The Anti Abortion Abolitionist Movement Is Dangerous. Here's What You Need To Know

[Ringtone]

June Medical Services v. Russo, the Supreme Court case regarding Louisiana’s 2014 admitting privileges law, has serious ramifications for the future of abortion rights in the United States. But there is a segment of the anti-abortion movement that doesn’t appear all that concerned with the outcome. If this seems odd, it’s because they never saw Roe v. Wade as a valid ruling, they don’t view the Supreme Court as a legitimate legal authority, and they dismiss the foundation of the Constitution.

Say hello to the so-called “abolitionist” movement, comprised of white men who say the pro-life movement is too secular, abortion constitutes homicide, and that people seeking abortion care should be criminalized and subject to the death penalty.

The anti-abortion abolitionist movement is dangerous. Here's what you need to know

The single biggest threat to America. It looks like harsher measures are going to have to be implemented to protect the country from these freaks.

The only extremists in this instance are baby.-murdering monsters who babble about how infanticide is a right, about how the founding socio-political philosophy of this nation or the Constitution in any way, shape or form prohibit the people from forbidding the abominable practice of abortion on demand.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

The ones who have explaining to do are those who claim to be pro-life but support the death penalty knowing that innocent people will be killed.

Every abortion kills an innocent human being, and there is no basis for anyone involved to doubt that an innocent human being is being killed.

Mistakes certainly happen, from time to time, in the justice system, but especially given all the safeguards involved, by the time a convicted criminal reaches the point of being executed, it's safe to say that everything humanly possible has been done to establish that he really is guilty of a crime so serious as to justify putting him to death, and there is certainly not any intent involved to kill an innocent person.

To try to compare the two as you are, and to suggest that abortion is justifiable while the death penalty is not, is just an example of deliberate, willful dishonesty on your part. But that's no surprise. Deep down, you know damn well that you are defending something that is indefensible and evil, and you know that you cannot defend it without lying your filthy ass off.

In 1998, there were less than a hundred convicted criminals put to death. That's the most in any year in this country's history. In 2019, there were only nine.

In each of these same years, over a million innocent children put to death by abortion. By the most conservative use of these numbers, we're talking anywhere from 10,000 to 100,000 innocent children murdered in cold blood by abortionists per convicted murderer put to death. Even if you assume that every convict put to death was innocent, and that that those responsible for it happening knew and intended to kill an innocent person, it still comes nowhere close to abortion.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

You used an oft-invoked example that isn't relevant.....People get the death penalty for being convicted of heinously violent acts, not just because they're inconvenient to someone else.

How you or I or anyone else wants to define "pro-life" is entirely beside the point.

People get the death penalty who are innocent.

They die, knowing they are innocent.

People who claim to be "pro-life" and who support the death penalty are frauds.

People who get the death penalty have been convicted in a court of law of violent murders.

Babies are murdered without even the benefit of trial or a single advocate on their behalf.

Is it ok to kill innocent people? Yes or No.

No. I've known a number of death penalty defendants most of whom died in prison of natural causes. None were innocent. Rarely is a mistake made. How many abortions are a mistake?

It really is very simple. Abortion is the intentional taking of a human life. And you could be okay with that the way people are okay with the death penalty. You do not have to hide and call it something else to satisfy your conscience. It's murder and it doesn't bother you. It doesn't bother me. Liberals and minorities killing the next generation of leftists and thugs doesn't bother me a bit.

You can't say "rarely" - you simply don't know.

And "rarely" still means the innocent ARE killed.

Either it is ok to do so or it is not. It's not a cafeteria.

It's okay. The people convicted of death penalty offenses may not be guilty of that crime but are guilty of plenty of others.

 

[Coyote]

People get the death penalty who are innocent.

They die, knowing they are innocent.

People who claim to be "pro-life" and who support the death penalty are frauds.

People who get the death penalty have been convicted in a court of law of violent murders.

Babies are murdered without even the benefit of trial or a single advocate on their behalf.

Is it ok to kill innocent people? Yes or No.

No. I've known a number of death penalty defendants most of whom died in prison of natural causes. None were innocent. Rarely is a mistake made. How many abortions are a mistake?

It really is very simple. Abortion is the intentional taking of a human life. And you could be okay with that the way people are okay with the death penalty. You do not have to hide and call it something else to satisfy your conscience. It's murder and it doesn't bother you. It doesn't bother me. Liberals and minorities killing the next generation of leftists and thugs doesn't bother me a bit.

You can't say "rarely" - you simply don't know.

And "rarely" still means the innocent ARE killed.

Either it is ok to do so or it is not. It's not a cafeteria.

It's okay. The people convicted of death penalty offenses may not be guilty of that crime but are guilty of plenty of others.

Wow. Simply wow.

You don't know that.

 

[Coyote]

The ones who have explaining to do are those who claim to be pro-life but support the death penalty knowing that innocent people will be killed.

Every abortion kills an innocent human being, and there is no basis for anyone involved to doubt that an innocent human being is being killed.

Mistakes certainly happen, from time to time, in the justice system, but especially given all the safeguards involved, by the time a convicted criminal reaches the point of being executed, it's safe to say that everything humanly possible has been done to establish that he really is guilty of a crime so serious as to justify putting him to death, and there is certainly not any intent involved to kill an innocent person.

To try to compare the two as you are, and to suggest that abortion is justifiable while the death penalty is not, is just an example of deliberate, willful dishonesty on your part. But that's no surprise. Deep down, you know damn well that you are defending something that is indefensible and evil, and you know that you cannot defend it without lying your filthy ass off.

In 1998, there were less than a hundred convicted criminals put to death. That's the most in any year in this country's history. In 2019, there were only nine.

In each of these same years, over a million innocent children put to death by abortion. By the most conservative use of these numbers, we're talking anywhere from 10,000 to 100,000 innocent children murdered in cold blood by abortionists per convicted murderer put to death. Even if you assume that every convict put to death was innocent, and that that those responsible for it happening knew and intended to kill an innocent person, it still comes nowhere close to abortion.

Mistakes happen.

Because we know that, we should oppose capital punishment. Period. That is the only consistent pro-life stance. Anti abortion, Anti capital punishment. Numbers are irrelevant to That One who loses his life.

I have a lot of respect for those who are consistently pro-life. They are very few in number.

 

[Coyote]

June Medical Services v. Russo, the Supreme Court case regarding Louisiana’s 2014 admitting privileges law, has serious ramifications for the future of abortion rights in the United States. But there is a segment of the anti-abortion movement that doesn’t appear all that concerned with the outcome. If this seems odd, it’s because they never saw Roe v. Wade as a valid ruling, they don’t view the Supreme Court as a legitimate legal authority, and they dismiss the foundation of the Constitution.

Say hello to the so-called “abolitionist” movement, comprised of white men who say the pro-life movement is too secular, abortion constitutes homicide, and that people seeking abortion care should be criminalized and subject to the death penalty.

The anti-abortion abolitionist movement is dangerous. Here's what you need to know

The single biggest threat to America. It looks like harsher measures are going to have to be implemented to protect the country from these freaks.

The only extremists in this instance are baby.-murdering monsters who babble about how infanticide is a right, about how the founding socio-political philosophy of this nation or the Constitution in any way, shape or form prohibit the people from forbidding the abominable practice of abortion on demand.

No one is saying infanticide is a right. In fact, no one is supporting infanticide.

Stop lying.

 

[DOTR]

June Medical Services v. Russo, the Supreme Court case regarding Louisiana’s 2014 admitting privileges law, has serious ramifications for the future of abortion rights in the United States. But there is a segment of the anti-abortion movement that doesn’t appear all that concerned with the outcome. If this seems odd, it’s because they never saw Roe v. Wade as a valid ruling, they don’t view the Supreme Court as a legitimate legal authority, and they dismiss the foundation of the Constitution.

Say hello to the so-called “abolitionist” movement, comprised of white men who say the pro-life movement is too secular, abortion constitutes homicide, and that people seeking abortion care should be criminalized and subject to the death penalty.

The anti-abortion abolitionist movement is dangerous. Here's what you need to know

The single biggest threat to America. It looks like harsher measures are going to have to be implemented to protect the country from these freaks.

We will ban abortion. Get used to it.

 

[Coyote]

June Medical Services v. Russo, the Supreme Court case regarding Louisiana’s 2014 admitting privileges law, has serious ramifications for the future of abortion rights in the United States. But there is a segment of the anti-abortion movement that doesn’t appear all that concerned with the outcome. If this seems odd, it’s because they never saw Roe v. Wade as a valid ruling, they don’t view the Supreme Court as a legitimate legal authority, and they dismiss the foundation of the Constitution.

Say hello to the so-called “abolitionist” movement, comprised of white men who say the pro-life movement is too secular, abortion constitutes homicide, and that people seeking abortion care should be criminalized and subject to the death penalty.

The anti-abortion abolitionist movement is dangerous. Here's what you need to know

The single biggest threat to America. It looks like harsher measures are going to have to be implemented to protect the country from these freaks.

We will ban abortion. Get used to it.

What will you do with all the unwanted kids? You willing to pay all the associated costs?

 

[lonemccord]

The single biggest threat to America. It looks like harsher measures are going to have to be implemented to protect the country from these freaks.

Americans in 30 states disagree with you and voted for pro life.

I wonder how the aborted would have voted, they must have been a threat too. Careful, the left has no problem killing things that disagree with them. 2A. Funny how the last abolitionists were right too....

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

 

[EvilCat Breath]

People who get the death penalty have been convicted in a court of law of violent murders.

Babies are murdered without even the benefit of trial or a single advocate on their behalf.

Is it ok to kill innocent people? Yes or No.

No. I've known a number of death penalty defendants most of whom died in prison of natural causes. None were innocent. Rarely is a mistake made. How many abortions are a mistake?

It really is very simple. Abortion is the intentional taking of a human life. And you could be okay with that the way people are okay with the death penalty. You do not have to hide and call it something else to satisfy your conscience. It's murder and it doesn't bother you. It doesn't bother me. Liberals and minorities killing the next generation of leftists and thugs doesn't bother me a bit.

You can't say "rarely" - you simply don't know.

And "rarely" still means the innocent ARE killed.

Either it is ok to do so or it is not. It's not a cafeteria.

It's okay. The people convicted of death penalty offenses may not be guilty of that crime but are guilty of plenty of others.

Wow. Simply wow.

You don't know that.

Yeah. Look at the rap sheets of these guys. For every conviction there are 20 times they got away with their crimes.

 

[Coyote]

Is it ok to kill innocent people? Yes or No.

No. I've known a number of death penalty defendants most of whom died in prison of natural causes. None were innocent. Rarely is a mistake made. How many abortions are a mistake?

It really is very simple. Abortion is the intentional taking of a human life. And you could be okay with that the way people are okay with the death penalty. You do not have to hide and call it something else to satisfy your conscience. It's murder and it doesn't bother you. It doesn't bother me. Liberals and minorities killing the next generation of leftists and thugs doesn't bother me a bit.

You can't say "rarely" - you simply don't know.

And "rarely" still means the innocent ARE killed.

Either it is ok to do so or it is not. It's not a cafeteria.

It's okay. The people convicted of death penalty offenses may not be guilty of that crime but are guilty of plenty of others.

Wow. Simply wow.

You don't know that.

Yeah. Look at the rap sheets of these guys. For every conviction there are 20 times they got away with their crimes.

You've seen them?

 

[Bob Blaylock]

No one is saying infanticide is a right. In fact, no one is supporting infanticide.

Stop lying.

You're playing dishonest semantic games, again.

We can play around with the meaning of the word “infanticide”, but regardless of what we think that word does or does not apply to, it has no bearing on the undeniable and immutable fact that induced abortion is the intentional killing of an innocent human being.

 

[lonemccord]

June Medical Services v. Russo, the Supreme Court case regarding Louisiana’s 2014 admitting privileges law, has serious ramifications for the future of abortion rights in the United States. But there is a segment of the anti-abortion movement that doesn’t appear all that concerned with the outcome. If this seems odd, it’s because they never saw Roe v. Wade as a valid ruling, they don’t view the Supreme Court as a legitimate legal authority, and they dismiss the foundation of the Constitution.

Say hello to the so-called “abolitionist” movement, comprised of white men who say the pro-life movement is too secular, abortion constitutes homicide, and that people seeking abortion care should be criminalized and subject to the death penalty.

The anti-abortion abolitionist movement is dangerous. Here's what you need to know

The single biggest threat to America. It looks like harsher measures are going to have to be implemented to protect the country from these freaks.

We will ban abortion. Get used to it.

What will you do with all the unwanted kids? You willing to pay all the associated costs?

Sounds like you are willing to I'll kids because they are unwanted... Did I get that right?

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

 

[dudmuck]

The ones who have explaining to do are those who claim to be pro-life but support the death penalty knowing that innocent people will be killed.

Every abortion kills an innocent human being, and there is no basis for anyone involved to doubt that an innocent human being is being killed.

Mistakes certainly happen, from time to time, in the justice system, but especially given all the safeguards involved, by the time a convicted criminal reaches the point of being executed, it's safe to say that everything humanly possible has been done to establish that he really is guilty of a crime so serious as to justify putting him to death, and there is certainly not any intent involved to kill an innocent person.

To try to compare the two as you are, and to suggest that abortion is justifiable while the death penalty is not, is just an example of deliberate, willful dishonesty on your part. But that's no surprise. Deep down, you know damn well that you are defending something that is indefensible and evil, and you know that you cannot defend it without lying your filthy ass off.

In 1998, there were less than a hundred convicted criminals put to death. That's the most in any year in this country's history. In 2019, there were only nine.

In each of these same years, over a million innocent children put to death by abortion. By the most conservative use of these numbers, we're talking anywhere from 10,000 to 100,000 innocent children murdered in cold blood by abortionists per convicted murderer put to death. Even if you assume that every convict put to death was innocent, and that that those responsible for it happening knew and intended to kill an innocent person, it still comes nowhere close to abortion.

Mistakes happen.

Because we know that, we should oppose capital punishment. Period. That is the only consistent pro-life stance. Anti abortion, Anti capital punishment. Numbers are irrelevant to That One who loses his life.

I have a lot of respect for those who are consistently pro-life. They are very few in number.

Considering how many die due to air pollution: yes very few are pro-life.
And those dying due to lack health care.
Both getting worse under this administration.

 

[DOTR]

June Medical Services v. Russo, the Supreme Court case regarding Louisiana’s 2014 admitting privileges law, has serious ramifications for the future of abortion rights in the United States. But there is a segment of the anti-abortion movement that doesn’t appear all that concerned with the outcome. If this seems odd, it’s because they never saw Roe v. Wade as a valid ruling, they don’t view the Supreme Court as a legitimate legal authority, and they dismiss the foundation of the Constitution.

Say hello to the so-called “abolitionist” movement, comprised of white men who say the pro-life movement is too secular, abortion constitutes homicide, and that people seeking abortion care should be criminalized and subject to the death penalty.

The anti-abortion abolitionist movement is dangerous. Here's what you need to know

The single biggest threat to America. It looks like harsher measures are going to have to be implemented to protect the country from these freaks.

We will ban abortion. Get used to it.

What will you do with all the unwanted kids? You willing to pay all the associated costs?

I’ll charge the people who have them.

 

[DOTR]

June Medical Services v. Russo, the Supreme Court case regarding Louisiana’s 2014 admitting privileges law, has serious ramifications for the future of abortion rights in the United States. But there is a segment of the anti-abortion movement that doesn’t appear all that concerned with the outcome. If this seems odd, it’s because they never saw Roe v. Wade as a valid ruling, they don’t view the Supreme Court as a legitimate legal authority, and they dismiss the foundation of the Constitution.

Say hello to the so-called “abolitionist” movement, comprised of white men who say the pro-life movement is too secular, abortion constitutes homicide, and that people seeking abortion care should be criminalized and subject to the death penalty.

The anti-abortion abolitionist movement is dangerous. Here's what you need to know

The single biggest threat to America. It looks like harsher measures are going to have to be implemented to protect the country from these freaks.

We will ban abortion. Get used to it.

What will you do with all the unwanted kids? You willing to pay all the associated costs?

BTW how’s abortion working out now for “unwanted” kids?

 

[DOTR]

June Medical Services v. Russo, the Supreme Court case regarding Louisiana’s 2014 admitting privileges law, has serious ramifications for the future of abortion rights in the United States. But there is a segment of the anti-abortion movement that doesn’t appear all that concerned with the outcome. If this seems odd, it’s because they never saw Roe v. Wade as a valid ruling, they don’t view the Supreme Court as a legitimate legal authority, and they dismiss the foundation of the Constitution.

Say hello to the so-called “abolitionist” movement, comprised of white men who say the pro-life movement is too secular, abortion constitutes homicide, and that people seeking abortion care should be criminalized and subject to the death penalty.

The anti-abortion abolitionist movement is dangerous. Here's what you need to know

The single biggest threat to America. It looks like harsher measures are going to have to be implemented to protect the country from these freaks.

We will ban abortion. Get used to it.

What will you do with all the unwanted kids? You willing to pay all the associated costs?

Sounds like you are willing to I'll kids because they are unwanted... Did I get that right?

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

You weren’t even coherent much less right.

 

[lonemccord]

June Medical Services v. Russo, the Supreme Court case regarding Louisiana’s 2014 admitting privileges law, has serious ramifications for the future of abortion rights in the United States. But there is a segment of the anti-abortion movement that doesn’t appear all that concerned with the outcome. If this seems odd, it’s because they never saw Roe v. Wade as a valid ruling, they don’t view the Supreme Court as a legitimate legal authority, and they dismiss the foundation of the Constitution.

Say hello to the so-called “abolitionist” movement, comprised of white men who say the pro-life movement is too secular, abortion constitutes homicide, and that people seeking abortion care should be criminalized and subject to the death penalty.

The anti-abortion abolitionist movement is dangerous. Here's what you need to know

The single biggest threat to America. It looks like harsher measures are going to have to be implemented to protect the country from these freaks.

We will ban abortion. Get used to it.

What will you do with all the unwanted kids? You willing to pay all the associated costs?

Sounds like you are willing to I'll kids because they are unwanted... Did I get that right?

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

You weren’t even coherent much less right.

So you are right? You sound like a baby k'lling lefty to me... Advocating for k'lling the unwanted, That's some twisted s***. If you can't figure out what I mean, you might be low IQ. But I bet you are smart enough to figure it out [emoji106][emoji106]. Go pretend be the savior of the world to justify killing the unborn. Nice barbaric look.

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

 

[DOTR]

June Medical Services v. Russo, the Supreme Court case regarding Louisiana’s 2014 admitting privileges law, has serious ramifications for the future of abortion rights in the United States. But there is a segment of the anti-abortion movement that doesn’t appear all that concerned with the outcome. If this seems odd, it’s because they never saw Roe v. Wade as a valid ruling, they don’t view the Supreme Court as a legitimate legal authority, and they dismiss the foundation of the Constitution.

Say hello to the so-called “abolitionist” movement, comprised of white men who say the pro-life movement is too secular, abortion constitutes homicide, and that people seeking abortion care should be criminalized and subject to the death penalty.

The anti-abortion abolitionist movement is dangerous. Here's what you need to know

The single biggest threat to America. It looks like harsher measures are going to have to be implemented to protect the country from these freaks.

We will ban abortion. Get used to it.

What will you do with all the unwanted kids? You willing to pay all the associated costs?

Sounds like you are willing to I'll kids because they are unwanted... Did I get that right?

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

You weren’t even coherent much less right.

So you are right? You sound like a baby k'lling lefty to me... Advocating for k'lling the unwanted, That's some twisted s***. If you can't figure out what I mean, you might be low IQ. But I bet you are smart enough to figure it out [emoji106][emoji106]. Go pretend be the savior of the world to justify killing the unborn. Nice barbaric look.

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

I’m not going to pretend to be the savior of anything. I just stared a fact...we are going to ban abortion. Deal with it.

 

[Dragonlady]

Stop posting about these fringe wackos. Stick to the mainstream arguments.
1. Pro-life
2. Pro-Choice
View attachment 312588 I'm PRO-LIFE!!

You are not "pro-life", you're anti-abortion. If you were pro-life, you'd want universal health care for the mother and the child. You'd want a quality education, for the child, and good nutrition. Life is more than breathing. It's having food, shelter, and security. It's parents knowing they can meet their child's needs. It's the opportunity to make the most of your talents.

The USA is not providing these things for working families.