations against the felon were withheld, according to the doj, because they were “incorrectly coded as duplicative,” This comes shortly after a subpoena for Pam to appear before the House oversight commitee. It was a coincidence, of course....
How about the woman who made the allegations be given protection and have her testify, like the boot licking repubs did to Bill Clinton? I am sure she is frightened to speak since she made such claims against a felonious mafia boss. She could end up dead like Epstein.
That the same woman who dropped her claims after it was revealed she had the help of some clown who wrote for Jerry Springer?
jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 159,997
- 39,890
- 2,180
I've asked and never got a response.
jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 159,997
- 39,890
- 2,180
This is what is in the files:
Age Verification | United States Department of Justice
View attachment 1227470
View attachment 1227468
....
View attachment 1227471
That is pretty detailed description of what happened... These are pretty scary allegations...
She could be interviewed more and see has she more detail, like what was the room like and what was in it...
Pictures of women who told her to wear a bra at night. If they recognise her...
More could be done to collaborate her testimony.
Remember it is a crime to lie to the FBI. So this brave woman was effectively under oath.
Is Trump going to speak about this while being legally bound to speak the truth...
Significance
The Katie Johnson case remains a notable example of allegations against high-profile figures that were never tested in court. It highlights issues of witness protection, media scrutiny, and the challenges faced by alleged victims in high-profile cases. The resurfacing of the case in 2026 followed the release of Epstein-related documents, but no new evidence or legal developments have emerged.allaboutlawyer.com+2
In summary, Katie Johnson’s testimony and lawsuits brought serious allegations against Trump and Epstein, but the claims were never adjudicated, and the plaintiff has remained anonymous and out of public view since the withdrawal of the lawsuits.
https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=f152...Y29udHJvdmVyc3ktYXJ0aWNsZS0xNTM2ODgzMjY&ntb=1
What I think is that I want every man who satisfied his lust with underage girls at Epstein Island to be identified, tried, found guilty, and punished. I assume some are Democrats and some are Republicans. It is outrageous that this scandal had continued along as it has without closure.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
-
Just In Case I Haven't Been Clear I DON'T Think That Trump Is A Sexual Predator- Started by ChristisKing
- Replies: 4
-
What I want America to look like in a 100 years
- Started by JakeWIlls92
- Replies: 3
