The compassionate GOP

[jack113]

We already have disability laws within our sovereign nation.. why give any power over our sovereign nation to the UN?? There is nothing to be gained except a way to bow to the UN

Yep, gonna have to go with this one.

Compassion in the GOP= how much money can I hide in theCayman islands.

 

[Stephanie]

We already have disability laws within our sovereign nation.. why give any power over our sovereign nation to the UN?? There is nothing to be gained except a way to bow to the UN

Yep, gonna have to go with this one.

Compassion in the GOP= how much money can I hide in theCayman islands.

ask any democrat congresscritter, they can probably tell ya

 

[tjvh]

Funny UN picture time...

 

[CrusaderFrank]

But the UN believes in AGW

 

[Seawytch]

So, what were the Republican objections? Why do they have a problem with this? Anyone?

 

[Seawytch]

Huffo Puffo Fluffo

We already have disability laws within our sovereign nation.. why give any power over our sovereign nation to the UN?? There is nothing to be gained except a way to bow to the UN

It's a non binding agreement. It would have done nothing to change US law.

 

[jack113]

The republican heart is nothing but a coin counter.

 

[Avatar4321]

So, what were the Republican objections? Why do they have a problem with this? Anyone?

Countless reasons:

1) We already have laws protecting the rights of the disabled
2) We don't need to outsource our sovereignty to the UN. We certainly dont need the UN, which is completely unaccountable to the voters, enforcing any laws.
3) We definitely done need the government/governments collecting names of the disabled from birth. That's how the exterminations in Germany began. Let's avoid that slippery slope.
4) We don't need to turn our "parents know best" policies to "government knows best" policies.

There are other problems as well.

 

[Avatar4321]

Huffo Puffo Fluffo

We already have disability laws within our sovereign nation.. why give any power over our sovereign nation to the UN?? There is nothing to be gained except a way to bow to the UN

It's a non binding agreement. It would have done nothing to change US law.

Then what is the point? Why waste our time making a non-binding agreement law?

 

[LogikAndReazon]

Yep, if its a UN "treaty" it must be good for the United States.............

European socialists and third world dictators know whats best for us....

 

[jack113]

Yep, if its a UN "treaty" it must be good for the United States.............

European socialists and third world dictators know whats best for us....

Yes republicans are all for right to life as long as long do not have to support that life. Why bother with the handy capped that are a big percentage of our military vets when you can throw them under the bus fro free.

 

[jack113]

Huffo Puffo Fluffo

We already have disability laws within our sovereign nation.. why give any power over our sovereign nation to the UN?? There is nothing to be gained except a way to bow to the UN

It's a non binding agreement. It would have done nothing to change US law.

So you support the Torah instead of the Christian faith. Do you have anything else you want to get off your chest?

 

[Luddly Neddite]

We already have disability laws within our sovereign nation.. why give any power over our sovereign nation to the UN?? There is nothing to be gained except a way to bow to the UN

Yep, gonna have to go with this one.

You could not be more wrong on this.

How did rws get to be so cruel and stupid? Why would they think this has something to do with sovereignty or giving away power?

Watched Robert and Elizabeth Dole as well as several veterans in wheelchairs, on the floor of congress, begging for them to vote in favor but, if there's one thing the GObP/pubpots hate and despise its anyone in a wheelchair.

Of all the shit you rw's pour out here every day, the one thing I cannot understand or forgive is your ongoing hatred for our vets. Especially those who came home in wheelchairs.

 

[LogikAndReazon]

Yep, if its a UN "treaty" it must be good for the United States.............

European socialists and third world dictators know whats best for us....

Yes republicans are all for right to life as long as long do not have to support that life. Why bother with the handy capped that are a big percentage of our military vets when you can throw them under the bus fro free.

Clearly, this must be one of those brain damaged vets.............

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Yep, if its a UN "treaty" it must be good for the United States.............

European socialists and third world dictators know whats best for us....

Yes republicans are all for right to life as long as long do not have to support that life. Why bother with the handy capped that are a big percentage of our military vets when you can throw them under the bus fro free.

That's exactly what the GObP/pubpots/rw's want.

They believe that our disabled vets should not have any rights that are usually accorded to US citizens. What they want is for them to be shut away in nursing homes, so the rw's don't have to look at them.

But of course, they would also refuse any govt money for their support.

Just get them out of sight - that's what the scum sucking rw's wants.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

So, what were the Republican objections? Why do they have a problem with this? Anyone?

Countless reasons:

1) We already have laws protecting the rights of the disabled
2) We don't need to outsource our sovereignty to the UN. We certainly dont need the UN, which is completely unaccountable to the voters, enforcing any laws.
3) We definitely done need the government/governments collecting names of the disabled from birth. That's how the exterminations in Germany began. Let's avoid that slippery slope.
4) We don't need to turn our "parents know best" policies to "government knows best" policies.

There are other problems as well.

This is very typical of the ignorant rw. First, he has a strong opinion, says he knows what he's talking about.

But then, the truth comes out with this.

Then what is the point? Why waste our time making a non-binding agreement law?

He has no clue. This is typical of so many of you.

All you know is that you're against helping anyone who has it harder or worse than you do. You want the elderly and children off food stamps but you wouldn't consider adopting a child you want to see forced to be born.

Disabled vets? **** em, right, rw's ?

Why don't you bother to EDUCATE yourselves before you make a decision? You know, like ACA. If you had a ******* clue, you would stop posting stupid shit about it every day.

gawd damn idiots, you actually take pride in being ignorant.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Oh yeah, and you're all "christians", right?

And you're really pissed about what fux is calling the "war on christmas", right?

******* hypocrites.

 

[rdean]

Romney, who was given a "free lunch" at the White House, complained Obama won because of "free gifts".

You know, stuff everyone wants but no one needs. Free Stuff like food and education and health care.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

The republican heart is nothing but a coin counter.

Actually, the bastards don't bother with coins or anything smaller than $1000. bill.

 

[LogikAndReazon]

So, what were the Republican objections? Why do they have a problem with this? Anyone?

Countless reasons:

1) We already have laws protecting the rights of the disabled
2) We don't need to outsource our sovereignty to the UN. We certainly dont need the UN, which is completely unaccountable to the voters, enforcing any laws.
3) We definitely done need the government/governments collecting names of the disabled from birth. That's how the exterminations in Germany began. Let's avoid that slippery slope.
4) We don't need to turn our "parents know best" policies to "government knows best" policies.

There are other problems as well.

This is very typical of the ignorant rw. First, he has a strong opinion, says he knows what he's talking about.

But then, the truth comes out with this.

Then what is the point? Why waste our time making a non-binding agreement law?

He has no clue. This is typical of so many of you.

All you know is that you're against helping anyone who has it harder or worse than you do. You want the elderly and children off food stamps but you wouldn't consider adopting a child you want to see forced to be born.

Disabled vets? **** em, right, rw's ?

Why don't you bother to EDUCATE yourselves before you make a decision? You know, like ACA. If you had a ******* clue, you would stop posting stupid shit about it every day.

gawd damn idiots, you actually take pride in being ignorant.

Ah yes the ACA.....................Commiecare for welfare queens................Stupendous