Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The blm riots are my evidence I don't expect you to admit your side does anything wrong just like you don't expect trump supporters to think Donald did anything wrong. And guess where that kind of closed-mindedness gets voters?There is no evidence for that assertion.
^ &*&$%##&^%%$&@@$% ^I saw a car strewn with right wing bumper stickers the other day. One of which said "The Patriots are getting upset." The other stickers made it clear the reference was not to the football team. It was to traitors who want to be thought of as patriots. Calling yourself a patriot when in fact you favor insurrection is delusional.....and disorienting. The line from 1984.........
“In the end the Party would announce that two and two made five, and you would have to believe it.”......comes to mind. So does MAGA.
From the beginning of Trumpery we were told the pictures we saw of the inauguration did not reflect reality. If you wanted to know what was real you had to listen to an inveterate liar. "What you're seeing and what you're reading is not what is happening." Don would have us believe liars are truth tellers. No wonder he spent so much time being interviewed on Faux.
Now he wants us to believe orchestrating a plan to steal the election by having, in part, the VP accept fake slates of electors rather than the ones representing the votes of the people is covered by the 1st A. Huh?
Orwell despised a lot of words. He wrote a whole essay on them in 1946. Titled “Politics and the English Language,” the essay takes aim at all of Orwell’s pet hatreds: excessive use of Latinate instead of Anglo-Saxon words; unwarranted use of the passive voice; mixed metaphors; clichés; and the phrase “not un-,” as in “it is not unlikely that Trump will seek office in 2024 if not barred from doing so.” (Redundant, fumes Orwell. Just say, “It’s likely.”)
But what Orwell is particularly angry about is imprecise language, and language that conceals rather than clarifies. Which, for him, includes most political language. “Political language,” he writes, “is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.”
For this reason, Orwell argues, politicians are particularly given to lazy, sloppy rhetoric, filled with meaningless buzzwords and clichés. Political language, he says, muffles the sense of what is being communicated, which is so often indefensible, with an overlay of righteous justification. And as a result, those who get caught up in this style of speech — both its speakers and its listeners — find their ability to think caught and shaped by their impoverished language. They are no longer able to recognize a lie as a lie and a murder as a murder because the language in which they speak is so vague as to allow them to consider a lie an alternative fact and a murder a tragic yet unavoidable accident.
https://www.vox.com/culture/2223319...-english-language-josh-hawley-donald-trump-jr
https://www.orwellfoundation.com/th...ther-works/politics-and-the-english-language/
It was only a matter of time before deflection was invoked.
There is no comparison to the roughly 70% of self identified Repubs who still believe the Big Lie.What deflection? You are being called out for using the classic leftist tactic of accusing your opponent of using your go to tactic.
The left has been abusing the English language since the 60's. Now SJW's have added doublethink requirements to the rape of the language.
You can't just say women can have penises, you have to BELIEVE women can have penises, and there have always been women with penises.
There is no comparison to the roughly 70% of self identified Repubs who still believe the Big Lie.
There is no comparison to the roughly 70% of self identified Repubs who still believe the Big Lie.
Equivocation doesn't change your belief in the Big Lie.........which is the belief the the election was not legitimately won by Biden.That's opinion, not language. You call it the big lie and cherry pick the worst accusations to tarnish those like me who still think ballot harvesting occurred and may have changed the results.
Equivocation doesn't change your belief in the Big Lie.........which is the belief the the election was not legitimately won by Biden.
For those of you who still believe in the biggest fraud ever perpetrated on millions of gullible Americans nothing will ever convince you of the con you've adopted. You embarrass yourselves every time you remind those grounded in reality of it.Everyone saw the fraud of unverifiable mail-in ballots.
It doesn't suit your needs, so you pretend that you didn't see it and are simply delusional,
did see it, but don't care, or don't have the mental acumen to understand it.
It could be any of those.
For those of you who still believe in the biggest fraud ever perpetrated on millions of gullible Americans nothing will ever convince you of the con you've adopted. You embarrass yourselves every time you remind those grounded in reality of it.
"These are not the droids you are looking for."For those of you who still believe in the biggest fraud ever perpetrated on millions of gullible Americans nothing will ever convince you of the con you've adopted. You embarrass yourselves every time you remind those grounded in reality of it.
Equivocation doesn't change your belief in the Big Lie.........which is the belief the the election was not legitimately won by Biden.
That qualifies as superstition.
that's one OPINION of the 2020 election, mine is there was something wrong with it, but it can't be proven...yet.
Not abuse of language like the left is doing.