Based on?Bolton is an asshole and I detest him - but he has a much better track record on truthfulness than Trump.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Based on?Bolton is an asshole and I detest him - but he has a much better track record on truthfulness than Trump.
You got fake newsOpposition research? I have those information long time ago. I already knew you are very poorly informed ignorant.
I KNOW what I’m talking about and I do NOT bullshit or lie.
You have not given me a single nonsense of your rebuttal.
You are embarrassing yourself.
The ones connected to your stupid liesWhat debunked post? You keep saying easy and asking information Dude.
NO NO NO and NO.....
You never gave me any of your bullshit rebuttal. Zero. NONE.
Then shut up. Put up or shut up, it’s simpleI don’t need to prove you anything. Trump blamed Obama for empty shelves facing Coronavirus. That’s a lie. What happened to the last 3 years if he knew it was empty.
Didn’t do shit till mid March 2020.
You didn’t give me any iaota of rebuttal.
Well that's a shameless little lie you just made up. Trump's past words and behaviors are not the result of my worldview. What a pathetic pile of spin.
trump is known to have solicited foreign governments for help in the election. So, when someone claims he solicited another foreign government for help, I find that very easy to believe. And so do you, but you are forced into lying to yourself out loud by your cultism.
And you should stop using the term, "confirmation bias", as you clearly do not understand it. Confirmation bias is when you use actual facts to confirm a view, when lots of other facts are ignored. So, witlessly and unwillingly, you would be saying that Bolton's claims are true, but I am incorrectly interpreting them as confirmation of my view of trump.
I swear, I spend half my time on this board correcting the Trump cultists' attacks on the English language.
It proved no such thing… just like all of your medical proclamationsSorry, I don't like Trump, but the failure of the impeachment proceedings proved that Trump did NOT solicit foreign governments to help in either election.
If it had been proven he had, then he would have been removed from office.
And since both impeachment proceedings failed, that indicts congress, not Trump.
Trump was bad, but congress was even worse.
Total. Utter. Crap. If you think the lack of impeachment had anything to do with his guilt or lack thereof, you are a fool.Sorry, I don't like Trump, but the failure of the impeachment proceedings proved that Trump did NOT solicit foreign governments to help in either election.
If it had been proven he had, then he would have been removed from office.
And since both impeachment proceedings failed, that indicts congress, not Trump.
Trump was bad, but congress was even worse.
You do hate opposition research
You're insane.Trump doesn't do opposition research. Trump just makes shit up about the opposition, or has the Russians do it for him, and then runs with the lies. He called Clinton a crook, he called Joe Biden "Sleepy Joe", but his attempts to paint Biden as a corrupt criminal, like he did with Hillary, were a complete failure. He didn't have 25 years of Republican lies and investigations smearing Biden the way he had with Clinton.
Trump was a clown and a fool and you're still talking about him like he was a real President who took the job seriously.
It proved no such thing… just like all of your medical proclamations
Total. Utter. Crap. If you think the lack of impeachment had anything to do with his guilt or lack thereof, you are a fool.
However, if you think his lack of being found guilty was partisan politics at its worst, there might be hope for you yet.
Trump doesn't do opposition research. Trump just makes shit up about the opposition, or has the Russians do it for him, and then runs with the lies. He called Clinton a crook, he called Joe Biden "Sleepy Joe", but his attempts to paint Biden as a corrupt criminal, like he did with Hillary, were a complete failure. He didn't have 25 years of Republican lies and investigations smearing Biden the way he had with Clinton.
Trump was a clown and a fool and you're still talking about him like he was a real President who took the job seriously.
No. All that proved is that unethical repubs refused to vote to convict him, even though many of those same right wing voters admitted he was guilty.Sorry, I don't like Trump, but the failure of the impeachment proceedings proved that Trump did NOT solicit foreign governments to help in either election.
If it had been proven he had, then he would have been removed from office.
And since both impeachment proceedings failed, that indicts congress, not Trump.
Trump was bad, but congress was even worse.
No. Hunter is a non-issue, and Biden was carrying out our foreign policy by following the president's instructions.I don't think so.
Both Bidens were caught red handed.
Hunter was over paid to do nothing, and Joe was illegally demanding Ukraine prosecutors be fired.
If it’s not illegal, how’s it unethical? When did he fire mueller?If there had been evidence of any wrong doing by Trump, he would have been removed from office.
About the only questionable thing he did was to fire Muller.
But that is not really illegal, just unethical.
Ha! We heard all the evidence did we? LOL...how gullible are you...We all saw and heard all the testimony, and there was nothing on Trump.
In fact, is would have been legal for Trump to hire Russians to work on his campaign, as long as they were not contributing for free,
He would have to pay them for it to be legal.
Really?If there had been evidence of any wrong doing by Trump, he would have been removed from office.
About the only questionable thing he did was to fire Muller.
But that is not really illegal, just unethical.