"The courts have all of a sudden, out of nowhere, they said, maybe you have to have trials"

[The Irish Ram]

Of course they should be deported if they committed crimes. Prove they committed a crime first. An unfounded accusation isn't enough.

Waltzing across our border and breaking our immigration laws is a crime...

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Of course they should be deported if they committed crimes. Prove they committed a crime first. An unfounded accusation isn't enough.

If they aren’t a US citizen and came here illegally that’s the crime. Crime proven deportation imminent.

 

[Orangecat]

How about this: you skip the system coming in, and you forfeit any system consideration when you’re kicked back out.

 

[Leo123]

We need to revamp the asylum laws too. The 'Maryland man' claimed asylum after he lost his immigration hearing.

 

[Care4all]

The left doesn’t want due process coming in but demands it to send them out. **** off.

NOPE! We want due process WHEN THEY COME IN, at that time.

It really would solve a multitude of our problems with immigration if we had enough immigration courts and judges to hear an undocumented illegal's case, the week or two from capture, keeping them detained until their hearing.

The wait for a court hearing date is around 5 years from entry, we are so shorthanded and back logged....which makes us release immigrants in to the country awaiting their hearings.

If we had a quick turn around on hearings...then those denied asylum are deported immediately from detention back to their own country, almost moments after arriving ... the most of them seeking asylum, are rejected.

Word would get around back in these foreign countries about all of their brothers and sisters spending months walking in caravans to the US, being returned back almost the minute they made it to the USA.... WHICH WOULD DISCOURAGE others considering selling all they own and making the trip.

 

[0311]

What the Constitution says about noncitizens' rights as Trump doubts need for due process

Over the last few days, President Trump has repeatedly questioned the constitutional right to due process. His attacks come as the courts warn that the administration is exceeding the scope of his authority. White House correspondent Laura Barrón-López reports on the latest and Amna Nawaz...

www.pbs.org

Donald Trump, President of the United States: It's a very difficult thing with the courts, because the courts have all of a sudden, out of nowhere, they said, maybe you have to have trials, trials. We're going to have five million trials? It doesn't work. It doesn't work. You wouldn't have a country left.

Pam is letting trump get away with this stuff? She should be disbarred. trump is showing his true ignorance.

The only qualifications Bondi has are her boobs.

 

[WEATHER53]

Not one judge lately deciding against Trump had a trial. They had a hearing from one side and each decided against Trump

 

[Doc7505]

NOPE! We want due process WHEN THEY COME IN, at that time.

It really would solve a multitude of our problems with immigration if we had enough immigration courts and judges to hear an undocumented illegal's case, the week or two from capture, keeping them detained until their hearing.

The wait for a court hearing date is around 5 years from entry, we are so shorthanded and back logged....which makes us release immigrants in to the country awaiting their hearings.

If we had a quick turn around on hearings...then those denied asylum are deported immediately from detention back to their own country, almost moments after arriving ... the most of them seeking asylum, are rejected.

Word would get around back in these foreign countries about all of their brothers and sisters spending months walking in caravans to the US, being returned back almost the minute they made it to the USA.... WHICH WOULD DISCOURAGE others considering selling all they own and making the trip.

~~~~~~
Were they given due process under the Biden Democrat administration when then illegally entered the U.S.?

 

[BULLDOG]

LMAO that's hilarious. "if" you say.

An accusation is not enough. A photoshopped tattoo is not enough.

 

[Care4all]

Not one judge lately deciding against Trump had a trial. They had a hearing from one side and each decided against Trump

It is Trump who is making the false claim about liberals saying illegal crossers need a trial...with Trump then saying it would take decades to deport illegals if we have to give due process to all of them, with a trial. Of course NO ONE said they needed a trial instead of a hearing.....except Trump himself...

Which is bullcrap. Due process for immigration is almost always a hearing before a judge in an immigration court and not a trial, as you noted.

 

[BULLDOG]

Waltzing across our border and breaking our immigration laws is a crime...

Applying for sanctuary is not a crime.

 

[BluesLegend]

An accusation is not enough. A photoshopped tattoo is not enough.

They are in OUR country ILLEGALLY you moron.

 

[Rigby5]

LOL

No, deportees don't get trials in Article III courts, Congress set up immigration courts for them. Where were all the trials when Obama was telling you about his deportations? Hmm?

And no, a petition for habeas isn't a trial. Duh. No court has said they get trials.

Wrong.
It is basic to any republic, that you can not do anything at all to people without a hearing except to bring them to the hearing.

And YES, all Obama deportees who refused voluntary deportation, had hearings.

 

[Rigby5]

Waltzing across our border and breaking our immigration laws is a crime...

Wrong.
A crime is harming others.
Illegal immigration is just a "regulatory infraction", and NOT a "crime", because it harms no one.

 

[The Irish Ram]

Applying for sanctuary is not a crime.

They aren't applying for sanctuary.

 

[Rigby5]

You don’t have trials for immigration deportations…at least we have never required it before

Wrong.
Any deportation has always required a trial unless it is voluntary.

 

[Rigby5]

They aren't applying for sanctuary.

Wrong.
Kilmar had applied for asylum.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

No, we aren't going to spend billions of taxpayer dollars to have millions of trials. If Trump deports under the same rules as Obama and Biden did, then there is no problem. The precedent has been set.

And if you voted for Hillary instead of Trump, then you also voted for this:

It’s different when a democrat does it

It just is

 

[luiza]

Pam is letting trump get away with this stuff? She should be disbarred. trump is showing his true ignorance.

Patently obvious that your understanding of priorities of life and sound business practises have failed you completely.

It constantly amazes me how we intelligent and sound thinking people keep she ship afloat whilst carrying so many people like you along with us for a "Free Ride" .

It is one of the saddening parts of life -- watching the really Stupid and Gullible people like you munching happily but without a clue how the world actually operates .

Dim Jim . So truly Dim .
Another of the Un-Americans .

 

[Leo123]

NOPE! We want due process WHEN THEY COME IN, at that time.

It really would solve a multitude of our problems with immigration if we had enough immigration courts and judges to hear an undocumented illegal's case, the week or two from capture, keeping them detained until their hearing.

The wait for a court hearing date is around 5 years from entry, we are so shorthanded and back logged....which makes us release immigrants in to the country awaiting their hearings.

If we had a quick turn around on hearings...then those denied asylum are deported immediately from detention back to their own country, almost moments after arriving ... the most of them seeking asylum, are rejected.

Word would get around back in these foreign countries about all of their brothers and sisters spending months walking in caravans to the US, being returned back almost the minute they made it to the USA.... WHICH WOULD DISCOURAGE others considering selling all they own and making the trip.

Gotta have a border to do that. Where were you for the past 4 years? Oh yeah you were crying about 'Orange Man Bad' wanting to CLOSE the border. Well, now we have millions of unknowns with no way to find them all much less set up courts to 'process' all of them. It is impossible to give them a quick turn time. Send them back and slap the illegal aliens with criminal records in Alcatraz. Let them wait for 5 or 10 years 'on ice' until their hearing.