The Democrats' Virginia Gerrymander Scheme not only Failed, it also Drained the Dems Campaign money for Battleground Districts in other States

LOL....He has a shit ton more power than you have. :laughing0301:

I didn't realize I was the president, but that's exactly the reply I would expect from someone who knows what I said is correct, but doesn't have the integrity to admit it.

Have a nice day.
 
Why should collusion between SCOTUS, Pedo President, and deep south confederate states to gerrymander red states into oblivion without a vote be omitted from this conversation?

Do you have evidence of this collusion with SCOTUS, or are you just operating as programmed?
 
Why should collusion between SCOTUS, Pedo President, and deep south confederate states to gerrymander red states into oblivion without a vote be omitted from this conversation? Context matters. You can just ignore me if it makes you uncomfortable.
At least I know now whose sock "Alicia" is.

Sorry you hate the USSC. Please don't send them death threats though.
 
Democrat’s attempts at gerrymandering have been hugely expensive and especially with regards to Virginia, hugely a waste of time and money. The USSC has booted them out the door following their begging and pleading for a reversal of the State SC knuckle beating with a ruler.

Maybe the Dems can borrow some money from Carmella Harris considering the $1.5 billion she spent during her 15-week “presidential” campaign during the last cackle- fest.



Democrats, already lagging behind Republicans in midterm campaign fundraising, relied heavily on a House Democratic-aligned dark-money group in an attempt to redraw Virginia’s congressional map in their favor, campaign finance records show.
Awwwwwwwwwwwwww, what a shame. And, the last time I heard, Republican coffers for the midterms are far, far ahead of democrats.
 
Do you have evidence of this collusion with SCOTUS, or are you just operating as programmed?
For decades republicans ran on capturing SCOTUS so it would rubberstamp whatever policies they want regardless of precedent. Now that it's happened collusion seems an appropriate term.
 
For decades republicans ran on capturing SCOTUS so it would rubberstamp whatever policies they want regardless of precedent. Now that it's happened collusion seems an appropriate term.

Because we're expected to believe that if the SCOTUS had a Democratic majority, they wouldn't do the same?
 
Because we're expected to believe that if the SCOTUS had a Democratic majority, they wouldn't do the same?
Do I think a Democrat SCOTUS would strip voting rights from millions of people and allow unrestricted gerrymandering? No, I don't think they would.
 
Do I think a Democrat SCOTUS would strip voting rights from millions of people and allow unrestricted gerrymandering? No, I don't think they would.
I think a Democrat SCOTUS would strip Firearms rights from Hundreds of millions of Americans .
 
For decades republicans ran on capturing SCOTUS so it would rubberstamp whatever policies they want regardless of precedent. Now that it's happened collusion seems an appropriate term.
You're clueless. The court has not rubberstamped everything the republicans wanted.
 

Democrats, already lagging behind Republicans in midterm campaign fundraising, relied heavily on a House Democratic-aligned dark-money group in an attempt to redraw Virginia’s congressional map in their favor, campaign finance records show.

Before voters cast their ballots in Virginia’s April redistricting referendum, the 10 wealthiest Republican-aligned political committees had close to twice as much cash on hand as their Democratic counterparts, according to Federal Election Commission records.

Despite this, Democratic-aligned groups poured more than $64 million into their attempt to net four congressional seats by redrawing Virginia’s congressional map, a bet that ultimately failed to pay off after the Virginia Supreme Court invalidated the redistricting process due to a procedural constitutional violation.


I'd say they got exactly what they deserve. They better call up their wealthy sponsors and beg Daddy Warbucks for some more money, having pissed away what they were given.

Excellent.
 
Why should collusion between SCOTUS, Pedo President, and deep south confederate states to gerrymander red states into oblivion without a vote be omitted from this conversation? Context matters. You can just ignore me if it makes you uncomfortable.

I'm not uncomfortable about anything.

It is worth noting that your words, really reminds us all, that the left must be utterly destroyed.
 
I think a Democrat SCOTUS would strip Forearms rights from Hundreds of millions of Americans .
Not even the current SCOTUS, in this MAGA created environment where laws, votes, and precedent don't mean anything, has been able to overturn a constitutional amendment. Though I suppose that's about to be tested with the 14th.
 
Why should collusion between SCOTUS, Pedo President, and deep south confederate states to gerrymander red states into oblivion without a vote be omitted from this conversation? Context matters. You can just ignore me if it makes you uncomfortable.
Why would anyone take your goofy conspiracy theories seriously?
 
Not even the current SCOTUS, in this MAGA created environment where laws, votes, and precedent don't mean anything, has been able to overturn a constitutional amendment. Though I suppose that's about to be tested with the 14th.
MAGA rules, dude.
 
15th post
Who is the pedo, Habib?
Trump and most of his administration. Have you been under a rock? Now that you're back with us send an e-mail to your representative about getting Trump to release the Epstein files.
 
Trump and most of his administration. Have you been under a rock? Now that you're back with us send an e-mail to your representative about getting Trump to release the Epstein files.
As expected, your pedo claims are just more retarded whining. Present the data showing Trump is a pedo.
 
As expected, your pedo claims are just more retarded whining. Present the data showing Trump is a pedo.
Trump's multiple accusers, his lifelong friendships with child traffickers, and his fierce protection of violent child rapists in the Epstein files have little to do with gerrymandering. I suggest you start a new thread and get back to the topic :itsok:
 
Back
Top Bottom