The "death" of the Republican Party will "save" America.

[Dot Com]

I would call Romney (R) a RINO but you never what he going to decide next. It depends on the political climate

 

[rightwinger]

Sure it is.

Please link evidence of Romney trying to impose his religious beliefs on others.

Gay Marriage
DADT
Banning Abortion

Macaroni.

Imbecile.

Romney has no problems pushing his religious social agenda on others

 

[rightwinger]

And so the thread dies. Romney has never moved to force religion upon anybody.

Progressive nutjobs. Hopefully they will get another (besides AIDS, obviously that isn't going to do the trick) fatal disease that kills progressives only and we will be released from their culture of death.

Romneys religion teaches him that gays are evil. So he uses his religious beliefs to push a social agenda blocking gays from the military and from getting married

There is no legal reason behind his position

 

[koshergrl]

No link.

As I said. So the thread dies. Evidence of the hysterical dishonesty and bigotry of the left.

 

[rightwinger]

No link.

As I said. So the thread dies. Evidence of the hysterical dishonesty and bigotry of the left.

As Obama backs gay marriage, Romney maintains opposition, calls it a ‘tender’ issue - The Washington Post

http://imkane.wordpress.com/2012/01/29/romneys-consistently-supported-dadt-repeal/

 

[koshergrl]

And that is indicative of him forcing religion on us?

Where, exactly?

You people are too stupid to breathe let alone have an intelligent conversation. You have a major disconnect between the word as it is spoken and written, and what you actually hear/read/say.

 

[koshergrl]

And PS...you don't have the RIGHT to persecute people based on their BELIEF SYSTEM. This is very basic...we have the RIGHT not to be discriminated against based on our religion...and saying that people who have faith have no place in politics is the very essence of discrimination and persecution. You do not have the right to dictate to someone what they may believe, or how they must come to their world view. You don't have the right to block the progress of a person based on whether or not a particular religion has somewhere down the line influenced them. That is discrimination, and a violation of human rights.

 

[koshergrl]

But progressives are the guardians of human rights violations, so I don't expect it to mean much to you.

 

[rightwinger]

And that is indicative of him forcing religion on us?

Where, exactly?

You people are too stupid to breathe let alone have an intelligent conversation. You have a major disconnect between the word as it is spoken and written, and what you actually hear/read/say.

Mitt has a religious objection to homosexuality. He is pushing his religious views on America. There is no legal or social reason to ban gay marriage.....only religious

 

[koshergrl]

Link. The. Evidence.

 

[koshergrl]

No, he's pushing his views, which happen to have been influenced by his religion.

And that's his right. We all have that right. That's what "freedom" means.

 

[M.D. Rawlings]

Sure they do.

Been there a bunch of times. Also been to Canada...

Never saw the kind of poverty you see here.

Yeah. It's a damn shame that lefty doesn't grasp why encouraging a welfare mentality among emerging groups is even more devastating for them in less hetrogeneous societies like America and in a number of Western European societies with large Middle Eastern, African and Asian populations. It's a damn shame that lefty doesn't understand why so many want to come to America and why less and less will want to do so if lefty succeeds in further undermining the free market system and individual liberty in America in favor his wont of running to the government all the time in the name of security. Lefty is such a sissy, but because he insists on squandering other people's hard-earned money on his futile government programs, rather than simply assuaging his pathological need to feel good about himself with his own scratch, he's a pathologically pollyannaish, moralizing prig as well.

The key word here is futile, but it never occurs to lefty that every time he thinks to indict capitalism, he is in fact making an unwitting admission that welfare schemes don’t work. They in fact makes things worse. For is it not so that the Great Society, billions upon billions of dollars later, was supposed to eliminate poverty forever?

 

[Misty]

Liberal message: here's everything for free paid for by the rich but the government will get credit

Conservative message: work hard be proud to succeed. Take care of your family. Give to other's out of kindness. Save your money. Live within your means.

 

[M.D. Rawlings]

And that is indicative of him forcing religion on us?

Where, exactly?

You people are too stupid to breathe let alone have an intelligent conversation. You have a major disconnect between the word as it is spoken and written, and what you actually hear/read/say.

Mitt has a religious objection to homosexuality. He is pushing his religious views on America. There is no legal or social reason to ban gay marriage.....only religious

The moral, legal, political, cultural and societal reasons that homosexual marriage should never be imposed on America at either the state or federal level are legion. Your breezy dismissal merely disregards or overlooks the moral, legal, political, cultural and societal rights and concerns of those who do not share your religious beliefs, if any, or your morality, such as it is.

Romney is well aware of what those moral, legal, political, cultural and societal reasons are, and so are the leftist elites who will insist on maintaining control of public institutions of education, especially, and will use public institutions in general to impose acceptance of homosexuality on private institutions and concerns. But lefty does not care about the rights of those with whom he disagrees. Never forget that lefty is a bureaucrat by nature. His intellectual musings are strictly pedestrian, banal. He never gets beyond sloganeering. Intellectual empathy lies beyond his reach. He just shoves his filth down the throats of others and drives societies toward divisiveness and chaos.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Euro-style socialism ain't it. It's an utter disaster and completely unsustainable.

Or didn't they teach you that in Commie Ass-Sucking History school?

No, they wouldn't, would they?

You seem to have an awful fascination with gay sex, dude.

It seems to me that guys who need to graphically describe gay sex are probably fantasizing about it...

It's kind of like the vegetarian who can't stop talking about sex.

Incidently, Europe has a higher standard of living than we do.

Which nations in Europe do you imagine have a standard of living that approaches ours?
Be a bit more specific if you could.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Then move your lazy ass there.

Oh, wait, that's right -- you're too much a coward to do anything. You'd rather sit at home, ***** on the internet, and wait for someone else to make the changes you demand.

Typical leftist.

Or I can just vote for change...

You don't think talkign on the internet changes the conversation? Then why do you do it?

Voting for Obama sure didn't improve our standard of living.

 

[Liberty]

If the democrats didn't support financial lunacy, I would support them. If the republicans didn't support social repression I would support them. If both parties weren't owned by the elitist bankers and corporate interests, I would support them. Thus, libertarianism is the only side that makes sense.

 

[JoeB131]

And PS...you don't have the RIGHT to persecute people based on their BELIEF SYSTEM. This is very basic...we have the RIGHT not to be discriminated against based on our religion...and saying that people who have faith have no place in politics is the very essence of discrimination and persecution. You do not have the right to dictate to someone what they may believe, or how they must come to their world view. You don't have the right to block the progress of a person based on whether or not a particular religion has somewhere down the line influenced them. That is discrimination, and a violation of human rights.

You have every right to keep your backward, stupid, homophobic, misogynistic beliefs in your homes and churches.

But they have no place in government.

 

[JoeB131]

Then move your lazy ass there.

Oh, wait, that's right -- you're too much a coward to do anything. You'd rather sit at home, ***** on the internet, and wait for someone else to make the changes you demand.

Typical leftist.

Or I can just vote for change...

You don't think talkign on the internet changes the conversation? Then why do you do it?

Voting for Obama sure didn't improve our standard of living.

Sure it did.

IN 2008, I was worried that we were going to shut down the doors and all lose our jobs, any day. That's how bad things were. We were generally afraid the auto-industry would collapse, and take us down with it. (We supply auto parts, among other things).

Then Obama saved the Auto industry.

 

[JoeB131]

Sure they do.

Been there a bunch of times. Also been to Canada...

Never saw the kind of poverty you see here.

Yeah. It's a damn shame that lefty doesn't grasp why encouraging a welfare mentality among emerging groups is even more devastating for them in less hetrogeneous societies like America and in a number of Western European societies with large Middle Eastern, African and Asian populations. It's a damn shame that lefty doesn't understand why so many want to come to America and why less and less will want to do so if lefty succeeds in further undermining the free market system and individual liberty in America in favor his wont of running to the government all the time in the name of security. Lefty is such a sissy, but because he insists on squandering other people's hard-earned money on his futile government programs, rather than simply assuaging his pathological need to feel good about himself with his own scratch, he's a pathologically pollyannaish, moralizing prig as well.

The key word here is futile, but it never occurs to lefty that every time he thinks to indict capitalism, he is in fact making an unwitting admission that welfare schemes don’t work. They in fact makes things worse. For is it not so that the Great Society, billions upon billions of dollars later, was supposed to eliminate poverty forever?

Except no one ever said it would.

Not that it was ever really tried. They were dismantling the Great Society the minute they launched it.