The Disgraceful Conduct of Dems During Hearing with Kari Lake

She stands head and shoulders above any of those who are questioning her in those videos and there is absolutely no comparison between her and that skank, commie Pramila Jayapal.
She's a nutcase who should have stuck to being a pretty face on Phoenix news.
She was actually pretty good at that before the Covid-19 pandemic turned her into a lunatic.
I used to enjoy watching her sometimes when visiting the Phoenix area.
 
At the rate you are calling for censorship you'll be down to just TASS soon.
So censorship is another word that you have no clue as to the meaning. There was nowhere in my post that I called for censorship. I called for the cessation of public funding to a propaganda outlet in the US. I didn't call for any government control of the media--those were the tactics of the DNC and the Biden admin--you know censorship like "truth police" and the "dept. of misinformation?" Surely you haven't forgotten those. BTW, NPR is closer to TASS than anything else in America. Educate yourself.
 
Democrats testify and then attack for not answering questions. Maybe they should ask actual questions instead of framing falsehoods.
  1. Democrats use these hearings not for information gathering but for their own pomp and circumstance, part of their own private politburo of misinformation. Guests subpoenaed there are merely soundboards to bounce their points off of.
  2. As part, they ask questions of their guests with no rational answer because they are expressed simply to lead the questionee into giving witness against themselves as guilty of something, then they try to limit their answers to a simple one word reply, to effectively keep them from even defending themselves. These are modern inquisitions.
  3. The one question I did not hear asked that should have been by Kari Lake of these people is this: If all this overseas radio and 'Voice of America' crap is so important and hitting home with so many people over there as an alternative news source to propaganda from the Chinese, etc., then why doesn't anyone there take it upon themselves to run with this stuff and produce it on their own? Why is it still wholly contingent upon us to create?
  4. The real question that should be asked of these democrats is: "OK, you are arguing how vital this stuff is to continue funding, then you are saying it is doing some good (for democracy in the world)--- great, what is it? Tell it to me. Specifically, what has it accomplished that wouldn't have gotten done so vital if we hadn't done it?
Without answering that, these democrats have no substance to their arguments and no basis in excoriating Kari Lake.
 
Back
Top Bottom