Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
June Medical Services v. Russo, the Supreme Court case regarding Louisiana’s 2014 admitting privileges law, has serious ramifications for the future of abortion rights in the United States. But there is a segment of the anti-abortion movement that doesn’t appear all that concerned with the outcome. If this seems odd, it’s because they never saw Roe v. Wade as a valid ruling, they don’t view the Supreme Court as a legitimate legal authority, and they dismiss the foundation of the Constitution.
Say hello to the so-called “abolitionist” movement, comprised of white men who say the pro-life movement is too secular, abortion constitutes homicide, and that people seeking abortion care should be criminalized and subject to the death penalty.
The anti-abortion abolitionist movement is dangerous. Here's what you need to know
The single biggest threat to America. It looks like harsher measures are going to have to be implemented to protect the country from these freaks.
The ones who have explaining to do are those who claim to be pro-life but support the death penalty knowing that innocent people will be killed.
It's okay. The people convicted of death penalty offenses may not be guilty of that crime but are guilty of plenty of others.No. I've known a number of death penalty defendants most of whom died in prison of natural causes. None were innocent. Rarely is a mistake made. How many abortions are a mistake?People who get the death penalty have been convicted in a court of law of violent murders.You used an oft-invoked example that isn't relevant.....People get the death penalty for being convicted of heinously violent acts, not just because they're inconvenient to someone else.
How you or I or anyone else wants to define "pro-life" is entirely beside the point.
People get the death penalty who are innocent.
They die, knowing they are innocent.
People who claim to be "pro-life" and who support the death penalty are frauds.
Babies are murdered without even the benefit of trial or a single advocate on their behalf.
Is it ok to kill innocent people? Yes or No.
It really is very simple. Abortion is the intentional taking of a human life. And you could be okay with that the way people are okay with the death penalty. You do not have to hide and call it something else to satisfy your conscience. It's murder and it doesn't bother you. It doesn't bother me. Liberals and minorities killing the next generation of leftists and thugs doesn't bother me a bit.
You can't say "rarely" - you simply don't know.
And "rarely" still means the innocent ARE killed.
Either it is ok to do so or it is not. It's not a cafeteria.
It's okay. The people convicted of death penalty offenses may not be guilty of that crime but are guilty of plenty of others.No. I've known a number of death penalty defendants most of whom died in prison of natural causes. None were innocent. Rarely is a mistake made. How many abortions are a mistake?People who get the death penalty have been convicted in a court of law of violent murders.People get the death penalty who are innocent.
They die, knowing they are innocent.
People who claim to be "pro-life" and who support the death penalty are frauds.
Babies are murdered without even the benefit of trial or a single advocate on their behalf.
Is it ok to kill innocent people? Yes or No.
It really is very simple. Abortion is the intentional taking of a human life. And you could be okay with that the way people are okay with the death penalty. You do not have to hide and call it something else to satisfy your conscience. It's murder and it doesn't bother you. It doesn't bother me. Liberals and minorities killing the next generation of leftists and thugs doesn't bother me a bit.
You can't say "rarely" - you simply don't know.
And "rarely" still means the innocent ARE killed.
Either it is ok to do so or it is not. It's not a cafeteria.
The ones who have explaining to do are those who claim to be pro-life but support the death penalty knowing that innocent people will be killed.
Every abortion kills an innocent human being, and there is no basis for anyone involved to doubt that an innocent human being is being killed.
Mistakes certainly happen, from time to time, in the justice system, but especially given all the safeguards involved, by the time a convicted criminal reaches the point of being executed, it's safe to say that everything humanly possible has been done to establish that he really is guilty of a crime so serious as to justify putting him to death, and there is certainly not any intent involved to kill an innocent person.
To try to compare the two as you are, and to suggest that abortion is justifiable while the death penalty is not, is just an example of deliberate, willful dishonesty on your part. But that's no surprise. Deep down, you know damn well that you are defending something that is indefensible and evil, and you know that you cannot defend it without lying your filthy ass off.
In 1998, there were less than a hundred convicted criminals put to death. That's the most in any year in this country's history. In 2019, there were only nine.
In each of these same years, over a million innocent children put to death by abortion. By the most conservative use of these numbers, we're talking anywhere from 10,000 to 100,000 innocent children murdered in cold blood by abortionists per convicted murderer put to death. Even if you assume that every convict put to death was innocent, and that that those responsible for it happening knew and intended to kill an innocent person, it still comes nowhere close to abortion.
June Medical Services v. Russo, the Supreme Court case regarding Louisiana’s 2014 admitting privileges law, has serious ramifications for the future of abortion rights in the United States. But there is a segment of the anti-abortion movement that doesn’t appear all that concerned with the outcome. If this seems odd, it’s because they never saw Roe v. Wade as a valid ruling, they don’t view the Supreme Court as a legitimate legal authority, and they dismiss the foundation of the Constitution.
Say hello to the so-called “abolitionist” movement, comprised of white men who say the pro-life movement is too secular, abortion constitutes homicide, and that people seeking abortion care should be criminalized and subject to the death penalty.
The anti-abortion abolitionist movement is dangerous. Here's what you need to know
The single biggest threat to America. It looks like harsher measures are going to have to be implemented to protect the country from these freaks.
The only extremists in this instance are baby.-murdering monsters who babble about how infanticide is a right, about how the founding socio-political philosophy of this nation or the Constitution in any way, shape or form prohibit the people from forbidding the abominable practice of abortion on demand.
June Medical Services v. Russo, the Supreme Court case regarding Louisiana’s 2014 admitting privileges law, has serious ramifications for the future of abortion rights in the United States. But there is a segment of the anti-abortion movement that doesn’t appear all that concerned with the outcome. If this seems odd, it’s because they never saw Roe v. Wade as a valid ruling, they don’t view the Supreme Court as a legitimate legal authority, and they dismiss the foundation of the Constitution.
Say hello to the so-called “abolitionist” movement, comprised of white men who say the pro-life movement is too secular, abortion constitutes homicide, and that people seeking abortion care should be criminalized and subject to the death penalty.
The anti-abortion abolitionist movement is dangerous. Here's what you need to know
The single biggest threat to America. It looks like harsher measures are going to have to be implemented to protect the country from these freaks.
June Medical Services v. Russo, the Supreme Court case regarding Louisiana’s 2014 admitting privileges law, has serious ramifications for the future of abortion rights in the United States. But there is a segment of the anti-abortion movement that doesn’t appear all that concerned with the outcome. If this seems odd, it’s because they never saw Roe v. Wade as a valid ruling, they don’t view the Supreme Court as a legitimate legal authority, and they dismiss the foundation of the Constitution.
Say hello to the so-called “abolitionist” movement, comprised of white men who say the pro-life movement is too secular, abortion constitutes homicide, and that people seeking abortion care should be criminalized and subject to the death penalty.
The anti-abortion abolitionist movement is dangerous. Here's what you need to know
The single biggest threat to America. It looks like harsher measures are going to have to be implemented to protect the country from these freaks.
We will ban abortion. Get used to it.
I wonder how the aborted would have voted, they must have been a threat too. Careful, the left has no problem killing things that disagree with them. 2A. Funny how the last abolitionists were right too....The single biggest threat to America. It looks like harsher measures are going to have to be implemented to protect the country from these freaks.
Americans in 30 states disagree with you and voted for pro life.
Yeah. Look at the rap sheets of these guys. For every conviction there are 20 times they got away with their crimes.It's okay. The people convicted of death penalty offenses may not be guilty of that crime but are guilty of plenty of others.No. I've known a number of death penalty defendants most of whom died in prison of natural causes. None were innocent. Rarely is a mistake made. How many abortions are a mistake?People who get the death penalty have been convicted in a court of law of violent murders.
Babies are murdered without even the benefit of trial or a single advocate on their behalf.
Is it ok to kill innocent people? Yes or No.
It really is very simple. Abortion is the intentional taking of a human life. And you could be okay with that the way people are okay with the death penalty. You do not have to hide and call it something else to satisfy your conscience. It's murder and it doesn't bother you. It doesn't bother me. Liberals and minorities killing the next generation of leftists and thugs doesn't bother me a bit.
You can't say "rarely" - you simply don't know.
And "rarely" still means the innocent ARE killed.
Either it is ok to do so or it is not. It's not a cafeteria.
Wow. Simply wow.
You don't know that.
Yeah. Look at the rap sheets of these guys. For every conviction there are 20 times they got away with their crimes.It's okay. The people convicted of death penalty offenses may not be guilty of that crime but are guilty of plenty of others.No. I've known a number of death penalty defendants most of whom died in prison of natural causes. None were innocent. Rarely is a mistake made. How many abortions are a mistake?Is it ok to kill innocent people? Yes or No.
It really is very simple. Abortion is the intentional taking of a human life. And you could be okay with that the way people are okay with the death penalty. You do not have to hide and call it something else to satisfy your conscience. It's murder and it doesn't bother you. It doesn't bother me. Liberals and minorities killing the next generation of leftists and thugs doesn't bother me a bit.
You can't say "rarely" - you simply don't know.
And "rarely" still means the innocent ARE killed.
Either it is ok to do so or it is not. It's not a cafeteria.
Wow. Simply wow.
You don't know that.
No one is saying infanticide is a right. In fact, no one is supporting infanticide.
Stop lying.
Sounds like you are willing to I'll kids because they are unwanted... Did I get that right?June Medical Services v. Russo, the Supreme Court case regarding Louisiana’s 2014 admitting privileges law, has serious ramifications for the future of abortion rights in the United States. But there is a segment of the anti-abortion movement that doesn’t appear all that concerned with the outcome. If this seems odd, it’s because they never saw Roe v. Wade as a valid ruling, they don’t view the Supreme Court as a legitimate legal authority, and they dismiss the foundation of the Constitution.
Say hello to the so-called “abolitionist” movement, comprised of white men who say the pro-life movement is too secular, abortion constitutes homicide, and that people seeking abortion care should be criminalized and subject to the death penalty.
The anti-abortion abolitionist movement is dangerous. Here's what you need to know
The single biggest threat to America. It looks like harsher measures are going to have to be implemented to protect the country from these freaks.
We will ban abortion. Get used to it.
What will you do with all the unwanted kids? You willing to pay all the associated costs?
Considering how many die due to air pollution: yes very few are pro-life.The ones who have explaining to do are those who claim to be pro-life but support the death penalty knowing that innocent people will be killed.
Every abortion kills an innocent human being, and there is no basis for anyone involved to doubt that an innocent human being is being killed.
Mistakes certainly happen, from time to time, in the justice system, but especially given all the safeguards involved, by the time a convicted criminal reaches the point of being executed, it's safe to say that everything humanly possible has been done to establish that he really is guilty of a crime so serious as to justify putting him to death, and there is certainly not any intent involved to kill an innocent person.
To try to compare the two as you are, and to suggest that abortion is justifiable while the death penalty is not, is just an example of deliberate, willful dishonesty on your part. But that's no surprise. Deep down, you know damn well that you are defending something that is indefensible and evil, and you know that you cannot defend it without lying your filthy ass off.
In 1998, there were less than a hundred convicted criminals put to death. That's the most in any year in this country's history. In 2019, there were only nine.
In each of these same years, over a million innocent children put to death by abortion. By the most conservative use of these numbers, we're talking anywhere from 10,000 to 100,000 innocent children murdered in cold blood by abortionists per convicted murderer put to death. Even if you assume that every convict put to death was innocent, and that that those responsible for it happening knew and intended to kill an innocent person, it still comes nowhere close to abortion.
Mistakes happen.
Because we know that, we should oppose capital punishment. Period. That is the only consistent pro-life stance. Anti abortion, Anti capital punishment. Numbers are irrelevant to That One who loses his life.
I have a lot of respect for those who are consistently pro-life. They are very few in number.
June Medical Services v. Russo, the Supreme Court case regarding Louisiana’s 2014 admitting privileges law, has serious ramifications for the future of abortion rights in the United States. But there is a segment of the anti-abortion movement that doesn’t appear all that concerned with the outcome. If this seems odd, it’s because they never saw Roe v. Wade as a valid ruling, they don’t view the Supreme Court as a legitimate legal authority, and they dismiss the foundation of the Constitution.
Say hello to the so-called “abolitionist” movement, comprised of white men who say the pro-life movement is too secular, abortion constitutes homicide, and that people seeking abortion care should be criminalized and subject to the death penalty.
The anti-abortion abolitionist movement is dangerous. Here's what you need to know
The single biggest threat to America. It looks like harsher measures are going to have to be implemented to protect the country from these freaks.
We will ban abortion. Get used to it.
What will you do with all the unwanted kids? You willing to pay all the associated costs?
June Medical Services v. Russo, the Supreme Court case regarding Louisiana’s 2014 admitting privileges law, has serious ramifications for the future of abortion rights in the United States. But there is a segment of the anti-abortion movement that doesn’t appear all that concerned with the outcome. If this seems odd, it’s because they never saw Roe v. Wade as a valid ruling, they don’t view the Supreme Court as a legitimate legal authority, and they dismiss the foundation of the Constitution.
Say hello to the so-called “abolitionist” movement, comprised of white men who say the pro-life movement is too secular, abortion constitutes homicide, and that people seeking abortion care should be criminalized and subject to the death penalty.
The anti-abortion abolitionist movement is dangerous. Here's what you need to know
The single biggest threat to America. It looks like harsher measures are going to have to be implemented to protect the country from these freaks.
We will ban abortion. Get used to it.
What will you do with all the unwanted kids? You willing to pay all the associated costs?
Sounds like you are willing to I'll kids because they are unwanted... Did I get that right?June Medical Services v. Russo, the Supreme Court case regarding Louisiana’s 2014 admitting privileges law, has serious ramifications for the future of abortion rights in the United States. But there is a segment of the anti-abortion movement that doesn’t appear all that concerned with the outcome. If this seems odd, it’s because they never saw Roe v. Wade as a valid ruling, they don’t view the Supreme Court as a legitimate legal authority, and they dismiss the foundation of the Constitution.
Say hello to the so-called “abolitionist” movement, comprised of white men who say the pro-life movement is too secular, abortion constitutes homicide, and that people seeking abortion care should be criminalized and subject to the death penalty.
The anti-abortion abolitionist movement is dangerous. Here's what you need to know
The single biggest threat to America. It looks like harsher measures are going to have to be implemented to protect the country from these freaks.
We will ban abortion. Get used to it.
What will you do with all the unwanted kids? You willing to pay all the associated costs?
Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk
So you are right? You sound like a baby k'lling lefty to me... Advocating for k'lling the unwanted, That's some twisted s***. If you can't figure out what I mean, you might be low IQ. But I bet you are smart enough to figure it out [emoji106][emoji106]. Go pretend be the savior of the world to justify killing the unborn. Nice barbaric look.Sounds like you are willing to I'll kids because they are unwanted... Did I get that right?June Medical Services v. Russo, the Supreme Court case regarding Louisiana’s 2014 admitting privileges law, has serious ramifications for the future of abortion rights in the United States. But there is a segment of the anti-abortion movement that doesn’t appear all that concerned with the outcome. If this seems odd, it’s because they never saw Roe v. Wade as a valid ruling, they don’t view the Supreme Court as a legitimate legal authority, and they dismiss the foundation of the Constitution.
Say hello to the so-called “abolitionist” movement, comprised of white men who say the pro-life movement is too secular, abortion constitutes homicide, and that people seeking abortion care should be criminalized and subject to the death penalty.
The anti-abortion abolitionist movement is dangerous. Here's what you need to know
The single biggest threat to America. It looks like harsher measures are going to have to be implemented to protect the country from these freaks.
We will ban abortion. Get used to it.
What will you do with all the unwanted kids? You willing to pay all the associated costs?
Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk
You weren’t even coherent much less right.
So you are right? You sound like a baby k'lling lefty to me... Advocating for k'lling the unwanted, That's some twisted s***. If you can't figure out what I mean, you might be low IQ. But I bet you are smart enough to figure it out [emoji106][emoji106]. Go pretend be the savior of the world to justify killing the unborn. Nice barbaric look.Sounds like you are willing to I'll kids because they are unwanted... Did I get that right?June Medical Services v. Russo, the Supreme Court case regarding Louisiana’s 2014 admitting privileges law, has serious ramifications for the future of abortion rights in the United States. But there is a segment of the anti-abortion movement that doesn’t appear all that concerned with the outcome. If this seems odd, it’s because they never saw Roe v. Wade as a valid ruling, they don’t view the Supreme Court as a legitimate legal authority, and they dismiss the foundation of the Constitution.
Say hello to the so-called “abolitionist” movement, comprised of white men who say the pro-life movement is too secular, abortion constitutes homicide, and that people seeking abortion care should be criminalized and subject to the death penalty.
The anti-abortion abolitionist movement is dangerous. Here's what you need to know
The single biggest threat to America. It looks like harsher measures are going to have to be implemented to protect the country from these freaks.
We will ban abortion. Get used to it.
What will you do with all the unwanted kids? You willing to pay all the associated costs?
Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk
You weren’t even coherent much less right.
Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk
Stop posting about these fringe wackos. Stick to the mainstream arguments.
1. Pro-life
2. Pro-Choice
View attachment 312588 I'm PRO-LIFE!!
