The current struggle

[Persuader]

Many white Americans think they need guns to fight this war. We in S. Africa also thought we needed guns — and tanks and helicopters and fighter planes. Because of boycotts, we couldn’t buy all the weapons we wanted, but we developed the best artillery in the world. Our G5 and G6 cannons could strike at distances of 120 km, and could fire tactical nuclear warheads. However, in the end, we were conquered without a single cannon shot. Naturally, there was violence: bloodshed, terrorism and so on. We fought the Russians and the Cubans in Angola, but there was never an actual war on South African soil. The real battle was non-military, psychological, and ideological.

There are remarkable similarities between Black Lives Matter and the former Anti-Apartheid Movement that laid South Africa low. In fact, one could draw a line from the Anti-Vietnam War movement to Anti-Apartheid and then to Black Lives Matter. Many of the same people, institutions and media have been involved in all three.

White “racists,” black victims

One of the most obvious ideas of all anti-white groups is that whites are racists and blacks are victims. This is dogma even when statistics show that whites, as in South Africa and America, are overwhelmingly the victims of black violence and not the other way round. White depravity now includes a whole panoply of invisible, implied, and even unconscious racisms. In both the US and South Africa, racial disparities in education, wealth, and even measured IQ between blacks and whites are ascribed to oppression.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

The difference here is that this is not a black-white conflict. This is the globalist movement using the Communist Left and its media in an attempt to take the country away from the Americans. They fully expected Clinton to win in 2016 and finish the job, but now we are once again an obstacle to their progress.

Their influence here is not what their media would have you believe.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Many white Americans think they need guns to fight this war. We in S. Africa also thought we needed guns — and tanks and helicopters and fighter planes. Because of boycotts, we couldn’t buy all the weapons we wanted, but we developed the best artillery in the world. Our G5 and G6 cannons could strike at distances of 120 km, and could fire tactical nuclear warheads. However, in the end, we were conquered without a single cannon shot. Naturally, there was violence: bloodshed, terrorism and so on. We fought the Russians and the Cubans in Angola, but there was never an actual war on South African soil. The real battle was non-military, psychological, and ideological.

There are remarkable similarities between Black Lives Matter and the former Anti-Apartheid Movement that laid South Africa low. In fact, one could draw a line from the Anti-Vietnam War movement to Anti-Apartheid and then to Black Lives Matter. Many of the same people, institutions and media have been involved in all three.

White “racists,” black victims

One of the most obvious ideas of all anti-white groups is that whites are racists and blacks are victims. This is dogma even when statistics show that whites, as in South Africa and America, are overwhelmingly the victims of black violence and not the other way round. White depravity now includes a whole panoply of invisible, implied, and even unconscious racisms. In both the US and South Africa, racial disparities in education, wealth, and even measured IQ between blacks and whites are ascribed to oppression.

These movements are Bolshevik plots. Communists are still trying to win.

The difference I see is that we have anywhere from 300 million to 600 million guns owned by civilians. It is the only impediment to their progress. And they will never get them.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Many white Americans think they need guns to fight this war. We in S. Africa also thought we needed guns — and tanks and helicopters and fighter planes. Because of boycotts, we couldn’t buy all the weapons we wanted, but we developed the best artillery in the world. Our G5 and G6 cannons could strike at distances of 120 km, and could fire tactical nuclear warheads. However, in the end, we were conquered without a single cannon shot. Naturally, there was violence: bloodshed, terrorism and so on. We fought the Russians and the Cubans in Angola, but there was never an actual war on South African soil. The real battle was non-military, psychological, and ideological.

There are remarkable similarities between Black Lives Matter and the former Anti-Apartheid Movement that laid South Africa low. In fact, one could draw a line from the Anti-Vietnam War movement to Anti-Apartheid and then to Black Lives Matter. Many of the same people, institutions and media have been involved in all three.

White “racists,” black victims

One of the most obvious ideas of all anti-white groups is that whites are racists and blacks are victims. This is dogma even when statistics show that whites, as in South Africa and America, are overwhelmingly the victims of black violence and not the other way round. White depravity now includes a whole panoply of invisible, implied, and even unconscious racisms. In both the US and South Africa, racial disparities in education, wealth, and even measured IQ between blacks and whites are ascribed to oppression.

These movements are Bolshevik plots. Communists are still trying to win.

The difference I see is that we have anywhere from 300 million to 600 million guns owned by civilians. It is the only impediment to their progress. And they will never get them.

It was estimated at 300,000,000 ten years ago, with 100,000,000 owners. Sales have been through the roof since Obama took office.

 

[Moonglow]

Many white Americans think they need guns to fight this war. We in S. Africa also thought we needed guns — and tanks and helicopters and fighter planes. Because of boycotts, we couldn’t buy all the weapons we wanted, but we developed the best artillery in the world. Our G5 and G6 cannons could strike at distances of 120 km, and could fire tactical nuclear warheads. However, in the end, we were conquered without a single cannon shot. Naturally, there was violence: bloodshed, terrorism and so on. We fought the Russians and the Cubans in Angola, but there was never an actual war on South African soil. The real battle was non-military, psychological, and ideological.

There are remarkable similarities between Black Lives Matter and the former Anti-Apartheid Movement that laid South Africa low. In fact, one could draw a line from the Anti-Vietnam War movement to Anti-Apartheid and then to Black Lives Matter. Many of the same people, institutions and media have been involved in all three.

White “racists,” black victims

One of the most obvious ideas of all anti-white groups is that whites are racists and blacks are victims. This is dogma even when statistics show that whites, as in South Africa and America, are overwhelmingly the victims of black violence and not the other way round. White depravity now includes a whole panoply of invisible, implied, and even unconscious racisms. In both the US and South Africa, racial disparities in education, wealth, and even measured IQ between blacks and whites are ascribed to oppression.

Depends on who makes the IQ test, eh?

 

[Persuader]

The difference here is that this is not a black-white conflict. This is the globalist movement using the Communist Left and its media in an attempt to take the country away from the Americans. They fully expected Clinton to win in 2016 and finish the job, but now we are once again an obstacle to their progress.

Their influence here is not what their media would have you believe.

The struggle in America is of the same nature that allowed the blacks to gain control of S. Africa.

The goal of course being the destruction of America.

Who will benefit from that?

Certainly not the blacks.

The communists used the blacks in S.Africa just as they are now doing in America.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

The communists here have no trouble attacking black people and blacks are sick of it.

Black Lives Matter Mob Invades Dallas Restaurant, Tries to Start Riot

Mindless chaos as mostly white BLM agitators scream at black families.

summit.news

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Many white Americans think they need guns to fight this war. We in S. Africa also thought we needed guns — and tanks and helicopters and fighter planes. Because of boycotts, we couldn’t buy all the weapons we wanted, but we developed the best artillery in the world. Our G5 and G6 cannons could strike at distances of 120 km, and could fire tactical nuclear warheads. However, in the end, we were conquered without a single cannon shot. Naturally, there was violence: bloodshed, terrorism and so on. We fought the Russians and the Cubans in Angola, but there was never an actual war on South African soil. The real battle was non-military, psychological, and ideological.

There are remarkable similarities between Black Lives Matter and the former Anti-Apartheid Movement that laid South Africa low. In fact, one could draw a line from the Anti-Vietnam War movement to Anti-Apartheid and then to Black Lives Matter. Many of the same people, institutions and media have been involved in all three.

White “racists,” black victims

One of the most obvious ideas of all anti-white groups is that whites are racists and blacks are victims. This is dogma even when statistics show that whites, as in South Africa and America, are overwhelmingly the victims of black violence and not the other way round. White depravity now includes a whole panoply of invisible, implied, and even unconscious racisms. In both the US and South Africa, racial disparities in education, wealth, and even measured IQ between blacks and whites are ascribed to oppression.

Depends on who makes the IQ test, eh?

The original IQ tests were created for racist purposes. That is an undeniable fact.

However, today, IQ tests present biases toward wealthy and influential folks versus common or poor folks. It has a lot less to do with race. Most of those tests have been proven to benefit those who have had opportunities and exposure to a variety of different circumstances versus those with limited resources who are not exposed to a variety of circumstances.

I guess in a way, IQ tests should be called well-rounded tests.

A better means of determining one's IQ is the format used for the LSATs. The "games" used in the LSATs require no prior knowledge, only reasoning ability, a property I find to be the sole indicator of intelligence.

Either way, communists must fucking die, and Johnny Ramone was a fucking genius. KACFM!!!

 

[Persuader]

Many white Americans think they need guns to fight this war. We in S. Africa also thought we needed guns — and tanks and helicopters and fighter planes. Because of boycotts, we couldn’t buy all the weapons we wanted, but we developed the best artillery in the world. Our G5 and G6 cannons could strike at distances of 120 km, and could fire tactical nuclear warheads. However, in the end, we were conquered without a single cannon shot. Naturally, there was violence: bloodshed, terrorism and so on. We fought the Russians and the Cubans in Angola, but there was never an actual war on South African soil. The real battle was non-military, psychological, and ideological.

There are remarkable similarities between Black Lives Matter and the former Anti-Apartheid Movement that laid South Africa low. In fact, one could draw a line from the Anti-Vietnam War movement to Anti-Apartheid and then to Black Lives Matter. Many of the same people, institutions and media have been involved in all three.

White “racists,” black victims

One of the most obvious ideas of all anti-white groups is that whites are racists and blacks are victims. This is dogma even when statistics show that whites, as in South Africa and America, are overwhelmingly the victims of black violence and not the other way round. White depravity now includes a whole panoply of invisible, implied, and even unconscious racisms. In both the US and South Africa, racial disparities in education, wealth, and even measured IQ between blacks and whites are ascribed to oppression.

These movements are Bolshevik plots. Communists are still trying to win.

The difference I see is that we have anywhere from 300 million to 600 million guns owned by civilians. It is the only impediment to their progress. And they will never get them.

Yes, definitely the movements were and are marxist in nature.

If America is fundamentally changed a huge power vacuum will come into play. Who will take advantage of that?

Guns are irrelevant in America simply because the whites who own most of them will not use them. Anyone who does not recognize that is dwelling in fantasy land.

If the leftwing gains the Presidency and control of the congress you can kiss your guns goodbye.

First they will make it impossible for you to get ammunition and then they will take your guns like was done in Australia.

White people are simply not organized well enough to prevent it.

Lots of folks talk the talk but few if any are willing to walk the walk.

My advice for anyone who wants to survive is to learn chinese and practice bending over.

 

[Moonglow]

Many white Americans think they need guns to fight this war. We in S. Africa also thought we needed guns — and tanks and helicopters and fighter planes. Because of boycotts, we couldn’t buy all the weapons we wanted, but we developed the best artillery in the world. Our G5 and G6 cannons could strike at distances of 120 km, and could fire tactical nuclear warheads. However, in the end, we were conquered without a single cannon shot. Naturally, there was violence: bloodshed, terrorism and so on. We fought the Russians and the Cubans in Angola, but there was never an actual war on South African soil. The real battle was non-military, psychological, and ideological.

There are remarkable similarities between Black Lives Matter and the former Anti-Apartheid Movement that laid South Africa low. In fact, one could draw a line from the Anti-Vietnam War movement to Anti-Apartheid and then to Black Lives Matter. Many of the same people, institutions and media have been involved in all three.

White “racists,” black victims

One of the most obvious ideas of all anti-white groups is that whites are racists and blacks are victims. This is dogma even when statistics show that whites, as in South Africa and America, are overwhelmingly the victims of black violence and not the other way round. White depravity now includes a whole panoply of invisible, implied, and even unconscious racisms. In both the US and South Africa, racial disparities in education, wealth, and even measured IQ between blacks and whites are ascribed to oppression.

Depends on who makes the IQ test, eh?

The original IQ tests were created for racist purposes. That is an undeniable fact.

However, today, IQ tests present biases toward wealthy and influential folks versus common or poor folks. It has a lot less to do with race. Most of those tests have been proven to benefit those who have had opportunities and exposure to a variety of different circumstances versus those with limited resources who are not exposed to a variety of circumstances.

I guess in a way, IQ tests should be called well-rounded tests.

A better means of determining one's IQ is the format used for the LSATs. The "games" used in the LSATs require no prior knowledge, only reasoning ability, a property I find to be the sole indicator of intelligence.

Either way, communists must fucking die, and Johnny Ramone was a fucking genius. KACFM!!!

That is because law classes use the format of essays for testing purposes...Instead of the true vs false and multiple choice test.
O used to write 25-30 page dissertations for and exam essay in law and film class.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Many white Americans think they need guns to fight this war. We in S. Africa also thought we needed guns — and tanks and helicopters and fighter planes. Because of boycotts, we couldn’t buy all the weapons we wanted, but we developed the best artillery in the world. Our G5 and G6 cannons could strike at distances of 120 km, and could fire tactical nuclear warheads. However, in the end, we were conquered without a single cannon shot. Naturally, there was violence: bloodshed, terrorism and so on. We fought the Russians and the Cubans in Angola, but there was never an actual war on South African soil. The real battle was non-military, psychological, and ideological.

There are remarkable similarities between Black Lives Matter and the former Anti-Apartheid Movement that laid South Africa low. In fact, one could draw a line from the Anti-Vietnam War movement to Anti-Apartheid and then to Black Lives Matter. Many of the same people, institutions and media have been involved in all three.

White “racists,” black victims

One of the most obvious ideas of all anti-white groups is that whites are racists and blacks are victims. This is dogma even when statistics show that whites, as in South Africa and America, are overwhelmingly the victims of black violence and not the other way round. White depravity now includes a whole panoply of invisible, implied, and even unconscious racisms. In both the US and South Africa, racial disparities in education, wealth, and even measured IQ between blacks and whites are ascribed to oppression.

These movements are Bolshevik plots. Communists are still trying to win.

The difference I see is that we have anywhere from 300 million to 600 million guns owned by civilians. It is the only impediment to their progress. And they will never get them.

Yes, definitely the movements were and are marxist in nature.

If America is fundamentally changed a huge power vacuum will come into play. Who will take advantage of that?

Guns are irrelevant in America simply because the whites who own most of them will not use them. Anyone who does not recognize that is dwelling in fantasy land.

If the leftwing gains the Presidency and control of the congress you can kiss your guns goodbye.

First they will make it impossible for you to get ammunition and then they will take your guns like was done in Australia.

White people are simply not organized well enough to prevent it.

Lots of folks talk the talk but few if any are willing to walk the walk.

My advice for anyone who wants to survive is to learn chinese and practice bending over.

Your warning is not being ignored. Trust me.

However, we have gone through this scenario in our minds many times. To rid America of guns would be a new impossible task.

The problem is finding people to go out and round up all of the guns. Most people in position to execute such a plan, such as military or police, are the same people as those from whom guns would be confiscated. Unless the left intends on sending out a bunch of social workers, it will not happen, and even if they did send out social workers, most of us would laugh at them.

I will agree that there have been efforts to limit ammunition supplies, but we have already seen the effort and have learned how to make our own ammunition. Most of us know the recipe for smokeless gun powder, but supplies are still readily available. In fact, the absence of common ammunition and most retailers is more of an indication of people stocking up on ammunition than anything else.

Many have built their own weapons, so the knowledge is widespread. One of the easiest weapon systems to assemble off books is the very weapon they are going after. It's not gonna happen. There's been many developments in technology to where many weapons components can be 3-D printed. The same technology used for general production of common goods is the same technology that can be used to produce weapons.

And, lastly, and most importantly, America is decidedly the only country with a long-standing gun culture. It is embedded. Our forefathers were frontiersmen, relying heavily on firearms for protection and food. Granted, the communists are really trying hard to erode that culture, but the recent uptick in new gun purchases a new gun owners suggests that All this riding bullshit has done nothing but further embed guns in America's culture. it will be even harder to get them now.

American gun ownership is the one thing that keeps these commies from taking bold action. Just the fact that a huge population of Americans are armed slows down their progress. They are relegated to incremental actions carried out over decades. That may be all we can hope for, but I'll take it now.