jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 150,199
- 34,395
- 2,180
Why’s it dire? Was it ever more?It hasn’t exceeded 300 ppm in 80,000 years
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why’s it dire? Was it ever more?It hasn’t exceeded 300 ppm in 80,000 years
Why are you even talking about this if you know nothing?Why’s it dire? Was it ever more?
You said dire!! What’s dire?Wky are you even talking about this if you know nothing?
Yes it was. It only got down to 300 ppm 2-3 million years ago.Why’s it dire? Was it ever more?
Previous increases in CO2 levels were never more than 35 ppm over ONE THOUSAND YEARS. We have achieved that in just the last 17 years.So why is it dire?
Humans have NEVER been at this level. The Earth hasn't been at this level for over 3 million years.Previous increases in CO2 levels were never more than 35 ppm over ONE THOUSAND YEARS. We have achieved that in just the last 17 years.
Pre industrial levels were 280 ppm. We’re past 409
Yet levels have been there without us! How odd from your nonsenseHumans have NEVER been at this level. The Earth hasn't been at this level for over 3 million years.
So you don’t understand that a rapid huge increase in CO2 is a problem?But what’s dire? You skated away again! Strange from someone like you so afraid, and can’t say from what! Odd
What is the problem? Identify it for us?So you don’t understand that a rapid huge increase in CO2 is a problem
Aside from you? Well, there's global warming.What is the problem? Identify it for us?
Precisely how much data is required oh Great Master of All Knowledge?BTW, you don’t have enough data to make such a corney remark
Except you can’t say where? Ice on both poles , oopsAside from you? Well, there's global warming.
Which doesn't decrease the validity of the statementWell plagairised.
Dude they’re talking about .012% of the atmosphere and there’s a problem. They can’t even identify the problem. How fking oddCurrently the atmosphere is .04% Carbon.
It was .03% 20 years ago.
If it falls to .02% plants will all over the planet will die.
The most ideal carbon percentage is between .03% to .04%.
We are still in the ideal range.
Let’s put it this way; the science practiced by all the institutes we have depended upon for decades, are responsible for ALL the greatest advances known to man. Guessing and making up shit is a distant last.what if they're wrong?
Hilarious. You have to look at real science first. There is no science taught in the entire world at any accredited institute that doesn’t think you’re FOS.Let’s look at the science with a bit of common sense.
These numbers are over your head, way over.Dude they’re talking about .012% of the atmosphere and there’s a problem. They can’t even identify the problem. How fking odd
Dufus, you know why CO2 is a green house gas. Go to go to a green house and gee, ask the attendant why the air is so moisture laden. He knows more then you it seems. Everyone does.CO2 is a greenhouse gas. So is water vapor.
It's not 0.04 %Carbon, it's Carbon Dioxide. It's now 0.0416 % and climbing so will have a significant effect of Global warming.Currently the atmosphere is .04% Carbon.
It was .03% 20 years ago.
If it falls to .02% plants will all over the planet will die.
The most ideal carbon percentage is between .03% to .04%.
We are still in the ideal range.
It's not 0.04 %Carbon, it's Carbon Dioxide. It's now 0.0416 % and climbing so will have a significant effect of Global warming.