Thank God. Bill Cosby walking today

[jc456]

Yea, but something tells me you wouldn't have this same energy if the person involved was someone else....

Or if one of the women involved was your daughter...the prosecutor fucked up...

People have sex all the time for favors. He was a very powerful person, and the women even admitted they were looking for favors to get into acting. Shit dude. get the story straight. It's why they couldn't convict him in the first place. All that fake crying on all of the news shows. fk everyone of them.

 

[Lastamender]

What an ordeal. That ugly bitch lied

Bill Cosby Criminally Charged in 2004 Sex-Assault Case

Andrea Constand, a former Temple University employee, had told police he drugged and violated her at his home near Philadelphia in 2004.

www.nbcnews.com

Nothing said he was innocent or the woman lied

Maybe finger rapist Joe can get his cell.

 

[Sunsettommy]

What an ordeal. That ugly bitch lied

Bill Cosby Criminally Charged in 2004 Sex-Assault Case

Andrea Constand, a former Temple University employee, had told police he drugged and violated her at his home near Philadelphia in 2004.

www.nbcnews.com

Nothing said he was innocent or the woman lied

Apparently you didn't see it.

Cos was proclaimed to be a Innocent as a newborn by the PA Supreme Court and ordered released.

I don't think so:

Pennsylvania’s highest court overturned Bill Cosby’s sex assault conviction Wednesday after finding an agreement with a previous prosecutor prevented him from being charged in the case.

From the Conclusion of the Court Decision itself:

IV. Conclusion

We do not question the discretion that is vested in prosecutors “over whether charges should be brought in any given case.” Stipetich, 652 A.2d at 1295. We will not undermine a prosecutor’s “general and widely recognized power to conduct criminal litigation and prosecutions on behalf of the Commonwealth, and to decide whether and when to prosecute, and whether and when to continue or discontinue a case.” Id. (quoting 34 See CDO (quoting Blue, 384 U.S. at 255). [J-100-2020] - 79 Commonwealth v. DiPasquale, 246 A.2d 430, 432 (Pa. 1968)). The decision to charge, or not to charge, a defendant can be conditioned, modified, or revoked at the discretion of the prosecutor.

However, the discretion vested in our Commonwealth’s prosecutors, however vast, does not mean that its exercise is free of the constraints of due process. When an unconditional charging decision is made publicly and with the intent to induce action and reliance by the defendant, and when the defendant does so to his detriment (and in some instances upon the advice of counsel), denying the defendant the benefit of that decision is an affront to fundamental fairness, particularly when it results in a criminal prosecution that was foregone for more than a decade. No mere changing of the guard strips that circumstance of its inequity. See, e.g., State v. Myers, 513 S.E.2d 676, 682 n.1 (W.Va. 1998) (explaining that “any change in the duly elected prosecutor does not affect the standard of responsibility for the office”). A contrary result would be patently untenable. It would violate long-cherished principles of fundamental fairness. It would be antithetical to, and corrosive of, the integrity and functionality of the criminal justice system that we strive to maintain.

For these reasons, Cosby’s convictions and judgment of sentence are vacated, and he is discharged.3

 

[jc456]

He is being released on a technicality

yep, they denied him his rights.

 

[jc456]

What an ordeal. That ugly bitch lied

Bill Cosby Criminally Charged in 2004 Sex-Assault Case

Andrea Constand, a former Temple University employee, had told police he drugged and violated her at his home near Philadelphia in 2004.

www.nbcnews.com

Nothing said he was innocent or the woman lied

Apparently you didn't see it.

Cos was proclaimed to be a Innocent as a newborn by the PA Supreme Court and ordered released.

I don't think so:

Pennsylvania’s highest court overturned Bill Cosby’s sex assault conviction Wednesday after finding an agreement with a previous prosecutor prevented him from being charged in the case.

From the Conclusion of the Court Decision itself:

IV. Conclusion

We do not question the discretion that is vested in prosecutors “over whether charges should be brought in any given case.” Stipetich, 652 A.2d at 1295. We will not undermine a prosecutor’s “general and widely recognized power to conduct criminal litigation and prosecutions on behalf of the Commonwealth, and to decide whether and when to prosecute, and whether and when to continue or discontinue a case.” Id. (quoting 34 See CDO (quoting Blue, 384 U.S. at 255). [J-100-2020] - 79 Commonwealth v. DiPasquale, 246 A.2d 430, 432 (Pa. 1968)). The decision to charge, or not to charge, a defendant can be conditioned, modified, or revoked at the discretion of the prosecutor.

However, the discretion vested in our Commonwealth’s prosecutors, however vast, does not mean that its exercise is free of the constraints of due process. When an unconditional charging decision is made publicly and with the intent to induce action and reliance by the defendant, and when the defendant does so to his detriment (and in some instances upon the advice of counsel), denying the defendant the benefit of that decision is an affront to fundamental fairness, particularly when it results in a criminal prosecution that was foregone for more than a decade. No mere changing of the guard strips that circumstance of its inequity. See, e.g., State v. Myers, 513 S.E.2d 676, 682 n.1 (W.Va. 1998) (explaining that “any change in the duly elected prosecutor does not affect the standard of responsibility for the office”). A contrary result would be patently untenable. It would violate long-cherished principles of fundamental fairness. It would be antithetical to, and corrosive of, the integrity and functionality of the criminal justice system that we strive to maintain.

For these reasons, Cosby’s convictions and judgment of sentence are vacated, and he is discharged.3

nope, it was vacated. Vacated means he wasn't ever sentenced, which then means he is innocent because they didn't find him guilty.

Vacating a Conviction: Definition

In general, to vacate a conviction means to set aside the verdict. In other words, it will appear as if the first trial and conviction never happened. Prosecutors will have the opportunity to pursue your case again, which means you may have to go endure another round of the criminal trial process.

 

[toobfreak]

Bill Cosby's conviction has been vacated by the PA Supreme Court. Trial was unfair. He will be released immediately.

SO LESSEE: it took 17 years to prosecute this one case to realize the charges were baseless, but the leftwing MSM investigated and resolved that all 80-100 cases of fraud across six states in multiple cities was all baseless and debunked in just 7 days? And Trump only got a few weeks to bring his cases?

 

[Sunsettommy]

What an ordeal. That ugly bitch lied

Bill Cosby Criminally Charged in 2004 Sex-Assault Case

Andrea Constand, a former Temple University employee, had told police he drugged and violated her at his home near Philadelphia in 2004.

www.nbcnews.com

Nothing said he was innocent or the woman lied

Apparently you didn't see it.

Cos was proclaimed to be a Innocent as a newborn by the PA Supreme Court and ordered released.

I don't think so:

Pennsylvania’s highest court overturned Bill Cosby’s sex assault conviction Wednesday after finding an agreement with a previous prosecutor prevented him from being charged in the case.

From the Conclusion of the Court Decision itself:

IV. Conclusion

We do not question the discretion that is vested in prosecutors “over whether charges should be brought in any given case.” Stipetich, 652 A.2d at 1295. We will not undermine a prosecutor’s “general and widely recognized power to conduct criminal litigation and prosecutions on behalf of the Commonwealth, and to decide whether and when to prosecute, and whether and when to continue or discontinue a case.” Id. (quoting 34 See CDO (quoting Blue, 384 U.S. at 255). [J-100-2020] - 79 Commonwealth v. DiPasquale, 246 A.2d 430, 432 (Pa. 1968)). The decision to charge, or not to charge, a defendant can be conditioned, modified, or revoked at the discretion of the prosecutor.

However, the discretion vested in our Commonwealth’s prosecutors, however vast, does not mean that its exercise is free of the constraints of due process. When an unconditional charging decision is made publicly and with the intent to induce action and reliance by the defendant, and when the defendant does so to his detriment (and in some instances upon the advice of counsel), denying the defendant the benefit of that decision is an affront to fundamental fairness, particularly when it results in a criminal prosecution that was foregone for more than a decade. No mere changing of the guard strips that circumstance of its inequity. See, e.g., State v. Myers, 513 S.E.2d 676, 682 n.1 (W.Va. 1998) (explaining that “any change in the duly elected prosecutor does not affect the standard of responsibility for the office”). A contrary result would be patently untenable. It would violate long-cherished principles of fundamental fairness. It would be antithetical to, and corrosive of, the integrity and functionality of the criminal justice system that we strive to maintain.

For these reasons, Cosby’s convictions and judgment of sentence are vacated, and he is discharged.3

nope, it was vacated. Vacated means he wasn't ever sentenced, which then means he is innocent because they didn't find him guilty.

Vacating a Conviction: Definition

In general, to vacate a conviction means to set aside the verdict. In other words, it will appear as if the first trial and conviction never happened. Prosecutors will have the opportunity to pursue your case again, which means you may have to go endure another round of the criminal trial process.

Oh geez, you didn't read the decision, they vacated the conviction NOT because he is innocent but he was not given a fair trial.

"However, the discretion vested in our Commonwealth’s prosecutors, however vast, does not mean that its exercise is free of the constraints of due process. When an unconditional charging decision is made publicly and with the intent to induce action and reliance by the defendant, and when the defendant does so to his detriment (and in some instances upon the advice of counsel), denying the defendant the benefit of that decision is an affront to fundamental fairness, particularly when it results in a criminal prosecution that was foregone for more than a decade. No mere changing of the guard strips that circumstance of its inequity. See, e.g., State v. Myers, 513 S.E.2d 676, 682 n.1 (W.Va. 1998) (explaining that “any change in the duly elected prosecutor does not affect the standard of responsibility for the office”). A contrary result would be patently untenable. It would violate long-cherished principles of fundamental fairness. It would be antithetical to, and corrosive of, the integrity and functionality of the criminal justice system that we strive to maintain."

bolding mine

We don't know if he assaulted women or not, but he was never given proper due process in being charged.

Try not to ignore the Court decision again.

 

[rightwinger]

He is being released on a technicality

yep, they denied him his rights.

He had his rights
The prosecution just provided testimony from other cases

 

[Hang on Sloopy]

My God you cock suckers defend the murdering Bill Clinton. You people are vile scum

 

[WEATHER53]

Liberals will mince and grind words to offer that he has not been freed.

 

[Notaradical60]

Hmmm? It is better that 10 guilty men go free then to have 1 innocent go to jail. There was obviously an attempt by "The State" to deny Mr. Cosby his Constitutionally guaranteed protections under the law. Too bad Prosecutors are covered under " Qualified Immunity Statutes" even when there is malice involved. They can never be held responsible personally. The State of Pa. Should probably get ready to write a big check, Court ruled they violated his rights, That's a Civil rights Violation, he should sue anyone who continues to refer to him as a convicted sex offender. His conviction has been "Vacated" which translates to No Conviction and No Charges like it never happened.

 

[Sunsettommy]

My God you cock suckers defend the murdering Bill Clinton. You people are vile scum

He murdered someone?

 

[Votto]

What an ordeal. That ugly bitch lied

Bill Cosby Criminally Charged in 2004 Sex-Assault Case

Andrea Constand, a former Temple University employee, had told police he drugged and violated her at his home near Philadelphia in 2004.

www.nbcnews.com

Nothing said he was innocent or the woman lied

Did Putin make him do it?

 

[rightwinger]

What an ordeal. That ugly bitch lied

Bill Cosby Criminally Charged in 2004 Sex-Assault Case

Andrea Constand, a former Temple University employee, had told police he drugged and violated her at his home near Philadelphia in 2004.

www.nbcnews.com

Nothing said he was innocent or the woman lied

Did Putin make him do it?

?

 

[Votto]

What an ordeal. That ugly bitch lied

Bill Cosby Criminally Charged in 2004 Sex-Assault Case

Andrea Constand, a former Temple University employee, had told police he drugged and violated her at his home near Philadelphia in 2004.

www.nbcnews.com

Nothing said he was innocent or the woman lied

Did Putin make him do it?

?

You know, all those "facts" you used to try and impeach Trump regarding allegations of him colluding with Putin?

People like yourself are the last to offer any credible information.

 

[Hang on Sloopy]

What an ordeal. That ugly bitch lied

Bill Cosby Criminally Charged in 2004 Sex-Assault Case

Andrea Constand, a former Temple University employee, had told police he drugged and violated her at his home near Philadelphia in 2004.

www.nbcnews.com

Nothing said he was innocent or the woman lied

Did Putin make him do it?

?

When I look at these womens face I wonder who the fuck would rape them????

Rape is the only sexual attention they could ever get...ugghhh...No way were they raped

 

[justoffal]

I absolutely loved this guy forever.....it broke my heart to see and hear all the stuff that came out about him and his bad habits....and yet I still hated to seem him to to prison,. He is still one of the icons of American culture......

Blaze Media | News, opinion, and entertainment

News, opinion, and entertainment for people who love the American way of life.

www.theblaze.com

 

[WinterBorn]

Glad to see Cos exonerated in this case.

I don't think he was exonerated. There were procedural issues at the trial.

 

[katsteve2012]

Ah, so now I can eat Jell-O pudding once again...

I thought his White Owl cigar commercials back in the day were cool. Many people don't recall those.

 

[jc456]

Oh geez, you didn't read the decision, they vacated the conviction NOT because he is innocent but he was not given a fair trial.

it said vacated the conviction. that means, he was never found guilty. Sorry, that's the definition. In order for him to be convicted, they'd have to have a third trial. Which means they'd have to find him guilty. So if one was never found guilty, one is still innocent. it's quite simple.