beautress
Always Faithful
NO we are not held responsible,,,the company isThe country of the plane's origin is the USA, whether we like it or not, and we are held liable if anything bad happens our country sold or took to a foreign country where it crashed. Political maneuvering can place blame wherever it cares to and after taking it to the UN, I'm pretty sure that facts could take on a whole 'nother dimension in the building that is shaped like a shoe made for someone with an ingrown toenail. *sigh*I thought this happened in another country,,,and the premise the FAA works under is not what was meant under original intent of the commerce clauseThe FAA is a paramilitary outfit and operates on an interstate basis, ergo it is subject to Presidential Executive Orders as an understandable consequence, imho.I just cant find where in the constitution this power exists
So the Company should be held responsible, Mr. P. Hunter?
So he's holding the company responsible? Oh, I thought you said, "NO we are not held responsible....the company is."since a plane holds just a few hundred and there are 325 million people in the country I dont see the general welfare,,,and the courts are for violations in the law not POTUSI already showed you. It’s to provide for the general welfare of the nation. The federal government can enforce rules and regulations on private businesses when it comes to the safety of the nation or when it comes to enforcing laws against private companies.military and army is interchangeable and what I insinuated was the 10th amendment is clear as to powers delegated,,,and no where in the constitution does it give the feds let alone POTUS the power over private companies or any of those others you listed,,,Sadly, you seem to be suffering from dementia. Yes, it was you who first used the word, “military.” [highlighted for your attention]I never insinuated that and thats not an interpretation,,,,you used the word military not me,,I just confirmed what it does say, and both words are interchangeable like rectum and assholeBut you insinuated the exact word had to appear there. Now you admit the Constitution can be left open to interpretation.
Does that mean you have to turn in your “true American” merit badge?
and NO its not up for interpretation as clarified in the 10th amendment,,,
And yes, you certainly did insinuate words had to be found in the Constitution since your reply to me pointing out the Constitutionality of the FAA’s enforcement of our airspace was to point out you don’t see airspace in there.
Ah, “military,” yet another noun not found in the Constitution. Good one; and thanks for the help in adding to my list.airforce is included in the military
the burden is on you to prove otherwise as to where those powers are in the constitution
I see this more as a punishment to Boeing for having business outside the country,,,he said they would pay for it
A personal vendetta or actually doing the right thing--which is it, or are we just fitting puzzle parts together to fit a certain political agenda? Please tell your DNC handlers to make up their minds, because they're making you look not like a talking head, but the opposite end, complete with foot in the mouth..

Last edited:


