Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
UN Resolution 242 says you are lying!the areas are disputed under international law (at most). You can stamp your feet as much as you want but the law is really clear on this. Calling international law "BS" is not a strong position to take.
Let's not forget, you are the fuckers who moved there, not them.Palestinians have no land ... they have no state ... they don't even have a legitimate representative body ...
You may as well argue that Lebanon is occupying Hezbollah land ... or Yemen is occupying Houthi land.
No, it doesn't. Nice try, though.UN Resolution 242 says you are lying!
"Disputed" means that there is a dispute about it. You have just agreed that people dispute it. Thanks!Name me one country on planet earth that recognizes Israel's right to that land? Just one.
Not actually true. You really should learn more.It is illegal under IHL to hold onto land seized in a war.
Land taken in the defensive war of 1967 which had previously been occupied by Jordan? Is that the land you mean?You took that land in the '67 war and nothing you can say or do will give you title to those territories. Nothing!
It was horrible when Poland attacked Germany, right?For the world to allow you to keep that land, is the equivalent of saying it was okay for Germany to annex Poland in WWII. And that ain't gonna happen!
Here you go! Read'em and weep...Roads segregated BY THE PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY, not the Israelis. All the Israeli sign is a warning. Read the sign for Pete’s sake.
Palestinians have every right in the world to resist the occupation of their homeland from a foreign force.The Israelis aren't randomly blowing up and attacking Palestinians, while the Palestinians are.
UN Resoltion 242 tells Israel to get the hell out of the occupied territories. It reiterates the fact that you cannot hold onto land seized in a war.No, it doesn't. Nice try, though.
"Disputed" means that there is a dispute about it. You have just agreed that people dispute it. Thanks!
Not actually true. You really should learn more.
Land taken in the defensive war of 1967 which had previously been occupied by Jordan? Is that the land you mean?
It was horrible when Poland attacked Germany, right?
You are entirely wrong. As to TITLE to that land---do you have any idea how "arabs" obtained "title"? Poland has been a "country" with a language,UN Resolution 242 says you are lying!
Name me one country on planet earth that recognizes Israel's right to that land? Just one.
It is illegal under IHL to hold onto land seized in a war. You took that land in the '67 war and nothing you can say or do will give you title to those territories. Nothing!
For the world to allow you to keep that land, is the equivalent of saying it was okay for Germany to annex Poland in WWII. And that ain't gonna happen!
You really should read the resolution (and look up the legal force of a UN resolution while you are at it). If it helps, I can give you some background by one of the guys who WROTE 242UN Resoltion 242 tells Israel to get the hell out of the occupied territories. It reiterates the fact that you cannot hold onto land seized in a war.
www.jpost.com
It was defensive. Arabs had already commited (intentionally) what was accepted as an act of war. This is old news.And no, it was not a defensive war. That is just a BS lie you keep spewing that no one believes. That war started when Israeli tanks rolled into Egypt. You attacked them. That is offensive.
wrong again----Nasser lined his troops and hundreds of tanks along withUN Resoltion 242 tells Israel to get the hell out of the occupied territories. It reiterates the fact that you cannot hold onto land seized in a war.
And no, it was not a defensive war. That is just a BS lie you keep spewing that no one believes. That war started when Israeli tanks rolled into Egypt. You attacked them. That is offensive.
Palestinians have been living there for two millenia. Zionists just moved there at the turn of the last century.You are entirely wrong. As to TITLE to that land---do you have any idea how "arabs" obtained "title"? Poland has been a "country" with a language,
and a culture and a government since the 10th century AD formed out of a
population that had a language and culture for ---something like the 10
preceding centuries. "arabs" are and have been for MILLENIA---people from
Arabia (where arabic developed) and nomadic. Even the "country" called
SAUDI ARABIA is a very new developement ---~~~ 1932 --a conglomeration
of several arabia tribal areas---but it is a country NOW. --with a population,
culture and government. "PALESTINE" is nothing more than Israel, Judea--
---and part of Syria and a few other bits and pieces named so by a Greek
historian----it is a land mass to which some nomadic "arabs" set up---often
temporarily, now and then between trading projects. NOT A COUNTRY, not
a government---barely a language---a sort of patois of arabic. No arabic
speaking people has accepted, to date, a BORDER with a country named ISRAEL which IS a country---with a language and a culture and a government.
indigenousbridges.com
That is a bullshit argument! UN Resolution 242 is a "binding" resolution that clearly states it is illegal to hold onto land seized in a war.You really should read the resolution (and look up the legal force of a UN resolution while you are at it). If it helps, I can give you some background by one of the guys who WROTE 242
Resolution 242 doesn't mean what people think it means - opinion
Many claim that Resolution 242 demands that Israel withdraw from all the territories it captured and that it cannot draw new boundaries.
and for more legal explanation,
Resolution 242 Revisited: New Evidence on the Required Scope of Israeli Withdrawal
United Nations Security Council Resolution 242, passed in the wake of the Six-Day War in 1967, is one of the body's most famous decisions. The resolution called for “[w]ithdrawal of Israel armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict.” The meaning of this provision--in...chicagounbound.uchicago.edu
It was defensive. Arabs had already commited (intentionally) what was accepted as an act of war. This is old news.
your grasp of history is "muslim grammar school level" The first muslimPalestinians have been living there for two millenia. Zionists just moved there at the turn of the last century.
They're the natives; you're the settlers.
That was nothing but locker room chest thumping. The Mossad knew at the time Egypt was not going to attack.wrong again----Nasser lined his troops and hundreds of tanks along with
Russian military experts in the field along the border with Israel and dismissed UN peace keepers and DECLARED the impending annihilation of Israel. <<< that is a declaration of war-----remember--even your hero
ADOLF did not declare war on the USA or on jews
So you are wrong on 2 counts and proud of it. You really need to do more reading before you write things like that.That is a bullshit argument! UN Resolution 242 is a "binding" resolution that clearly states it is illegal to hold onto land seized in a war.
History doesn't agree with youAnd no, it was not a defensive war. That war started when Israeli tanks rolled into Egypt. Period. Nothing you can say changes that.
You can continue to be wrong because it is funny to watch.BTW, you can take that condescending attitude of yours and stick it where the sun don't shine!
Have you ever heard of Ahab Ha'am?your grasp of history is "muslim grammar school level" The first muslim
I knew as a friend when we were both 14 years old. He was the son of
a Pakistani who worked in the UN. He told me about a concept that to
that point I did not know. "MUSLIM LAND"----Of course all of the Middle
East is "MUSLIM LAND" as is all of Southeast Asia and the Iberian
penninsula. Today---all of Paterson, New Jersey is also MUSLIM LAND.
Talk to muslims from India, Pakistan, Indonesia, just about any african
country. They will make you SO HAPPY
"the mossad knew" ----do not try claiming what anyone "KNEW" in court---That was nothing but locker room chest thumping. The Mossad knew at the time Egypt was not going to attack.
Nothing changes the fact that your tanks rolled into their country to start that war.
You say I'm wrong, but you can't say why? 242 was clear. You cannot hold onto land seized in a war. Period.So you are wrong on 2 counts and proud of it. You really need to do more reading before you write things like that.
History doesn't agree with you
United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea, (Geneva: UN Publications, 1958), pp. 132–34
You can continue to be wrong because it is funny to watch.
Of course I heard of that desperate story writer. I have heard of many otherHave you ever heard of Ahab Ha'am?
The Jewish settlers] treat the Arabs with hostility and cruelty, trespass unjustly, beat them shamelessly for no sufficient reason, and even take pride in doing so. The Jews were slaves in the land of their Exile, and suddenly they found themselves with unlimited freedom, wild freedom that ONLY exists in a land like Turkey. This sudden change has produced in their hearts an inclination towards repressive tyranny, as always happens when slave rules." 'Ahad Ha'Am warned: "We are used to thinking of the Arabs as primitive men of the desert, as a donkey-like nation that neither sees nor understands what is going around it. But this is a GREAT ERROR. The Arab, like all sons of Sham, has sharp and crafty mind . . . Should time come when life of our people in Palestine imposes to a smaller or greater extent on the natives, they WILL NOT easily step aside." (One Palestine Complete, p.
So, according to Ahab, you are the settlers and they are the natives.
Here you go..."the mossad knew" ----do not try claiming what anyone "KNEW" in court---
your statement will be dismissed unless you can prove your credentials as
a mind reader. Are you suggesting that Nasser was INSANE and Brezhnez
was insane? Russia just WANTED to supply Egypt with hundreds of war
tanks AND experts to coach the Egyptian army FOR FUN? and the dismissal
of the UN peace keepers was a April fools day prank?----
