Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your postulations have all been tried and all have failed miserably... I will let you run in circles with yourself, as you don't have a clue why what you propose failed previously..It hasn't failed and isn't failing. Technology is improving, all the time.And where was or is, danielpalos' response?Wind Energy has already failed where it is the windiest, it will never work, it has failed for the last 40 years in California, how many more years and how many more billions do you think it will take to fix the problems.better aqueducts, better roads, and better windmills, along with more well regulated militia; can make wing energy happen, anywhere it may be windy.
you are just not paying attention. no wonder nobody takes the right wing seriously.Your postulations have all been tried and all have failed miserably... I will let you run in circles with yourself, as you don't have a clue why what you propose failed previously..It hasn't failed and isn't failing. Technology is improving, all the time.And where was or is, danielpalos' response?Wind Energy has already failed where it is the windiest, it will never work, it has failed for the last 40 years in California, how many more years and how many more billions do you think it will take to fix the problems.better aqueducts, better roads, and better windmills, along with more well regulated militia; can make wing energy happen, anywhere it may be windy.
PS I love the fact you would kill off all of the bird life to complete your dream... What A Fool!
nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics.I see how valuable your time is via your posts.i did; it helps if you have a valid argument, instead of simply wasting time=money.
bailing out, right wing, legacy programs. yes, we do have the high road.nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics.I see how valuable your time is via your posts.i did; it helps if you have a valid argument, instead of simply wasting time=money.
Left wing economics just placed 9.7 trillion dollars in debt on us in 8 years.. Your in no position to claim the high road on this..
Let me put it this way..you are just not paying attention. no wonder nobody takes the right wing seriously.Your postulations have all been tried and all have failed miserably... I will let you run in circles with yourself, as you don't have a clue why what you propose failed previously..It hasn't failed and isn't failing. Technology is improving, all the time.And where was or is, danielpalos' response?Wind Energy has already failed where it is the windiest, it will never work, it has failed for the last 40 years in California, how many more years and how many more billions do you think it will take to fix the problems.better aqueducts, better roads, and better windmills, along with more well regulated militia; can make wing energy happen, anywhere it may be windy.
PS I love the fact you would kill off all of the bird life to complete your dream... What A Fool!
Under what justification? What you are suggesting is a war crime, and, should the orange clown actually do something like that, he would face a War Crimes trial. And be hung for the criminal that he is.So it`s okay if Pres.D.J. Trump would deliver one of these Manhattan Project fusion reactors to Iran with a B1 to "assist" them?I would; but the right insists on Manhattan Projects for fission instead of fusion.Fusion is better.
Nice, point out the commercial fusion reactor that proves your point.
miniaturization changes that equilibrium. you simply don't get the concept, as is usual for the right wing.Let me put it this way..you are just not paying attention. no wonder nobody takes the right wing seriously.Your postulations have all been tried and all have failed miserably... I will let you run in circles with yourself, as you don't have a clue why what you propose failed previously..It hasn't failed and isn't failing. Technology is improving, all the time.And where was or is, danielpalos' response?Wind Energy has already failed where it is the windiest, it will never work, it has failed for the last 40 years in California, how many more years and how many more billions do you think it will take to fix the problems.
PS I love the fact you would kill off all of the bird life to complete your dream... What A Fool!
You have no clue what P=I*R is.. Therefore you have no clue how amperage and voltage are related.
Its no wonder fools like you are not taken seriously...
socialism took us to the Moon and back, last millennium. capitalism is still looking for a capital clue and a capital Cause.Anybody who thinks renewables are cheaper than fossil fuels are matrix bubble dwellers who would buy a bag of dog doo for $1,000 a pop if packaged up just right!! The bozo AGW propagandists only tell people the costs of the finished product and leave out transmission line costs, storage costs and worst of all, depreciation costs which are enormous. Not to mention that government subsidies keep the market afloat or it would die out in a few months! Ghey.
Fucking typical phony liberal crap..................for folks who want to find out the REAL costs of renewables >>>
https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2015/10/18/the-real-cost-of-wind-power/
https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2016/08/15/the-vast-gamble-on-wind-power/
https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2015/01/21/wind-power-slumps-to-under-1-of-uk-electricity-generation/
https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2013/08/29/wind-farms-produce-enough-for-a-few-cups-of-tea/
https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2016/12/29/investment-in-onshore-wind-solar-power-dries-up/
https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2016/09/29/chinas-new-coal-boom-growing-panic-about-green-energy-policies/
an upgraded, state-of-the-art grid, can make renewables, more cost effective.
[/URL]
infrastructure costs.an upgraded, state-of-the-art grid, can make renewables, more cost effective.
s0n......not gonna happen. Like I said in an earlier post........for governments, its all about costs. Costs to the consumer. Germany went full swing into renewables, especially wind in the last 10 years but has gone big on coal imports in the last few years. Why? Because the German people started getting their electric bills and they freaked out. Building transmission lines are mega-expensive and always left out of the cost equation by members of the AGW religion. Too, maximum effective use of these things is 30 years before replacement.........many experts think that timeline is not realistic.
Hey but don't take my word for it...........go look at the Obama EIA projections for renewables 30 years from now = a joke. Combined still will sit at 10%-11% with most of that being hydro.
Renewables will continue to be a green fantasy but stick around just enough for the profit takers to line their pockets. Politicians like keeping their jobs.........they get the boot when the constituents have their electric bills doubling. That's the way it is..........fossil fuels will dominate the energy landscape for decades no matter what the science says. Bogus statistics on costs of renewables are plentiful. But when you take a close look, you end up realizing how laughable it really is. One thing will ALWAYS determine the future of energy": costs.
infrastructure costs.an upgraded, state-of-the-art grid, can make renewables, more cost effective.
s0n......not gonna happen. Like I said in an earlier post........for governments, its all about costs. Costs to the consumer. Germany went full swing into renewables, especially wind in the last 10 years but has gone big on coal imports in the last few years. Why? Because the German people started getting their electric bills and they freaked out. Building transmission lines are mega-expensive and always left out of the cost equation by members of the AGW religion. Too, maximum effective use of these things is 30 years before replacement.........many experts think that timeline is not realistic.
Hey but don't take my word for it...........go look at the Obama EIA projections for renewables 30 years from now = a joke. Combined still will sit at 10%-11% with most of that being hydro.
Renewables will continue to be a green fantasy but stick around just enough for the profit takers to line their pockets. Politicians like keeping their jobs.........they get the boot when the constituents have their electric bills doubling. That's the way it is..........fossil fuels will dominate the energy landscape for decades no matter what the science says. Bogus statistics on costs of renewables are plentiful. But when you take a close look, you end up realizing how laughable it really is. One thing will ALWAYS determine the future of energy": costs.
miniaturization changes that equilibrium. you simply don't get the concept, as is usual for the right wing.Let me put it this way..you are just not paying attention. no wonder nobody takes the right wing seriously.Your postulations have all been tried and all have failed miserably... I will let you run in circles with yourself, as you don't have a clue why what you propose failed previously..It hasn't failed and isn't failing. Technology is improving, all the time.And where was or is, danielpalos' response?
PS I love the fact you would kill off all of the bird life to complete your dream... What A Fool!
You have no clue what P=I*R is.. Therefore you have no clue how amperage and voltage are related.
Its no wonder fools like you are not taken seriously...
cap and trade is merely, playing shell games with statism.infrastructure costs.an upgraded, state-of-the-art grid, can make renewables, more cost effective.
s0n......not gonna happen. Like I said in an earlier post........for governments, its all about costs. Costs to the consumer. Germany went full swing into renewables, especially wind in the last 10 years but has gone big on coal imports in the last few years. Why? Because the German people started getting their electric bills and they freaked out. Building transmission lines are mega-expensive and always left out of the cost equation by members of the AGW religion. Too, maximum effective use of these things is 30 years before replacement.........many experts think that timeline is not realistic.
Hey but don't take my word for it...........go look at the Obama EIA projections for renewables 30 years from now = a joke. Combined still will sit at 10%-11% with most of that being hydro.
Renewables will continue to be a green fantasy but stick around just enough for the profit takers to line their pockets. Politicians like keeping their jobs.........they get the boot when the constituents have their electric bills doubling. That's the way it is..........fossil fuels will dominate the energy landscape for decades no matter what the science says. Bogus statistics on costs of renewables are plentiful. But when you take a close look, you end up realizing how laughable it really is. One thing will ALWAYS determine the future of energy": costs.
Sure does........but its backed by the people. The folks are all for fighting global warming until they start seeing how it hits them in the pocketbook......which is why Cap and Trade died when it hit the floor in congress.
It is amazing how little people know about renewables epic fAiL around the world........because it isn't reported here. Spain.......Australia........Germany. A disaster...........
http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2013/03/14/germanys-green-energy-disaster-a-cautionary-tale-for-world-leaders/#3796074b14a6
Most Americans have no clue what RGGI is about............another green disaster.
http://www.robertstavinsblog.org/tag/rggi/
Trump knows this shit is a loser and is going to be whacking renewables with a baseball bat upside the head.........because its cost stoopid.
i am not sure why you believe what you do.miniaturization changes that equilibrium. you simply don't get the concept, as is usual for the right wing.Let me put it this way..you are just not paying attention. no wonder nobody takes the right wing seriously.Your postulations have all been tried and all have failed miserably... I will let you run in circles with yourself, as you don't have a clue why what you propose failed previously..It hasn't failed and isn't failing. Technology is improving, all the time.
PS I love the fact you would kill off all of the bird life to complete your dream... What A Fool!
You have no clue what P=I*R is.. Therefore you have no clue how amperage and voltage are related.
Its no wonder fools like you are not taken seriously...
AS usual your understanding of Physics and Science fails.. Feelings wont fix the stupid your trying to impose.
Still haven't learned that generation capacity and actual output are not the same things huh?
"The U.S. is indeed the fastest developed growth market for solar globally and in 2016 will be the highest growth market overall," said Mohit Anand, GTM's senior analyst for Global Solar Market
http://www.computerworld.com/articl...t-to-smash-solar-power-records-this-year.html
No new coal plants at all. Wind and solar account for over 68% of all new generation in 2015.
It has failed, increased tax dollars paying for it, higher electric bills, and bankrupt countries attest to this fact. Venuzuala case in point.It hasn't failed and isn't failing. Technology is improving, all the time.And where was or is, danielpalos' response?Wind Energy has already failed where it is the windiest, it will never work, it has failed for the last 40 years in California, how many more years and how many more billions do you think it will take to fix the problems.better aqueducts, better roads, and better windmills, along with more well regulated militia; can make wing energy happen, anywhere it may be windy.
>>>
If Trump uses a Nuke, it will be justified, and people like you can simply go to hell with your "hate america first" attitude.Under what justification? What you are suggesting is a war crime, and, should the orange clown actually do something like that, he would face a War Crimes trial. And be hung for the criminal that he is.
