Thank God. Bill Cosby walking today

Oh geez, you didn't read the decision, they vacated the conviction NOT because he is innocent but he was not given a fair trial.
it said vacated the conviction. that means, he was never found guilty. Sorry, that's the definition. In order for him to be convicted, they'd have to have a third trial. Which means they'd have to find him guilty. So if one was never found guilty, one is still innocent. it's quite simple.

CONVICTION means guilty, he WAS guilty, but vacated for reasons you keep ignoring:

"IV. Conclusion

We do not question the discretion that is vested in prosecutors “over whether charges should be brought in any given case.” Stipetich, 652 A.2d at 1295. We will not undermine a prosecutor’s “general and widely recognized power to conduct criminal litigation and prosecutions on behalf of the Commonwealth, and to decide whether and when to prosecute, and whether and when to continue or discontinue a case.” Id. (quoting 34 See CDO (quoting Blue, 384 U.S. at 255). [J-100-2020] - 79 Commonwealth v. DiPasquale, 246 A.2d 430, 432 (Pa. 1968)). The decision to charge, or not to charge, a defendant can be conditioned, modified, or revoked at the discretion of the prosecutor.

However, the discretion vested in our Commonwealth’s prosecutors, however vast, does not mean that its exercise is free of the constraints of due process. When an unconditional charging decision is made publicly and with the intent to induce action and reliance by the defendant, and when the defendant does so to his detriment (and in some instances upon the advice of counsel), denying the defendant the benefit of that decision is an affront to fundamental fairness, particularly when it results in a criminal prosecution that was foregone for more than a decade. No mere changing of the guard strips that circumstance of its inequity. See, e.g., State v. Myers, 513 S.E.2d 676, 682 n.1 (W.Va. 1998) (explaining that “any change in the duly elected prosecutor does not affect the standard of responsibility for the office”). A contrary result would be patently untenable. It would violate long-cherished principles of fundamental fairness. It would be antithetical to, and corrosive of, the integrity and functionality of the criminal justice system that we strive to maintain.

For these reasons, Cosby’s convictions and judgment of sentence are vacated, and he is discharged.3"

bolding mine

=======

They stated he WAS convicted and duly sentenced, that is what they vacated.

you are looking foolish here.
 
So whatever became of that "#metoo" movement Cosby got caught up in? I guess it was just the feelgood outrage of the day, replaced by cries of "racism."

I'll be glad when that one goes away too.
 
CONVICTION means guilty, he WAS guilty, but vacated for reasons you keep ignoring:
nope, I look at the language used. Vacated disposes of the conviction. It says it in the damn definition. The conviction never existed.

You are embarrassing yourself here:

Merriam-Webster

"Definition of conviction


1: the act or process of finding a person guilty of a crime especially in a court of law.

The Judges stated he was convicted and sentenced in court,

"For these reasons, Cosby’s convictions and judgment of sentence are vacated, and he is discharged.3"

It is right there in front of you!

They vacated the conviction and sentencing because the Prosecutors wrongly charged him and compelled testimony under duress. There was a prior agreement not to charge Cosby of a crime on the woman, but the next Prosecutor made the charges and took him to trial anyway, which is a violation of the earlier agreement.

It is clear you didn't read much of anything.
 
Lol......When a big news story hits,the Mods will be out deleting and merging like mad men. I beat the Buzzer.........You'll see what I mean in time...lolol




Lol I just heard the "I beat you and no child can beat The Grinch" going through my head in the Grinch's voice when I saw that comment. XD
 
CONVICTION means guilty, he WAS guilty, but vacated for reasons you keep ignoring:
nope, I look at the language used. Vacated disposes of the conviction. It says it in the damn definition. The conviction never existed.

You are embarrassing yourself here:

Merriam-Webster

"Definition of conviction


1: the act or process of finding a person guilty of a crime especially in a court of law.

The Judges stated he was convicted and sentenced in court,

"For these reasons, Cosby’s convictions and judgment of sentence are vacated, and he is discharged.3"

It is right there in front of you!

They vacated the conviction and sentencing because the Prosecutors wrongly charged him and compelled testimony under duress. There was a prior agreement not to charge Cosby of a crime on the woman, but the next Prosecutor made the charges and took him to trial anyway, which is a violation of the earlier agreement.

It is clear you didn't read much of anything.
And another court vacated that conviction. I gave you that definition. You can’t win this one
 
Ya got the money to file appeal after appeal....you get off...although you are still guilty as sin.

Money and fame rule our justice system.
 
What an ordeal. That ugly bitch lied
Nothing said he was innocent or the woman lied
He is still guilty as a fact. But he is free by law.
We know this was politically motivated hit job.

You ever see that bitch who testified, an OD of Viagra would be useless
 
Cosby was long considered too white. His fact based comments on Dysfunction angered the “make excuses” crowd so they went after him
 
As I promised two pages ago, liberals mincing and altering words such that he has not been set free. You don’t get set free if you are guilty because when you are guilty you don’t get set free.
 
Anyways let me see if I've got this right,.. he was freed because nobody read him his right to remain silent or what?
 
I'm still a bit confused why it got overturned, but I'm still definitely happy about it!! :D
 

Forum List

Back
Top