The Bolton Bombshell (from his book)

[colfax_m]

Seems like an awfully strange thing to lie about then.

Awfully strange you think private conversations with his cabinet is impeachable lol

Ask Richard Nixon.

Talking about foreign aid? That’s what Richard Nixon did? Lol

He was impeached based on “conversations”. Don’t be dense.

Impeach means accused and he’s about to be Acquitted

So was OJ.

 

[jc456]

Trumps conversation still isn’t impeachable lol
And the aid went out. Gotta move on

Seems like an awfully strange thing to lie about then.

Awfully strange you think private conversations with his cabinet is impeachable lol

Ask Richard Nixon.

Talking about foreign aid? That’s what Richard Nixon did? Lol

He was impeached based on “conversations”. Don’t be dense.

that isn't evidence. did anyone ever teach you anything? remember square block goes in square hole.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

It seems Real Conservatives are coming to the defense of Bolton. Maybe the Faux Conservatives who are defending trump will wake up and smell the coffee, well, maybe one or two of them.

Winds of change have begun to blow, the one question will be if there are Republican Senators who took the oath seriously and will vote to convict Donald J. Trump and remove him from office.

For what? What crime wry? By the way....let Bolton be a witness, because I want to hear from Biden Jr and the whistleblower.
Bolton's book is no more than a red herring anyways.

Why do you want the WB to testify?

Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA)
The Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA) protects Federal employees and applicants for employment who lawfully disclose information they reasonably believe evidences:

• a violation of law, rule, or regulation;
• gross mismanagement;
• a gross waste of funds;
• an abuse of authority;
• or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety.

Under the WPA, certain federal employees may not take or fail to take, or threaten to take or fail to take; any personnel action against an employee or applicant for employment because of the employee or applicant’s protected whistleblowing. See 5 U.S.C. § 2302(b)(8).

WPA does not render a whistleblower anonymous, but only protects from certain agency actions. Testifying before federal committees or Congress is not among them.

Read the law before you post again:

5 U.S. Code § 2302 - Prohibited personnel practices

You read it, and point out the text that refutes my contention.

 

[Rye Catcher]

So can the president decide to investigate anyone for anything?

Obviously not.

Ha ha ha,

you are flailing all over the place....

You are ignoring my post that destroys the absurd Bolton narrative desperate Schiff is trying to float.

Post 1020 you have ignored from the previous page of this thread.

You are an embarrassment to the human race with your galaxy level severe stupidity and ignorance.

You’re afraid. I get it. Don’t want Bolton to testify because it might upset the little fantasy you’ve created.

Let him testify, then we get Biden Jr.

What do you expect Hunter Biden will be asked, and what do you expect he will say in response?

He will show that there was reason for concern over corruption. Hell, the Heinz kid distanced himself and his employer
from what Biden Jr. was doing and emailed the State Dept of his concerns, wry.

Where do you get your information?

For the Readers, see:

What Hunter Biden did on the board of Ukrainian energy company Burisma

Hunter Biden says taking a job at a Ukrainian energy company was "poor judgment"

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...adff70-dfd9-11e9-8fd3-d943b4ed57e0_story.html

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Because no one knows what your talking about, the aid went out, the Ukraine President has no idea what your talking about

Most of the aid went out. Some didn’t. The Ukrainians did know. We have lots of evidence. Your case is built on lies.

Trump claims aid and the investigation wasn’t linked. If Bolton testifies otherwise, it’ll continue to prove that Trump has been this whole time. That’s bad for the defense.

Trumps conversation still isn’t impeachable lol
And the aid went out. Gotta move on

Seems like an awfully strange thing to lie about then.

Awfully strange you think private conversations with his cabinet is impeachable lol

Ask Richard Nixon.

Nixon was not impeached. How many time have you been told that in just this thread alone.

 

[Jitss617]

WHO CARES! In 1776 we didn’t even have a doj,, we didn’t have osha, we investigated our selves.. you don’t like it move out

It ain’t 1776 champ. Trump didn’t want to involve the DoJ because they are accountable to the country. Rudy ain’t.

If you break the law you break the law.. it is 1776,, you will never change the bill of rights

You mean like due process? That was denied to Joe Biden.

What due process did Bolton not receive? You apparently don't know what that means because you were never in a high school civics class.

Biden, we are talking about Biden.

You can’t launch investigations into anyone for any reason. Doing so violates their rights.

Lol what!?

 

[Jitss617]

Awfully strange you think private conversations with his cabinet is impeachable lol

Ask Richard Nixon.

Talking about foreign aid? That’s what Richard Nixon did? Lol

He was impeached based on “conversations”. Don’t be dense.

Impeach means accused and he’s about to be Acquitted

So was OJ.

What’s your point ,, if you have evidence pls provided it

 

[colfax_m]

Most of the aid went out. Some didn’t. The Ukrainians did know. We have lots of evidence. Your case is built on lies.

Trump claims aid and the investigation wasn’t linked. If Bolton testifies otherwise, it’ll continue to prove that Trump has been this whole time. That’s bad for the defense.

Trumps conversation still isn’t impeachable lol
And the aid went out. Gotta move on

Seems like an awfully strange thing to lie about then.

Awfully strange you think private conversations with his cabinet is impeachable lol

Ask Richard Nixon.

Nixon was not impeached. How many time have you been told that in just this thread alone.

Just stop. I don’t have time for this.

 

[colfax_m]

Ask Richard Nixon.

Talking about foreign aid? That’s what Richard Nixon did? Lol

He was impeached based on “conversations”. Don’t be dense.

Impeach means accused and he’s about to be Acquitted

So was OJ.

What’s your point ,, if you have evidence pls provided it

My point is y’all are acting obtuse. It’s aggravating.

 

[Meister]

Ha ha ha,

you are flailing all over the place....

You are ignoring my post that destroys the absurd Bolton narrative desperate Schiff is trying to float.

Post 1020 you have ignored from the previous page of this thread.

You are an embarrassment to the human race with your galaxy level severe stupidity and ignorance.

You’re afraid. I get it. Don’t want Bolton to testify because it might upset the little fantasy you’ve created.

Let him testify, then we get Biden Jr.

What do you expect Hunter Biden will be asked, and what do you expect he will say in response?

He will show that there was reason for concern over corruption. Hell, the Heinz kid distanced himself and his employer
from what Biden Jr. was doing and emailed the State Dept of his concerns, wry.

Where do you get your information?

For the Readers, see:

What Hunter Biden did on the board of Ukrainian energy company Burisma

Hunter Biden says taking a job at a Ukrainian energy company was "poor judgment"

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...adff70-dfd9-11e9-8fd3-d943b4ed57e0_story.html

It was brought into evidence by Bondi yesterday, actually, showed the documents, wry.

 

[colfax_m]

You’re afraid. I get it. Don’t want Bolton to testify because it might upset the little fantasy you’ve created.

Let him testify, then we get Biden Jr.

What do you expect Hunter Biden will be asked, and what do you expect he will say in response?

He will show that there was reason for concern over corruption. Hell, the Heinz kid distanced himself and his employer
from what Biden Jr. was doing and emailed the State Dept of his concerns, wry.

Where do you get your information?

For the Readers, see:

What Hunter Biden did on the board of Ukrainian energy company Burisma

Hunter Biden says taking a job at a Ukrainian energy company was "poor judgment"

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...adff70-dfd9-11e9-8fd3-d943b4ed57e0_story.html

It was brought into evidence by Bondi yesterday, actually, showed the documents, wry.

Bondi failed to show any rational basis that could be consider a basis for an investigation.

If Hunter exercised bad judgement, so be it. But bad judgement isn’t a crime.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Some book written by a fired DC swamp creature was leaked to the NY Times...got it.

yep you are right and its another leak by somebody about something somebody believes who is mad at the president .......so what !! if all Boltons got is his opinion it means nothing .and even if the president delayed funds thats within his power to do for whatever reason he deems fit ! it may not look good but there is no way republicans are going to remove him for something as trivial as that ... leave it to dems to scream quid pro quo when the president wants to investigate a quid pro quo !

Doesn't even matter Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz obliterated the Bolton nonsense. Even if true its not an impeachable offense. He gave an example, if a president told Israel U.S. aid would be withheld unless Israel agreed to stop building settlements a clear quid pro quo that's not an impeachable offense. In fact presidents have long exercised that authority.

So I guess you all can agree that Biden didn’t do anything wrong then.

What are you blabbering about?

Quid pro quo’s are normal. That’s what you’re accusing Biden of doing.

LOL.....how does getting your son hired on for 80k a month with no experience fit in?

 

[Faun]

Sounds like you're playing on an Impeached Trump's golf course.

Soon to be an acquitted Trump's golf course....

Will always be impeached, even when acquitted.

impeached for the audacity of questioning tyranny by his election.

No, impeached for soliciting foreign aid for his campaign

Its what is believed now isn't it? Our political ties are more important then anything else. Presidents can be impeached for a lot of things that can be brought up. I fully expect Repubs to impeach the next Prog President if they control the House. Proceeding to pre start election night of that year and go full force once sworn in the following January. Every president can be impeached from now on. It will be funny in sardonic way.

Impeached Trump broke the law and abused the power of his office, for which he was rightfully impeached. Deal with it.

 

[jc456]

so where's the bombshell at?

 

[jc456]

WHO CARES! In 1776 we didn’t even have a doj,, we didn’t have osha, we investigated our selves.. you don’t like it move out

It ain’t 1776 champ. Trump didn’t want to involve the DoJ because they are accountable to the country. Rudy ain’t.

If you break the law you break the law.. it is 1776,, you will never change the bill of rights

You mean like due process? That was denied to Joe Biden.

What due process did Bolton not receive? You apparently don't know what that means because you were never in a high school civics class.

Biden, we are talking about Biden.

You can’t launch investigations into anyone for any reason. Doing so violates their rights.

sure you can, we've had three and a half years looking for a crime to put on trump!!!! where the hell you been?

 

[ph3iron]

Drafts of the book outline the potential testimony of the former national security adviser if he were called as a witness in the president’s impeachment trial.

WASHINGTON — President Trump told his national security adviser in August that he wanted to continue freezing $391 million in security assistance to Ukraine until officials there helped with investigations into Democrats including the Bidens, according to an unpublished manuscript by the former adviser, John R. Bolton.

Trump Tied Ukraine Aid to Demands for Inquiries, Bolton Book Says

John Bolton Reportedly Recalls Trump Tying Ukraine Aid To Biden Investigation

How can Republicans not vote for witnesses after this? Apparently this information was provided to both The Washington Post and The New York Times.

Oh yeah, a possible alledged discruntled official telling the truth ?? Sure he is... Chuckle, chuckle, chuckle.

Without physical facts to present, then it is just all bullcrap. He won't be called anyways, because he has been compromised as a fact toting witness due to the conflicts of interest being heavily involved.

Why should we read anything a WWII deferment guy has as his pic?

How old was John Wayne in 1941?

You can't answer that, can you?

Was he married? How many kids did he have? Was he under contract to a motion picture studio who would have sued him had he volunteered?

You can't answer those either, can you?

Omg he would have been sued if he volunteered for his country?
The ultimate reason?
Almost as good a reason as bone spurs
He was a coward admit it, posing in military clothes

 

[jc456]

Let him testify, then we get Biden Jr.

What do you expect Hunter Biden will be asked, and what do you expect he will say in response?

He will show that there was reason for concern over corruption. Hell, the Heinz kid distanced himself and his employer
from what Biden Jr. was doing and emailed the State Dept of his concerns, wry.

Where do you get your information?

For the Readers, see:

What Hunter Biden did on the board of Ukrainian energy company Burisma

Hunter Biden says taking a job at a Ukrainian energy company was "poor judgment"

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...adff70-dfd9-11e9-8fd3-d943b4ed57e0_story.html

It was brought into evidence by Bondi yesterday, actually, showed the documents, wry.

Bondi failed to show any rational basis that could be consider a basis for an investigation.

If Hunter exercised bad judgement, so be it. But bad judgement isn’t a crime.

then why are we here in the senate? you need new mirrors.

 

[ph3iron]

It ain’t 1776 champ. Trump didn’t want to involve the DoJ because they are accountable to the country. Rudy ain’t.

If you break the law you break the law.. it is 1776,, you will never change the bill of rights

You mean like due process? That was denied to Joe Biden.

What due process did Bolton not receive? You apparently don't know what that means because you were never in a high school civics class.

Biden, we are talking about Biden.

You can’t launch investigations into anyone for any reason. Doing so violates their rights.

sure you can, we've had three and a half years looking for a crime to put on trump!!!! where the hell you been?

Might help if the con released people and docs??

 

[colfax_m]

yep you are right and its another leak by somebody about something somebody believes who is mad at the president .......so what !! if all Boltons got is his opinion it means nothing .and even if the president delayed funds thats within his power to do for whatever reason he deems fit ! it may not look good but there is no way republicans are going to remove him for something as trivial as that ... leave it to dems to scream quid pro quo when the president wants to investigate a quid pro quo !

Doesn't even matter Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz obliterated the Bolton nonsense. Even if true its not an impeachable offense. He gave an example, if a president told Israel U.S. aid would be withheld unless Israel agreed to stop building settlements a clear quid pro quo that's not an impeachable offense. In fact presidents have long exercised that authority.

So I guess you all can agree that Biden didn’t do anything wrong then.

What are you blabbering about?

Quid pro quo’s are normal. That’s what you’re accusing Biden of doing.

LOL.....how does getting your son hired on for 80k a month with no experience fit in?

So it’s a crime for Hunter it work for Burisma?

I’ll break it down.
Joe Biden using loan guarantees to get a prosecutor fired isn’t illegal.

Hunter Biden working for Burisma isn’t illegal.

If those two things are connected, it’s illegal. Is there any evidence that they’re connected?

 

[Jitss617]

Talking about foreign aid? That’s what Richard Nixon did? Lol

He was impeached based on “conversations”. Don’t be dense.

Impeach means accused and he’s about to be Acquitted

So was OJ.

What’s your point ,, if you have evidence pls provided it

My point is y’all are acting obtuse. It’s aggravating.

The irony lol