Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you were honest, (not that I'm accusing you of being honest), you would acknowledge that the specifics you post are nothing more specific than silly "quotes" you quote-mine from Harun Yahya.I am certain that both you and I are aware that the entirety of your discussion is not discussion at all, but cutting and pasting "quotes".Oh gawd.
Yet another thread of pc's goofy cut and paste "quotes", quote-mined from Harun Yahya.
I am certain that you and I both fervently hope for the day when you develop the ability to actually discuss the material that I post, and that you no longer have to use the same tired cliches over and over.
Best of luck.
Your silly "quotes" are the definition of tired cliches.
So cute...I refer to 'cliches' and you pick right up on that and repeat it.
So....I do teach you.
"...not discussion at all, but cutting and pasting "quotes".(sic...period belongs inside the quotation marks.)
So....you are unable to read?
That must be why you are never able to comment on the specifics that I post....much less the unassailable conclusions.
So.... We can agree you're incapable of actually composing a coherent argument.
You poor, dear.If you were honest, (not that I'm accusing you of being honest), you would acknowledge that the specifics you post are nothing more specific than silly "quotes" you quote-mine from Harun Yahya.I am certain that both you and I are aware that the entirety of your discussion is not discussion at all, but cutting and pasting "quotes".Oh gawd.
Yet another thread of pc's goofy cut and paste "quotes", quote-mined from Harun Yahya.
I am certain that you and I both fervently hope for the day when you develop the ability to actually discuss the material that I post, and that you no longer have to use the same tired cliches over and over.
Best of luck.
Your silly "quotes" are the definition of tired cliches.
So cute...I refer to 'cliches' and you pick right up on that and repeat it.
So....I do teach you.
"...not discussion at all, but cutting and pasting "quotes".(sic...period belongs inside the quotation marks.)
So....you are unable to read?
That must be why you are never able to comment on the specifics that I post....much less the unassailable conclusions.
So.... We can agree you're incapable of actually composing a coherent argument.
Poor Hollie.....tsk., tsk., tsk.
Still no reference to anything in the thread.....
Help me with this....for clarity....are you a liar, or simply an imbecile?
9. I was waiting for disagreement over the claim that the church endorsed equal status for women.
Such as this:
'Didn't Paul state somewhat regressive views on women,' e.g., "Wives, be subject to your husbands, as to the Lord."
Well, he did....but the context included repeated emphasis on the obligations of husbands to their wives. Thomas Cahill writes that in Paul we find "the only clarion affirmation of sexual equality in the whole of the Bible — and the first one ever to be made in any of the many literatures of our planet."
Thomas Cahill, "Desire of the Everlasting Hills: The World Before and After Jesus,"p. 141.
a. "In those days, you would have been hard put to find anyone who believed in 'sexual equality' in the modern sense, and the person who comes closest to it is, strangely enough, Paul."
A. N. Wilson, "Paul: The Mind of the Apostle,"p.140.
You poor, dear.If you were honest, (not that I'm accusing you of being honest), you would acknowledge that the specifics you post are nothing more specific than silly "quotes" you quote-mine from Harun Yahya.I am certain that both you and I are aware that the entirety of your discussion is not discussion at all, but cutting and pasting "quotes".Oh gawd.
Yet another thread of pc's goofy cut and paste "quotes", quote-mined from Harun Yahya.
I am certain that you and I both fervently hope for the day when you develop the ability to actually discuss the material that I post, and that you no longer have to use the same tired cliches over and over.
Best of luck.
Your silly "quotes" are the definition of tired cliches.
So cute...I refer to 'cliches' and you pick right up on that and repeat it.
So....I do teach you.
"...not discussion at all, but cutting and pasting "quotes".(sic...period belongs inside the quotation marks.)
So....you are unable to read?
That must be why you are never able to comment on the specifics that I post....much less the unassailable conclusions.
So.... We can agree you're incapable of actually composing a coherent argument.
Poor Hollie.....tsk., tsk., tsk.
Still no reference to anything in the thread.....
Help me with this....for clarity....are you a liar, or simply an imbecile?
You always get angry and reactive when your cutting and pasting is ridiculed for being an exercise in intellectual Sloth. However, understanding your limitations, it's even worse when you try to string words together into sentences.
[
"Romans actually had a pretty sensible series of laws."
Where do you get your history.....comic books?
Theodosius the Great, was Roman Emperor from 379 to 395. Theodosius was the last emperor to rule over both the eastern and the western halves of the Roman Empire."
Theodosius I - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
3." In 390 the population of Thessalonica rioted in complaint against the presence of the local Gothic garrison. The garrison commander was killed in the violence, soTheodosius ordered the Goths to kill all the spectators in the circus as retaliation; Theodoret, a contemporary witness to these events, reports:
"... the anger of the Emperor rose to the highest pitch, and he gratified his vindictive desire for vengeance by unsheathing the sword most unjustly and tyrannically against all, slaying the innocent and guilty alike. It is said seven thousand perishedwithout any forms of law, and without even having judicial sentence passed upon them; but that, like ears of wheat in the time of harvest, they were alike cut down."
Ibid.
Aren't you kind of defeating your own argument here? Theodosius was one of the Christian Emperors after Constantine the Great (notice how all these guys call themselves "The Great"?) made Christianity the state religion of the Roman Empire.
Not surprisingly, Rome rapidly descended into barbarism after the Christians took over.
You poor, dear.If you were honest, (not that I'm accusing you of being honest), you would acknowledge that the specifics you post are nothing more specific than silly "quotes" you quote-mine from Harun Yahya.I am certain that both you and I are aware that the entirety of your discussion is not discussion at all, but cutting and pasting "quotes".Oh gawd.
Yet another thread of pc's goofy cut and paste "quotes", quote-mined from Harun Yahya.
I am certain that you and I both fervently hope for the day when you develop the ability to actually discuss the material that I post, and that you no longer have to use the same tired cliches over and over.
Best of luck.
Your silly "quotes" are the definition of tired cliches.
So cute...I refer to 'cliches' and you pick right up on that and repeat it.
So....I do teach you.
"...not discussion at all, but cutting and pasting "quotes".(sic...period belongs inside the quotation marks.)
So....you are unable to read?
That must be why you are never able to comment on the specifics that I post....much less the unassailable conclusions.
So.... We can agree you're incapable of actually composing a coherent argument.
Poor Hollie.....tsk., tsk., tsk.
Still no reference to anything in the thread.....
Help me with this....for clarity....are you a liar, or simply an imbecile?
You always get angry and reactive when your cutting and pasting is ridiculed for being an exercise in intellectual Sloth. However, understanding your limitations, it's even worse when you try to string words together into sentences.
Still not a word about anything posted?
Obviously you aren't a fan of mine, but it is increasingly clear that the reason is that you cannot deal with my postings.
But you can prove me wrong.....just challenge anything I've posted: let's see a cogent response.
Waiting.
You poor, dear.If you were honest, (not that I'm accusing you of being honest), you would acknowledge that the specifics you post are nothing more specific than silly "quotes" you quote-mine from Harun Yahya.I am certain that both you and I are aware that the entirety of your discussion is not discussion at all, but cutting and pasting "quotes".Oh gawd.
Yet another thread of pc's goofy cut and paste "quotes", quote-mined from Harun Yahya.
I am certain that you and I both fervently hope for the day when you develop the ability to actually discuss the material that I post, and that you no longer have to use the same tired cliches over and over.
Best of luck.
Your silly "quotes" are the definition of tired cliches.
So cute...I refer to 'cliches' and you pick right up on that and repeat it.
So....I do teach you.
"...not discussion at all, but cutting and pasting "quotes".(sic...period belongs inside the quotation marks.)
So....you are unable to read?
That must be why you are never able to comment on the specifics that I post....much less the unassailable conclusions.
So.... We can agree you're incapable of actually composing a coherent argument.
Poor Hollie.....tsk., tsk., tsk.
Still no reference to anything in the thread.....
Help me with this....for clarity....are you a liar, or simply an imbecile?
You always get angry and reactive when your cutting and pasting is ridiculed for being an exercise in intellectual Sloth. However, understanding your limitations, it's even worse when you try to string words together into sentences.
Still not a word about anything posted?
Obviously you aren't a fan of mine, but it is increasingly clear that the reason is that you cannot deal with my postings.
But you can prove me wrong.....just challenge anything I've posted: let's see a cogent response.
Waiting.
Prove you wrong?
You did nothing but cut and paste a hodgepodge of "quotes" that you scoured from sources as flimsy as wiki. If the authors of the "quotes" were available to defend them, that would be another matter.
What we're left with are your edited and parsed "quotes" which you are hopeless to defend.
Waiting.... for you to scour Harun Yahya for more silliness.
C'mon. You really are that stupid. It's comically tragic that you dump these silly threads in multiple forums but you're unable to actually offer any coherent comment on what you're cutting and pasting.You poor, dear.If you were honest, (not that I'm accusing you of being honest), you would acknowledge that the specifics you post are nothing more specific than silly "quotes" you quote-mine from Harun Yahya.I am certain that both you and I are aware that the entirety of your discussion is not discussion at all, but cutting and pasting "quotes".Oh gawd.
Yet another thread of pc's goofy cut and paste "quotes", quote-mined from Harun Yahya.
I am certain that you and I both fervently hope for the day when you develop the ability to actually discuss the material that I post, and that you no longer have to use the same tired cliches over and over.
Best of luck.
Your silly "quotes" are the definition of tired cliches.
So cute...I refer to 'cliches' and you pick right up on that and repeat it.
So....I do teach you.
"...not discussion at all, but cutting and pasting "quotes".(sic...period belongs inside the quotation marks.)
So....you are unable to read?
That must be why you are never able to comment on the specifics that I post....much less the unassailable conclusions.
So.... We can agree you're incapable of actually composing a coherent argument.
Poor Hollie.....tsk., tsk., tsk.
Still no reference to anything in the thread.....
Help me with this....for clarity....are you a liar, or simply an imbecile?
You always get angry and reactive when your cutting and pasting is ridiculed for being an exercise in intellectual Sloth. However, understanding your limitations, it's even worse when you try to string words together into sentences.
Still not a word about anything posted?
Obviously you aren't a fan of mine, but it is increasingly clear that the reason is that you cannot deal with my postings.
But you can prove me wrong.....just challenge anything I've posted: let's see a cogent response.
Waiting.
Prove you wrong?
You did nothing but cut and paste a hodgepodge of "quotes" that you scoured from sources as flimsy as wiki. If the authors of the "quotes" were available to defend them, that would be another matter.
What we're left with are your edited and parsed "quotes" which you are hopeless to defend.
Waiting.... for you to scour Harun Yahya for more silliness.
C'mon....you can't be as stupid as you appear......never any comment on the material, the ideas, the points made in the posts?
But you can prove me wrong.....just challenge anything I've posted: let's see a cogent response.
Still waiting.
C'mon. You really are that stupid. It's comically tragic that you dump these silly threads in multiple forums but you're unable to actually offer any coherent comment on what you're cutting and pasting.You poor, dear.If you were honest, (not that I'm accusing you of being honest), you would acknowledge that the specifics you post are nothing more specific than silly "quotes" you quote-mine from Harun Yahya.I am certain that both you and I are aware that the entirety of your discussion is not discussion at all, but cutting and pasting "quotes".Oh gawd.
Yet another thread of pc's goofy cut and paste "quotes", quote-mined from Harun Yahya.
I am certain that you and I both fervently hope for the day when you develop the ability to actually discuss the material that I post, and that you no longer have to use the same tired cliches over and over.
Best of luck.
Your silly "quotes" are the definition of tired cliches.
So cute...I refer to 'cliches' and you pick right up on that and repeat it.
So....I do teach you.
"...not discussion at all, but cutting and pasting "quotes".(sic...period belongs inside the quotation marks.)
So....you are unable to read?
That must be why you are never able to comment on the specifics that I post....much less the unassailable conclusions.
So.... We can agree you're incapable of actually composing a coherent argument.
Poor Hollie.....tsk., tsk., tsk.
Still no reference to anything in the thread.....
Help me with this....for clarity....are you a liar, or simply an imbecile?
You always get angry and reactive when your cutting and pasting is ridiculed for being an exercise in intellectual Sloth. However, understanding your limitations, it's even worse when you try to string words together into sentences.
Still not a word about anything posted?
Obviously you aren't a fan of mine, but it is increasingly clear that the reason is that you cannot deal with my postings.
But you can prove me wrong.....just challenge anything I've posted: let's see a cogent response.
Waiting.
Prove you wrong?
You did nothing but cut and paste a hodgepodge of "quotes" that you scoured from sources as flimsy as wiki. If the authors of the "quotes" were available to defend them, that would be another matter.
What we're left with are your edited and parsed "quotes" which you are hopeless to defend.
Waiting.... for you to scour Harun Yahya for more silliness.
C'mon....you can't be as stupid as you appear......never any comment on the material, the ideas, the points made in the posts?
But you can prove me wrong.....just challenge anything I've posted: let's see a cogent response.
Still waiting.
There's really nothing to challenge when you spammers do nothing more than scour the web for "quotes" that are edited, parsed and out of context. That appeals to people such as yourself who are absent any ability to offer a coherent comment on what they're cutting and pasting.
Let's see you provide some more cut and paste spam.C'mon. You really are that stupid. It's comically tragic that you dump these silly threads in multiple forums but you're unable to actually offer any coherent comment on what you're cutting and pasting.You poor, dear.If you were honest, (not that I'm accusing you of being honest), you would acknowledge that the specifics you post are nothing more specific than silly "quotes" you quote-mine from Harun Yahya.I am certain that both you and I are aware that the entirety of your discussion is not discussion at all, but cutting and pasting "quotes".Oh gawd.
Yet another thread of pc's goofy cut and paste "quotes", quote-mined from Harun Yahya.
I am certain that you and I both fervently hope for the day when you develop the ability to actually discuss the material that I post, and that you no longer have to use the same tired cliches over and over.
Best of luck.
Your silly "quotes" are the definition of tired cliches.
So cute...I refer to 'cliches' and you pick right up on that and repeat it.
So....I do teach you.
"...not discussion at all, but cutting and pasting "quotes".(sic...period belongs inside the quotation marks.)
So....you are unable to read?
That must be why you are never able to comment on the specifics that I post....much less the unassailable conclusions.
So.... We can agree you're incapable of actually composing a coherent argument.
Poor Hollie.....tsk., tsk., tsk.
Still no reference to anything in the thread.....
Help me with this....for clarity....are you a liar, or simply an imbecile?
You always get angry and reactive when your cutting and pasting is ridiculed for being an exercise in intellectual Sloth. However, understanding your limitations, it's even worse when you try to string words together into sentences.
Still not a word about anything posted?
Obviously you aren't a fan of mine, but it is increasingly clear that the reason is that you cannot deal with my postings.
But you can prove me wrong.....just challenge anything I've posted: let's see a cogent response.
Waiting.
Prove you wrong?
You did nothing but cut and paste a hodgepodge of "quotes" that you scoured from sources as flimsy as wiki. If the authors of the "quotes" were available to defend them, that would be another matter.
What we're left with are your edited and parsed "quotes" which you are hopeless to defend.
Waiting.... for you to scour Harun Yahya for more silliness.
C'mon....you can't be as stupid as you appear......never any comment on the material, the ideas, the points made in the posts?
But you can prove me wrong.....just challenge anything I've posted: let's see a cogent response.
Still waiting.
There's really nothing to challenge when you spammers do nothing more than scour the web for "quotes" that are edited, parsed and out of context. That appeals to people such as yourself who are absent any ability to offer a coherent comment on what they're cutting and pasting.
I must admit that I get a kick out of revealing what a dunce you are.
But you can prove me wrong.....just challenge anything I've posted: let's see a cogent response.
Still waiting.
Let's see you provide some more cut and paste spam.C'mon. You really are that stupid. It's comically tragic that you dump these silly threads in multiple forums but you're unable to actually offer any coherent comment on what you're cutting and pasting.You poor, dear.If you were honest, (not that I'm accusing you of being honest), you would acknowledge that the specifics you post are nothing more specific than silly "quotes" you quote-mine from Harun Yahya.I am certain that both you and I are aware that the entirety of your discussion is not discussion at all, but cutting and pasting "quotes".Oh gawd.
Yet another thread of pc's goofy cut and paste "quotes", quote-mined from Harun Yahya.
I am certain that you and I both fervently hope for the day when you develop the ability to actually discuss the material that I post, and that you no longer have to use the same tired cliches over and over.
Best of luck.
Your silly "quotes" are the definition of tired cliches.
So cute...I refer to 'cliches' and you pick right up on that and repeat it.
So....I do teach you.
"...not discussion at all, but cutting and pasting "quotes".(sic...period belongs inside the quotation marks.)
So....you are unable to read?
That must be why you are never able to comment on the specifics that I post....much less the unassailable conclusions.
So.... We can agree you're incapable of actually composing a coherent argument.
Poor Hollie.....tsk., tsk., tsk.
Still no reference to anything in the thread.....
Help me with this....for clarity....are you a liar, or simply an imbecile?
You always get angry and reactive when your cutting and pasting is ridiculed for being an exercise in intellectual Sloth. However, understanding your limitations, it's even worse when you try to string words together into sentences.
Still not a word about anything posted?
Obviously you aren't a fan of mine, but it is increasingly clear that the reason is that you cannot deal with my postings.
But you can prove me wrong.....just challenge anything I've posted: let's see a cogent response.
Waiting.
Prove you wrong?
You did nothing but cut and paste a hodgepodge of "quotes" that you scoured from sources as flimsy as wiki. If the authors of the "quotes" were available to defend them, that would be another matter.
What we're left with are your edited and parsed "quotes" which you are hopeless to defend.
Waiting.... for you to scour Harun Yahya for more silliness.
C'mon....you can't be as stupid as you appear......never any comment on the material, the ideas, the points made in the posts?
But you can prove me wrong.....just challenge anything I've posted: let's see a cogent response.
Still waiting.
There's really nothing to challenge when you spammers do nothing more than scour the web for "quotes" that are edited, parsed and out of context. That appeals to people such as yourself who are absent any ability to offer a coherent comment on what they're cutting and pasting.
I must admit that I get a kick out of revealing what a dunce you are.
But you can prove me wrong.....just challenge anything I've posted: let's see a cogent response.
Still waiting.
Waiting.
Oh my. Are you scouring Harun Yahya for more edited and parsed "quotes" you can spam this thread with?Let's see you provide some more cut and paste spam.C'mon. You really are that stupid. It's comically tragic that you dump these silly threads in multiple forums but you're unable to actually offer any coherent comment on what you're cutting and pasting.You poor, dear.If you were honest, (not that I'm accusing you of being honest), you would acknowledge that the specifics you post are nothing more specific than silly "quotes" you quote-mine from Harun Yahya.I am certain that both you and I are aware that the entirety of your discussion is not discussion at all, but cutting and pasting "quotes".Oh gawd.
Yet another thread of pc's goofy cut and paste "quotes", quote-mined from Harun Yahya.
I am certain that you and I both fervently hope for the day when you develop the ability to actually discuss the material that I post, and that you no longer have to use the same tired cliches over and over.
Best of luck.
Your silly "quotes" are the definition of tired cliches.
So cute...I refer to 'cliches' and you pick right up on that and repeat it.
So....I do teach you.
"...not discussion at all, but cutting and pasting "quotes".(sic...period belongs inside the quotation marks.)
So....you are unable to read?
That must be why you are never able to comment on the specifics that I post....much less the unassailable conclusions.
So.... We can agree you're incapable of actually composing a coherent argument.
Poor Hollie.....tsk., tsk., tsk.
Still no reference to anything in the thread.....
Help me with this....for clarity....are you a liar, or simply an imbecile?
You always get angry and reactive when your cutting and pasting is ridiculed for being an exercise in intellectual Sloth. However, understanding your limitations, it's even worse when you try to string words together into sentences.
Still not a word about anything posted?
Obviously you aren't a fan of mine, but it is increasingly clear that the reason is that you cannot deal with my postings.
But you can prove me wrong.....just challenge anything I've posted: let's see a cogent response.
Waiting.
Prove you wrong?
You did nothing but cut and paste a hodgepodge of "quotes" that you scoured from sources as flimsy as wiki. If the authors of the "quotes" were available to defend them, that would be another matter.
What we're left with are your edited and parsed "quotes" which you are hopeless to defend.
Waiting.... for you to scour Harun Yahya for more silliness.
C'mon....you can't be as stupid as you appear......never any comment on the material, the ideas, the points made in the posts?
But you can prove me wrong.....just challenge anything I've posted: let's see a cogent response.
Still waiting.
There's really nothing to challenge when you spammers do nothing more than scour the web for "quotes" that are edited, parsed and out of context. That appeals to people such as yourself who are absent any ability to offer a coherent comment on what they're cutting and pasting.
I must admit that I get a kick out of revealing what a dunce you are.
But you can prove me wrong.....just challenge anything I've posted: let's see a cogent response.
Still waiting.
Waiting.
What??? You still haven't been able to come up with any comment on the posts?
I know you'd love to be able to respond....you just don't have the ability.
Let me put some more together on this theme, and give you another chance....
Now....gear up!
1. Seems that the mission of militant secularists is to banish religion from the public space. ."
[
Really?
Now, my pal, ErroneousJoe writes glowingly about Roman culture....
He might have missed this:
"The overwhelming opinion about the Romans in academic – and wider – circles today is hostile. The Romans are seen as militaristic imperialists, who owed their success to their brutality and their militarism."
Why Rome Barbarism and Civilization
10. How about reverence for human life, Rome vs the contemporary chuch?
At the opposite end of the spectrum we find the gladiatorial games. Crowds that included the very best citizens exulted as scores of men, and sometimes many hundreds, slaughtered one another for fleeting fame and honor. Not that they always had much choice in the matter.
Elaine Pagels describes the action at the Roman amphitheater in the second century: "The spectators cheered the men who recklessly courted death, and thrilled to the moment of the death blow. The crowd would go wild when a defeated gladiator defiantly thrust out his neck to his antagonist's sword, and they jeered and hooted when a loser bolted in panic."
Pagels, "The Origin o f Satan," p. 115
a. ' Christians deplored this entertainment, and not merely because there was always the chance that they might themselves someday wind up as prey. Rather, they were repulsed by the way this spectacle debased human life.
When the Emperor Constantine outlawed gladiator games in the fourth century (or attempted to; they flourished for decades afterward), he did so as an affirmation of Christian values.'
"Christianity on Trial," Carroll and Shiflett, p. 6-7