The disturbing view of Muslims in the US

[PaintMyHouse]

Are you saying Amal Clooney is responsible for other Muslims....

Are you white... Are you responsible for other White people... What every religion or atheist, are you responsible for others apart of your faith...

Nope, you just generalise and say all muslims are bad because there is a few bad muslims...

REMEMBER THE WESTERN WORLD STARTED INTERFERING WITH THE MIDDLE EAST FIRST....

Did we?

When was the first 'Interference'?

And please... be as specific as your intellectual limitations allow.

Who supported and sold arms to the Shah and propted up he evil regime?

Who has Millitary bases in Saudi Arabia keeping a dictator protected...

The Shah's regime wasn't half as evil as the one that replaced it, and it wasn't as evil as any of the Muslim run regimes that currently infest the Middle East. The mistake that moron Carter made was not helping the Shah.

The mistake was overthrowing their elected government, and putting in our puppet and his police-state.

No that wasn't a mistake. That government was no better than the current government.

It doesn't matter a **** what it was, we had no right to overthrow it.

 

[bripat9643]

Did we?

When was the first 'Interference'?

And please... be as specific as your intellectual limitations allow.

Who supported and sold arms to the Shah and propted up he evil regime?

Who has Millitary bases in Saudi Arabia keeping a dictator protected...

The Shah's regime wasn't half as evil as the one that replaced it, and it wasn't as evil as any of the Muslim run regimes that currently infest the Middle East. The mistake that moron Carter made was not helping the Shah.

The mistake was overthrowing their elected government, and putting in our puppet and his police-state.

No that wasn't a mistake. That government was no better than the current government.

It doesn't matter a **** what it was, we had no right to overthrow it.

Ann Coulter - June 10, 2009 - WELCOME BACK, CARTER​

The CIA's taking out Mossadegh was probably the greatest thing that agency ever did. This was back in 1953, before the CIA became a collection of lawyers and paper-pushers.

Mossadegh was as crazy as a March hare (which is really saying something when your competition is Moammar Gadhafi, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini and Saddam Hussein). He gave interviews in pink pajamas while lying in bed. He wept, he fainted, and he set his nation on a path of permanent impoverishment by "nationalizing" the oil wells, where they sat idle after the British companies that knew how to operate them pulled out.

But he was earthy and hated the British, so left-wing academics adored Mossadegh

. The New York Times compared him to Thomas Jefferson.

True, Mossadegh had been "elected" by the Iranian parliament -- but only in the chaos following the assassination of the sitting prime minister.

In short order, the shah dismissed this clown, but Mossadegh refused to step down, so the CIA forcibly removed him and allowed the shah's choice to assume the office. This "coup," as liberal academics term it, was approved by liberals' favorite Republican president, Dwight Eisenhower, and supported by such ponderous liberal blowhards as John Foster Dulles.​

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Who supported and sold arms to the Shah and propted up he evil regime?

Who has Millitary bases in Saudi Arabia keeping a dictator protected...

The Shah's regime wasn't half as evil as the one that replaced it, and it wasn't as evil as any of the Muslim run regimes that currently infest the Middle East. The mistake that moron Carter made was not helping the Shah.

The mistake was overthrowing their elected government, and putting in our puppet and his police-state.

No that wasn't a mistake. That government was no better than the current government.

It doesn't matter a **** what it was, we had no right to overthrow it.

Ann Coulter - June 10, 2009 - WELCOME BACK, CARTER​

The CIA's taking out Mossadegh was probably the greatest thing that agency ever did. This was back in 1953, before the CIA became a collection of lawyers and paper-pushers.

Mossadegh was as crazy as a March hare (which is really saying something when your competition is Moammar Gadhafi, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini and Saddam Hussein). He gave interviews in pink pajamas while lying in bed. He wept, he fainted, and he set his nation on a path of permanent impoverishment by "nationalizing" the oil wells, where they sat idle after the British companies that knew how to operate them pulled out.

But he was earthy and hated the British, so left-wing academics adored Mossadegh

. The New York Times compared him to Thomas Jefferson.

True, Mossadegh had been "elected" by the Iranian parliament -- but only in the chaos following the assassination of the sitting prime minister.

In short order, the shah dismissed this clown, but Mossadegh refused to step down, so the CIA forcibly removed him and allowed the shah's choice to assume the office. This "coup," as liberal academics term it, was approved by liberals' favorite Republican president, Dwight Eisenhower, and supported by such ponderous liberal blowhards as John Foster Dulles.​

No nation has the right, ever, to overthrow the government of another nation. Now you know.

 

[bripat9643]

The Shah's regime wasn't half as evil as the one that replaced it, and it wasn't as evil as any of the Muslim run regimes that currently infest the Middle East. The mistake that moron Carter made was not helping the Shah.

The mistake was overthrowing their elected government, and putting in our puppet and his police-state.

No that wasn't a mistake. That government was no better than the current government.

It doesn't matter a **** what it was, we had no right to overthrow it.

Ann Coulter - June 10, 2009 - WELCOME BACK, CARTER​

The CIA's taking out Mossadegh was probably the greatest thing that agency ever did. This was back in 1953, before the CIA became a collection of lawyers and paper-pushers.

Mossadegh was as crazy as a March hare (which is really saying something when your competition is Moammar Gadhafi, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini and Saddam Hussein). He gave interviews in pink pajamas while lying in bed. He wept, he fainted, and he set his nation on a path of permanent impoverishment by "nationalizing" the oil wells, where they sat idle after the British companies that knew how to operate them pulled out.

But he was earthy and hated the British, so left-wing academics adored Mossadegh

. The New York Times compared him to Thomas Jefferson.

True, Mossadegh had been "elected" by the Iranian parliament -- but only in the chaos following the assassination of the sitting prime minister.

In short order, the shah dismissed this clown, but Mossadegh refused to step down, so the CIA forcibly removed him and allowed the shah's choice to assume the office. This "coup," as liberal academics term it, was approved by liberals' favorite Republican president, Dwight Eisenhower, and supported by such ponderous liberal blowhards as John Foster Dulles.​

No nation has the right, ever, to overthrow the government of another nation. Now you know.

So we had no right to overthrow Nazi Germany or imperial Japan?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

The mistake was overthrowing their elected government, and putting in our puppet and his police-state.

No that wasn't a mistake. That government was no better than the current government.

It doesn't matter a **** what it was, we had no right to overthrow it.

Ann Coulter - June 10, 2009 - WELCOME BACK, CARTER​

The CIA's taking out Mossadegh was probably the greatest thing that agency ever did. This was back in 1953, before the CIA became a collection of lawyers and paper-pushers.

Mossadegh was as crazy as a March hare (which is really saying something when your competition is Moammar Gadhafi, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini and Saddam Hussein). He gave interviews in pink pajamas while lying in bed. He wept, he fainted, and he set his nation on a path of permanent impoverishment by "nationalizing" the oil wells, where they sat idle after the British companies that knew how to operate them pulled out.

But he was earthy and hated the British, so left-wing academics adored Mossadegh

. The New York Times compared him to Thomas Jefferson.

True, Mossadegh had been "elected" by the Iranian parliament -- but only in the chaos following the assassination of the sitting prime minister.

In short order, the shah dismissed this clown, but Mossadegh refused to step down, so the CIA forcibly removed him and allowed the shah's choice to assume the office. This "coup," as liberal academics term it, was approved by liberals' favorite Republican president, Dwight Eisenhower, and supported by such ponderous liberal blowhards as John Foster Dulles.​

No nation has the right, ever, to overthrow the government of another nation. Now you know.

So we had no right to overthrow Nazi Germany or imperial Japan?

We defeated them, dumbass, in a world war. We did not overthrow them because they were taking back what belonged to them in the first place. It was war.

 

[jasonnfree]

Americans have had their rights and ability to travel unharrassed greatly reduced due to one group, Muslim terrorists. The last group of people I'd want as immigrants. Everywhere muslims settle there are major problems. It's insanity to allow tens of thousands more here, especially without background checks which would be impossible. If they keep coming here, at least make them settle in the same neighborhoods as the bushes and cheneys. These are the rats that got rid of their former business partner sadaam, who at least kept the extemely crazy ones neutralized.

 

[jon_berzerk]

The view of Muslims is incredibly bad after what Bush did.

If I did not already have the perfect signature... THIS would be my new signature, as it defines the mental disorder that defines the Ideological Left: PERFECTLY!

great point

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Americans have had their rights and ability to travel unharrassed greatly reduced due to one group, Muslim terrorists. The last group of people I'd want as immigrants. Everywhere muslims settle there are major problems. It's insanity to allow tens of thousands more here, especially without background checks which would be impossible. If they keep coming here, at least make them settle in the same neighborhoods as the bushes and cheneys. These are the rats that got rid of their former business partner sadaam, who at least kept the extemely crazy ones neutralized.

Man, spare me the blame of Islam on Bush. Its' absurd on its face. With regard to the Muslim invasion of the US ... obama has been imported Muslims by the millions.

 

[jon_berzerk]

No that wasn't a mistake. That government was no better than the current government.

It doesn't matter a **** what it was, we had no right to overthrow it.

Ann Coulter - June 10, 2009 - WELCOME BACK, CARTER​

The CIA's taking out Mossadegh was probably the greatest thing that agency ever did. This was back in 1953, before the CIA became a collection of lawyers and paper-pushers.

Mossadegh was as crazy as a March hare (which is really saying something when your competition is Moammar Gadhafi, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini and Saddam Hussein). He gave interviews in pink pajamas while lying in bed. He wept, he fainted, and he set his nation on a path of permanent impoverishment by "nationalizing" the oil wells, where they sat idle after the British companies that knew how to operate them pulled out.

But he was earthy and hated the British, so left-wing academics adored Mossadegh. The New York Times compared him to Thomas Jefferson.

True, Mossadegh had been "elected" by the Iranian parliament -- but only in the chaos following the assassination of the sitting prime minister.

In short order, the shah dismissed this clown, but Mossadegh refused to step down, so the CIA forcibly removed him and allowed the shah's choice to assume the office. This "coup," as liberal academics term it, was approved by liberals' favorite Republican president, Dwight Eisenhower, and supported by such ponderous liberal blowhards as John Foster Dulles.​

No nation has the right, ever, to overthrow the government of another nation. Now you know.

So we had no right to overthrow Nazi Germany or imperial Japan?

We defeated them, dumbass, in a world war. We did not overthrow them because they were taking back what belonged to them in the first place. It was war.

We did not overthrow them because they were taking back what belonged to them in the first place.

that is exactly what hitler said he was doing

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

We defeated them, dumbass, in a world war.

Works out the same. You can dance on the head of this pitiful pin if ya like, but killing Leftists to prevent them from acquiring power and wrecking the lives of millions of people, is what Americans used to do best. Until the Left acquired power here and did to us, what we spent so many years preventing around the world.

Remember, there is no right to ruin people's lives with you're unsound notions and irrational feelings. You simply feel there is... . But in fairness to you, that's only because you're an imbecile.

The simple fact is, if you possessed the intellectual means to be something other than a Relativist... you'd be something else.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

It doesn't matter a **** what it was, we had no right to overthrow it.

Ann Coulter - June 10, 2009 - WELCOME BACK, CARTER​

The CIA's taking out Mossadegh was probably the greatest thing that agency ever did. This was back in 1953, before the CIA became a collection of lawyers and paper-pushers.

Mossadegh was as crazy as a March hare (which is really saying something when your competition is Moammar Gadhafi, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini and Saddam Hussein). He gave interviews in pink pajamas while lying in bed. He wept, he fainted, and he set his nation on a path of permanent impoverishment by "nationalizing" the oil wells, where they sat idle after the British companies that knew how to operate them pulled out.

But he was earthy and hated the British, so left-wing academics adored Mossadegh. The New York Times compared him to Thomas Jefferson.

True, Mossadegh had been "elected" by the Iranian parliament -- but only in the chaos following the assassination of the sitting prime minister.

In short order, the shah dismissed this clown, but Mossadegh refused to step down, so the CIA forcibly removed him and allowed the shah's choice to assume the office. This "coup," as liberal academics term it, was approved by liberals' favorite Republican president, Dwight Eisenhower, and supported by such ponderous liberal blowhards as John Foster Dulles.​

No nation has the right, ever, to overthrow the government of another nation. Now you know.

So we had no right to overthrow Nazi Germany or imperial Japan?

We defeated them, dumbass, in a world war. We did not overthrow them because they were taking back what belonged to them in the first place. It was war.

We did not overthrow them because they were taking back what belonged to them in the first place.

that is exactly what hitler said he was doing

In this case the oil fields actually did belong to them, and that made the west very unhappy.

 

[jon_berzerk]

Ann Coulter - June 10, 2009 - WELCOME BACK, CARTER​

The CIA's taking out Mossadegh was probably the greatest thing that agency ever did. This was back in 1953, before the CIA became a collection of lawyers and paper-pushers.

Mossadegh was as crazy as a March hare (which is really saying something when your competition is Moammar Gadhafi, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini and Saddam Hussein). He gave interviews in pink pajamas while lying in bed. He wept, he fainted, and he set his nation on a path of permanent impoverishment by "nationalizing" the oil wells, where they sat idle after the British companies that knew how to operate them pulled out.

But he was earthy and hated the British, so left-wing academics adored Mossadegh. The New York Times compared him to Thomas Jefferson.

True, Mossadegh had been "elected" by the Iranian parliament -- but only in the chaos following the assassination of the sitting prime minister.

In short order, the shah dismissed this clown, but Mossadegh refused to step down, so the CIA forcibly removed him and allowed the shah's choice to assume the office. This "coup," as liberal academics term it, was approved by liberals' favorite Republican president, Dwight Eisenhower, and supported by such ponderous liberal blowhards as John Foster Dulles.​

No nation has the right, ever, to overthrow the government of another nation. Now you know.

So we had no right to overthrow Nazi Germany or imperial Japan?

We defeated them, dumbass, in a world war. We did not overthrow them because they were taking back what belonged to them in the first place. It was war.

We did not overthrow them because they were taking back what belonged to them in the first place.

that is exactly what hitler said he was doing

In this case the oil fields actually did belong to them, and that made the west very unhappy.

the point is once again your point was factually incorrect

 

[PaintMyHouse]

No nation has the right, ever, to overthrow the government of another nation. Now you know.

So we had no right to overthrow Nazi Germany or imperial Japan?

We defeated them, dumbass, in a world war. We did not overthrow them because they were taking back what belonged to them in the first place. It was war.

We did not overthrow them because they were taking back what belonged to them in the first place.

that is exactly what hitler said he was doing

In this case the oil fields actually did belong to them, and that made the west very unhappy.

the point is once again your point was factually incorrect

No, we overthrew their government because they nationalized their oil industry, that the west wanted for itself. It's history, no spin or lying is required.

 

[jon_berzerk]

So we had no right to overthrow Nazi Germany or imperial Japan?

We defeated them, dumbass, in a world war. We did not overthrow them because they were taking back what belonged to them in the first place. It was war.

We did not overthrow them because they were taking back what belonged to them in the first place.

that is exactly what hitler said he was doing

In this case the oil fields actually did belong to them, and that made the west very unhappy.

the point is once again your point was factually incorrect

No, we overthrew their government because they nationalized their oil industry, that the west wanted for itself. It's history, no spin or lying is required.

you can sit and argue with yourself

others know you are full of hot air

 

[PaintMyHouse]

We defeated them, dumbass, in a world war. We did not overthrow them because they were taking back what belonged to them in the first place. It was war.

We did not overthrow them because they were taking back what belonged to them in the first place.

that is exactly what hitler said he was doing

In this case the oil fields actually did belong to them, and that made the west very unhappy.

the point is once again your point was factually incorrect

No, we overthrew their government because they nationalized their oil industry, that the west wanted for itself. It's history, no spin or lying is required.

you can sit and argue with yourself

others know you are full of hot air

Nope. What I post is true, not an apology for evil. Go lie with your kind.

"The 1953 Iranian coup d'état, known in Iran as the 28 Mordad coup, was the overthrow of the democratically elected Prime Minister of Iran Mohammad Mosaddegh on 19 August 1953, orchestrated by the United Kingdom (under the name "Operation Boot") and the United States (under the name TPAJAX Project).[3][4][5][6]

Mossadegh had sought to audit the books of the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AIOC), a British corporation (now BP) and to change the terms of the company's access to Iranian petroleum reserves. Upon the refusal of the AIOC to co-operate with the Iranian government, the parliament (Majlis) voted to nationalize the assets of the company and expel their representatives from the country.[7][8][9]"
1953 Iranian coup d'état - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[jon_berzerk]

We did not overthrow them because they were taking back what belonged to them in the first place.

that is exactly what hitler said he was doing

In this case the oil fields actually did belong to them, and that made the west very unhappy.

the point is once again your point was factually incorrect

No, we overthrew their government because they nationalized their oil industry, that the west wanted for itself. It's history, no spin or lying is required.

you can sit and argue with yourself

others know you are full of hot air

Nope. What I post is true, not an apology for evil. Go lie with your kind.

"The 1953 Iranian coup d'état, known in Iran as the 28 Mordad coup, was the overthrow of the democratically elected Prime Minister of Iran Mohammad Mosaddegh on 19 August 1953, orchestrated by the United Kingdom (under the name "Operation Boot") and the United States (under the name TPAJAX Project).[3][4][5][6]

Mossadegh had sought to audit the books of the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AIOC), a British corporation (now BP) and to change the terms of the company's access to Iranian petroleum reserves. Upon the refusal of the AIOC to co-operate with the Iranian government, the parliament (Majlis) voted to nationalize the assets of the company and expel their representatives from the country.[7][8][9]"
1953 Iranian coup d'état - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

excuse me for being curt

but you are an untruthful and unreliable poster

 

[PaintMyHouse]

In this case the oil fields actually did belong to them, and that made the west very unhappy.

the point is once again your point was factually incorrect

No, we overthrew their government because they nationalized their oil industry, that the west wanted for itself. It's history, no spin or lying is required.

you can sit and argue with yourself

others know you are full of hot air

Nope. What I post is true, not an apology for evil. Go lie with your kind.

"The 1953 Iranian coup d'état, known in Iran as the 28 Mordad coup, was the overthrow of the democratically elected Prime Minister of Iran Mohammad Mosaddegh on 19 August 1953, orchestrated by the United Kingdom (under the name "Operation Boot") and the United States (under the name TPAJAX Project).[3][4][5][6]

Mossadegh had sought to audit the books of the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AIOC), a British corporation (now BP) and to change the terms of the company's access to Iranian petroleum reserves. Upon the refusal of the AIOC to co-operate with the Iranian government, the parliament (Majlis) voted to nationalize the assets of the company and expel their representatives from the country.[7][8][9]"
1953 Iranian coup d'état - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

excuse me for being curt

but you are an untruthful and unreliable poster

I am nothing of the kind. What I say I can back up, always. I don't say it, unlike most here, otherwise.

 

[jon_berzerk]

the point is once again your point was factually incorrect

No, we overthrew their government because they nationalized their oil industry, that the west wanted for itself. It's history, no spin or lying is required.

you can sit and argue with yourself

others know you are full of hot air

Nope. What I post is true, not an apology for evil. Go lie with your kind.

"The 1953 Iranian coup d'état, known in Iran as the 28 Mordad coup, was the overthrow of the democratically elected Prime Minister of Iran Mohammad Mosaddegh on 19 August 1953, orchestrated by the United Kingdom (under the name "Operation Boot") and the United States (under the name TPAJAX Project).[3][4][5][6]

Mossadegh had sought to audit the books of the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AIOC), a British corporation (now BP) and to change the terms of the company's access to Iranian petroleum reserves. Upon the refusal of the AIOC to co-operate with the Iranian government, the parliament (Majlis) voted to nationalize the assets of the company and expel their representatives from the country.[7][8][9]"
1953 Iranian coup d'état - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

excuse me for being curt

but you are an untruthful and unreliable poster

I am nothing of the kind. What I say I can back up, always. I don't say it, unlike most here, otherwise.

why would anyone expect you to say otherwise

not likely

 

[Unkotare]

.... The reasons are clear, Bush wanted to make a new Common Enemy...

That is a bald-faced lie.

 

[Unkotare]

Hey, if FDR could make concentration camps in a war against the Japanese, I'm sure a conservative president could get American support to build concentration camps in a war against Islam. ....

That scumbag fdr wasn't a conservative, and we are not at war with a religion.

Only democrat presidents have ever built concentration camps in this country. It fits their ideology well.