The CEO shooter got caught and surprise, surprise...

[daveman]

Want a theocracy? Move to one. They cannot work.

Nobody wants a theocracy except leftists, who want to mandate worship of their god Government.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Your refusal to acknowledge anyone's point who isn't simply parroting your own is a "you" problem, Skippy, and doesn't obligate anyone to change their behavior.

I don't think you know this.

See what I mean, Skippy?

You’re not even trying to make a point. You’re just bitching about me. We call that “ad hominem”. It’s a pretty good indication that you suck at arguing a point so you’d rather just fling poo instead.

Were you aware of this? Probably not.

 

[sealybobo]

If a company values their employees and their business, they'll negotiate in good faith and avoid all the union crap.

It’s fear of unionization, or having to compete against union jobs, that brings wages up.

 

[daveman]

If you don’t recognize the irony of spelling/grammatical errors in posts criticizing the intelligence of others, that’s your problem.

So did he say anything about which Constitutional rights have been chipped away at? No, right? Didn’t think so.

Class is in session. Pay attention, child.

DUE PROCESS: Democrats want to restrict ownership of firearms based on names being present on a no-fly list, when reasons for being on that list are flimsy, sometimes just as a suspicion. Same with Red Flag laws. Unconstitutional.

THE SECOND AMENDMENT: Democrats have spoken out against it, saying it needs to be changed or scrapped altogether. See the Assault Weapons Ban and numerous rules by the unelected ATF which limit 2A rights, always with the blessing of Democrats.

THE FIRST AMENDMENT: Democrats have enacted hate speech laws. Unconstitutional. Democrats want to censor "misinformation" and pressured social media outlets to silence conservative voices. Unconstitutional. California Democrats tried to pass a law making it a crime to question the alleged consensus on climate change.

The CDC created a moratorium on evictions, without having the authority to do so and unconstitutionally preventing landlords from evicting tenants who don't pay rent or damage property. After SCOTUS declared the moratorium had to expire, Biden tried to extend it, even though he acknowledged it was unconstitutional. Democrats praised both the moratorium and Biden for extending it.

THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE: Democrats have repeatedly enacted race- and gender-based laws that reward some people and punish others. Unconstitutional.

THE 15TH, 19TH, 24TH, AND 26TH AMENDMENTS: By refusing to support laws to require ID to vote, Democrats are disenfranchising all eligible American citizen voters.

Now, this is the part where you acknowledge that a list of rights being chipped away has been presented to you.

But if all you're going to do is screech NUH UH!! like a cranky toddler told to take a nap, you can just shut the **** up instead.

 

[daveman]

See what I mean, Skippy?

You’re not even trying to make a point. You’re just bitching about me. We call that “ad hominem”. It’s a pretty good indication that you suck at arguing a point so you’d rather just fling poo instead.

Were you aware of this? Probably not.

I am aware of more than you can possibly know.

My point has been made. Are you man enough to acknowledge it, or are you just a cranky toddler?

 

[daveman]

It’s fear of unionization, or having to compete against union jobs, that brings wages up.

That is a good incentive. However, the risk of union demands forcing a business to close is a very real danger as well.

A new study published in Journal of Political Economy showed that excessive demands from strong unions, which led to a high frequency of strikes in the Rust Belt region between 1950-2020, are one of the main reasons for the decline in manufacturing employment in the Rest Belt during that time period.

Rust Belt manufacturing industries had, by far, the highest rates of work stoppages from strikes in the United States. According to CPS data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, between the years 1973 and 1980, 48.1% of workers were union members in Rust Belt manufacturing compared to 28.4% among manufacturing workers in the rest of the country. As the economists note, “While unionization rates in manufacturing were around twice as high in the Rust Belt as outside, rates of work stoppages were about seven times as high in the Rust Belt. In other words, labor relations were particularly fraught among unions concentrated in the Rust Belt.”

During this time, the compensation package demands were also higher than usual as compared to the demands in other regions.

So what happened? Excessive union demands, strikes, and work stoppages led to lower average rates of investment and productivity growth by Rust Belt firms relative to those in the rest of the country. Over time, employment moved from the Rust Belt to the rest of the country.

This is common sense. Rust Belt firms faced increasing labor costs and reduced productivity, forcing many to either downsize or relocate to regions with less union influence and lower labor costs.

Overall, these labor union conflicts accounted for 55% of the decline in the Rust Belt's share of U.S. manufacturing employment, leading to its economic deterioration throughout the second half of the 20th century.

The Rust Belt unions shot themselves in the foot and got their members unemployed.

 

[beagle9]

That’s not a reasonable claim.

You’ve been responding to me. Therefore, according to you, you believe my claims are well-constructed.

Right? Or are you going to contradict yourself with your flimsy logic?

Round and around you go, and where you'll stop only a leftist like you might know. No one is impressed by your childish bull chit, now go play in traffic.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Class is in session. Pay attention, child.

DUE PROCESS: Democrats want to restrict ownership of firearms based on names being present on a no-fly list, when reasons for being on that list are flimsy, sometimes just as a suspicion. Same with Red Flag laws. Unconstitutional.

THE SECOND AMENDMENT: Democrats have spoken out against it, saying it needs to be changed or scrapped altogether. See the Assault Weapons Ban and numerous rules by the unelected ATF which limit 2A rights, always with the blessing of Democrats.

THE FIRST AMENDMENT: Democrats have enacted hate speech laws. Unconstitutional. Democrats want to censor "misinformation" and pressured social media outlets to silence conservative voices. Unconstitutional. California Democrats tried to pass a law making it a crime to question the alleged consensus on climate change.

The CDC created a moratorium on evictions, without having the authority to do so and unconstitutionally preventing landlords from evicting tenants who don't pay rent or damage property. After SCOTUS declared the moratorium had to expire, Biden tried to extend it, even though he acknowledged it was unconstitutional. Democrats praised both the moratorium and Biden for extending it.

THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE: Democrats have repeatedly enacted race- and gender-based laws that reward some people and punish others. Unconstitutional.

THE 15TH, 19TH, 24TH, AND 26TH AMENDMENTS: By refusing to support laws to require ID to vote, Democrats are disenfranchising all eligible American citizen voters.

Now, this is the part where you acknowledge that a list of rights being chipped away has been presented to you.

But if all you're going to do is screech NUH UH!! like a cranky toddler told to take a nap, you can just shut the **** up instead.

How does ”speaking out against” guns chip away at you right to own guns?

 

[XponentialChaos]

I am aware of more than you can possibly know.

Maybe you should dislodge your head from your own ass, Skippy.

 

[daveman]

How does ”speaking out against” guns chip away at you right to own guns?

I guess you missed the bit about Red Flag laws and tying purchasing to the No-Fly list.

You were supposed to shut the **** up, boy.

Now continue flailing about impotently. Your question was answered. You got the list you wanted.

 

[daveman]

Maybe you should dislodge your head from your own ass, Skippy.

Oooh, is that some of that ad hominem you were crying about a while ago?

 

[XponentialChaos]

I guess you missed the bit about Red Flag laws and tying purchasing to the No-Fly list.

You were supposed to shut the **** up, boy.

Now continue flailing about impotently. Your question was answered. You got the list you wanted.

“They said this” and “they want that”.

Drop the right-wing paranoia spin. Which rights of yours have ACTUALLY been chipped away? Which right did you have that you no longer have?

 

[XponentialChaos]

Oooh, is that some of that ad hominem you were crying about a while ago?

Weren’t you the one bitching about people trying to fluff up their own ego?

“I am aware of more than you can possibly know.”

LoL.

 

[daveman]

“They said this” and “they want that”.

Drop the right-wing paranoia spin. Which rights of yours have ACTUALLY been chipped away? Which right did you have that you no longer have?

No, boy. I gave you your list. The list you whined on and on about.

Now you need to shut the **** up.

 

[daveman]

Weren’t you the one bitching about people trying to fluff up their own ego?

“I am aware of more than you can possibly know.”

LoL.

Dude. That's like complaining about me saying the sun comes up in the east.

You are not a bright person.

 

[XponentialChaos]

No, boy. I gave you your list. The list you whined on and on about.

Now you need to shut the **** up.

Well you tried. If that’s the best you can do, then you still can’t point at rights that have been taken away.

I’m glad we cleared that up. No go sit in the corner and re-evaluate your poor decisions.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Dude. That's like complaining about me saying the sun comes up in the east.

You are not a bright person.

Must be stuck up there, huh?

 

[beagle9]

Unions protect bad workers.

And good worker's too, so somehow it has worked over the year's on many occasions, but not always are the Union's right (AGREE).

 

[Picaro]

We need to increase revenue

And we do that by tariffs and on-shoring high productivity jobs and the higher wages manufacturing and industrial jobs provide compared to service industry and govt. jobs, stifle financial capitalism in favor of industrial capitalism.

Goliath: The 100-Year War Between Monopoly Power and De…

A startling look at how concentrated financial power an…

www.goodreads.com

pdf download notice, for those on phones:

Today and Tomorrow- Henry Ford

https://paulakers.net/wp-content/uploads/dlm_uploads/2018/05/TAT-20180526.pdf

 

[pknopp]

Class is in session. Pay attention, child.

DUE PROCESS: Democrats want to restrict ownership of firearms based on names being present on a no-fly list, when reasons for being on that list are flimsy, sometimes just as a suspicion. Same with Red Flag laws. Unconstitutional.

THE SECOND AMENDMENT: Democrats have spoken out against it, saying it needs to be changed or scrapped altogether. See the Assault Weapons Ban and numerous rules by the unelected ATF which limit 2A rights, always with the blessing of Democrats.

Trump Backs 'Red Flag' Laws That Could Impact Veteran Gun Ownership