Ringtone
Platinum Member
- Sep 3, 2019
- 6,142
- 3,522
- 940
- Thread starter
- #41
The law of gravity define how mass warps space. The law can exist just fine in the absence of space, it would just be hard to prove it. 1 + 1 = 2 The concept of '1' does not require a physical object.I'm saying you jumped from "something exists" to "something intelligent exists", with no justification.
Well, you repeat, essentially, the same idea here. My response stands and stays. Laws imply unembodied mind. I ask again:
Where, precisely, are these laws of physics ontologically hanging out . . . prior to the existence of the physical world?
crickets chirping
Indeed, the laws of logic and mathematics are immaterial. As for the laws of physics, are saying that they precede the physical world in time and being as well?