The Donald overrules the FAA...Grounds the Boeing 737

[Frannie]

Military is found in the Constitution, though the form used is militia.

Next

LOLOL

Umm, no, a militia is not the military.

Look dumbass the first US military academy was founded in 1802, the revolution was won with militias.

Next fool

frannie tell me how we could have an army if we didnt have a country???

Well we did, it was termed militia however because the geniuses in charge obviously knew what they were doing in retrospect.

Military
Militia

There are several forms of English you know, at least two of them were in use at the time

I would suggest you not call others dumbass's after that comment

the two are very different things and clearly separated in the constitution

LOL how could they be separated if the Constitution never mentioned military?

Yawning, let me know when you wake up

 

[Pogo]

But you insinuated the exact word had to appear there. Now you admit the Constitution can be left open to interpretation.

Does that mean you have to turn in your “true American” merit badge?

I never insinuated that and thats not an interpretation,,,,you used the word military not me,,I just confirmed what it does say, and both words are interchangeable like rectum and asshole

and NO its not up for interpretation as clarified in the 10th amendment,,,

Sadly, you seem to be suffering from dementia. Yes, it was you who first used the word, “military.” [highlighted for your attention]

airforce is included in the military

Ah, “military,” yet another noun not found in the Constitution. Good one; and thanks for the help in adding to my list.

And yes, you certainly did insinuate words had to be found in the Constitution since your reply to me pointing out the Constitutionality of the FAA’s enforcement of our airspace was to point out you don’t see airspace in there.

military and army is interchangeable and what I insinuated was the 10th amendment is clear as to powers delegated,,,and no where in the constitution does it give the feds let alone POTUS the power over private companies or any of those others you listed,,,

the burden is on you to prove otherwise as to where those powers are in the constitution

I already showed you. It’s to provide for the general welfare of the nation. The federal government can enforce rules and regulations on private businesses when it comes to the safety of the nation or when it comes to enforcing laws against private companies.

since a plane holds just a few hundred and there are 325 million people in the country I dont see the general welfare,,,and the courts are for violations in the law not POTUS

I see this more as a punishment to Boeing for having business outside the country,,,he said they would pay for it

This ^^ may well be the most fucked-up logic I've seen all day.

 

[Frannie]

airforce is included in the military,,,and any true american knows those others are being done illegally,,,which is my main point

LOLOL

Ah, “military,” yet another noun not found in the Constitution. Good one; and thanks for the help in adding to my list.

As far as “true Americans,” you really mean only those who think like you. Which ironically, is not very American culture.

ok they use armies instead of military, but we both agree they are the same thing,,,

I'm gonna go out on a limb and say you have a college education,,,

a problem I have found with them is they only go as far as they feel good and stop there,,,

you may want to read more of the constitution because in the 10th amendment its very clear about it

But you insinuated the exact word had to appear there. Now you admit the Constitution can be left open to interpretation.

Does that mean you have to turn in your “true American” merit badge?

I never insinuated that and thats not an interpretation,,,,you used the word military not me,,I just confirmed what it does say, and both words are interchangeable like rectum and asshole

and NO its not up for interpretation as clarified in the 10th amendment,,,

Sadly, you seem to be suffering from dementia. Yes, it was you who first used the word, “military.” [highlighted for your attention]

So? Here are other nouns you won’t explicitly in the Constitution yet they’re deemed Constitutional... “Air Force”, “abortion”, “same-sex marriage.”

airforce is included in the military

Ah, “military,” yet another noun not found in the Constitution. Good one; and thanks for the help in adding to my list.

And yes, you certainly did insinuate words had to be found in the Constitution since your reply to me pointing out the Constitutionality of the FAA’s enforcement of our airspace was to point out you don’t see airspace in there.

Are anti aircraft missiles mentioned in the Constitution, what about Fentanyl and LSD

 

[dudmuck]

fantastic

Lol, you castrated fool, Trump acted and grounded the planes.

So shave that pic up where the sun never hits you.

only until the pressure became too great.
SURPRISE: TRUMP KEPT 737 MAX JETS FLYING AFTER PERSONAL CALL FROM BOEING C.E.O.

^
Like those people have a tap on Trump's phone or something? Let's be pragmatic about this..

vanity fair has a good reputation on factual report.
But in any case, its also reported by newsweek and vox.
This time its real.

 

[Frannie]

I never insinuated that and thats not an interpretation,,,,you used the word military not me,,I just confirmed what it does say, and both words are interchangeable like rectum and asshole

and NO its not up for interpretation as clarified in the 10th amendment,,,

Sadly, you seem to be suffering from dementia. Yes, it was you who first used the word, “military.” [highlighted for your attention]

Ah, “military,” yet another noun not found in the Constitution. Good one; and thanks for the help in adding to my list.

And yes, you certainly did insinuate words had to be found in the Constitution since your reply to me pointing out the Constitutionality of the FAA’s enforcement of our airspace was to point out you don’t see airspace in there.

military and army is interchangeable and what I insinuated was the 10th amendment is clear as to powers delegated,,,and no where in the constitution does it give the feds let alone POTUS the power over private companies or any of those others you listed,,,

the burden is on you to prove otherwise as to where those powers are in the constitution

I already showed you. It’s to provide for the general welfare of the nation. The federal government can enforce rules and regulations on private businesses when it comes to the safety of the nation or when it comes to enforcing laws against private companies.

since a plane holds just a few hundred and there are 325 million people in the country I dont see the general welfare,,,and the courts are for violations in the law not POTUS

I see this more as a punishment to Boeing for having business outside the country,,,he said they would pay for it

This ^^ may well be the most fucked-up logic I've seen all day.

Give me a minute and I can beat any fucked up logic anywhere anytime.

 

[Pogo]

Sadly, you seem to be suffering from dementia. Yes, it was you who first used the word, “military.” [highlighted for your attention]

​

And yes, you certainly did insinuate words had to be found in the Constitution since your reply to me pointing out the Constitutionality of the FAA’s enforcement of our airspace was to point out you don’t see airspace in there.

military and army is interchangeable and what I insinuated was the 10th amendment is clear as to powers delegated,,,and no where in the constitution does it give the feds let alone POTUS the power over private companies or any of those others you listed,,,

the burden is on you to prove otherwise as to where those powers are in the constitution

I already showed you. It’s to provide for the general welfare of the nation. The federal government can enforce rules and regulations on private businesses when it comes to the safety of the nation or when it comes to enforcing laws against private companies.

since a plane holds just a few hundred and there are 325 million people in the country I dont see the general welfare,,,and the courts are for violations in the law not POTUS

I see this more as a punishment to Boeing for having business outside the country,,,he said they would pay for it

This ^^ may well be the most fucked-up logic I've seen all day.

Give me a minute and I can beat any fucked up logic anywhere anytime.

I was gonna say, there's still a few hours in the day....

 

[Faun]

But you insinuated the exact word had to appear there. Now you admit the Constitution can be left open to interpretation.

Does that mean you have to turn in your “true American” merit badge?

I never insinuated that and thats not an interpretation,,,,you used the word military not me,,I just confirmed what it does say, and both words are interchangeable like rectum and asshole

and NO its not up for interpretation as clarified in the 10th amendment,,,

Sadly, you seem to be suffering from dementia. Yes, it was you who first used the word, “military.” [highlighted for your attention]

airforce is included in the military

Ah, “military,” yet another noun not found in the Constitution. Good one; and thanks for the help in adding to my list.

And yes, you certainly did insinuate words had to be found in the Constitution since your reply to me pointing out the Constitutionality of the FAA’s enforcement of our airspace was to point out you don’t see airspace in there.

military and army is interchangeable and what I insinuated was the 10th amendment is clear as to powers delegated,,,and no where in the constitution does it give the feds let alone POTUS the power over private companies or any of those others you listed,,,

the burden is on you to prove otherwise as to where those powers are in the constitution

I already showed you. It’s to provide for the general welfare of the nation. The federal government can enforce rules and regulations on private businesses when it comes to the safety of the nation or when it comes to enforcing laws against private companies.

since a plane holds just a few hundred and there are 325 million people in the country I dont see the general welfare,,,and the courts are for violations in the law not POTUS

I see this more as a punishment to Boeing for having business outside the country,,,he said they would pay for it

It’s not a question of the seating capacity of the jet. It’s for the safety of all 325 million people, anyone of whom could fly on a plane deemed unsafe.

 

[Faun]

LOLOL

Ah, “military,” yet another noun not found in the Constitution. Good one; and thanks for the help in adding to my list.

As far as “true Americans,” you really mean only those who think like you. Which ironically, is not very American culture.

ok they use armies instead of military, but we both agree they are the same thing,,,

I'm gonna go out on a limb and say you have a college education,,,

a problem I have found with them is they only go as far as they feel good and stop there,,,

you may want to read more of the constitution because in the 10th amendment its very clear about it

But you insinuated the exact word had to appear there. Now you admit the Constitution can be left open to interpretation.

Does that mean you have to turn in your “true American” merit badge?

I never insinuated that and thats not an interpretation,,,,you used the word military not me,,I just confirmed what it does say, and both words are interchangeable like rectum and asshole

and NO its not up for interpretation as clarified in the 10th amendment,,,

Sadly, you seem to be suffering from dementia. Yes, it was you who first used the word, “military.” [highlighted for your attention]

So? Here are other nouns you won’t explicitly in the Constitution yet they’re deemed Constitutional... “Air Force”, “abortion”, “same-sex marriage.”

airforce is included in the military

Ah, “military,” yet another noun not found in the Constitution. Good one; and thanks for the help in adding to my list.

And yes, you certainly did insinuate words had to be found in the Constitution since your reply to me pointing out the Constitutionality of the FAA’s enforcement of our airspace was to point out you don’t see airspace in there.

Are anti aircraft missiles mentioned in the Constitution, what about Fentanyl and LSD

Now you’re arguing my point, thanks.

 

[progressive hunter]

I never insinuated that and thats not an interpretation,,,,you used the word military not me,,I just confirmed what it does say, and both words are interchangeable like rectum and asshole

and NO its not up for interpretation as clarified in the 10th amendment,,,

Sadly, you seem to be suffering from dementia. Yes, it was you who first used the word, “military.” [highlighted for your attention]

Ah, “military,” yet another noun not found in the Constitution. Good one; and thanks for the help in adding to my list.

And yes, you certainly did insinuate words had to be found in the Constitution since your reply to me pointing out the Constitutionality of the FAA’s enforcement of our airspace was to point out you don’t see airspace in there.

military and army is interchangeable and what I insinuated was the 10th amendment is clear as to powers delegated,,,and no where in the constitution does it give the feds let alone POTUS the power over private companies or any of those others you listed,,,

the burden is on you to prove otherwise as to where those powers are in the constitution

I already showed you. It’s to provide for the general welfare of the nation. The federal government can enforce rules and regulations on private businesses when it comes to the safety of the nation or when it comes to enforcing laws against private companies.

since a plane holds just a few hundred and there are 325 million people in the country I dont see the general welfare,,,and the courts are for violations in the law not POTUS

I see this more as a punishment to Boeing for having business outside the country,,,he said they would pay for it

It’s not a question of the seating capacity of the jet. It’s for the safety of all 325 million people, anyone of whom could fly on a plane deemed unsafe.

bullshit!!!
\
now if it were a rash of planes falling out of the air I can maybe see the need,,but 2 planes in other countries,,,sorry not a good reason

 

[Frannie]

military and army is interchangeable and what I insinuated was the 10th amendment is clear as to powers delegated,,,and no where in the constitution does it give the feds let alone POTUS the power over private companies or any of those others you listed,,,

the burden is on you to prove otherwise as to where those powers are in the constitution

I already showed you. It’s to provide for the general welfare of the nation. The federal government can enforce rules and regulations on private businesses when it comes to the safety of the nation or when it comes to enforcing laws against private companies.

since a plane holds just a few hundred and there are 325 million people in the country I dont see the general welfare,,,and the courts are for violations in the law not POTUS

I see this more as a punishment to Boeing for having business outside the country,,,he said they would pay for it

This ^^ may well be the most fucked-up logic I've seen all day.

Give me a minute and I can beat any fucked up logic anywhere anytime.

I was gonna say, there's still a few hours in the day....

Hours?

That's actually funny

 

[progressive hunter]

Sadly, you seem to be suffering from dementia. Yes, it was you who first used the word, “military.” [highlighted for your attention]

​

And yes, you certainly did insinuate words had to be found in the Constitution since your reply to me pointing out the Constitutionality of the FAA’s enforcement of our airspace was to point out you don’t see airspace in there.

military and army is interchangeable and what I insinuated was the 10th amendment is clear as to powers delegated,,,and no where in the constitution does it give the feds let alone POTUS the power over private companies or any of those others you listed,,,

the burden is on you to prove otherwise as to where those powers are in the constitution

I already showed you. It’s to provide for the general welfare of the nation. The federal government can enforce rules and regulations on private businesses when it comes to the safety of the nation or when it comes to enforcing laws against private companies.

since a plane holds just a few hundred and there are 325 million people in the country I dont see the general welfare,,,and the courts are for violations in the law not POTUS

I see this more as a punishment to Boeing for having business outside the country,,,he said they would pay for it

This ^^ may well be the most fucked-up logic I've seen all day.

Give me a minute and I can beat any fucked up logic anywhere anytime.

youve had over an hour and so far just made an ass of yourself

 

[Frannie]

ok they use armies instead of military, but we both agree they are the same thing,,,

I'm gonna go out on a limb and say you have a college education,,,

a problem I have found with them is they only go as far as they feel good and stop there,,,

you may want to read more of the constitution because in the 10th amendment its very clear about it

But you insinuated the exact word had to appear there. Now you admit the Constitution can be left open to interpretation.

Does that mean you have to turn in your “true American” merit badge?

I never insinuated that and thats not an interpretation,,,,you used the word military not me,,I just confirmed what it does say, and both words are interchangeable like rectum and asshole

and NO its not up for interpretation as clarified in the 10th amendment,,,

Sadly, you seem to be suffering from dementia. Yes, it was you who first used the word, “military.” [highlighted for your attention]

So? Here are other nouns you won’t explicitly in the Constitution yet they’re deemed Constitutional... “Air Force”, “abortion”, “same-sex marriage.”

airforce is included in the military

Ah, “military,” yet another noun not found in the Constitution. Good one; and thanks for the help in adding to my list.

And yes, you certainly did insinuate words had to be found in the Constitution since your reply to me pointing out the Constitutionality of the FAA’s enforcement of our airspace was to point out you don’t see airspace in there.

Are anti aircraft missiles mentioned in the Constitution, what about Fentanyl and LSD

Now you’re arguing my point, thanks.

Actually I can't argue here because in all seriousness I have no idea what the topic even is.

I am just babbling and catching flies with the babs

You are stuck

 

[progressive hunter]

LOLOL

Ah, “military,” yet another noun not found in the Constitution. Good one; and thanks for the help in adding to my list.

As far as “true Americans,” you really mean only those who think like you. Which ironically, is not very American culture.

ok they use armies instead of military, but we both agree they are the same thing,,,

I'm gonna go out on a limb and say you have a college education,,,

a problem I have found with them is they only go as far as they feel good and stop there,,,

you may want to read more of the constitution because in the 10th amendment its very clear about it

But you insinuated the exact word had to appear there. Now you admit the Constitution can be left open to interpretation.

Does that mean you have to turn in your “true American” merit badge?

I never insinuated that and thats not an interpretation,,,,you used the word military not me,,I just confirmed what it does say, and both words are interchangeable like rectum and asshole

and NO its not up for interpretation as clarified in the 10th amendment,,,

Sadly, you seem to be suffering from dementia. Yes, it was you who first used the word, “military.” [highlighted for your attention]

So? Here are other nouns you won’t explicitly in the Constitution yet they’re deemed Constitutional... “Air Force”, “abortion”, “same-sex marriage.”

airforce is included in the military

Ah, “military,” yet another noun not found in the Constitution. Good one; and thanks for the help in adding to my list.

And yes, you certainly did insinuate words had to be found in the Constitution since your reply to me pointing out the Constitutionality of the FAA’s enforcement of our airspace was to point out you don’t see airspace in there.

Are anti aircraft missiles mentioned in the Constitution, what about Fentanyl and LSD

its time to get a drink and shut the **** up because you are sounding like a complete moron

 

[Pogo]

military and army is interchangeable and what I insinuated was the 10th amendment is clear as to powers delegated,,,and no where in the constitution does it give the feds let alone POTUS the power over private companies or any of those others you listed,,,

the burden is on you to prove otherwise as to where those powers are in the constitution

I already showed you. It’s to provide for the general welfare of the nation. The federal government can enforce rules and regulations on private businesses when it comes to the safety of the nation or when it comes to enforcing laws against private companies.

since a plane holds just a few hundred and there are 325 million people in the country I dont see the general welfare,,,and the courts are for violations in the law not POTUS

I see this more as a punishment to Boeing for having business outside the country,,,he said they would pay for it

This ^^ may well be the most fucked-up logic I've seen all day.

Give me a minute and I can beat any fucked up logic anywhere anytime.

youve had over an hour and so far just made an ass of yourself

Relax, you're still well in the lead.

 

[Faun]

Sadly, you seem to be suffering from dementia. Yes, it was you who first used the word, “military.” [highlighted for your attention]

​

And yes, you certainly did insinuate words had to be found in the Constitution since your reply to me pointing out the Constitutionality of the FAA’s enforcement of our airspace was to point out you don’t see airspace in there.

military and army is interchangeable and what I insinuated was the 10th amendment is clear as to powers delegated,,,and no where in the constitution does it give the feds let alone POTUS the power over private companies or any of those others you listed,,,

the burden is on you to prove otherwise as to where those powers are in the constitution

I already showed you. It’s to provide for the general welfare of the nation. The federal government can enforce rules and regulations on private businesses when it comes to the safety of the nation or when it comes to enforcing laws against private companies.

since a plane holds just a few hundred and there are 325 million people in the country I dont see the general welfare,,,and the courts are for violations in the law not POTUS

I see this more as a punishment to Boeing for having business outside the country,,,he said they would pay for it

It’s not a question of the seating capacity of the jet. It’s for the safety of all 325 million people, anyone of whom could fly on a plane deemed unsafe.

bullshit!!!
\
now if it were a rash of planes falling out of the air I can maybe see the need,,but 2 planes in other countries,,,sorry not a good reason

Two planes that crashed due to a software glitch that exists in all of those planes, regardless of which country they’re flown in.

 

[Frannie]

military and army is interchangeable and what I insinuated was the 10th amendment is clear as to powers delegated,,,and no where in the constitution does it give the feds let alone POTUS the power over private companies or any of those others you listed,,,

the burden is on you to prove otherwise as to where those powers are in the constitution

I already showed you. It’s to provide for the general welfare of the nation. The federal government can enforce rules and regulations on private businesses when it comes to the safety of the nation or when it comes to enforcing laws against private companies.

since a plane holds just a few hundred and there are 325 million people in the country I dont see the general welfare,,,and the courts are for violations in the law not POTUS

I see this more as a punishment to Boeing for having business outside the country,,,he said they would pay for it

This ^^ may well be the most fucked-up logic I've seen all day.

Give me a minute and I can beat any fucked up logic anywhere anytime.

youve had over an hour and so far just made an ass of yourself

God I love it when you talk sexy like that

 

[Marion Morrison]

fantastic

Lol, you castrated fool, Trump acted and grounded the planes.

So shave that pic up where the sun never hits you.

only until the pressure became too great.
SURPRISE: TRUMP KEPT 737 MAX JETS FLYING AFTER PERSONAL CALL FROM BOEING C.E.O.

^
Like those people have a tap on Trump's phone or something? Let's be pragmatic about this..

vanity fair has a good reputation on factual report.
But in any case, its also reported by newsweek and vox.
This time its real.

Repeated fake news is still fake news. I could take the time and point out why, but why bother?

Oh what the heck? It all comes from the NY Times.

"according to two people briefed on the conversation."
Two-Thirds of the 737 Max 8 Jets in the World Have Been Pulled From the Skies

Anonymous sources say the New York Times is full of shit.

 

[progressive hunter]

military and army is interchangeable and what I insinuated was the 10th amendment is clear as to powers delegated,,,and no where in the constitution does it give the feds let alone POTUS the power over private companies or any of those others you listed,,,

the burden is on you to prove otherwise as to where those powers are in the constitution

I already showed you. It’s to provide for the general welfare of the nation. The federal government can enforce rules and regulations on private businesses when it comes to the safety of the nation or when it comes to enforcing laws against private companies.

since a plane holds just a few hundred and there are 325 million people in the country I dont see the general welfare,,,and the courts are for violations in the law not POTUS

I see this more as a punishment to Boeing for having business outside the country,,,he said they would pay for it

It’s not a question of the seating capacity of the jet. It’s for the safety of all 325 million people, anyone of whom could fly on a plane deemed unsafe.

bullshit!!!
\
now if it were a rash of planes falling out of the air I can maybe see the need,,but 2 planes in other countries,,,sorry not a good reason

Two planes that crashed due to a software glitch that exists in all of those planes, regardless of which country they’re flown in.

so you say,,,

 

[Frannie]

ok they use armies instead of military, but we both agree they are the same thing,,,

I'm gonna go out on a limb and say you have a college education,,,

a problem I have found with them is they only go as far as they feel good and stop there,,,

you may want to read more of the constitution because in the 10th amendment its very clear about it

But you insinuated the exact word had to appear there. Now you admit the Constitution can be left open to interpretation.

Does that mean you have to turn in your “true American” merit badge?

I never insinuated that and thats not an interpretation,,,,you used the word military not me,,I just confirmed what it does say, and both words are interchangeable like rectum and asshole

and NO its not up for interpretation as clarified in the 10th amendment,,,

Sadly, you seem to be suffering from dementia. Yes, it was you who first used the word, “military.” [highlighted for your attention]

So? Here are other nouns you won’t explicitly in the Constitution yet they’re deemed Constitutional... “Air Force”, “abortion”, “same-sex marriage.”

airforce is included in the military

Ah, “military,” yet another noun not found in the Constitution. Good one; and thanks for the help in adding to my list.

And yes, you certainly did insinuate words had to be found in the Constitution since your reply to me pointing out the Constitutionality of the FAA’s enforcement of our airspace was to point out you don’t see airspace in there.

Are anti aircraft missiles mentioned in the Constitution, what about Fentanyl and LSD

its time to get a drink and shut the **** up because you are sounding like a complete moron

No answer huh?

Click to expand...
Are anti aircraft missiles mentioned in the Constitution, what about Fentanyl and LSD

What about green anti gravity suits

 

[Pogo]

military and army is interchangeable and what I insinuated was the 10th amendment is clear as to powers delegated,,,and no where in the constitution does it give the feds let alone POTUS the power over private companies or any of those others you listed,,,

the burden is on you to prove otherwise as to where those powers are in the constitution

I already showed you. It’s to provide for the general welfare of the nation. The federal government can enforce rules and regulations on private businesses when it comes to the safety of the nation or when it comes to enforcing laws against private companies.

since a plane holds just a few hundred and there are 325 million people in the country I dont see the general welfare,,,and the courts are for violations in the law not POTUS

I see this more as a punishment to Boeing for having business outside the country,,,he said they would pay for it

It’s not a question of the seating capacity of the jet. It’s for the safety of all 325 million people, anyone of whom could fly on a plane deemed unsafe.

bullshit!!!
\
now if it were a rash of planes falling out of the air I can maybe see the need,,but 2 planes in other countries,,,sorry not a good reason

Two planes that crashed due to a software glitch that exists in all of those planes, regardless of which country they’re flown in.

Or to, or from. Bizarre that the poster needs this explained.

Looks like the US was the last country in the world to ground it.