Texas denies anchor babies birth certificates

[PaintMyHouse]

Yes, states being unconstitutional, great idea...

You must have missed this part.

the link...
"But local officials, which issue birth certificates registered by the Texas Department of State Health Services Vital Statistics Unit, told the women they would no longer accept either the matricula consular, which is a photo ID issued by the Mexican Consulate to Mexican nationals living in the U.S., or a foreign passport without a current U.S. visa. Undocumented Central American women are also being turned away because they only have a passport without a U.S. visa. “They are locking out a huge chunk of the undocumented immigrant community,” says Harbury"

Guess you need a visa. If you're an illegal you won't have one.

If the baby was born here, it's American. Deal with it, the Supreme Court did, more than 100 years ago.

Cite the court case?

125 years ago they said Indians are American citizens under the 14th but not illegal newborns

United States v. Wong Kim Ark
In the case of United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), the Supreme Court ruled that a person who

• is born in the United States
• of parents who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of a foreign power
• whose parents have a permanent domicile and residence in the United States
• whose parents are there carrying on business and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity of the foreign power to which they are subject

becomes, at the time of his birth, a citizen of the United States by virtue of the first clause of the 14th Amendment of the Constitution.
Birthright citizenship in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The parents both had legal visas. They wren't illegals.

Doesn't matter a damn, they dealt with that, and ignored it. Besides why would that matter? Oh right, it doesn't.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Capitalism respects no borders. Now you know. it's too late for you to stop the little brown baby invasion regardless. Welcome to the minority, ******...

You really don't live in the real world at all spouting nonsense like that.

None of that is nonsense, unfortunately.

White 77.7%
Hispanic, Latino 17.1%
USA QuickFacts from the US Census Bureau

White alone, not Hispanic or Latino, percent, 2013 62.6%.

And we know who is making babies, and it ain't ******...

It is still a ways to go with only 17.1% over 62.6%
Look at how large white families are being attacked.
You are being used as pawns by the media and the lefties.
Divide and conquer - not for the good of our Nation.

They will not be the majority, but you will be the minority, soon...
Whites Surprisingly Chill About Becoming Minority - Bloomberg View

 

[Care4all]

did they have visas? They were not allowed to be USA citizens and there was no possibility of wong's parents becoming citizens due to the laws at the time, right? Or was this an earlier period in History for such?

if they had Visas, then the court would not have needed to establish whether they were foreign nationals or not....if they had visas, this would ALREADY had been clear to the courts, no?

 

[peach174]

You really don't live in the real world at all spouting nonsense like that.

None of that is nonsense, unfortunately.

White 77.7%
Hispanic, Latino 17.1%
USA QuickFacts from the US Census Bureau

White alone, not Hispanic or Latino, percent, 2013 62.6%.

And we know who is making babies, and it ain't ******...

It is still a ways to go with only 17.1% over 62.6%
Look at how large white families are being attacked.
You are being used as pawns by the media and the lefties.
Divide and conquer - not for the good of our Nation.

They will not be the majority, but you will be the minority, soon...
Whites Surprisingly Chill About Becoming Minority - Bloomberg View

Dream on

 

[PaintMyHouse]

did they have visas? They were not allowed to be USA citizens and there was no possibility of wong's parents becoming citizens due to the laws at the time, right? Or was this an earlier period in History for such?

if they had Visas, then the court would not have needed to establish whether they were foreign nationals or not....if they had visas, this would ALREADY had been clear to the courts, no?

That's the right period, and his folks went home. How they got here didn't matter to the SC in the end. The dissent was not amused by that.

 

[Camp]

The legal issue is certification. Very little attention is being given to this story. That is because it is recognized as a political show that will go nowhere. The birth certificates are being held by the two counties making the challenge. They are not being certified due to the inability of the parents to provide documentation. It will end up in court, in fact, it is on it's way there now. The court will demand the certificates or copies as evidence. They will be entered into the court record as official documents of the court. The court records will be available to the public and become proof of birth as official documents of the court. Along the way the counties and state of Texas will have to battle the Feds and contribute resources for the political show they are staging.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

None of that is nonsense, unfortunately.

White 77.7%
Hispanic, Latino 17.1%
USA QuickFacts from the US Census Bureau

White alone, not Hispanic or Latino, percent, 2013 62.6%.

And we know who is making babies, and it ain't ******...

It is still a ways to go with only 17.1% over 62.6%
Look at how large white families are being attacked.
You are being used as pawns by the media and the lefties.
Divide and conquer - not for the good of our Nation.

They will not be the majority, but you will be the minority, soon...
Whites Surprisingly Chill About Becoming Minority - Bloomberg View

Dream on

That's not a dream, that's math...

 

[peach174]

did they have visas? They were not allowed to be USA citizens and there was no possibility of wong's parents becoming citizens due to the laws at the time, right? Or was this an earlier period in History for such?

if they had Visas, then the court would not have needed to establish whether they were foreign nationals or not....if they had visas, this would ALREADY had been clear to the courts, no?

That's the right period, and his folks went home. How they got here didn't matter. to the SC.

They were here running their business legally.
They did not come here illegally and were not breaking the law.
It was import enough to mention it in the Court document, so yes it did have bearing on the courts decision.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

did they have visas? They were not allowed to be USA citizens and there was no possibility of wong's parents becoming citizens due to the laws at the time, right? Or was this an earlier period in History for such?

if they had Visas, then the court would not have needed to establish whether they were foreign nationals or not....if they had visas, this would ALREADY had been clear to the courts, no?

That's the right period, and his folks went home. How they got here didn't matter. to the SC.

They were here running their business legally.
They did not come here illegally and were not breaking the law.
It was import enough to mention it in the Court document, so yes it did have bearing on the courts decision.

Except it didn't, but it helped justify their opinion. In the dissent it clearly shows their concerns that this decision would mean that if you dropped a kid here, almost without exception, they would be an American, automatically. And that's exactly what has happened ever since.

 

[Claudette]

Oh for heavens sakes. I give up.

You believe as you wish and I'll do the same.

Just one problem, the law is on his side and you are wrong.

Nope. The law was never a law.

the constitution is law

But this isn't the constitution.

'Anchor' Babies: No More U.S. Citizenship - BusinessWeek

All told, federal law (not the Constitution) gives citizenship to an estimated minimum 400,000 babies each year who don’t have even one parent who is a U.S. citizen or permanent legal immigrant. This is a huge impediment to efforts to stabilize U.S. population to allow for environmental sustainability. And it is a great incentive for more illegal immigration

Each of these babies becomes an anchor who retards deportation of unlawfully present parents—and who eventually will be an anchor for entire families and villages as chain migration leads to the immigration of grandparents, aunts, uncles, and cousins

Its Federal Law which can me changed without doing anything to the amendment at all.

 

[peach174]

did they have visas? They were not allowed to be USA citizens and there was no possibility of wong's parents becoming citizens due to the laws at the time, right? Or was this an earlier period in History for such?

if they had Visas, then the court would not have needed to establish whether they were foreign nationals or not....if they had visas, this would ALREADY had been clear to the courts, no?

That's the right period, and his folks went home. How they got here didn't matter. to the SC.

They were here running their business legally.
They did not come here illegally and were not breaking the law.
It was import enough to mention it in the Court document, so yes it did have bearing on the courts decision.

Except it didn't, but it helped justify their opinion. In the dissent it clearly shows their concerns that this decision would mean that if you dropped a kid here, almost without exception, they would be an American, automatically. And that's exactly what has happened ever since.

As long as the parents are here legally, not illegally.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

did they have visas? They were not allowed to be USA citizens and there was no possibility of wong's parents becoming citizens due to the laws at the time, right? Or was this an earlier period in History for such?

if they had Visas, then the court would not have needed to establish whether they were foreign nationals or not....if they had visas, this would ALREADY had been clear to the courts, no?

That's the right period, and his folks went home. How they got here didn't matter. to the SC.

They were here running their business legally.
They did not come here illegally and were not breaking the law.
It was import enough to mention it in the Court document, so yes it did have bearing on the courts decision.

Except it didn't, but it helped justify their opinion. In the dissent it clearly shows their concerns that this decision would mean that if you dropped a kid here, almost without exception, they would be an American, automatically. And that's exactly what has happened ever since.

As long as the parents are here legally, not illegally.

That changed nothing, in their opinion, and why would it? if all these wetbacks were here legally, with no plans to become Americans, their kids born here would still be Americans. Their legal status here changes nothing.

 

[boilermaker55]

They are the biggest group of hypocrites imaginable.
But they don't think so.

Except that's completely unconstitutional.

Funny how once upon a few years ago the wingnuts all claimed that they were going to protect the Constitution.

Lying idiots.

 

[boilermaker55]

Doesn't say that in the Constitution, which you hold in such high esteem.
Or then is it like scientific research and findings too, like only when it fits into your little world, then its fine.
Seems religion also fills the gaps for your kind, only when it is ok with you.

did they have visas? They were not allowed to be USA citizens and there was no possibility of wong's parents becoming citizens due to the laws at the time, right? Or was this an earlier period in History for such?

if they had Visas, then the court would not have needed to establish whether they were foreign nationals or not....if they had visas, this would ALREADY had been clear to the courts, no?

That's the right period, and his folks went home. How they got here didn't matter. to the SC.

They were here running their business legally.
They did not come here illegally and were not breaking the law.
It was import enough to mention it in the Court document, so yes it did have bearing on the courts decision.

Except it didn't, but it helped justify their opinion. In the dissent it clearly shows their concerns that this decision would mean that if you dropped a kid here, almost without exception, they would be an American, automatically. And that's exactly what has happened ever since.

As long as the parents are here legally, not illegally.

 

[ogibillm]

did they have visas? They were not allowed to be USA citizens and there was no possibility of wong's parents becoming citizens due to the laws at the time, right? Or was this an earlier period in History for such?

if they had Visas, then the court would not have needed to establish whether they were foreign nationals or not....if they had visas, this would ALREADY had been clear to the courts, no?

That's the right period, and his folks went home. How they got here didn't matter. to the SC.

They were here running their business legally.
They did not come here illegally and were not breaking the law.
It was import enough to mention it in the Court document, so yes it did have bearing on the courts decision.

Except it didn't, but it helped justify their opinion. In the dissent it clearly shows their concerns that this decision would mean that if you dropped a kid here, almost without exception, they would be an American, automatically. And that's exactly what has happened ever since.

As long as the parents are here legally, not illegally.

where do you read that in the 14th amendment?

 

[peach174]

Doesn't say that in the Constitution, which you hold in such high esteem.
Or then is it like scientific research and findings too, like only when it fits into your little world, then its fine.
Seems religion also fills the gaps for your kind, only when it is ok with you.

did they have visas? They were not allowed to be USA citizens and there was no possibility of wong's parents becoming citizens due to the laws at the time, right? Or was this an earlier period in History for such?

if they had Visas, then the court would not have needed to establish whether they were foreign nationals or not....if they had visas, this would ALREADY had been clear to the courts, no?

That's the right period, and his folks went home. How they got here didn't matter. to the SC.

They were here running their business legally.
They did not come here illegally and were not breaking the law.
It was import enough to mention it in the Court document, so yes it did have bearing on the courts decision.

Except it didn't, but it helped justify their opinion. In the dissent it clearly shows their concerns that this decision would mean that if you dropped a kid here, almost without exception, they would be an American, automatically. And that's exactly what has happened ever since.

As long as the parents are here legally, not illegally.

did they have visas? They were not allowed to be USA citizens and there was no possibility of wong's parents becoming citizens due to the laws at the time, right? Or was this an earlier period in History for such?

if they had Visas, then the court would not have needed to establish whether they were foreign nationals or not....if they had visas, this would ALREADY had been clear to the courts, no?

That's the right period, and his folks went home. How they got here didn't matter. to the SC.

They were here running their business legally.
They did not come here illegally and were not breaking the law.
It was import enough to mention it in the Court document, so yes it did have bearing on the courts decision.

Except it didn't, but it helped justify their opinion. In the dissent it clearly shows their concerns that this decision would mean that if you dropped a kid here, almost without exception, they would be an American, automatically. And that's exactly what has happened ever since.

As long as the parents are here legally, not illegally.

where do you read that in the 14th amendment?

We were talking about a court case.

 

[koshergrl]

I want to elect Texas as president.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Doesn't say that in the Constitution, which you hold in such high esteem.
Or then is it like scientific research and findings too, like only when it fits into your little world, then its fine.
Seems religion also fills the gaps for your kind, only when it is ok with you.

That's the right period, and his folks went home. How they got here didn't matter. to the SC.

They were here running their business legally.
They did not come here illegally and were not breaking the law.
It was import enough to mention it in the Court document, so yes it did have bearing on the courts decision.

Except it didn't, but it helped justify their opinion. In the dissent it clearly shows their concerns that this decision would mean that if you dropped a kid here, almost without exception, they would be an American, automatically. And that's exactly what has happened ever since.

As long as the parents are here legally, not illegally.

That's the right period, and his folks went home. How they got here didn't matter. to the SC.

They were here running their business legally.
They did not come here illegally and were not breaking the law.
It was import enough to mention it in the Court document, so yes it did have bearing on the courts decision.

Except it didn't, but it helped justify their opinion. In the dissent it clearly shows their concerns that this decision would mean that if you dropped a kid here, almost without exception, they would be an American, automatically. And that's exactly what has happened ever since.

As long as the parents are here legally, not illegally.

where do you read that in the 14th amendment?

We were talking about a court case.

And the court case said it didn't matter how you got here, just were you born here? It's been treated that way ever since.

 

[Claudette]

Doesn't say that in the Constitution, which you hold in such high esteem.
Or then is it like scientific research and findings too, like only when it fits into your little world, then its fine.
Seems religion also fills the gaps for your kind, only when it is ok with you.

did they have visas? They were not allowed to be USA citizens and there was no possibility of wong's parents becoming citizens due to the laws at the time, right? Or was this an earlier period in History for such?

if they had Visas, then the court would not have needed to establish whether they were foreign nationals or not....if they had visas, this would ALREADY had been clear to the courts, no?

That's the right period, and his folks went home. How they got here didn't matter. to the SC.

They were here running their business legally.
They did not come here illegally and were not breaking the law.
It was import enough to mention it in the Court document, so yes it did have bearing on the courts decision.

Except it didn't, but it helped justify their opinion. In the dissent it clearly shows their concerns that this decision would mean that if you dropped a kid here, almost without exception, they would be an American, automatically. And that's exactly what has happened ever since.

As long as the parents are here legally, not illegally.

Its not in the constitution. Post 250

 

[ogibillm]

Doesn't say that in the Constitution, which you hold in such high esteem.
Or then is it like scientific research and findings too, like only when it fits into your little world, then its fine.
Seems religion also fills the gaps for your kind, only when it is ok with you.

That's the right period, and his folks went home. How they got here didn't matter. to the SC.

They were here running their business legally.
They did not come here illegally and were not breaking the law.
It was import enough to mention it in the Court document, so yes it did have bearing on the courts decision.

Except it didn't, but it helped justify their opinion. In the dissent it clearly shows their concerns that this decision would mean that if you dropped a kid here, almost without exception, they would be an American, automatically. And that's exactly what has happened ever since.

As long as the parents are here legally, not illegally.

That's the right period, and his folks went home. How they got here didn't matter. to the SC.

They were here running their business legally.
They did not come here illegally and were not breaking the law.
It was import enough to mention it in the Court document, so yes it did have bearing on the courts decision.

Except it didn't, but it helped justify their opinion. In the dissent it clearly shows their concerns that this decision would mean that if you dropped a kid here, almost without exception, they would be an American, automatically. And that's exactly what has happened ever since.

As long as the parents are here legally, not illegally.

where do you read that in the 14th amendment?

We were talking about a court case.

at the heart of it we're talking about the 14th amendment.
so do you see a requirement for legal residency in the 14th amendment?