Undre Trump wages are up and tax cuts increase spending power.
Yep.
No.
NAZI policies
As I said, no despot is focused on obeying the tenants of socialism, rather, they only like the appeal of the propaganda that is timeless, and the fact to even have it a chance of working, they need complete control over every aspect of society
This could be the mission statement of the current Progressive Party aka Democrats.As I said, no despot is focused on obeying the tenants of socialism, rather, they only like the appeal of the propaganda that is timeless, and the fact to even have it a chance of working, they need complete control over every aspect of society
Here is a little slice of history for ya.
National Socialist Party of Germany (NAZI) quotes:
We ask that government undertake the obligation above all of providing citizens with adequate opportunity for employment and earning a living. The activities of the individual must not be allowed to clash with the interests of the community, but must take place within the confines and be for the good of all. Therefore, we demand: ... an end to the power of financial interest. We demand profit sharing in big business. We demand a broad extension of care for the aged. We demand ... the greatest possible consideration of small business in the purchases of the national, state, and municipal governments. In order to make possible to every capable and industrious [citizen] the attainment of higher education and thus the achievement of a post of leadership, the government must provide an all-around enlargement of our system of public education.... We demand the education at government expense of gifted children of poor parents.... The government must undertake the improvement of public health -- by protecting mother and child, by prohibiting child labor -- by the greatest possible support for all groups concerned with the physical education of youth. [W]e combat the ... materialistic spirit within and without us, and are convinced that a permanent recovery of our people can only proceed from within on the foundation of The Common Good Before the Individual Good.
Sound familiar?
I thought it was.
Dude, one city has an openly democratic socialist mayor, which is somewhat different from the socialism you are attempting to paint him with.
You actually said something I agreed with.The Fox News crowd started to notice "socialism" on 1/21/2009
Before that they cheered it for 8 years and hence have ZERO credibility claiming they oppose it.
When W was trying to socialize senior drugs (at a RETAIL price to the taxpayer, no bulk discount at all), there was a problem. The actuary who did the cost estimate found the cost way higher than what W was telling Congress. True to the form of all traitors, liars, socialists/fascists, W had the actuary threatened to "shut up or else" to deceive the Congress into socializing senior drugs. And the OP describes W as "conservative..." and THAT is the #1 problem of the GOP today, too many "faux conservatives" who actually pop a lot of free Pfizer pills that their "conservative" hero W socialized.
Inquiry Confirms Top Medicare Official Threatened Actuary Over Cost of Drug Benefits (Published 2004)
Health and Human Services Department internal investigation confirms that then-Admr Thomas A Scully threatened to fire Medicare chief actuary Richard S Foster if he told Congress that drug benefit legislation would likely cost up to $600 billion over ten years, far more than White House figure...www.nytimes.com
If the OP had opposed socialism, he would have opposed W. He didn't. He still loves W, the worst traitor in American history.
I know you meant that as sarcasm but you are factually correct.
As I said, no despot is focused on obeying the tenants of socialism, rather, they only like the appeal of the propaganda that is timeless, and the fact to even have it a chance of working, they need complete control over every aspect of society
Here is a little slice of history for ya.
National Socialist Party of Germany (NAZI) quotes:
We ask that government undertake the obligation above all of providing citizens with adequate opportunity for employment and earning a living. The activities of the individual must not be allowed to clash with the interests of the community, but must take place within the confines and be for the good of all. Therefore, we demand: ... an end to the power of financial interest. We demand profit sharing in big business. We demand a broad extension of care for the aged. We demand ... the greatest possible consideration of small business in the purchases of the national, state, and municipal governments. In order to make possible to every capable and industrious [citizen] the attainment of higher education and thus the achievement of a post of leadership, the government must provide an all-around enlargement of our system of public education.... We demand the education at government expense of gifted children of poor parents.... The government must undertake the improvement of public health -- by protecting mother and child, by prohibiting child labor -- by the greatest possible support for all groups concerned with the physical education of youth. [W]e combat the ... materialistic spirit within and without us, and are convinced that a permanent recovery of our people can only proceed from within on the foundation of The Common Good Before the Individual Good.
Sound familiar?
Germany had universal health care going back to Bismarck. Argument Fail.
No, except for the Jews, no one got their wealth confiscated.
Simply not True. The Churches in Germany were all in on the Nazi thing.
That Sounds like something Republican like.
The NAZIs were socialists and very much like todays progressives. Progressives are sick mix of socialists communists stateists and the mentally ill
Does it work that way with authoritarians too?
Americans are losing spending power, say researchers: Most can no longer afford a 'minimal quality of life'
The Ludwig Institute's Minimal Quality of Life Index found that, in 2023, only 40% of Americans earned enough money to get by in relative comfort.www.cnbc.com
Is trump's plan to increase unaffordability to increase the appeal of an autocrat?
