And a theory is a lot more than a guess. There's a lot of physical and empirical evidence that backs a theory. You realize gravity is explained only as a theory as well, yes?
You can't cite any physical or empirical evidence to support creationism. It can't even be logically deduced.
Every shred of evidence points to America being a Christian Nation and yet you would probably fight me over that. And that was only a few hundred years ago so I really don't expect you to believe real scientific evidence when it comes to something that happened a few thousand years ago.
I wouldn't argue that the pilgrims came here to worship independently of the Anglican church. What I would argue is that the Founding Fathers intended to avoid the same theocratic monopoly created by the very British government they rejected by refusing to have a state religion.
Because that is all evolution is is a "belief." Science is observable. Gravity is a scientifically observable theory. Micro evolution is science because it can be observed. Micro evolution is a part of both evolutionism's and creationism's theory and is the only scientifically testable part. Beyond that Evolutionism is nothing but a belief.
This is an oversimplification, but human remains are less "human" the deeper you dig through the earth's surface if you were to scope out a wide area. And other species' fossils seem to converge as far as their structures and appearances go. Are you arguing this isn't an observable sign of evolution?
A system of hope that there is no God.
Yeah, here we go again, we're all out to disprove god. yada yada yada.
Scientists don't care about religion. Religion exists in a metaphysical plane that has absolutely NOTHING to do with the physical realm that scientists study. Believers or not, they cannot rely on physical evidence and observation to make any kind of statement on a concept that does not dwell in a nonphysical realm such as God, or any god for that matter.