Texas Files Lawsuit at SCOTUS Against GA, PA, MI, and WI

They don't get to dictate how other states hold their elections, FruitLoops

:cuckoo:
They had the same case Bush did. They would have won. That is why the SCOTUS did not hear it.
 
They don't get to dictate how other states hold their elections, FruitLoops

:cuckoo:
They had the same case Bush did. They would have won. That is why the SCOTUS did not hear it.
The court did not hear it because the plaintiff did not have standing to file the lawsuit. In essence, you can't sue over something that's none of your business.
 
If you don't like the way your neighbor is raising their child, you have no right to sue them.
 
The court did not hear it because the plaintiff did not have standing to file the lawsuit. In essence, you can't sue over something that's none of your business.
It was their business. 71 electoral votes were involved.
 
A lot of people are at it everyday.
Only a deadheader would continue to argue a moot point.

There is nothing in the constitution that can change the outcome of the election.
Not even congress can change the results now.
 
Only a deadheader would continue to argue a moot point.

There is nothing in the constitution that can change the outcome of the election.
Not even congress can change the results now.
Last loves kicking dead horses and talking at length about about how the 1969 American lunar landing was a fake.
 
Only a deadheader would continue to argue a moot point.

There is nothing in the constitution that can change the outcome of the election.
Not even congress can change the results now.
Fraud is illegal. It can be remedied.
 
Back
Top Bottom