The Color of Crime...Report Statistics Released

[Bonnie]

Im not posting this to incite a discussion of racial hate but rather hopefully to have a cohesive debate on the relevance of profiling based on facts..... Are our law enforcement professionals really being allowed to do their jobs??



The Color of Crime: Study on Racial Differences Released
By Nicholas Stix (10/06/05)

Imagine if one demographic group in America were 33 times more prone to commit crimes than another group. How would you feel about the relatively crime-prone group? The relatively crime-free group? Wouldn’t you want to know about such differences?

But we don’t have to imagine anything. The above contrast was not a hypothetical case, but rather the statistical relationship of black to Asian crime in America, as detailed in the new report, The Color of Crime, released by the New Century Foundation, the organization that sponsors American Renaissance magazine.

* “… between 2001 and 2003, blacks were 39 times more likely to commit violent crimes against whites than the reverse, and 136 times more likely to commit robbery.”

* Between 2001 and 2003, blacks committed, on average, 15,400 black-on-white rapes per year, while whites averaged only 900 white-on-black rapes per year.

* “Of the nearly 770,000 violent interracial crimes committed every year involving blacks and whites, blacks commit 85 percent and whites commit 15 percent.”

But there are five-and-one-half as many whites as blacks. If anything, the numbers should be reversed. After all, as leftists always tell us, all groups are supposed to be equally represented in all categories, for good or ill. (Well, not really. Leftists never call on the NBA and NFL to institute racial parity for white players.)

* Nationally, youth gangs are 90 percent non-white. “Hispanics are 19 times more likely than whites to be members of youth gangs. Blacks are 15 times more likely, and Asians are nine times more likely.”

* The only crime category in which Asians are more heavily represented than whites is illegal gambling.

* “Blacks commit more violent crime against whites than against blacks. Forty-five percent of their victims are white, 43 percent are black, and 10 percent are Hispanic. When whites commit violent crime, only three percent of their victims are black.”

But how can that be, when for years commentators of all political persuasions have insisted that the majority of the victims of black crime are themselves black? But it has been true for some time, because blacks increasingly target whites based on the color of the latter’s skin. The commentators have been guilty variously of lying or laziness.

* Far from being guilty of “racially profiling” innocent blacks, police have been exercising racial bias on behalf of blacks, arresting fewer blacks than their proportion of criminals: “… blacks who committed crimes that were reported to the police were 26 percent less likely to be arrested than people of other races who committed the same crimes.”

* “… police are determined to arrest non-black rather than black criminals.” (I have seen this practice in operation on the streets and subways of New York.)

* “[Blacks] are eight times more likely than people of other races to rob someone, for example, and 5.5 times more likely to steal a car.”

Well, as everyone knows, innocent blacks get rounded up by the police all the time, so we can safely ignore such statistics. After all, isn’t that what the NAACP, Village Voice, New York Times, and countless black “activists” and prominent academics have been saying for years? And although the folks insisting on the reality of racial profiling have no facts to back up their claims, they enjoy political prestige and moral authority. The Color of Crime, meanwhile, is based merely on lowly facts. As we shall see, prominent people are already saying that we should ignore The Color of Crime, because it wasn’t produced by the right sort of people. (And of course, the “right sort of people” never tells the truth about race and crime.)

* Charges of racial profiling, which maintain that police target innocent black motorists for traffic stops notwithstanding, a 2002 study by Maryland’s Public Service Research Institute found that police were stopping too few black speeders (23%), compared to their proportion of actual speeders (25%). In fact, “blacks were twice as likely to speed as whites” in general, and there was an even higher frequency of black speeders in the 90-mph and higher range.

* “… the only evidence for police bias is disproportionate arrest rates for those groups police critics say are the targets of bias. High black arrest rates appear to reflect high crime rates, not police misconduct.”

* Blacks not only commit violent crimes at far higher rates than non-blacks, but their crimes are more violent than those of whites. Blacks are three times as likely as non-blacks to commit assault with guns, and twice as likely as non-blacks to commit assault with knives.

* Blacks not only commit violent crimes at far higher rates than whites, but blacks commit “white collar” offenses -- fraud, bribery, racketeering and embezzlement, respectively -- at two to five times the white rate.

* The single greatest indicator of an area’s crime rate is not poverty or education, but race and ethnicity. Even when one controls for income, the black crime rate is much higher than the white rate.

Things are actually much worse than the above notes suggest. As The Color of Crime notes, the feds inflate white crime statistics by counting Hispanic offenders as white; at the same time, “Hispanics are a [hate crime] victim category but not a perpetrator category.” If someone attacks a Mexican for racial reasons, he becomes a Hispanic victim of a hate crime. However, if the same Mexican commits a hate crime against a black, he is classified as a ‘white’ perpetrator. Even more absurdly, if a Mexican commits a hate crime against a white, both victim and perpetrator are reported as white.” Thus, the number of white perpetrators is exaggerated, while the number of white victims is constricted by the federal double-standard.

And as the study fails to note, with black-on-white male prison rape an institutionalized sport among black inmates, hundreds of thousands of white men have thus been victimized but never counted by the government. Meanwhile, white-on-black male prison rape is virtually non-existent.

Some of the study’s many sources were the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reports (UCRs); the feds’ National Crime Victimization Study (NCVS), in which 149,000 people across the country, in statistical proportion to all demographic groups, were called; the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS); and Supplemental Homicide Reports (SHRs); State Court Processing Statistics (SCPS); National Youth Gang Survey; the Federal Justice Statistics Program (FJSP); and National Corrections Reporting Program (NCRP). The succinct report slays dragons in the course of mere footnotes, such as its nailing of tenured California State University criminology professor Phyllis B. Gerstenfeld, who in her book Hate Crimes: Causes, Controls and Controversies, the reality of interracial violence be damned, depicted whites only as perpetrators, and not as the victims of hate crimes.

The Color of Crime – not to be confused with a 1998 piece of propaganda of the same name by tenured University of Maryland professor of criminology, Katheryn K. Russell -- is the most scientifically rigorous research on crime and race available. It’s the state of the art.

The mainstream media will surely be anxious to publicize and discuss The Color of Crime. After all, hasn’t the public been inundated since the late 1990s (and ultimately, since the 1960s) with dubious charges of racism (“racial profiling”) against law enforcement and the justice system? And don’t the MSM always tell us that they will report on anything newsworthy? Doesn’t the New York Times claim to be “the newspaper of record”?

In a future column, we shall see just how the MSM has responded to The Color of Crime.

In any event, the report gave in precise numbers what any sentient being over the age of twenty and living in the United States has long known. A 75-year-old Irish neighbor of mine is a retired nurse who was run out of a once-lovely Brooklyn neighborhood forty years ago by “integration” (read: brazen black crime in broad daylight). As she said to me last spring on the street, “The problem is … you know what the problem is.”

http://www.americandaily.com/article/9584

 

[GotZoom]

Fantastic post!

However, it was obviously written by a racist organization that does not have the truth as a priority. (j/k)

Now...I wonder if we will hear anything about this in the MSM...or Jesse...or Al...or Charlie....

 

[Bonnie]

Zoom..However, it was obviously written by a racist organization that does not have the truth as a priority. (j/k)

You are a funny guy, and surely you beat others to that punch!! lol

 

[dmp]

Blacks who commit crimes only do so because the White Man has held them down for 200 years...it's their way of 'speaking out'...'expressing themselves'.

 

[speederdoc]

I think no news medium dependent on advertising for income would dare to print these statistics. They are not new, and many of them have been posted on this board before, but the internet is the only place I ever see them.

 

[Mr. P]

..... Are our law enforcement professionals really being allowed to do their jobs??

Nope, they have been Handcuffed!

 

[no1tovote4]

[Jesse Jackson]
The employmentation of the examentation of such ratialation of crimination is a racist aplementation!
[/jesse]

 

[Max Power]

* “… between 2001 and 2003, blacks were 39 times more likely to commit violent crimes against whites than the reverse, and 136 times more likely to commit robbery.”

* Between 2001 and 2003, blacks committed, on average, 15,400 black-on-white rapes per year, while whites averaged only 900 white-on-black rapes per year.

But there are five-and-one-half as many whites as blacks. If anything, the numbers should be reversed.

Okay, so if there are 5 times as many whites as blacks, doesn't that mean that blacks would be 5 times as likely to pick whites as victims, and whites are 1/5 as likely to pick blacks?

Of course, this alone doesn't explain the numbers, I won't debate that blacks are (statistically) more criminal than whites, but, NO, those numbers shouldn't be reversed. The author is very confused.

 

[Hagbard Celine]

The reason for this doesn't have anything to do with population numbers and it isn't because blacks are an inferior race. It's because of history and culture. Slaves were brought here out of barbarism and then freed out into white society having absolutely no preconception of how things worked. Now, as tends to happen in situations like that, the majority of blacks live immersed in a subculture that is often looked upon as inferior and poor. Being born into a life like that is an uphill battle all the way against economic factors, racism, ignorance and mainstream culture. Some make it through, the majority don't. It's sad.

I wish Bill Cosby's message had been more widely accepted because he made a lot of good points about the state of African American culture today. The media plays a big part in sustaining negative images of black culture. Many believe that their only way out is through rap or sports. Since the failure rate is high in both of those, many turn to drugs, gangs and/or crime.

Can people really be held responsible for partaking in the culture they are born into? Or will the culture have to change to facilitate any real individual change?

 

[speederdoc]

Can people really be held responsible for partaking in the culture they are born into?

Yes.

 

[dmp]

It's because of history and culture.

That is a crock of horseshit brother. We're not talking about history - we're talking about people taking accountabilty for their TODAY actions.

 

[speederdoc]

Would anyone seriously consider excusing someone's criminal actions simply because they grew up in a challenging environment? Is that not the ultimate steaming pile of liberal poo?

 

[Nuc]

That is a crock of horseshit brother. We're not talking about history - we're talking about people taking accountabilty for their TODAY actions.

How is it that Asians can come here and succeed within 5 years and blacks can't succeed in an entire lifetime?

 

[Bonnie]

Can people really be held responsible for partaking in the culture they are born into? Or will the culture have to change to facilitate any real individual change?

YES!!!! And many do just fine. Culture is not responsible for crime......

 

[dmp]

How is it that Asians can come here and succeed within 5 years and blacks can't succeed in an entire lifetime?

Your question is logically flawed. "Asians" and "Blacks"??

'some' of both species 'fail'.

Some of both 'succeed'.

Noboy is a victim to their economic condition.

 

[Bonnie]

Would anyone seriously consider excusing someone's criminal actions simply because they grew up in a challenging environment? Is that not the ultimate steaming pile of liberal poo?

Yes!! But poo is too nice of a word.

 

[Nuc]

Your question is logically flawed. "Asians" and "Blacks"??

'some' of both species 'fail'.

Some of both 'succeed'.

Noboy is a victim to their economic condition.

You know what I'm saying. And Asians don't even get affirmative action.
:soul: :soul: :soul: :soul: :soul:

 

[no1tovote4]

How is it that Asians can come here and succeed within 5 years and blacks can't succeed in an entire lifetime?

When the culture denounces those that do well in school as "oreos" and "too white" and advances a culture of negativity with "poor-mes" as leaders. When it is willing to allow any action because they are "persecuted" for their skin color and willing to believe any Jesse, Farrakhan, or Sharpton willing to pronounce them free of guilt for negative actions because the "crackers" are all out to get them. When all of these come into play you can pretty much expect those that wallow in such negative thought will end up with negative action. Thankfully the culture has been coming into conversation more and more lately and there may be an end to this sometime in the future.

 

[speederdoc]

Yes!! But poo is too nice of a word.

 

[Bonnie]

Better but I had a different descriptive in mind