AGAIN -- WHERE do you see any mention of anybody's religion here?
Are we lost on what the word "where" means?
It says he was a tourist, describing him only as "Asian". Far as I know "Asian" is not a religion.
Aw come on, get real here, we are in a Muslim country, and the lifeguards because they were male were not allowed to save the girl. You're grasping at straws here. It's not like this barbaric faith hasn't caused Muslims to do this kind of barbarity before.
And AGAIN .... the officials IN that country, ON the scene, who are presumably themselves Muslims, tried to rescue the girl, were stopped by the intervening "Asian" father, and then arrested and sued him for what he did.
>> Lt. Col. Burqibah added that the girl’s father was later arrested by Dubai Police for stopping the rescue team from saving his daughter’s life and doing their job.
““This is one of the incidents which I cannot forget. It shocked me and many others who were involved in the case.
... Lt. Col. Burqibah added that the girl’s father was later arrested by Dubai Police for stopping the rescue team from saving his daughter’s life and doing their job.
"He was prosecuted and sued by the concerned authorities.” ---
Emirates 24/7 <<
Col. Burquibah was apparently relating a story from two decades ago that still haunts him.. For exactly the same reason it haunts us.
--- And yet somehow you want to blame "Islam". In a story that makes no mention of any kind of religion at all.
What's wrong with this picture?
Whats wrong with this pictures is....drumroll....islam is known for honor killings. Therefore, if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it's usually a duck. In this case, it turned out to be a turkey.
No actually it isn't. That's only if you read hacks like Roudy who are clearly making it up as they go.
"Honor killings" are a
cultural artifact left over from thousands of years of patriarchal traditions. They still go on in some
cultures -- because it's a
cultural thing -- exclusive of any religion.
For example they go on in both India and Pakistan, committed by Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs.... men who have nothing in common in religion but very much have the subcontinent cultural traditions in common. On the other hand they don't happen in, say, Morocco or Tunisia, which are as Muslim as they come.
So the commonality here is
culture -- not religion. And this cultural bullshit was around
long before any of those religions were even founded. It's got DEEP roots. As a woman you need to know this.
Second thing wrong with this picture is....drumroll...why print that story NOW? And who reported it? Or rather, who chose to have it reported? MEDIA. And what was the MEDIA's true agenda in printing this old story?
Lots of things wrong with this. Not just one thing.
Yup, I pointed out that it's from 1996. I always check out these scary-monster stories from the middle east; we take them with many grains of salt.
Bottom line though, there's no mention of anybody's religion here; and if we want to assume one, well the authorites who tried to save the girl were local in Dubai --- which means Muslims. They were trying to be the good guys.
Somebody needs to walk me through how we get "Islam did this" out of that. Why would these (presumably Muslim) officials arrest the guy and prosecute him, if that's the case? Hm?
The girl's father was a devout Muslim who would have rather seen his daughter dead than a male lifeguard touch her body in order to save her from drowning. The only culture in "Asia" who would behave like this are people of the Islamic faith. Even the honor killings in India are conducted by, mostly, drum roll please...PEOPLE OF THE MUSLIM FAITH.
Honour killings bring dishonour to India - Al Jazeera English
Killed in the name of 'honour'
"Honour killings" are traditionally associated with developing countries with significant Muslim populations, and India has been no exception.
Indian Muslim Mothers Charged In Honor Killings Of Daughters Who Married Hindu Men
Mohammad Shafia who murdered daughter in honour killing said he d do the same again Daily Mail Online
Bull. *******.
Shit.
----- Number one, there's absolutely no mention of "devout" (or non-devout) "Muslim" (or any other religion) attached to the father, the daughter, the lifeguards, the police who arrested him, the writer, the publisher, the owner of the internet server it sits on, the local ice cream vendor,
anyone in the story at all, anywhere.
Including its source links. You're pulling this shit completely out of your ass.
---- Number two, the concept of "honor killing" is widespread worldwide, especially among tribal units with a nomadic historical background, practiced in Mediterranean Europe (rooting back to ancient Rome's doctrine of
pater familias) as well as the Inca and Aztecs in the Americas. NONE of them were Muslim, as Islam
hadn't even been invented yet --- which again confirms my characterization of a socio-CULTURAL/tribal tradition... not a religious one.
Italy didn't toughen its laws against it until less than forty years ago (1981). Brazil didn't clamp down until 19
91. Yet none of those Italian or Brazilian honor killings had jack squat to do with being Catholic.
>> The cultural features which lead to honor killings are complex. Honor killings involve violence and fear as a tool of maintaining control. Honor killings are argued to have their origin among nomadic peoples and herdsmen: such populations carry all their valuables with them and risk having them stolen, and do not have proper recourse to law. As a result, inspiring fear, using aggression, and cultivating a reputation for violent revenge in order to protect property is preferred to other behaviors. In societies where there is a weak rule of law, people must build fierce reputations.
[22]
In many cultures where honor is of central value, men are sources, or active generators /agents of that honor, while the only effect that women can have on honor is to destroy it. << --
Honor Killing Wiki Page
>> The incident in Subalpur village in West Bengal’s Birbhum district, in which a 20-year-old tribal woman was gang-raped by a dozen men as punishment for alleged immoral conduct, is shocking in its unimaginable brutality and points to a larger malaise. The order by a kangaroo court led by a village headman is proof that a section of rural India is outside the pale of the country’s constitutional values and judicial system. Ill-informed men with medieval social attitudes and patriarchal prejudices are allowed to adjudicate on the conduct and morality of women and pass unconscionable forms of punishment, such as social ostracism, payment of arbitrary fines and, as in this case, sexual violence in lieu of monetary penalty. <<
That's in India, from
this page full of honour killing news, and it illustrates AGAIN the tribal sociocultural origins that have nothing to do with Hinduism, or Sikhism, or Islam or any other religion.
Oh wait, I already said that. You just weren't listening.
---- Number three, honor killing is
prohibited in Islam anyway:
>> There is no such concept in Islam that is called “honor killing”. Islam holds every soul in high esteem and does not allow any transgression upon it. It does not allow people to take the law in their own hands and administer justice, because doing so will be leading to chaos and lawlessness. Therefore, based on this, Islam does not permit such killings.
First of all, in order to sanction killing, it must be through a binding verdict issued by an authoritative law court. Individuals themselves have no authority either to judge cases or pass judgments. Therefore, a Muslim should not sanction such killing because doing so will be leading to the rule of the law of the jungle. A civilized society cannot be run by such laws.”
--- Sheikh Ahmad Kutty, senior lecturer and Islamic scholar, Islamic Institute of Toronto
“Like all other religions, Islam strictly prohibits murder and killing without legal justification. Allah, Most High, says, “Whoso slayeth a believer of set purpose, his reward is Hell for ever. Allah is wroth against him and He hath cursed him and prepared for him an awful doom.” (An-Nisa’: 93)
The so-called “honor killing” is based on ignorance and disregard of morals and laws, which cannot be abolished except by disciplinary punishments.
It goes without saying that people are not entitled to take the law in their own hands, for it’s the responsibility of the Muslim State and its concerned bodies to maintain peace, security, etc., and to prevent chaos and disorder from creeping into the Muslim society.”
--- Sheikh `Atiyyah Saqr, former head of Al-Azhar Fatwa Committee (
source for both here)
---- Number four, if this bullshit you pick out of your nose had any validity we should expect to see honor killings wherever we see Islam, yet we don't. On the other hand India's swimming in it, and
trying to pass its own tougher legislation. Trying to pass laws to change culture -- kinda like gun control laws here.
I'm pretty sure there's not a whole lotta Muslims in India. I'm pretty sure that's why they divided the British colonial territory into India and Pakistan.
Albania had/has a long tradition of it within the
Kanun, the local oral-tradition community laws that are thought to date
all the way back to the Bronze Age, Islam didn't even
reach Albania until the 14th century and is only followed by slightly over half the population; yet honor killings were fairly common in rural Albania (and elsewhere in the Balkans) up until the dictatorial communist government took over after WWII.
The Incas and Aztecs encountered by the Spanish were practicing it, as well as in our own time the Cosa Nostra, who tend to use machine guns, in a tradition of "honor" that goes back to ancient Rome.
None of this shit has anything to do with Islam, which did not exist in ancient Rome, which did not exist in the Bronze Age, which did not exist among the Native Americans of the 16th century. Nor, by definition, does it exist among Hindus and Sikhs in India. Nor does the Mafia doing it make it "Catholic".
---- And number five, we did all this shit before, you and your ilk got your asses handed back to you then, and here you come with the same made-up crap expecting different results. All you're doing here is trying to foment hate by making shit up with absolutely no evidence whatsoever. When you do that, yer gonna get yer ass called on it, pronto.