The definitive guide to the 2nd Amendment

[danielpalos]

we should not have security problems in our free States.

The U.S. Constitution never guaranteed you security. It guaranteed you liberty. You are responsible for your own security (hence the 2nd Amendment). If you’re too lazy or too much of a pussy for that responsibility, then you need to find a new nation.

Buh-bye!

lol. We have a Second Amendment. It is not, about natural rights.

 

[danielpalos]

Social-ism starts with a Social Contract, like our federal Constitution.

The U.S. Constitution isn’t a “social” contract, snowflake. It’s a constitution. Otherwise, it would be called the “U.S. Social Contract”. The more desperate you get to support your uninformed, bat-shit crazy position, the more you say really stupid shit (and the more everyone is laughing at you).

Case in point - here is the official definition of “constitution”. Please show the class where the word “social” exists anywhere.

View attachment 184895

Be a good boy now and go play. The adults are talking.

Yes, dear; it is.

You have to refer to a dictionary, silly.

 

[danielpalos]

the right wing can never get their story straight.

That is the difference between the right and the left. You have a “story” and you need to get it straight. The right simply has facts. They are so easy to deal in. And when you deal only with facts, you don’t have to worry about having to remember your previous web of lies.

There is no appeal to ignorance of the first clause of or Second Amendment.

 

[P@triot]

the right wing can never get their story straight.

That is the difference between the right and the left. You have a “story” and you need to get it straight. The right simply has facts. They are so easy to deal in. And when you deal only with facts, you don’t have to worry about having to remember your previous web of lies.

There is no appeal to ignorance of the first clause of or Second Amendment.

The prefatory clause (the “why”) is merely an explanation. It is not the “what”. The what is undeniable and indisputable. The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

It cannot be more clear. And that is why you are so frustrated. Try as you may, you’re incapable of finding a loophole to disarm the American people. Sorry fascist!

 

[danielpalos]

the right wing can never get their story straight.

That is the difference between the right and the left. You have a “story” and you need to get it straight. The right simply has facts. They are so easy to deal in. And when you deal only with facts, you don’t have to worry about having to remember your previous web of lies.

There is no appeal to ignorance of the first clause of or Second Amendment.

The prefatory clause (the “why”) is merely an explanation. It is not the “what”. The what is undeniable and indisputable. The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

It cannot be more clear. And that is why you are so frustrated. Try as you may, you’re incapable of finding a loophole to disarm the American people. Sorry fascist!

dear, the "prefatory clause" contains the Legislative, intent and purpose. No amount of Judicial activism, can change that legal fact.

 

[P@triot]

dear, the "prefatory clause" contains the Legislative, intent and purpose. No amount of Judicial activism, can change that legal fact.

No it doesn’t snowflake. In no way, shape, or form does the prefatory clause (the “why”) mean “intent” or “purpose”. Once again, a basic definition exposes your ignorance about basic words.

No matter how desperately you want to find a loophole in the 2nd Amendment, you can’t. Now shhh!!! The adults are speaking. We cannot continue to have your childish outbursts interrupt the discussions.

 

[P@triot]

dear, the "prefatory clause" contains the Legislative, intent and purpose. No amount of Judicial activism, can change that legal fact.

The word “legislative” should not be capitalized in your sentence as it does not start the sentence and it is not a proper noun. Additionally, there should not be a comma after the word “legislative” in your sentence.

It’s painfully obvious that you are under the age of 18. Please focus on your studies and leave these discussions to the grownups.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

dear, the "prefatory clause" contains the Legislative, intent and purpose. No amount of Judicial activism, can change that legal fact.

The word “legislative” should not be capitalized in your sentence as it does not start the sentence and it is not a proper noun. Additionally, there should not be a comma after the word “legislative” in your sentence.

It’s painfully obvious that you are under the age of 18. Please focus on your studies and leave these discussions to the grownups.

Are you arguing with danielpalos? I can't see. I have him on ignore. But, the responses sound like you are addressing the kind of "wellness of regulation" nonsense he refuses to back up with any meaningful authority.

 

[P@triot]

This would be hilarious if it wasn’t so tragic...

Rev. Al Sharpton’s half-brother was charged with murder in a Sunday shooting death in Alabama after participating in Saturday’s anti-gun “March For Our Lives,” according to a report.

There’s a reason these people want you disarmed. They have no intention of giving up their firearms. And they desperately want helpless, unarmed victims.

Al Sharpton’s Half-Brother Charged With Murder In Shooting One Day After Participating In Gun March

 

[P@triot]

You have to refer to a dictionary, silly.

Well that’s what you do when a child doesn’t know a word. You open a dictionary and you show it to them. That’s what I just did with you. It proved you dead-wrong as always. The U.S. Constitution is not a “social contract” and that’s just an indisputable fact. The definition even proves as much.

 

[P@triot]

we should not have security problems in our free States.

The U.S. Constitution never guaranteed you security. It guaranteed you liberty. You are responsible for your own security (hence the 2nd Amendment). If you’re too lazy or too much of a pussy for that responsibility, then you need to find a new nation.

Buh-bye!

lol. We have a Second Amendment.

We do...and you should try reading it sometime!

 

[P@triot]

Once again a mass shooting was averted because of more guns...not less.

Pulse wasn’t the killer’s intended target. It was Disney. At 10 pm, the killer arrived at the Disney World shopping and entertainment area. He used a stroller to conceal his weapon. Security camera footage shows him passing multiple police and security officers and even watching their movements. It apparently made him rethink his choice.

Good guys with guns stopped a terror attack on Disney that night, and they didn’t even know they were doing it. Imagine if more people open-carried. How many more attacks would that stop before they even got started?

I marvel at the left’s shameless ability to be wrong 24x7 but to continue with the same idiotic narrative.

The narrative for the Pulse nightclub killing just fell apart and the media doesn’t give a crap

 

[P@triot]

As usual, the left pushed their oppression way too far. It’s time conservatives aggressively pursue the complete and total restoration of their 2nd Amendment rights.

 

[P@triot]

The left will vehemently oppose this. Know why? Because it doesn’t result in the eradication of the 2nd Amendment and it will end mass school shootings. They still need the latter to achieve the former...

 

[kamisorishears]

Thanks for the sharing nice post.

 

[danielpalos]

dear, the "prefatory clause" contains the Legislative, intent and purpose. No amount of Judicial activism, can change that legal fact.

No it doesn’t snowflake. In no way, shape, or form does the prefatory clause (the “why”) mean “intent” or “purpose”. Once again, a basic definition exposes your ignorance about basic words.
View attachment 184982
No matter how desperately you want to find a loophole in the 2nd Amendment, you can’t. Now shhh!!! The adults are speaking. We cannot continue to have your childish outbursts interrupt the discussions.

dear, it happens to contain the legislative Intent and Purpose for the second clause.

No amount of Judicial activism can change that legal fact in our Republic.

 

[danielpalos]

dear, the "prefatory clause" contains the Legislative, intent and purpose. No amount of Judicial activism, can change that legal fact.

The word “legislative” should not be capitalized in your sentence as it does not start the sentence and it is not a proper noun. Additionally, there should not be a comma after the word “legislative” in your sentence.

It’s painfully obvious that you are under the age of 18. Please focus on your studies and leave these discussions to the grownups.

Our federal legislators have the sole power to write words on formerly blank pieces of paper, and have them enacted as laws in our Republic.

 

[danielpalos]

dear, the "prefatory clause" contains the Legislative, intent and purpose. No amount of Judicial activism, can change that legal fact.

The word “legislative” should not be capitalized in your sentence as it does not start the sentence and it is not a proper noun. Additionally, there should not be a comma after the word “legislative” in your sentence.

It’s painfully obvious that you are under the age of 18. Please focus on your studies and leave these discussions to the grownups.

Are you arguing with danielpalos? I can't see. I have him on ignore. But, the responses sound like you are addressing the kind of "wellness of regulation" nonsense he refuses to back up with any meaningful authority.

lack of fallacy, is an authority. only the right wing, never gets it.

 

[danielpalos]

You have to refer to a dictionary, silly.

Well that’s what you do when a child doesn’t know a word. You open a dictionary and you show it to them. That’s what I just did with you. It proved you dead-wrong as always. The U.S. Constitution is not a “social contract” and that’s just an indisputable fact. The definition even proves as much.

lol. Nobody on the left takes the right wing seriously about Any Thing, serious.

Our federal Constitution and supreme law of the land, is no fallacy of Composition.

the composition of something

 

[danielpalos]

we should not have security problems in our free States.

The U.S. Constitution never guaranteed you security. It guaranteed you liberty. You are responsible for your own security (hence the 2nd Amendment). If you’re too lazy or too much of a pussy for that responsibility, then you need to find a new nation.

Buh-bye!

lol. We have a Second Amendment.

We do...and you should try reading it sometime!

I have; it is whole and entire reason, i know the right wing is full of fallacy.