People have sex all the time for favors. He was a very powerful person, and the women even admitted they were looking for favors to get into acting. Shit dude. get the story straight. It's why they couldn't convict him in the first place. All that fake crying on all of the news shows. fk everyone of them.
Maybe finger rapist Joe can get his cell.Nothing said he was innocent or the woman liedWhat an ordeal. That ugly ***** lied
Bill Cosby Criminally Charged in 2004 Sex-Assault Case
Andrea Constand, a former Temple University employee, had told police he drugged and violated her at his home near Philadelphia in 2004.www.nbcnews.com
Nothing said he was innocent or the woman liedWhat an ordeal. That ugly ***** lied
Bill Cosby Criminally Charged in 2004 Sex-Assault Case
Andrea Constand, a former Temple University employee, had told police he drugged and violated her at his home near Philadelphia in 2004.
Apparently you didn't see it.
Cos was proclaimed to be a Innocent as a newborn by the PA Supreme Court and ordered released.
yep, they denied him his rights.
nope, it was vacated. Vacated means he wasn't ever sentenced, which then means he is innocent because they didn't find him guilty.Nothing said he was innocent or the woman liedWhat an ordeal. That ugly ***** lied
Bill Cosby Criminally Charged in 2004 Sex-Assault Case
Andrea Constand, a former Temple University employee, had told police he drugged and violated her at his home near Philadelphia in 2004.
Apparently you didn't see it.
Cos was proclaimed to be a Innocent as a newborn by the PA Supreme Court and ordered released.
I don't think so:
From the Conclusion of the Court Decision itself:
IV. Conclusion
We do not question the discretion that is vested in prosecutors “over whether charges should be brought in any given case.” Stipetich, 652 A.2d at 1295. We will not undermine a prosecutor’s “general and widely recognized power to conduct criminal litigation and prosecutions on behalf of the Commonwealth, and to decide whether and when to prosecute, and whether and when to continue or discontinue a case.” Id. (quoting 34 See CDO (quoting Blue, 384 U.S. at 255). [J-100-2020] - 79 Commonwealth v. DiPasquale, 246 A.2d 430, 432 (Pa. 1968)). The decision to charge, or not to charge, a defendant can be conditioned, modified, or revoked at the discretion of the prosecutor.
However, the discretion vested in our Commonwealth’s prosecutors, however vast, does not mean that its exercise is free of the constraints of due process. When an unconditional charging decision is made publicly and with the intent to induce action and reliance by the defendant, and when the defendant does so to his detriment (and in some instances upon the advice of counsel), denying the defendant the benefit of that decision is an affront to fundamental fairness, particularly when it results in a criminal prosecution that was foregone for more than a decade. No mere changing of the guard strips that circumstance of its inequity. See, e.g., State v. Myers, 513 S.E.2d 676, 682 n.1 (W.Va. 1998) (explaining that “any change in the duly elected prosecutor does not affect the standard of responsibility for the office”). A contrary result would be patently untenable. It would violate long-cherished principles of fundamental fairness. It would be antithetical to, and corrosive of, the integrity and functionality of the criminal justice system that we strive to maintain.
For these reasons, Cosby’s convictions and judgment of sentence are vacated, and he is discharged.3
nope, it was vacated. Vacated means he wasn't ever sentenced, which then means he is innocent because they didn't find him guilty.Nothing said he was innocent or the woman liedWhat an ordeal. That ugly ***** lied
Bill Cosby Criminally Charged in 2004 Sex-Assault Case
Andrea Constand, a former Temple University employee, had told police he drugged and violated her at his home near Philadelphia in 2004.
Apparently you didn't see it.
Cos was proclaimed to be a Innocent as a newborn by the PA Supreme Court and ordered released.
I don't think so:
From the Conclusion of the Court Decision itself:
IV. Conclusion
We do not question the discretion that is vested in prosecutors “over whether charges should be brought in any given case.” Stipetich, 652 A.2d at 1295. We will not undermine a prosecutor’s “general and widely recognized power to conduct criminal litigation and prosecutions on behalf of the Commonwealth, and to decide whether and when to prosecute, and whether and when to continue or discontinue a case.” Id. (quoting 34 See CDO (quoting Blue, 384 U.S. at 255). [J-100-2020] - 79 Commonwealth v. DiPasquale, 246 A.2d 430, 432 (Pa. 1968)). The decision to charge, or not to charge, a defendant can be conditioned, modified, or revoked at the discretion of the prosecutor.
However, the discretion vested in our Commonwealth’s prosecutors, however vast, does not mean that its exercise is free of the constraints of due process. When an unconditional charging decision is made publicly and with the intent to induce action and reliance by the defendant, and when the defendant does so to his detriment (and in some instances upon the advice of counsel), denying the defendant the benefit of that decision is an affront to fundamental fairness, particularly when it results in a criminal prosecution that was foregone for more than a decade. No mere changing of the guard strips that circumstance of its inequity. See, e.g., State v. Myers, 513 S.E.2d 676, 682 n.1 (W.Va. 1998) (explaining that “any change in the duly elected prosecutor does not affect the standard of responsibility for the office”). A contrary result would be patently untenable. It would violate long-cherished principles of fundamental fairness. It would be antithetical to, and corrosive of, the integrity and functionality of the criminal justice system that we strive to maintain.
For these reasons, Cosby’s convictions and judgment of sentence are vacated, and he is discharged.3
Vacating a Conviction: Definition
In general, to vacate a conviction means to set aside the verdict. In other words, it will appear as if the first trial and conviction never happened. Prosecutors will have the opportunity to pursue your case again, which means you may have to go endure another round of the criminal trial process.
He had his rights
Did Putin make him do it?Nothing said he was innocent or the woman liedWhat an ordeal. That ugly ***** lied
Bill Cosby Criminally Charged in 2004 Sex-Assault Case
Andrea Constand, a former Temple University employee, had told police he drugged and violated her at his home near Philadelphia in 2004.
?Did Putin make him do it?Nothing said he was innocent or the woman liedWhat an ordeal. That ugly ***** lied
Bill Cosby Criminally Charged in 2004 Sex-Assault Case
Andrea Constand, a former Temple University employee, had told police he drugged and violated her at his home near Philadelphia in 2004.
You know, all those "facts" you used to try and impeach Trump regarding allegations of him colluding with Putin??Did Putin make him do it?Nothing said he was innocent or the woman liedWhat an ordeal. That ugly ***** lied
Bill Cosby Criminally Charged in 2004 Sex-Assault Case
Andrea Constand, a former Temple University employee, had told police he drugged and violated her at his home near Philadelphia in 2004.
When I look at these womens face I wonder who the **** would rape them?????Did Putin make him do it?Nothing said he was innocent or the woman liedWhat an ordeal. That ugly ***** lied
Bill Cosby Criminally Charged in 2004 Sex-Assault Case
Andrea Constand, a former Temple University employee, had told police he drugged and violated her at his home near Philadelphia in 2004.
www.theblaze.com
I thought his White Owl cigar commercials back in the day were cool. Many people don't recall those.
it said vacated the conviction. that means, he was never found guilty. Sorry, that's the definition. In order for him to be convicted, they'd have to have a third trial. Which means they'd have to find him guilty. So if one was never found guilty, one is still innocent. it's quite simple.
