Whether it was lots of melanin, or lack of melanin....it has always been the basis for selection to lead the nation.....at least for Democrats.
"Did a State Democratic Party Logo Once Feature the Slogan ‘White Supremacy’?
Until 1966, the official logo of the Alabama Democratic Party featured a crowing rooster and a banner reading "White Supremacy."
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/dem-party-logo-white-supremacy/
The poster who put up this message is quite the cheerleader for one party. Do note the Democratic Party split in the 60's, the old saying, "you can't trust a Southern Democrat", the votes along regional lines even more so than party lines on some civil rights legislation and especially the results of this election:
United States presidential election, 1968 - Wikipedia
If the Democrats did not abandon their southern heritage George Wallace and his "American Racist Party" split of the Democratic Party did not siphon off 13% of the vote Nixon's 43.4% to Humphry's 42.7% might have been changed enough to alter the electoral college vote as well.
There is some debate where the conservative Southern Democrats went after '72. They're dying off now but I'm going to say in Missouri the good ol boys are largely Republican. The R's had only put military hero Eisenhower (of the military industrial complex speech) into the oval office between 1928 and 1968. No doubt they wern't happy with but also weren't brave enough to turn away 13% of the popular vote.
The end result is racism is bad. If we can get enough Republicans to drive the white supremacists to vote for some other party it would be a real stand up thing to do.
1. "The poster who put up this message is quite the cheerleader for one party."
Well, there's one American party, and one racist party....as proven in this thread.
2. "Do note the Democratic Party split in the 60's, the old saying, "you can't trust a Southern Democrat", the votes along regional lines even more so than party lines on some civil rights legislation and especially the results of this election:
United States presidential election, 1968 - Wikipedia"
The was no such split.
Let's prove it.
“The Republican campaign slogan from the Nixon era- which tagged the Democrats as being the party of ‘acid, amnesty and abortion’- was clearly not about race, but referred instead to the hippie life style, to the Vietnam War and to the permissive 1973 Roe v. Wade abortion decision. Nixon’s voters were, as in Merle Haggard’s famous 1969 song, Okies from Muskogee who refuse to take drugs or dodge the draft and ‘like living right and being free.’ ….certainly not about racism or white supremacy.” D’Souza, "Death of a Nation," p.24
Of course, problem #1 is that the Democrats cannot provide a single example of an explicitly racist pitch in the campaign. There never was one.
3. "If the Democrats did not abandon their southern heritage George Wallace and his "American Racist Party" split of the Democratic Party did not siphon off 13% of the vote Nixon's 43.4% to Humphry's 42.7% might have been changed enough to alter the electoral college vote as well."
Watch this:
"Four years after Goldwater, the segregationist vote went right back to Democrats:
Humphrey got half of Wallace’s supporters on election day. Nixon got none of ‘em.
“When the '68 campaign began, Nixon was at 42 percent, Humphrey at 29 percent, Wallace at 22 percent. When it ended, Nixon and Humphrey were tied at 43 percent, with Wallace at 13 percent.
The 9 percent of the national vote that had been peeled off from Wallace had gone to Humphrey.” Pat Buchanan - The neocons & Nixon's southern strategy
4. The proof is so simple.....not as simple as you are....but simple nonetheless.
The racist Democrats were Dixiecrats....not Dixiecans.
And they went right back to voting for Democrats.
What really matters is we both seem to think racism is wrong and you don't want them in your party. You'll go so far as to say the Republican Party has no room for racists, right? I have no party so I can't really make the same pledge, but trust me, my snowflake issue is being anti-NAZI.
Historical U.S. Presidential Elections 1789-2016
Its weird. First the northeast all voted for Lincoln and the Republicans.
After that for 70ish years the South became almost solid blue.
By the end of the 1920's capitalism looked soo bad we almost had a socialist revolution. The world changed, capitalism was saved and almost everyone voted blue until 1948.
between 1948 and 1968 you get these weird mixes. The southern U.S. votes for racist Democrats sometimes against the "national" candidate. The North voted Republican.
Then in 72 the Democrats were such a mess Nixon won EVERYTHING.
In 76 the Democrats found a Southern Democrat to unite the party and they barely beat Gerald Ford, the replacement for the vice president who resigned in scandal who took over for the president who resigned in scandal.
Since then the old Confederacy has been pretty darned red. Even sorta southerner Bill Clinton didn't make that big a dent in it.
Think I'm a regionalist? Yup.
Civil Rights Act of 1964 - Wikipedia Racism is thicker than donkey or elephant blood.
"... but trust me, my snowflake issue is being anti-NAZI."
The Nazi Party used the Democrats as their model.
1. First, the Nazis copied the Progressives/Democrats Immigration Policies.
Only the ‘right races’ welcomed.
“Progressives opposed immigration and enacted several immigration restrictions during the 1920s. Progressives also tried to force immigrants to adopt Progressive moral beliefs.”
Progressive Movement - Ohio History Central
And…
Immigrant Restrictions During the Progressive Era | Synonym
Hitler lauded the Progressives’ immigration policies.
“By refusing immigration on principle to elements in poor health, by simply
excluding certain racesfrom naturalization, it professes in slow beginnings a view which is peculiar to the folkish state concept.”
“Mein Kampf,” chapter three
“Hitler also appealed to the racially exclusionary provisions of U.S. immigration laws, specifically the 1924 Immigration Act that had been pushed by American progressives as a model of enlightened eugenic legislation. “There is today one state,” Hitler noted, “in which at least weak beginning toward a better conception are noticeable. Of course it is not our German Republic but the American union. By refusing immigration on principle to elements in poor health, by simply excluding certain races from naturalization, it professes in slow beginnings a view which is peculiar to the
Volkish state concept.”
Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats
How about Franklin Roosevelt's attitude toward other races....?
"This attitude dovetails with what is known about
FDR's views regarding immigrants in general and Asian immigrants in particular.... He recommended that
future immigration should be limited to those who had "blood of the right sort." FDR's troubling view of Jews
Sieg Heil, Franklin????
2. Know what else the Nazis learned from the Progressives/Democrats?
“…history of laws against
miscegenation—interracial marriage or procreation—in the United States.
Under the influence of Darwinism, racial science and an associated eugenics movement emerged in the late nineteenth century, grew with
the Progressive movement, peaked in the 1920s, and disappeared during World War II. (Its enthusiastic embrace by Hitler did not help it…”
The Race Against Race
“The Germanic inhabitant of the American continent, who has remained
racially pure and unmixed, rose to be master of the continent; he will remain the master as long as he does not fall a victim to
defilement of the blood.”
Adolph Hitler
Untitled Document
“At Nuremberg, the Nazis sought to preserve Nordic racial purity by outlawing racial intermarriage with Jews in much the same manner that Democratic anti-miscegenation laws outlawed racial intermarriage with blacks.”
Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats
3. Guess were Adolph got the idea for sterilization of ‘undesireables’???
“…Hitler learned from progressive sterilization laws that had been enacted in America through the influence of activists like Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood. “I have studied with great interest the laws of several American states concerning prevention of reproduction by people whose progeny would in all probability be of no value or be injurious to the racial stock.”
Hitler’s views—which closely parallel Sanger’s—provided the basis for the Nazi sterilization laws of 1933 which began by targeting “imbeciles” and the mentally retarded, and later expanded to cover Jews, gypsies, and other social undesirables.”
Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats
Hitler wrote to the president of the American Eugenics Society to ask for a copy of his “The Case for Sterilization.”
(
Margaret Sanger and Sterilization)
German race science stood on American progressive’s shoulders.
4. T
he Nazi Nuremberg Laws were taken nearly wholly from the Jim Crow Laws of the Democrat controlled South.
In “Hitler's American Model: The United States and the Making of Nazi Race Law ,” by James Whitman, he shows how the Nazis took the Democrats’ Jim Crow Laws, simply changed the word ‘black’ and inserted the word ‘Jew.’
“Let’s remember that every segregation law in the South was passed by a Democratic legislature, signed by a Democratic governor, and enforced by Democratic officials. The Nuremberg team carefully studied these laws that were mainly aimed at blacks and used them to formulate their own racist legislation mainly aimed at Jews.”
Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats
From the LATimes:
“At a crucial 1934 planning meeting for the Nuremberg system, the Minister of Justice presented a memorandum on American law. According to a transcript, he led a detailed discussion of miscegenation statutes from all over the United States. Moreover it is clear that the most radical Nazis were the most eager advocates of American practices.
Roland Freisler, who would become president of the Nazi People's Court, declared that American jurisprudence "would suit us perfectly."
When the Nazis wrote the Nuremberg laws, they looked to racist American statutes
5. although the Nazis used the Democrat doctrines, Jim Crow and segregation laws as their model…..
….wait for it…..
….the Nazis found them TOO HARSH!!!!!
“And the ugly irony is that when the Nazis rejected American law, it was often because they found it too harsh. For example, Nazi observers shuddered at the "human hardness" of the "one drop" rule, which classified people "of predominantly white appearance" as blacks. To them, American racism was sometimes simply too inhumane.
That may sound implausible — too awful to believe — but in their early years in power, the Nazis were not yet contemplating the "final solution." At first, they had a different fate in mind for the German Jewry: Jews were to be reduced to second-class citizenship and punished criminally if they sought to marry or engage in sexual contact with "Aryans." The ultimate goal was to terrify Germany's Jews into emigrating.”
When the Nazis wrote the Nuremberg laws, they looked to racist American statutes
If it weren’t so tragic, it’d be funny: the Progressives/Democrat’s programs were too rigid for the Nazis.
Amazing.
“…the Nazis balked at defining Jews as anyone possessing “one drop” of Jewish blood in line with the Democratic “one drop rule.” Incredibly the Nazis rejected the one-drop precedent of their American counterparts as too harsh. They defined a Jew as one who has predominant Jewish ancestry—usually characterized by three Jewish grandparents.”
Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats
6. The three considered the most Progressive Presidents….all had racist political views.
Woodrow Wilson segregated the federal government.
FDR chose as his first Supreme Court nominee, a KKKer.
LBJ led the fight against anti-lynching laws.
7. And….the Nazis praised FDR’s policies as nearly identical to theirs.
The National Socialists hailed FDR’s ‘relief measures’ in ways you will recognize:
a. May 11, 1933, the Nazi newspaper Volkischer Beobachter, (People’s Observer): “Roosevelt’s Dictatorial Recovery Measures.”
b. And on January 17, 1934, “We, too, as German National Socialists are looking toward America…” and “Roosevelt’s adoption of National Socialist strains of thought in his economic and social policies” comparable to Hitler’s own dictatorial ‘Fuhrerprinzip.’
c. And “[Roosevelt], too demands that collective good be put before individual self-interest. Many passages in his book ‘Looking Forward’ could have been written by a National Socialist….one can assume that he feels considerable affinity with the National Socialist philosophy.”
d. The paper also refers to “…the fictional appearance of democracy.”
In 1938, American ambassador Hugh R. Wilson reported to FDR his conversations with Hitler: “Hitler then said that he had watched with interest the methods which you, Mr. President, have been attempting to adopt for the United States…. I added that you were very much interested in certain phases of the sociological effort, notably for the youth and workmen, which is being made in Germany…” cited in “Franklin D. Roosevelt and Foreign Affairs,” vol.2, p. 27.
8. The Nazis love the Democrat policies of ‘enslave and colonize.’
Many know that Andrew Jackson is considered to be the father of the modern Democrat Party.
Will…..in that case, he should also be remembered as at least a step-father of
"der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei,” Hitler’s bunch.
You see, another thing the Nazis learned from the Democrats was use to push the ‘
Untermenschen’ out of the way to gain ‘lebensraum.’
“….what did Hitler learn from the Democratic Party and from his fellow leftists in America? First, he credited his plan of
lebensraum or “living space”—specifically, his plan to forcibly seize the land in Russia, Poland and Eastern Europe, and enslave the native inhabitants—to the Jacksonian Democrats. In a 1928 speech, Hitler noted that Americans in the Jacksonian Era had “gunned down the millions of Redskins to a few hundred thousand, and now keep the modest remnant under observation in a cage.”
Historian Timothy Snyder makes the same point in
Bloodlands, “As Hitler imagined the future, Germany would deal with the Slavs much as the North Americans had dealt with the Indians.” Using a formula developed by the Democrats, Hitler sought to drive the Poles, Russians and Slavs from their land; dispatch Germans to take it over; and enslave the conquered peoples that refused to leave.
Notice that Rich and Snyder, who are both progressives, never mentioned the term “Democrat.” They are content to say that Hitler got his ideas from the white man, or from the North Americans. Yet it was the Democratic Party under its founder, Andrew Jackson, and then under Jackson’s Democratic successors, that massacred the Indians and drove them west and presided over the ignominious Trail of Tears. This is the actual precedent that Hitler appealed to in formulating his plans of conquest, dispossession and enslavement.”
Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats
9. Hitler “…. did, however, learn how to frame his policies of racial discrimination and Nordic supremacy, his
lebensraum strategy of mass displacement and subjugation, and his genocidal mechanisms for exterminating the “unfit,” from his fellow leftists and progressives in the United States.
This is the disgraceful legacy of the Democratic left. Scholars and media pundits who know this history are deeply frightened by it. They realize that if young people discover it, if it comes to become widely known, then the whole progressive Democratic project will be discredited. No longer will progressives be able to pose as the part of the good, the true and the beautiful; on the contrary, they will be exposed as a partly complicit in racism, mass murder and genocide.”
Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats
Everyone has seen your posts.....it's clear which party you support.
So stop lying.
