Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It was his. A federal court ruled that the president has the authority to determine which documents are personal and which belong to the government.When you are in possession of property that is not yours and are made aware of this fact, you still refuse to turn them over, then, at that point, you are stealing.
The Appeals Court shot that down!It was his. A federal court ruled that the president has the authority to determine which documents are personal and which belong to the government.
How long are you morons going to beat this dead horse. You all come off as OCD and delusional.
Wrong.The Appeals Court shot that down!
Not wrong! You don't even know what they said.Wrong.
Wrong. There is no "they," dumbass.Not wrong! You don't even know what they said.
No one in their right mind would look at the PRA and conclude that these highly classified documents would be personal.A federal court ruled that the president has the authority to determine which documents are personal and which belong to the government.
What the fuck is "PRA?" Nobody knows what the documents contain except the FBI,No one in their right mind would look at the PRA and conclude that these highly classified documents would be personal.
The PRA is the presidential records act and it defines what a presidential record is.What the fuck is "PRA?" Nobody knows what the documents contain except the FBI,
according to comey it was…she had an illegal serve, keep hidden with classified documents for years…,completely insecure….comey even said if she had a google account it would of been more secureNo it wasn't.
the PRA isn’t a criminal code. Likely some docs that were presidential records, hence why trump was actively working with the NA to give them everything but xiden used that as a opportunity to raid his political rivals house for personal items, like his attorney client privledge documents…complete Stalinist tacticThe PRA is the presidential records act and it defines what a presidential record is.
These are clearly presidential records and you’d have to be delusional to think otherwise.
Trump decides which records belong to the government, turd. A federal court has already ruled on it.The PRA is the presidential records act and it defines what a presidential record is.
These are clearly presidential records and you’d have to be delusional to think otherwise.
The court decision you’re referring to was not about Trump.Trump decides which records belong to the government, turd. A federal court has already ruled on it.
How many times are you Trump hating morons going to repeat this horseshitl
No one in their right mind would look at the PRA and conclude that these highly classified documents would be personal.
That's right. It was about presidential records, you fucking moron.The court decision you’re referring to was not about Trump.
So no, a federal court has not already ruled on it.
It was about Clinton.That's right. It was about presidential records, you fucking morning.
why should trump be treated differently under the law then prior presidents?The court decision you’re referring to was not about Trump.
So no, a federal court has not already ruled on it.
Prior presidents haven’t done what Trump is doing.why should trump be treated differently under the law then prior presidents?
what’s that? of course they have. That why Clintons case went to court and the court ruled in that casePrior presidents haven’t done what Trump is doing.
No judge is going to accept that these documents were personal documents as defined by the PRA.
The very important differences are serious national security risks.what’s that? of course they have. That why Clintons case went to court and the court ruled in that case
ok, maybe not…but that’s not a crime the PRA isnkr a criminal code.
why isn’t it binding? there were no national security risk. The docs were all stored and guard by armed federal agentsThe very important differences are serious national security risks.
Clinton’s case isn’t relevant to these concerns and isn’t even binding precedent.
